Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07QUITO1091, ANOTHER U.S. OIL COMPANY PULLING OUT OF ECUADOR

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07QUITO1091.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07QUITO1091 2007-05-15 13:32 2011-05-02 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Quito
VZCZCXYZ0655
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHQT #1091/01 1351332
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 151332Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 6972
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA PRIORITY 6647
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 2546
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ MAY 0589
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA PRIORITY 1653
RUEHGL/AMCONSUL GUAYAQUIL PRIORITY 2309
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS QUITO 001091 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR WHA/EPSC FAITH CORNEILLE 
TREASURY FOR SGOOCH 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EPET EINV EC
SUBJECT: ANOTHER U.S. OIL COMPANY PULLING OUT OF ECUADOR 
 
Reftel:  06 QUITO 2147 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  Conoco Philips has decided to sell its assets in 
Ecuador.  Conoco acquired several production and exploration blocks 
in Ecuador when it purchased Burlington Resources in 2006, and 
concluded that the Ecuadorian assets are not economically attractive 
compared to other holdings in its portfolio.  With Conoco's 
departure, City Oriente is the last U.S.-owned operating oil company 
in Ecuador (of the two other remaining U.S. companies, one produces 
natural gas and the other is a portfolio investor).  End Summary. 
 
2.  (SBU) Herb Vickers, General Manager of Burlington Resources 
Ecuador (acquired by major oil company Conoco Phillips in May 2006) 
informed the Ambassador on May 10 that Conoco has decided to dispose 
of its assets in Ecuador.  Conoco had tried to privately arrange a 
purchase with some of its business partners in Ecuador, but those 
partners backed out.  Conoco will now open a data room so potential 
buyers can review its assets.  Conoco informed the GOE of its plans, 
and wanted to advise the Embassy as well. 
 
3.  (SBU) Conoco has minority shares in two blocks in Ecuador 
currently producing oil (Blocks 7 and 21), which are operated by the 
French company Perenco.  Conoco also holds the rights to two 
exploration blocks (Block 24 is wholly owned and Block 23 is owned 
jointly with Argentine firm CGC).  Both exploration blocks have been 
in force majeure for years due to problems with indigenous and 
environmental groups opposed to petroleum operations. 
 
4.  (SBU) Vickers explained that a large petroleum company like 
Conoco requires a high rate of return for its assets, and the 
holdings in Ecuador would be hard pressed to reach that threshold. 
Returns in Ecuador deteriorated with the revenue sharing 
requirements imposed by the 2006 amendment to the Hydrocarbon Reform 
Law.  Further complicating the equation is uncertainty regarding 
additional changes that might be imposed by the Correa 
administration, which, when incorporated into estimates of future 
returns, further reduce the financial attractiveness of the 
Ecuadorian holdings. 
 
5.  (SBU) Conoco first attempted to sell its assets in Ecuador to 
Perenco, which was interested and close to finalizing a sale in 
December 2006.  Perenco said that it backed out of the purchase 
because it did not want to take on the exploration blocks that 
Conoco was trying to sell as port of the package.  However, Vickers 
speculates that Perenco withdrew due to uncertainty over the 
direction the new Correa government might take.  (Other sources 
ascribe Perenco's non-interest to the death of the French owner in a 
December 2006 French Alps skiing accident, and his heirs' desire to 
sell their Ecuadorian operation.) 
 
6.  (SBU)   Vickers said Conoco tried to package the production and 
exploration blocks together, so that the buyer would take over a $1 
million guarantee that the company might have to pay if it abandons 
the exploration blocks.  However, when Conoco opens a data room for 
its assets, it will no longer try to sell all its blocks as a 
package, but would be willing to give away the exploration blocks to 
any interested company.  Vickers said that there is interest from 
Ecuadorian operators for the production blocks, but little interest 
in the exploration blocks due to the difficulties with indigenous 
and environmental interests.  Vickers speculated that the government 
might cancel its exploration rights, rather than see a different 
company attempt to explore the area, given Energy Minister Acosta's 
statements that he wants to limit new exploration.  If so, that 
would also cancel Conoco's guarantee. 
 
7.  (SBU) Vickers said that Conoco is framing its departure as a 
financial decision following the consolidation of Conoco's and 
Burlington's assets.  Given Conoco's other holdings in the region, 
particularly Peru where indigenous groups also oppose its 
activities, Conoco does not want to give any public play to the 
political uncertainty that went into its calculations or the 
indigenous problems that also have hampered its operations. 
However, Vickers speculated that the international NGO community 
will paint Conoco's departure as a win for environmentalists. 
 
8.  (SBU) Comment.  Ecuador's difficult and uncertain investment 
climate, particularly in the petroleum sector, was an important 
factor behind the Conoco decision to withdraw and explains its 
inability even to give its exploration rights gratis to another oil 
company.  This is the second time it has left (it also pulled out in 
the early 1990s), rejoining the list of U.S. companies that have 
left Ecuador (among those that have left in the last 15 years: 
ARCO, Exxon, Maxus, Occidental, Tenneco, Texaco, Unocal, and 
Vintage).  Vickers, who also worked in Indonesia, said that 
Indonesians kept pressing for more benefits from foreign oil 
companies, but knew not to push the foreign investors over a line 
that would force them to leave.  Ecuador, he said, does not know 
where that line is. 
 
9.  (SBU) With Conoco/Burlington's withdrawal, U.S. participation in 
Ecuador's oil and gas sector is confined to City Oriente, EDC (Noble 
Energy), and Murphy Oil.  City Oriente, a small, family-operated 
company, is the sole U.S.-owned company producing oil in Ecuador. 
City, like Conoco, is worried about its ability to maintain its 
Ecuador operation and has filed for international arbitration over 
the conditions imposed unilaterally by the hydrocarbons law.  Noble 
Energy produces natural gas in offshore Block 3 to supply their 
electricity generator, Machala Power.  Noble Energy has filed for 
international arbitration to recover $60m owed by the GOE for 
electricity sold.  Murphy Oil, based in El Dorado, Arkansas, is a 
20% portfolio investor in Repsol YPF's Block 16.  Income from Murphy 
Oil's share of production fell from $7.7m in 2006 to $4.1m in 2007 
due to increased royalty payments mandated in a 2006 amendment to 
Ecuador's Hydrocarbons Law. 
 
JEWELL