VZCZCXRO5266
OO RUEHHM
DE RUEHHI #0888/01 1350842
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 150842Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY HANOI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5353
INFO RUEHHM/AMCONSUL HO CHI MINH 3024
RHEHNSC/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RUEHBK/AMEMBASSY BANGKOK 5666

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 HANOI 000888 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/MLS 
NSC FOR ASIA/HOLLY MORROW 
BANGKOK FOR PC DIRECTOR JOHN WILLIAMS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON PREL EAID VM
SUBJECT: GVN WANTS TO NEGOTIATE ON PEACE CORPS; STICKING POINTS 
REMAIN 
 
 
¶1. (SBU) This is an action request.  Please see paragraph 10. 
 
¶2. (SBU) Summary:  EconCouns met with officials of the Ministry of 
Education and Training (MOET) and Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) 
on May 14, 2006, to obtain an update on the Government of Vietnam's 
(GVN's) intentions on the establishment of a Peace Corps (PC) 
program.  While serious sticking points remain, the GVN demonstrated 
a willingness to negotiate formally with the Peace Corps, and has 
asked for the USG to appoint a "negotiator."  MOET stated that it 
would like to conclude discussions this month or in early June, in 
advance of the visit of President Nguyen Minh Triet to Washington. 
Mission Vietnam seeks guidance on how to respond.  End Summary. 
 
¶3. (SBU) Econ Counselor met with MOET International Cooperation 
Department Director General Tran Ba Viet Dzung, Senior Officer Le 
Duc Long and MFA Deputy Director Americas Department Nguyen Ba Hung 
at MOET on the afternoon of May 11.  The purpose of the meeting was 
to obtain an update on the status of the Government of Vietnam's 
intentions on the establishment of the PC presence in Vietnam.  As 
the record of discussion below shows, there are still a number of 
issues where we and the GVN do not see eye to eye. 
 
¶4. (SBU) EconCouns opened the meeting by noting statements by Deputy 
Prime Minister Pham Gia Khiem last March in Washington that Vietnam 
was ready to welcome PC to Vietnam.  Frankly, he continued, these 
confuse us because the GVN has yet to signal its willingness to 
seriously negotiate an agreement necessary for this to occur. 
EconCouns recounted some of the main sticking points for the U.S. 
side, such as the need for a country agreement, the issue of 
immunities, the number of authorized staff positions, the number of 
volunteers, and Vietnam's insistence that any program initially be 
"temporary" or a "pilot."  Given the encouraging signal from Deputy 
Prime Minister Khiem in his visit to the United States in March, the 
recent letter supporting a PC program in Vietnam signed by several 
U.S Senators and other positive comments about the possibility of 
the Peace Corps being a deliverable during the upcoming visit of 
President Triet to Washington, EconCouns inquired whether there had 
been any changes to the GVN's positions.  He concluded by noting 
that the ball was in the GVN's court. 
 
¶5. (SBU) Emphasizing the positive, Dzung responded with the 
following eight points: 
 
(1) Negotiator(s): Dzung asked the USG to assign a single negotiator 
or a negotiation team to conduct further discussions.  Dzung said 
that he will serve as the chief negotiator for the Vietnamese. 
 
(2) On the PC's entry into Vietnam: Dzung recalled that at the first 
meeting last year, John Williams, PC Country Director in Thailand, 
explained that the PC only comes to a country upon invitation. 
Dzung commented that Vietnam accepts PC's presence. 
 
(3) Program duration: While it had originally said in our exchanges 
there would be "24-month limit" on the program, Vietnam has changed 
its position because of its understanding of the time it takes to 
set up administratively.  Therefore it would accept a "27-month 
period." 
 
(4) The number of volunteers to serve:  The maximum number of 
volunteers will be 20. 
 
(5) Number of the PC staff in country:  The GVN will allow two 
people instead one, as previously proposed. 
 
(6) Tax treatment:  While MOET is still working with the MOF on this 
issue, the GVN would treat PC volunteers the same as volunteers from 
other countries, such as Australia, Belgium, Canada, Japan, Korea 
and the United Kingdom. 
 
(7) U.S. signatory:  The GVN would like to have the U.S. Ambassador 
be the signatory on the agreement for the U.S. side.  A senior 
official from MOET will be appointed by the Prime Minister as a 
signatory. 
 
(8) Governed law for dispute resolution:  If any dispute arises, the 
applicable law will be Vietnamese law and regulations. 
 
¶6. (SBU) MFA's Hung said they would be willing to discuss all of the 
issues further.  He added that the GVN hoped to be able to conclude 
the agreement before President Triet's visit.  Therefore, both sides 
should work together quickly to solve the pending issues.  When 
EconCouns asked how the GVN saw the next steps and the time line, 
and whether the GVN proposed to send a negotiating team to 
Washington, Dzung answered that Vietnam would like to have the 
negotiations in Hanoi this month or in early June.  He thought it 
 
HANOI 00000888  002 OF 002 
 
 
would take three or four days to negotiate the text.  He urged the 
USG to take a practical stand on the issue, and not "demand 
conditions that the Vietnamese cannot satisfy."  He criticized the 
PC country agreement template as "concentrated only on the U.S. 
side's privileges."  He stated that Vietnam is willing to work 
seriously with the United States on the establishment of a PC 
program if an appropriate negotiator is identified and draft 
agreement can be negotiated. 
 
¶7. (SBU) EconCouns stressed that the PC cannot work in a country 
without signing a country agreement reflecting the long-term vision 
and commitment of the organization.  In response, Hung confirmed 
that Vietnam is willing and desires to sign a 
government-to-government -- not agency to agency -- commitment. 
Hung also noted that Vietnam agreed not to call the program a 
"pilot" project anymore, although the initial term would be 27 
months.  The GVN was flexible enough to consider any additional 
points that the United States wanted to insert in the agreement 
which would help reflect the PC's long-term plan, as long as the 
wording abides by Vietnamese law and meets its interests.  EconCouns 
said he would report back to Washington and note the Vietnamese 
request for designating a negotiator. 
 
¶8. (SBU) Comment:  While this was the most positive exchange the 
Embassy has had with the GVN on this subject since our first talks 
last year, it remains to be seen whether the Vietnamese can move far 
enough to meet the requirements of the Peace Corps.  We believe 
negotiations would be useful, however, given the GVN's positive 
change in attitude and the positive signal of engagement reaching an 
agreement would send in the context of the upcoming top-level 
exchange.  Though major sticking points remain, the GVN approach - 
presumably with an eye on the need for Triet deliverables -- is more 
flexible than it was months ago. 
 
¶9. (SBU) Comment continued:  We see two possible options for 
responding to Vietnam's request: 
 
(a) Continue negotiations at the Embassy-MOET level, but with 
specific instructions from Washington; or 
 
(b) Agree to send a PC negotiator to Hanoi. 
 
Post's recommendation is to adopt option (b).  Through direct talks, 
we will quickly determine the GVN's seriousness in moving forward. 
Regardless of the option adopted, Post suggests that we formalize 
our positions on key issues in a diplomatic note prior to initiating 
direct talks. 
 
¶10. (SBU) Action request:  Please advise ASAP whether and how 
Mission should respond to the GVN request to appoint a negotiator to 
come to Hanoi within the next several weeks.  End action request. 
 
MARINE