Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07ANKARA1154, TURKISH MILITARY COURT ISSUES FIRST CONVICTION OF

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07ANKARA1154.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07ANKARA1154 2007-05-15 12:17 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ankara
VZCZCXYZ0137
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHAK #1154 1351217
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 151217Z MAY 07
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2100
INFO RUEHAK/USDAO ANKARA TU PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC//USDP:PDUSDP/ISA:EUR/ISA:NESA/DSCA// PRIORITY
RUEUITH/ODC ANKARA TU PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J-3/J-5// PRIORITY
RUFOADA/JAC MOLESWORTH RAF MOLESWORTH UK PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE PRIORITY
UNCLAS ANKARA 001154 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PGOV MARR TU
SUBJECT: TURKISH MILITARY COURT ISSUES FIRST CONVICTION OF 
ACTIVE DUTY GENERAL 
 
 
1. (SBU) In its first sentencing of an active-duty general 
officer, a Turkish military court convicted Third Army 
Commander, and previous ISAF Commander, GEN Erdem Erdagi of 
misusing his authority by accepting a bribe for the award of 
a military construction tender during his 2002 to 2004 
command of the 8th Corps in Elazig.  Erdagi was fined and 
sentenced on May 10 to eleven months and 25 days in prison -- 
five days short of the 12 month sentence threshold which 
carries a penalty of mandatory dismissal from the military. 
 
2. (SBU) Erdagi, who is well-respected for his leadership of 
ISAF VII from February through August 2005, was one of 
several military commanders -- but the only active-duty 
general -- charged together with a number of lower-ranking 
officers during a 2003-2004 crackdown on corruption by former 
Chief of Staff GEN Hilmi Ozkok.  The majority were accused in 
military contract award cases.  In addition to Erdagi, two 
retired general officers were convicted.  Former Naval Forces 
Commander ADM Ilhami Erdil was accused of directing military 
contracts to a firm headed by his daughter and a friend and 
for excessive personal spending.  Erdil had acquired two 
penthouse apartments valued at $1.25M, significantly 
exceeding the salary of a general officer.  He received a 2.5 
year prison sentence, was stripped of military privileges and 
his houses were seized.  ADM Aydin Gurul was sentenced to 
five months in prison for profiting from a military contract. 
 Both Erdagi and Gurul have appealed the decisions in their 
cases.  According to press reports, ADM Erdil is serving his 
sentence but is preparing to request a review of his case by 
the European Court of Human Rights. 
 
3. (SBU) COMMENT: The military investigations begun under GEN 
(r) Ozkok were unprecedented in Turkish history.  Ozkok, who 
was perceived to have a good working relationship with the 
ruling Justice and Development Party which rode to power in 
2002 in part on a corruption-free image, may have wanted to 
demonstrate that the military should be held to that same, 
high standard.  While GEN Buyukanit, the current Chief of 
Staff, might not have instigated such investigations himself, 
he is perceived to hold the same high standard for the 
military and is expected to uphold the military court 
decisions in these cases.  END COMMENT. 
 
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/ 
 
WILSON