VZCZCXRO6837
RR RUEHGI RUEHRN
DE RUEHNR #2242/01 1451354
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 251354Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY NAIROBI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9963
INFO RUEHXR/RWANDA COLLECTIVE
RUEHDS/AMEMBASSY ADDIS ABABA 9331
RUEHAM/AMEMBASSY AMMAN 0086
RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 0063
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 0436
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0333
RUEHBE/AMEMBASSY BELIZE
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 0237
RUEHBR/AMEMBASSY BRASILIA 0135
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 1822
RUEHBU/AMEMBASSY BUENOS AIRES 0041
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 0134
RUEHOR/AMEMBASSY GABORONE 0872
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 0162
RUEHLC/AMEMBASSY LIBREVILLE 0341
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 2266
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0244
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 1304
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 2224
RUEHSA/AMEMBASSY PRETORIA 8812
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 5146
RUEHYN/AMEMBASSY SANAA 0433
RUEHSJ/AMEMBASSY SAN JOSE 0127
RUEHNT/AMEMBASSY TASHKENT 0048
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE 0971
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0628
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 1823
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 4166

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 04 NAIROBI 002242 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR OES, OES/ETC ROWENA WATSON, OES/OMC AMANDA JOHNSON MILLER, 
AF/E, AND AF/EPS 
 
POSTS FOR REO AND ESTH OFFICERS 
 
ADDIS ABABA FOR REO LISA BRODEY 
 
E.O. 12958:  N/A 
TAGS: SENV ECON KSCA ETRD PGOV PINR KE
SUBJECT: CITES COP 14: KENYA SEEKS USG SUPPORT ON IVORY TRADE BAN, 
AGREES WITH LYNX, SAWFISH, CORAL LISTINGS 
 
REFS: (A) NAIROBI 2216  (B) 05/14/07 WATSON-ALDRIDGE EMAIL 
 
      (C) STATE 57912   (D) NAIROBI 1188 
      (E) NAIROBI 1110 
 
¶1.  (U) Sensitive but Unclassified.  Please protect accordingly. 
 
¶2.  (SBU) Summary:  Kenya remains hopeful that the U.S. will side 
with it and Mali and oppose efforts by Namibia, Zimbabwe, Botswana, 
and South Africa to get CITES approval for additional one-off sales 
of government-held stockpiles of ivory.  Kenya agrees with U.S. 
proposals pertaining to species listings for lynx, sawfish, and 
coral.  Its proposed 20-year ban on trade in raw and finished ivory, 
Kenyan Wildlife Service senior officials emphasize, is open to 
reexamination should African elephant numbers markedly increase and 
if the CITES elephant watch-group, MIKE (Monitoring the Illegal 
Killing of Elephants), improves its surveillance of trade in ivory. 
However, given the significant amount of illegal ivory seized in the 
past two years, Kenya is highly skeptical of the resolve and ability 
of Japan and other prospective consuming nations to abide by the 
provisions of the original one-off sales.  End Summary. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
Expect Kenyan Cooperation on U.S. CITES Proposals 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
¶3.  (SBU) Per ref C instructions, post presented USG CITES CoP14 
proposals on bobcat (Lynx rufus), sawfish, and all species of pink 
and red corals to Kenya Wildlife Service (KWS) officials.  Post also 
provided USG views on the various proposals concerning possible 
trade in government-held stockpiles of legal ivory (ref B).  In 
separate May 23 meetings with three senior KWS officials who will be 
members of Kenya's CITES delegation - Dr. Richard Bagine, Deputy 
Director for Biodiversity Research, Planning, and Monitoring; Dr. 
James G. Njogu, Head of Conventions, Biotechnology, and Information 
Management; and Patrick Omondi, Head of Species Conservation and 
Management - post learned that Kenya agrees with the U.S. proposals 
and, in fact, will be a co-sponsor of the sawfish proposal.  (Note: 
Minister of Wildlife and Tourism Morris Dzoro and KWS Director 
Julius Kipng'etich will lead the Kenyan delegation to the June 3-15 
CoP14 in The Hague.  Noted elephant and rhino researcher Dr. Edmond 
Bradley Martin and "Save the Elephants" founder Dr. Iain 
Douglas-Hamilton will also be in attendance from Kenya.  End Note.) 
 
 
--------------------------------- 
Opposition to Annual Ivory Quotas 
--------------------------------- 
 
¶4.  (SBU) The Kenyan KWS officials were pleased to learn that the 
United States has reservations about the Botswana-Namibia CoP14 
Proposition 4, which aims to establish annual quotas for the export 
of raw ivory from Botswana, Namibia, South Africa, and Zimbabwe. 
They were especially gratified to hear that the United States shares 
 
NAIROBI 00002242  002.6 OF 004 
 
 
Kenya's view that Zimbabwe does not merit inclusion because of its 
poor record of elephant protection.  Kenya is also pleased that the 
United States believes it is "premature" for Botswana to be allowed 
to export live animals and leather goods for commercial purposes and 
sell 20,000 kilos of ivory (CoP14 Proposition 5).  Kenya remains 
uneasy about CITES-sanctioned trade in ivory and is not convinced 
that it diminishes illegal trade; nevertheless, Kenya does not 
object to the pending one-off sale of ivory approved at CoP12 in 
¶2002. 
 
-------------------------- 
Elephants Are Our Heritage 
-------------------------- 
 
¶5.  (SBU) Dr. Bagine emphasized that for Kenya and the eleven other 
countries which support its proposed 20-year ban on trade in raw and 
semi-finished or finished ivory (ref A) elephants are part of their 
heritage.  While acknowledging that elephant numbers in southern 
Africa are increasing, he bemoaned the precarious position of 
pachyderms throughout the rest of Africa because of poaching.  Both 
he and Omondi pointed out that Senegal's meager numbers, for 
example, have dropped from 20 to 10 while Burundi no longer has any 
elephants. 
 
-------------- 
MIKE's a Mouse 
-------------- 
 
¶6.  (SBU) All three argued that a 20-year moratorium, what Bagine 
repeatedly referred to as a "breather," on the ivory trade is needed 
to let African stocks recover and to give the CITES elephant 
watch-group, MIKE (Monitoring the Illegal Killing of Elephants), 
more time to tabulate elephant numbers, oversee trade in legal raw 
and finished ivory, investigate illegal trade in ivory, and survey 
how well consuming nations, specifically Japan, are complying with 
CITES regulations.  Dr. Bagine candidly admitted that Kenya is 
"dissatisfied with MIKE monitoring and reporting from southern 
Africa; we expected better MIKE enforcement of CITES regulations," 
while Omondi and Dr. Njogu complained that MIKE has not ensured that 
Japan is compliant.  They bemoaned that Japan failed to report, as 
required, the confiscation of a huge amount of illegal ivory (3,000 
kilograms) seized August 2006 in Osaka, to the CITES Standing 
Committee. 
 
¶7.  (SBU) Omondi noted between August 2005 and August 2006 there 
were twelve major seizures of African ivory, comprising 23,460 
kilograms and 91 un-weighed tusks, en route to the Far East.  In the 
Kenyans' view, there has been an escalation of the illegal ivory 
trade since CITES agreed to the first one-off sale of 
government-held ivory. (Note: A report released last week by 
TRAFFIC, the wildlife trade monitoring network of the World 
Conservation Union (IUCN) and the World Wildlife Fund (WWF), gives 
credence to Kenya's fears that elephant poaching is on the rise. 
 
NAIROBI 00002242  003 OF 004 
 
 
Globally, there is an average of 92 seizures per month.  Large-scale 
ivory seizures of one ton or more have increased dramatically: from 
an annual average of 17 between 1989 and 1997 to 32 between 1998 and 
¶2006.  Kenya, alone, has had 212 elephants poached since CoP13 in 
October 2004.  TRAFFIC reports 41,043 kilos of illegal ivory have 
been confiscated and an estimated 20,000 elephants killed since 
CoP13.  It contends the illegal ivory trade is rampant in the 
Democratic Republic of Congo, Cameroon, and Nigeria.  End Note.) 
 
¶8.  (SBU) Combating this revived illegal trade has taken a heavy 
toil in increased costs for foot and air surveillance and in 
heightened threats to park rangers (as reported in ref A, KWS lost 
three of its rangers in a shootout with Somali poachers on May 19). 
As Dr. Njogu summed it, "Opening up the ivory market means 
employment of more rangers, the deaths of more rangers, 
concentration on security rather than conservation, less community 
involvement, more patrol vehicles, and more degradation."  Dr. 
Bagine bitterly complained that buyers from consuming countries (he 
specifically mentioned Germany, Japan, and China) are profiting from 
trade in illegal ivory - hiring and arming the poachers with 
sophisticated weapons, buying ivory from them at $40 to $60 a kilo, 
and selling it to unscrupulous artisans for as much as $800 a kilo. 
 
------------------------------------------ 
Elephant Poaching blamed on Asian Networks 
------------------------------------------ 
 
¶9.  (SBU) Omondi and Njogu contend Asian crime syndicates are most 
to blame for elephant poaching and joined with Bagine in arguing 
that governments must crack down on ivory peddlers and establish a 
computerized registration and tracking system of all legal ivory 
stockpiles in the world.  This tracking system would be able to 
trace raw and worked ivory back to its country of origin.  Until 
these actions are taken, Kenya believes there should be no trading 
in ivory.  Thus, Dr. Njogu said Kenya remains hopeful that the 
United States will align with it, Mali, and several other "African 
Elephant Range Countries" in opposing efforts by Namibia, Zimbabwe, 
Botswana, and South Africa to get CITES approval for additional 
one-off sales of government-held stockpiles of ivory.  (Note: 
According to the "Elephant Trade Information System" (ETIS), Asians 
are noticeably involved in the illegal ivory trade.  It reports 
Chinese citizens have been arrested, detained, or absconded in at 
least 126 significant ivory seizure cases in 22 African elephant 
range states.  Aside from Mainland China, ETIS names Hong Kong, 
Macao, Taiwan, Japan, and Thailand as major markets.  That said, 
1,500 kilograms of illegal ivory were seized in France last 
November.  End Note.) 
 
¶10.  (SBU) In addition, the Kenyans suggested that the moratorium 
would allow for the systematic transfer of excess elephants from 
large populations in southern Africa and Tanzania to replenish the 
herds in Senegal, Sierra Leone, Niger, Nigeria, Rwanda, and other 
western and central African countries.  They predict that these 
 
NAIROBI 00002242  004 OF 004 
 
 
countries would otherwise see their elephant populations disappear. 
Provided that elephant numbers do increase significantly during the 
course of the moratorium and MIKE does a better job of monitoring 
ivory stockpiles, the Kenyans said their government would not be 
opposed to amending the moratorium, if adopted.  In response to U.S. 
concerns that the ban would preempt future proposals for trade and 
thus violate CITES Article XV as expressed in ref B, the Kenyans 
politely retorted that the proposed moratorium would not prevent 
CITES members from submitting amendments at any time should 
circumstances change.  They said Kenya is confident that the 
proposal is consistent with CITES and the prerogative of its members 
to submit amendments to existing restrictions. 
 
-------------------------- 
Black Rhino Quota is Wrong 
-------------------------- 
 
¶11.  (SBU) Aside from elephants still being hunted for their tusks, 
rhinos, too, remain at risk for their horns.  The Kenyans pointedly 
criticized Namibia for having convinced CITES to permit the taking 
of five black rhinos a year.  Omondi charged that the Namibians 
produced wildly exaggerated numbers of black rhino to justify the 
annual hunting quota.  The Kenyan delegation will seek to persuade 
the Parties to repeal the decision allowing for the quota, in part, 
because its member are highly skeptical that Namibia has at least 
2,000 black rhinos.  On its part, Kenya has only 539 black rhinos, 
which Omondi said are targets of well-armed poachers, especially 
from Somalia. 
 
Ranneberger