Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07BEIRUT618, LEBANON: MINISTRY OF FINANCE STAFF REVIEWS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07BEIRUT618.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07BEIRUT618 2007-05-02 13:59 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Beirut
VZCZCXRO3273
PP RUEHAG RUEHBC RUEHDE RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHKUK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHLB #0618/01 1221359
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 021359Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY BEIRUT
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8071
INFO RUEHEE/ARAB LEAGUE COLLECTIVE
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 1063
RHMFISS/CDR USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 BEIRUT 000618 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
NSC FOR ABRAMS/SINGH/MARCHESE/HARDING 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EFIN LE PGOV PREL SY
SUBJECT: LEBANON:  MINISTRY OF FINANCE STAFF REVIEWS 
MEETINGS IN WASHINGTON 
 
 
SUMMARY 
------- 
 
1. (SBU)  In separate meetings with Ministry of Finance 
staff, the common view of their recent meetings in Washington 
was positive.  While MOF Director General Alain Bifani gave a 
sharp, insightful readout of the meetings, his working level 
finance team were already focused on the next event, a 
Eurobond offer.  It appears that non-technical discussions 
were somewhat overshadowed by events at the World Bank.  The 
IMF EPCA will require local oversight by the IMF, which might 
not be welcome.  End summary. 
 
BIFANI OVERVIEW 
--------------- 
 
2. (SBU)  On April 25 Econoff and Econ Specialist met with 
Director General of the Ministry of Finance Alain Bifani to 
discuss his recent trip to Washington with Minister of 
Finance Jihad Azour.  Bifani, always candid and usually 
somewhat cynical, was surprisingly upbeat about the 
delegation's reception in Washington.  He noted that the tone 
was considerably different than any of the previous "possibly 
as many as twenty" official visits he has made to DC.  He 
characterized their reception as "all positive" with complete 
political support.  He did point out, however, there was very 
little in the way of technical discussions, and that the core 
group meeting was an opportunity for clarification rather 
than vision.  Bifani (who is politically connected to 
President Emile Lahoud and Michel Aoun, not the March 14 
majority represented by his minister) elected not to attend 
any meetings which were purely political, pointing out that 
by doing so, he would not be accused of being the source of 
any leak of information.  He did attend the meeting with 
Timothy Adams, which was "more than he expected," but too 
brief to discuss conditionality "triggers"  in detail. 
 
THE VIEW FROM THE MOF TEAM 
-------------------------- 
 
3.  (SBU)  On April 26 we met with the MOF finance team, 
always calm and relaxed despite their busy workload.  They 
were pleased with the results of the many meetings in 
Washington, attended by two of their six-member team.  They 
characterized the meetings as "touching base" with the 
donors, and providing a progress update.  Although they were 
concerned about the bill to authorize the USG portion of the 
donations -- "Is it signed yet?" was the first question -- 
the discussions in Washington were perceived as positive. 
Those at the meetings believe the USG understands their 
concerns about triggers and possible linkage with the 
unpopular gasoline tax.  They are preparing a proposal to 
outline conditionality, and to cover the order of 
disbursement for the funds to be used for debt reduction. 
They did not have a deadline for delivering the proposals to 
the Department. 
 
BIFANI ON THE EPCA 
------------------ 
 
4. (SBU)  Bifani said that he attended nineteen meetings 
during the fast-paced three-day trip.  The majority were with 
groups or individuals from the International Monetary Fund 
(IMF) and the World Bank (WB).  Regarding the IMF, Bifani 
repeated what we have heard previously:  the IMF staff was 
not in favor of the Emergency Post Conflict Assistance 
program (EPCA), which they indicated was "forced on them" by 
the IMF board.  In fact, he heard rumors that the staff had 
tried to elicit guarantees from the member countries for the 
$77 million EPCA.  Because of this resistance, he suggested, 
the staff were exceedingly supportive, offering any 
assistance in shifting the weight of responsibilities away 
from the IMF and toward the donors.  His final reading of the 
situation was that IMF's staff continue to have reservations 
about Lebanon, believing that the country "can't make it," 
and would be content to avoid confronting those concerns. 
 
5. (SBU)  The delegation from the GOL, which included the 
Ministers of Finance and Economy and Trade and their staffs, 
made a "commitment" to a Stand-by Agreement, which assuming 
successful negotiations should follow the EPCA next year. 
They suggested to the IMF that negotiations of terms should 
begin immediately.  Bifani told us that because the Central 
Bank (BDL) was not represented at these meetings and most of 
the conditionality involves the BDL, this stance may not be 
 
BEIRUT 00000618  002 OF 003 
 
 
completely sincere.  Bifani, himself a member of the BDL 
board, understands the "delicacy" of this position.  If the 
new conditions are presented to the BDL as a fait accompli, 
there are two possible outcomes:  acceptance, or a rejection, 
with the latter jeopardizing any progress achieved.  In his 
opinion, the negotiation of any Stand-by Agreement requires a 
functioning government.  He guessed there might have been a 
back-room deal, and said he does not know if the commitment 
to the Stand-by is a maneuver or not - it could simply be a 
ploy to keep some politicians in office. 
 
INCREASED IMF PRESENCE IN LEBANON A SURPRISE 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU)  One outcome of the discussions with the IMF was 
GOL's reaction to the requirement for an IMF Resident 
Representative (ResRep) to administer the EPCA.  Although 
this is a widely-known requirement in such arrangements, it 
apparently came as a surprise to the delegation.  There was 
no immediate agreement to this requirement.  The IMF 
responded there could be some negotiation as to the selection 
of the individual or the access by the press to the ResRep, 
but it was not offered as an option.  Bifani's speculation 
was that the GOL is concerned with both the transparency 
issue, and also the desire of the GOL to present only one 
voice -- its own -- to the rest of the world.  On a side 
note, Bifani characterized the French representatives at the 
meeting as helpful, very technical, but at the same time 
aware of the difference that might come quickly based on the 
French presidential outcome. 
 
IMF ALREADY SOMETHING OF A BURDEN 
--------------------------------- 
 
7. (SBU)  The IMF is perceived as something of a burden to 
the MOF team, which has already hosted several visits, and 
have another one in two weeks.  Characterizing the visits as 
a series of all-day meetings, which take them away from other 
work, they are nevertheless preparing for the next one. 
Asked why the IMF EPCA did not need approval by Parliament, 
they explained that up to $1.5 billion in loans for debt 
reduction was previously approved under Law 476-2002 as a 
part of Paris II.  Until that amount is reached, loans for 
debt reduction and budgetary support do not need approval by 
Parliament.  All other loans, however, and loans after that 
total is reached will need approval.  Grants do not require 
Parliamentary approval. 
 
WORLD BANK UNDER STRESS 
----------------------- 
 
8. (SBU)  The meetings with the World Bank were in complete 
contrast.  Overshadowed by the breaking news about President 
Wolfowitz, the meetings were not substantive in Bifani's 
opinion.  Many of their interlocutors were uncertain of the 
future, or already on the way out, like Joseph Saba.  Bifani 
was pleased to see the basics of the 2005 agreement were 
still a part of the discussions.  The WB focused on the 
issues of the power sector and the social security/pension 
reform process.  The GOL delegation announced that the Social 
Security office had agreed to "open its book" to the WB. 
However, when Bifani returned to Lebanon and checked, he says 
that no one there knew anything about that agreement.  In 
fact, he believes neither side is "telling the full truth". 
Bifani believes that Wolfowitz was instrumental in WB 
commitments to Lebanon, which leaves up in the air the 
question of what will happen if Wolfowitz leaves.  Referring 
to his meeting with Francois Bourgignon, whom Bifani 
described as  a non-political economist, Bifani felt there 
was good discussion about the need to implement the planned 
reforms.  However, at no time was there any discussion about 
a possible break-even point in the GOL finances, or exactly 
what is going to be done with donor funds. 
 
9. (SBU)  The MOF team was not directly aware of the on-going 
WB discord.  The WB will be sending a team to sign the 
Development Policy Loan shortly.  The $200 million loan for 
the power sector is before the WB board for approval now. 
This loan will need Cabinet approval only.  It is expected to 
go to the Minister of Finance for approval by the end of May. 
 
 
BIFANI ON REFORM 
---------------- 
 
 
BEIRUT 00000618  003 OF 003 
 
 
10. (SBU)  Bifani is always willing to share his insight on 
the current internal struggles in the GOL.  He said that 
recently French Ambassador Emie pointedly asked the Prime 
Minister about the budget, which has still not been passed by 
the cabinet.  He received no direct answer, but Bifani, who 
claims the budget as his own, feels that at least the Cabinet 
could pass it, and then complain that it cannot be enacted 
because the Parliament cannot meet and the President will not 
sign it.  The social security and pension reforms, on the 
other hand, had already been submitted to Parliament and have 
been discussed, with even opposition members in favor. 
However, as for the EDL, Bifani believed that the GOL is not 
even beginning to address the three key points, which he says 
are the choice of a source of power, forecasting of future 
requirements and investments, and the management issues. 
These, he feels, should be addressed as soon as possible. 
 
11. (SBU)  The MOF team is already focused on the next step 
in the program, which is the upcoming $400 million Eurobond 
issue.  Two RFPs are out, seeking two banks to handle the 
sale, which they expect will be sold over three weeks, 
largely to Lebanese investors. 
FELTMAN