Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07TOKYO1763, ASTOP: JAPAN'S RESPONSE TO RUSSSIA'S PARTICIPATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TOKYO1763.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07TOKYO1763 2007-04-20 09:03 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHKO #1763 1100903
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 200903Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2884
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6707
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 1628
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 2781
UNCLAS TOKYO 001763 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KNNP PREL RS
SUBJECT: ASTOP: JAPAN'S RESPONSE TO RUSSSIA'S PARTICIPATION 
IS LUKEWARM 
 
REF: SECSTATE 39551 
 
1. On April 17, ESToff spoke with MOFA Principal Deputy 
Director, Non-Proliferation, Science and Nuclear Energy 
Division Kaoru Magosaki, concerning Russian participation in 
ASTOP. Magosaki informed ESToff that Russian Minister 
Counsellor Galizin visited MOFA on March 7 to appeal to the 
Japanese government on behalf of Russia. However, GOJ is 
lukewarm to the prospect. Magosaki believes that Russia may 
not be a constructive partner. He cited three main reasons. 
 
a. Displeased with performance at multilateral forums: At a 
recent PSI meeting in Montreal, Russia objected to discussing 
Res. 1718, which is an important issue to Japan.  Magosaki 
said that Japan cannot welcome a country into ASTOP, which 
refuses to address critical issues affecting Japan's 
political and social landscape. 
 
 
b. Official reports of ASTOP meetings are distributed: Japan 
is willing to share reports of ASTOP meetings with Russian 
counterparts. Therefore there is no need for Russia to 
attend. ASTOP is a framework to enhance dialogue, not a 
decision-making body. (NOTE:  In the past, MOFA did not issue 
an official report of the meetings. However, last year, due 
to China's urging, a report was drafted.  With interest in 
these meetings increasing, it is likely that a formal report 
will be made available to all interested parties.) 
 
c. Non-Asian countries may overshadow ASTOP's objectives: 
Magosaki stated that although Canada and New Zealand were 
invited to participate in ASTOP in 2007, it is too early to 
consider further expansion because discussion could be 
diluted if too many non-Asian countries attend. 
 
 
2. Although Russia has a long-history of nuclear experience, 
intelligence and analysis capabilities, MOFA stated that it 
is premature to consider inviting Russia as a partner. 
However, if Russia changes its posture on Res. 1718 in 
multilateral forums, then Japan may be willing to consider 
bringing Russia into ASTOP. Magosaki concluded the 
conversation by stating that Japan looks forward to a 
response from Washington on its views. 
SCHIEFFER