VZCZCXRO8327
RR RUEHCHI
DE RUEHBK #2047/01 0990952
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 090952Z APR 07
FM AMEMBASSY BANGKOK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6130
INFO RUEHCHI/AMCONSUL CHIANG MAI 3405

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 BANGKOK 002047 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR EAP/MLS MELANIE HIGGINS; 
DEPARTMENT FOR EAP/PD JESSICA DAVIES 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KPAO OIIP PHUM TH
SUBJECT: Internet Censorship and YouTube 
 
¶1. (U) SUMMARY: The Ministry of Information and Communications 
Technology (MICT) has blocked the popular website YouTube.com 
because of video clips mocking the Thai King.  In the past two 
weeks, Thailand has also blocked a pro-Thaksin website and has asked 
at least one major site to take down a political chat room.  While 
Internet censorship is not new to Thailand, there is concern by some 
media advocates of an up-tick in the number of sites that have been 
blocked since the September 19 coup -- an allegation disputed by 
Thai officials.  Conversations with Thai officials reveal a lack of 
both transparency and coordination in decisions to block websites. 
A draft cyber crime law under consideration will give the MICT the 
legal authority it currently lacks to block sites. END SUMMARY 
 
YouTube.com Blocked for Mocking King... 
--------------------------------------- 
 
¶2. (SBU) On Wednesday, April 4, MICT added Google-owned YouTube.com 
to its "blocklist" after a user posted a video clip with crudely 
drawn markings and pictures of feet superimposed over the image of 
the King.  An MICT officer told PDoff that, when the ministry 
noticed the video, MICT Minister Sittichai Pookaiyaudom contacted 
Google.com to ask them to pull the offending video.  According to 
the MICT officer, Google responded that the user was using 
"guerilla" tactics -- posting, pulling, and reposting his clips 
repeatedly -- making it impossible to pull the clip.  As a result, 
MICT decided to block the entire YouTube.com site "for a few days." 
 
¶3. (SBU) Since MICT blocked the site, the original user pulled the 
clip after getting over 63,000 hits.  However, at least ten 
additional clips commenting on the video or duplicating its content 
have appeared, each generating tens of thousands of hits. 
 
...As Are Local Sites Critical of Prem 
-------------------------------------- 
 
¶4. (SBU) Thai sites critical of Privy Council President Prem 
Tinsulanonda have also run afoul of MICT.  On Monday, April, MICT 
asked pantip.com to shut down its popular political chatroom 
"Rajdamnoen."  The Minister cited "several threads" that "undermined 
national security."  He did not clarify what topics had raised his 
concerns, and said the site could re-open when "the political 
situation improves."  Before it was blocked, the room carried 
several discussions critical of General Prem's involvement in the 
coup.  Pantip.com has also closed a chatroom devoted to discussing 
constitutional drafting issues.  (Comment: Pantip.com and the 
participants in the Rajdamnoen Room are perceived as leaning towards 
the deposed Thaksin regime.  End comment.) 
 
¶5. (SBU) MICT has also blocked other sites critical of Prem.  On 
Friday, April 4, Council for National Security (CNS) Chairman Sonthi 
ordered police to look into pressing libel charges against 
www.saturdaynews.org, which was asking for signatures to support 
Prem's "impeachment."  A MICT official said they had not blocked the 
site, but it is not currently accessible. (Note:  Post is unable to 
determine the source of the block. End note.)  Likewise, sites 
linked to deposed Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra such as 
hi-thaksin.net remain inaccessible in Thailand.  The anti-coup 
www.19sep.org has been blocked six times since the coup.  On April 
4, MICT Minister Sittichai stated that MICT was responsible for 
"regulating, blocking, or terminating any electronic information 
media deemed harmful to democratic reform." 
 
Over 10,000 Sites Blocked -- Mostly Porn 
---------------------------------------- 
 
¶6. (U) According to C.J. Heinke -- a Canadian-American assistant 
lecturer at Thammasat University and founder of the local NGO 
Freedom Against Censorship Thailand (FACT) -- the number of blocked 
websites in Thailand has risen dramatically since the September 19 
coup.  Heinke asserted that as of January 11, 2007, MICT's was 
blocking 13,435 websites, compared to 2,475 on October 13, 2006.  By 
March 15, 2007, the number of blocked sites had fallen to 10,388; 
Heinke surmised that the drop resulted from MICT culling duplicated 
web URLs from their "blocklist." 
 
¶7. (SBU) This blocklist has never been revealed to the public and is 
considered sensitive by the government, although FACT has a link to 
it on its website.  Heinke acknowledged that the vast majority of 
these blocked websites are pornographic or gambling sites.  However, 
it also includes a few anti-coup political sites, displays of lese 
majeste, and sites supporting the southern separatists, such as the 
Pattani United Liberation Organization (PULO) site. 
 
MICT'S Defense 
-------------- 
 
¶8. (SBU) In a conversation with PDoff, the American-educated MICT 
Deputy Permanent Secretary Maneerat Plipat noted that Internet 
 
BANGKOK 00002047  002 OF 002 
 
 
censorship in Thailand had been ongoing since the early 1990s, and 
disagreed with the notion that censorship in Thailand had increased 
since the coup.  She argued that censorship was worse during the 
Thaksin era when there was constant pressure on Internet providers 
to shut sites critical of Thaksin.  Responding to FACT's 
allegations, Maneerat disputed the claim that there had been a 
dramatic jump in blocked websites since the coup; she opined that 
most of the websites in question had been blocked under the Thaksin 
era.  She noted that the blocklist changes often, with new sites 
added and others removed upon further review by the MICT's sole 
cyber cop.  Maneerat said that the blocklist is not made public out 
of concern that it would cause excessive harm to individual sites 
that are temporarily blocked and then removed from the list. 
 
MICT as Cyber-Censor 
-------------------- 
 
¶9. (SBU) In principle, MICT's "cyber cop" (who declined to speak 
with PDoff) receives tip-offs from the public and other government 
officials about illegal or offensive web content.  The MICT cyber 
cop then either makes a determination of his own or refers the issue 
to Manereet for review.  If the site is determined to contain 
illegal content, the cyber cop makes a written request to Thiland's 
Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to block the site.  Thailand does 
not have standard criteria to decide whether a website should be 
blocked. 
 
¶10. (SBU) Maneerat acknowledged that MICT has no legal authority to 
block websites, and in order to block a site MICT sends a "request" 
to the Thai ISPs.  Although the ISPs are not required by law to 
comply, MICT Minister Sittichai has threatened to reduce the 
bandwidth of any ISP that fails to cooperate.  The owners of the 
blocked site can petition to have it unblocked by demonstrating that 
it no longer has content that violates the Thai criminal code.  In 
addition, Maneerat acknowledged that MICT has blocked websites 
itself at the level of the international information gateway into 
Thailand. 
 
Others Can Block? 
----------------- 
 
¶11. (SBU) In practice, other Thai government agencies may be able to 
block sites.  During an Embassy-sponsored March 15 program on 
Internet censorship, Maneerat said that she did not know who ordered 
the hi-thaksin.net website blocked, but that it "wasn't MICT." 
Maneerat also said the police had pressured MICT to block websites 
containing content related to the banned book "The King Never 
Smiles."  Maneerat added that she had not recommended that the 
websites be blocked.  Still, even without MICT's involvement, Thai 
users cannot access the Yale University Press website containing 
reviews of the book. (Note: Again, post does not know who blocked 
the site. End note.) 
 
COMMENT: A New Law? 
------------------- 
 
¶12. (SBU) The Thai government's Internet censorship regime is 
neither coordinated nor transparent.  Stovepiping within different 
agencies, lack of transparency in the censorship process, and 
rivalries between the police and DSI only reinforces these problems. 
 The Thai National Legislative Assembly is expected to vote next 
month on a pending cyber crime bill, which, among other things, will 
vest sole legal authority in the MICT to force ISPs to block 
websites.  Later this month, Public Affairs Section will host two 
meetings for members of the Special Committee charged with reviewing 
the draft bill.  They wish to study the U.S. experience in cyber 
crime law enforcement.  END COMMENT. 
 
BOYCE