Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
2010/12/01
2010/12/02
2010/12/03
2010/12/04
2010/12/05
2010/12/06
2010/12/07
2010/12/08
2010/12/09
2010/12/10
2010/12/11
2010/12/12
2010/12/13
2010/12/14
2010/12/15
2010/12/16
2010/12/17
2010/12/18
2010/12/19
2010/12/20
2010/12/21
2010/12/22
2010/12/23
2010/12/25
2010/12/26
2010/12/27
2010/12/28
2010/12/29
2010/12/30
2011/01/01
2011/01/02
2011/01/04
2011/01/05
2011/01/07
2011/01/09
2011/01/11
2011/01/12
2011/01/13
2011/01/14
2011/01/15
2011/01/16
2011/01/17
2011/01/18
2011/01/19
2011/01/20
2011/01/21
2011/01/22
2011/01/23
2011/01/24
2011/01/25
2011/01/26
2011/01/27
2011/01/28
2011/01/29
2011/01/30
2011/01/31
2011/02/01
2011/02/02
2011/02/03
2011/02/04
2011/02/05
2011/02/06
2011/02/07
2011/02/08
2011/02/09
2011/02/10
2011/02/11
2011/02/12
2011/02/13
2011/02/14
2011/02/15
2011/02/16
2011/02/17
2011/02/18
2011/02/19
2011/02/20
2011/02/21
2011/02/22
2011/02/23
2011/02/24
2011/02/25
2011/02/26
2011/02/27
2011/02/28
2011/03/01
2011/03/02
2011/03/03
2011/03/04
2011/03/05
2011/03/06
2011/03/07
2011/03/08
2011/03/09
2011/03/10
2011/03/11
2011/03/13
2011/03/14
2011/03/15
2011/03/16
2011/03/17
2011/03/18
2011/03/19
2011/03/20
2011/03/21
2011/03/22
2011/03/23
2011/03/24
2011/03/25
2011/03/26
2011/03/27
2011/03/28
2011/03/29
2011/03/30
2011/03/31
2011/04/01
2011/04/02
2011/04/03
2011/04/04
2011/04/05
2011/04/06
2011/04/07
2011/04/08
2011/04/09
2011/04/10
2011/04/11
2011/04/12
2011/04/13
2011/04/14
2011/04/15
2011/04/16
2011/04/17
2011/04/18
2011/04/19
2011/04/20
2011/04/21
2011/04/22
2011/04/23
2011/04/24
2011/04/25
2011/04/26
2011/04/27
2011/04/28
2011/04/29
2011/04/30
2011/05/01
2011/05/02
2011/05/03
2011/05/04
2011/05/05
2011/05/06
2011/05/07
2011/05/08
2011/05/09
2011/05/10
2011/05/11
2011/05/12
2011/05/13
2011/05/14
2011/05/15
2011/05/16
2011/05/17
2011/05/18
2011/05/19
2011/05/20
2011/05/21
2011/05/22
2011/05/23
2011/05/24
2011/05/25
2011/05/26
2011/05/27
2011/05/28
2011/05/29
2011/05/30
2011/05/31
2011/06/01
2011/06/02
2011/06/03
2011/06/04
2011/06/05
2011/06/06
2011/06/07
2011/06/08
2011/06/09
2011/06/10
2011/06/11
2011/06/12
2011/06/13
2011/06/14
2011/06/15
2011/06/16
2011/06/17
2011/06/18
2011/06/19
2011/06/20
2011/06/21
2011/06/22
2011/06/23
2011/06/24
2011/06/25
2011/06/26
2011/06/27
2011/06/28
2011/06/29
2011/06/30
2011/07/01
2011/07/02
2011/07/04
2011/07/05
2011/07/06
2011/07/07
2011/07/08
2011/07/10
2011/07/11
2011/07/12
2011/07/13
2011/07/14
2011/07/15
2011/07/16
2011/07/17
2011/07/18
2011/07/19
2011/07/20
2011/07/21
2011/07/22
2011/07/23
2011/07/25
2011/07/27
2011/07/28
2011/07/29
2011/07/31
2011/08/01
2011/08/02
2011/08/03
2011/08/05
2011/08/06
2011/08/07
2011/08/08
2011/08/09
2011/08/10
2011/08/11
2011/08/12
2011/08/13
2011/08/15
2011/08/16
2011/08/17
2011/08/18
2011/08/19
2011/08/21
2011/08/22
2011/08/23
2011/08/24
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Embassy Athens
Embassy Asuncion
Embassy Astana
Embassy Asmara
Embassy Ashgabat
Embassy Apia
Embassy Antananarivo
Embassy Ankara
Embassy Amman
Embassy Algiers
Embassy Addis Ababa
Embassy Accra
Embassy Abuja
Embassy Abu Dhabi
Embassy Abidjan
Consulate Auckland
Consulate Amsterdam
Consulate Alexandria
Consulate Adana
American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
Embasy Bonn
Embassy Bujumbura
Embassy Buenos Aires
Embassy Budapest
Embassy Bucharest
Embassy Brussels
Embassy Bridgetown
Embassy Brazzaville
Embassy Bratislava
Embassy Brasilia
Embassy Bogota
Embassy Bishkek
Embassy Bern
Embassy Berlin
Embassy Belmopan
Embassy Belgrade
Embassy Beirut
Embassy Beijing
Embassy Banjul
Embassy Bangui
Embassy Bangkok
Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan
Embassy Bamako
Embassy Baku
Embassy Baghdad
Consulate Belfast
Consulate Barcelona
Embassy Cotonou
Embassy Copenhagen
Embassy Conakry
Embassy Colombo
Embassy Chisinau
Embassy Caracas
Embassy Canberra
Embassy Cairo
Consulate Curacao
Consulate Ciudad Juarez
Consulate Chiang Mai
Consulate Chennai
Consulate Chengdu
Consulate Casablanca
Consulate Cape Town
Consulate Calgary
Embassy Dushanbe
Embassy Dublin
Embassy Doha
Embassy Djibouti
Embassy Dili
Embassy Dhaka
Embassy Dar Es Salaam
Embassy Damascus
Embassy Dakar
DIR FSINFATC
Consulate Dusseldorf
Consulate Durban
Consulate Dubai
Consulate Dhahran
Embassy Guatemala
Embassy Grenada
Embassy Georgetown
Embassy Gaborone
Consulate Guayaquil
Consulate Guangzhou
Consulate Guadalajara
Embassy Helsinki
Embassy Harare
Embassy Hanoi
Consulate Hong Kong
Consulate Ho Chi Minh City
Consulate Hermosillo
Consulate Hamilton
Consulate Hamburg
Consulate Halifax
Embassy Kyiv
Embassy Kuwait
Embassy Kuala Lumpur
Embassy Kolonia
Embassy Kinshasa
Embassy Kingston
Embassy Kigali
Embassy Khartoum
Embassy Kathmandu
Embassy Kampala
Embassy Kabul
Consulate Krakow
Consulate Kolkata
Consulate Karachi
Embassy Luxembourg
Embassy Lusaka
Embassy Luanda
Embassy London
Embassy Lome
Embassy Ljubljana
Embassy Lisbon
Embassy Lima
Embassy Lilongwe
Embassy Libreville
Embassy La Paz
Consulate Leipzig
Consulate Lahore
Consulate Lagos
Mission USOSCE
Mission USNATO
Mission UNESCO
Mission Geneva
Embassy Muscat
Embassy Moscow
Embassy Montevideo
Embassy Monrovia
Embassy Mogadishu
Embassy Minsk
Embassy Mexico
Embassy Mbabane
Embassy Maseru
Embassy Maputo
Embassy Manila
Embassy Manama
Embassy Managua
Embassy Malabo
Embassy Madrid
Consulate Munich
Consulate Mumbai
Consulate Montreal
Consulate Monterrey
Consulate Milan
Consulate Merida
Consulate Melbourne
Consulate Matamoros
Consulate Marseille
Embassy Nouakchott
Embassy Nicosia
Embassy Niamey
Embassy New Delhi
Embassy Ndjamena
Embassy Nassau
Embassy Nairobi
Consulate Nuevo Laredo
Consulate Naples
Consulate Naha
Consulate Nagoya
Embassy Pristina
Embassy Pretoria
Embassy Praia
Embassy Prague
Embassy Port Of Spain
Embassy Port Moresby
Embassy Port Louis
Embassy Port Au Prince
Embassy Podgorica
Embassy Phnom Penh
Embassy Paris
Embassy Paramaribo
Embassy Panama
Consulate Peshawar
REO Mosul
REO Kirkuk
REO Hillah
REO Basrah
Embassy Rome
Embassy Riyadh
Embassy Riga
Embassy Reykjavik
Embassy Rangoon
Embassy Rabat
Consulate Rio De Janeiro
Consulate Recife
Secretary of State
Embassy Suva
Embassy Stockholm
Embassy Sofia
Embassy Skopje
Embassy Singapore
Embassy Seoul
Embassy Sarajevo
Embassy Santo Domingo
Embassy Santiago
Embassy Sanaa
Embassy San Salvador
Embassy San Jose
Consulate Surabaya
Consulate Strasbourg
Consulate St Petersburg
Consulate Shenyang
Consulate Shanghai
Consulate Sapporo
Consulate Sao Paulo
Embassy Tunis
Embassy Tripoli
Embassy Tokyo
Embassy Tirana
Embassy The Hague
Embassy Tel Aviv
Embassy Tehran
Embassy Tegucigalpa
Embassy Tbilisi
Embassy Tashkent
Embassy Tallinn
Consulate Toronto
Consulate Tijuana
Consulate Thessaloniki
USUN New York
USMISSION USTR GENEVA
USEU Brussels
US Office Almaty
US Mission Geneva
US Mission CD Geneva
US Interests Section Havana
US Delegation, Secretary
US Delegation FEST TWO
UNVIE
UN Rome
Embassy Ulaanbaatar
Embassy Vilnius
Embassy Vientiane
Embassy Vienna
Embassy Vatican
Embassy Valletta
Consulate Vladivostok
Consulate Vancouver
Browse by tag
AMGT
ASEC
AEMR
AR
APECO
AU
AORC
AS
ADANA
AJ
AF
AFIN
AMED
AM
ABLD
AFFAIRS
AMB
APER
ACOA
AG
AA
AE
ABUD
ARABL
AO
AND
ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
AID
AL
ASCH
AADP
AORD
ADM
AINF
AINT
ASEAN
AORG
AY
ABT
ARF
AGOA
AVIAN
APEC
ANET
AGIT
ASUP
ATRN
ASECVE
ALOW
AODE
AGUILAR
AN
ADB
ASIG
ADPM
AT
ACABQ
AGR
ASPA
AFSN
AZ
AC
ALZUGUREN
ANGEL
AIAG
AFSI
ASCE
ABMC
ANTONIO
AIDS
ASEX
ADIP
ALJAZEERA
AFGHANISTAN
ASECARP
AROC
ASE
ABDALLAH
ADCO
AMGMT
AMCHAMS
AGAO
ACOTA
ANARCHISTS
AMEDCASCKFLO
AK
ARSO
ARABBL
ASO
ANTITERRORISM
AGRICULTURE
AFINM
AOCR
ARR
AFPK
ASSEMBLY
AORCYM
AINR
ACKM
AGMT
AEC
APRC
AIN
AFPREL
ASFC
ASECTH
AFSA
ANTXON
AFAF
AFARI
AX
AMER
ASECAF
ASECAFIN
AFZAL
APCS
AGUIRRE
AIT
ARCH
AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL
AOPC
AMEX
ARM
ALI
AQ
ATFN
AMBASSADOR
AORCD
AVIATION
ARAS
AINFCY
ACBAQ
AOPR
AREP
ALEXANDER
AMTC
AOIC
ABLDG
ASEK
AER
ALOUNI
AMCT
AVERY
APR
AMAT
AEMRS
AFU
AMG
ATPDEA
ALL
AORL
ACS
AECL
AUC
ACAO
BA
BR
BB
BG
BEXP
BY
BRUSSELS
BU
BD
BTIO
BK
BL
BO
BE
BMGT
BM
BN
BWC
BBSR
BTT
BX
BC
BH
BEN
BUSH
BF
BHUM
BILAT
BT
BTC
BMENA
BBG
BOND
BAGHDAD
BAIO
BP
BRPA
BURNS
BUT
BGMT
BCW
BOEHNER
BOL
BASHAR
BOU
BIDEN
BTRA
BFIN
BOIKO
BZ
BERARDUCCI
BOUCHAIB
BEXPC
BTIU
CPAS
CA
CASC
CS
CBW
CIDA
CO
CODEL
CI
CROS
CU
CH
CWC
CMGT
CVIS
CDG
CTR
CG
CF
CD
CHIEF
CJAN
CBSA
CE
CY
CB
CW
CM
CDC
COUNTRY
CLEARANCE
CHR
CT
COE
CV
COUNTER
CN
CPUOS
CTERR
CVR
CVPR
COUNTRYCLEARANCE
CLOK
CONS
CITES
COM
CONTROLS
CAN
CACS
CR
CACM
CVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGKIRF
COMMERCE
CAMBODIA
CZ
CJ
CFIS
CASCC
COUNTERTERRORISM
CAS
CONDOLEEZZA
CLINTON
CTBT
CEN
CRISTINA
CFED
CARC
CTM
CARICOM
CSW
CICTE
CJUS
CYPRUS
CNARC
CBE
CMGMT
CARSON
CWCM
CIVS
CENTCOM
COPUOS
CAPC
CGEN
CKGR
CITEL
CQ
CITT
CIC
CARIB
CVIC
CAFTA
CVISU
CHRISTOPHER
CDB
CEDAW
CNC
COMMAND
CENTER
COL
CAJC
CUIS
CONSULAR
CLMT
CBC
CIA
CIS
CEUDA
CHINA
CAC
CL
DR
DJ
DEMOCRATIC
DEMARCHE
DA
DOMESTIC
DISENGAGEMENT
DRL
DB
DE
DHS
DAO
DCM
DHSX
DARFUR
DAVID
DO
DEAX
DEFENSE
DEA
DTRO
DPRK
DARFR
DOC
DK
DTRA
DAC
DOD
DIEZ
DMINE
DRC
DCG
DPKO
DOT
DEPT
DOE
DS
DKEM
ECON
ETTC
EFIS
ETRD
EC
EMIN
EAGR
EAID
EFIN
EUN
ECIN
EG
EWWT
EINV
ENRG
ELAB
EPET
EIND
EN
EAIR
EUMEM
ECPS
ES
EI
ELTN
ET
EZ
EU
ER
EINT
ENGR
ECONOMIC
ENIV
EK
EFTA
ETRN
EMS
EPA
ESTH
ENRGMO
EET
EEB
EXIM
ECTRD
ELNT
ETRA
ENV
EAG
EREL
ENVIRONMENT
ECA
EAP
ECONOMY
EINDIR
EDUARDO
ETR
EUREM
ELECTIONS
ETRC
EICN
EXPORT
EMED
EARG
EGHG
EINF
ECIP
EID
ETRO
EAIDHO
EENV
EURM
EPEC
ERNG
ENERG
EIAD
EAGER
EXBS
ED
ELAM
EWT
ENGRD
ERIN
ECO
EDEV
ECE
ECPSN
ENGY
EL
EXIMOPIC
ETRDEC
ECCT
EINVECON
EUR
ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID
EFI
ECOSOC
EXTERNAL
ESCAP
EITC
ETCC
EENG
ERA
ENRD
EBRD
ENVR
ETRAD
EPIN
ECONENRG
EDRC
ETMIN
ELTNSNAR
ECHEVARRIA
ELAP
EPIT
EDUC
ESA
EAIDXMXAXBXFFR
EETC
EIVN
EBEXP
ESTN
EGOV
ECOM
EAIDRW
ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS
ETRDGK
ENVI
ELN
EPRT
EPCS
EPTED
ERTD
EUM
EAIDS
ETRB
EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM
EDU
EV
EAIDAF
EDA
EINTECPS
EGAD
EPREL
EINVEFIN
ECLAC
EUCOM
ECCP
ELDIN
EIDN
EINVKSCA
ENNP
EFINECONCS
EFINTS
ETC
EAIRASECCASCID
EINN
ETRP
EFQ
ECOQKPKO
EGPHUM
EBUD
ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ
ECPC
ECONOMICS
ENERGY
EIAR
EINDETRD
ECONEFIN
ECOWAS
EURN
ETRDEINVTINTCS
EFIM
ETIO
EATO
EIPR
EINVETC
ETTD
ETDR
EIQ
ECONCS
ENRGIZ
EAC
ESPINOSA
EAIG
ENTG
EUC
ERD
EINVECONSENVCSJA
EEPET
EUNCH
ESENV
ECINECONCS
ETRDECONWTOCS
ECUN
FR
FI
FOREIGN
FARM
FAO
FK
FCSC
FREEDOM
FARC
FAS
FJ
FIN
FINANCE
FAC
FBI
FTAA
FM
FCS
FAA
FETHI
FRB
FRANCISCO
FORCE
FTA
FT
FMGT
FCSCEG
FDA
FERNANDO
FINR
FIR
FDIC
FOR
FOI
FKLU
FO
FMLN
FISO
GM
GERARD
GT
GA
GG
GR
GTIP
GB
GH
GZ
GV
GE
GAZA
GY
GJ
GEORGE
GOI
GCC
GMUS
GI
GABY
GLOBAL
GUAM
GC
GOMEZ
GUTIERREZ
GL
GOV
GKGIC
GF
GU
GWI
GARCIA
GTMO
GANGS
GIPNC
GAERC
GREGG
GUILLERMO
GASPAR
HA
HYMPSK
HO
HK
HUMAN
HR
HU
HN
HHS
HIV
HURI
HDP
HUD
HUMRIT
HSWG
HUMANITARIAN
HIGHLIGHTS
HUM
HUMANR
HL
HILLARY
HSTC
HCOPIL
HADLEY
HOURANI
HARRIET
HESHAM
HI
HNCHR
HEBRON
HUMOR
IZ
IN
IAEA
IS
IMO
ILO
IR
IC
IT
ITU
ID
IV
IMF
IBRD
IWC
ICAO
INF
ICRC
IO
IPR
IRAQI
ISO
IK
ISRAELI
IDB
INFLUENZA
IRAQ
INL
IQ
ICES
IRMO
IRAN
ISCON
IGAD
ITALY
INTERNAL
ILC
ISSUES
ICCAT
IADB
ICTY
ICTR
ITPGOV
ITALIAN
IQNV
IRDB
INMARSAT
INCB
INRB
ICJ
ISRAEL
INR
IFO
ITRA
IEA
ISPA
IOM
ITRD
IL
IHO
IFAD
IPROP
IDLI
ISCA
INV
IBB
ISPL
INRA
INTELSAT
ISAF
IRS
IEF
ITER
ISAAC
ICC
INDO
IIP
IATTC
IND
INS
IZPREL
IAHRC
IEFIN
IACI
INNP
IA
INTERPOL
IFIN
IRAJ
IX
IF
ITPHUM
ITA
IP
IZEAID
IRPE
IDA
ISLAMISTS
ITF
INRO
IBET
IDP
IRC
KMDR
KPAO
KOMC
KNNP
KFLO
KDEM
KSUM
KIPR
KFLU
KE
KCRM
KJUS
KAWC
KZ
KSCA
KDRG
KCOR
KGHG
KPAL
KTIP
KMCA
KCRS
KPKO
KOLY
KRVC
KVPR
KG
KWBG
KTER
KS
KN
KSPR
KWMN
KV
KTFN
KFRD
KU
KSTC
KSTH
KISL
KGIC
KAPO
KSEP
KDP
KFIN
KTEX
KTIA
KUNR
KCMR
KCIP
KMOC
KTDB
KBIO
KMPI
KSAF
KFEM
KUNC
KPRV
KIRC
KACT
KRMS
KNPT
KMFO
KHIV
KHLS
KPWR
KCFE
KREC
KRIM
KHDP
KVIR
KNNNP
KCEM
KIRF
KGIT
KLIG
KNUP
KSAC
KNUC
KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KTBT
KSCI
KIDE
KPGOV
KLPM
KTDD
KOCI
KNNC
KOMS
KBCT
KLFU
KLAB
KSEO
KICC
KJUST
KUWAIT
KSEC
KUK
KEDEM
KJRE
KMRS
KSRE
KREISLER
KSCS
KPIR
KPOA
KESS
KCOM
KWIR
KIVP
KRCM
KGLB
KPOW
KPOL
KSEAO
KNAP
KCUL
KPREL
KREF
KPRP
KICA
KPMI
KPRM
KQ
KPOP
KFSC
KPFO
KPALAOIS
KRM
KBWG
KCORR
KVRC
KR
KFTN
KTTB
KNAR
KINR
KWN
KCSY
KIIP
KPRO
KREL
KFPC
KW
KWM
KRFD
KFLOA
KMCC
KIND
KNEP
KHUM
KSKN
KT
KOMO
KDRL
KTFIN
KSOC
KPO
KGIV
KSTCPL
KSI
KNNB
KNDP
KICCPUR
KDMR
KFCE
KIMMITT
KMNP
KOMCSG
KGCC
KRAD
KCRP
KAUST
KWAWC
KCHG
KRDP
KPAS
KITA
KMSG
KTIAPARM
KPAOPREL
KWGB
KIRP
KMIG
KSEI
KLSO
KWNN
KHSA
KCRIM
KNPP
KPAONZ
KWWW
KGHA
KY
KCRCM
KGCN
KPLS
KPAOY
KRIF
KTRD
KTAO
KJU
KBTS
KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW
KO
KEMR
KENV
KEAI
KWAC
KFIU
KWIC
KNNO
KPAI
KTBD
KILS
KPA
KRCS
KWBGSY
KNPPIS
KNNPMNUC
KERG
KLTN
KLIP
KTLA
KAWK
KVRP
KAID
KX
KWCI
KNPR
KCFC
KNEI
KFTFN
KTFM
KCERS
KDEMAF
KMEPI
KEMS
KDRM
KBTR
KEDU
KIRL
KNNR
KMPT
KPDD
KPIN
KDEV
KAKA
KFRP
KINL
KWWMN
KWBC
KA
KOM
KWNM
KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG
KRGY
KNNF
KICR
KIFR
KWMNCS
KPAK
KDDG
KCGC
KID
KNSD
KMPF
KWMM
LY
LE
LABOR
LH
LN
LO
LAB
LT
LAURA
LTTE
LG
LU
LI
LA
LB
LOTT
LORAN
LAW
LVPR
LARREA
LEBIK
LS
LOVE
LR
LEON
LAVIN
LOG
MU
MARR
MX
MASS
MOPS
MNUC
MCAP
MTCRE
MRCRE
MTRE
MASC
MY
MK
MDC
MG
MO
MEPN
MW
MILI
MCC
MR
MEDIA
MZ
MEPP
MOPPS
MA
MAS
MI
MP
MIL
MV
MC
MD
MCA
MT
MARITIME
MOPSGRPARM
MAAR
MOROCCO
MCAPS
MOOPS
ML
MN
MEPI
MNUCPTEREZ
MTCR
MUNC
MPOS
MONUC
MAR
MGMT
MENDIETA
MARIA
MONTENEGRO
MURRAY
MOTO
MACP
MINUSTAH
MCCONNELL
MGT
MARQUEZ
MANUEL
MNUR
MF
MOHAMMAD
MAPP
MOHAMED
MNU
MFA
MTS
MLS
MIAH
MEETINGS
MERCOSUR
MED
MARAD
MNVC
MINURSO
MIK
MARK
MBM
MILITARY
MAPS
MILA
MACEDONIA
MICHEL
MASSMNUC
MUCN
MQADHAFI
MPS
MARRGH
NZ
NATO
NI
NO
NU
NG
NL
NPT
NS
NP
NA
NASA
NSF
NTTC
NAS
NEA
NANCY
NSG
NRR
NATIONAL
NKNNP
NMNUC
NSC
NC
NE
NR
NARC
NGO
NELSON
NATEU
NDP
NIH
NK
NIPP
NERG
NSSP
NSFO
NATSIOS
NFSO
NTDB
NT
NCD
NEGROPONTE
NATOIRAQ
NAR
NZUS
NCCC
NH
NAFTA
NEW
NRG
NUIN
NOVO
NATOPREL
NEY
NV
NICHOLAS
NPA
NW
NORAD
NPG
NOAA
OPRC
OPDC
OTRA
OECD
OVIP
OREP
ODC
OIIP
OAS
OSCE
OPIC
OMS
OIC
OFDA
OEXC
OFDP
OPCW
OCED
OIE
OSCI
OM
OPAD
ODIP
OPCD
OCII
ORUE
ODPC
OPPI
ORA
OCEA
OREG
OUALI
OMIG
ODAG
OPREP
OFFICIALS
OSAC
OEXP
OPEC
OFPD
OMAR
ORC
OAU
OPDP
OIL
OVIPPRELUNGANU
OSHA
OTRD
OPCR
OF
OFDPQIS
OSIC
OHUM
OTR
OBSP
OGAC
OTRAORP
OESC
OVP
ON
OES
OTAR
OCS
PREL
PGOV
PARM
PINR
PHUM
PM
PREF
PTER
PK
PINS
PBIO
PHSA
PE
PBTS
PA
PL
POL
PAK
POV
POLITICS
POLICY
PROP
PRELTBIOBA
PKO
PO
PIN
PNAT
PU
PHAM
PALESTINIAN
PTERPGOV
PGOVPREL
PKPA
PHYTRP
PP
PTEL
PREC
PENA
PRM
PELOSI
PAS
PRELAF
PRE
PUNE
PSOE
POLM
PRELKPAO
PIRF
PGPV
PARMP
PRELL
PVOV
PROV
POLUN
PS
PHUMPTER
PROG
PRELGOV
PERSONS
PERURENA
PKK
PRGOV
PH
POLITICAL
PLAB
PDEM
PCI
PRL
PREM
PINSO
PEREZ
PPAO
PERM
PETR
PERL
PBS
PGOVZI
PINT
PARMS
PCON
PETERS
PRELBR
PMIL
PSOCI
PF
PLO
PNUM
PTERM
PJUS
PNIR
PHUMKPAL
PG
PREZ
PGIC
PAO
PTBS
PROTECTION
PRELPK
PGOVENRG
PRELKPKO
PATTY
PSOC
PARTIES
PRELSP
PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ
PMIG
PAIGH
PARK
PETER
PPREL
PTERPREL
PHUS
PKPO
PGOVECON
POUS
PMAR
PWBG
PAR
PARMIR
PGOVGM
PHUH
PTE
PY
PPEL
PDOV
PGOVSOCI
PGOVPM
PRELEVU
PGOR
PRELKPAOIZ
PBTSRU
PGVO
PHUMR
PPD
PGV
PRAM
PINL
PSI
PKPAL
PPA
PTERE
PGOF
PINO
PREO
PHAS
PRHUM
PHUMA
PGO
PAC
PRESL
PORG
PKFK
PEPR
PRELP
PREFA
PNG
PFOR
PGOVLO
PHUMBA
PREK
PHUME
PHJM
POLINT
PGOVE
PHALANAGE
PARTY
PECON
PEACE
PROCESS
PLN
PEDRO
PASS
PCUL
PGGV
PSA
PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA
PGIV
PHUMPREL
PRFE
POGOV
PEL
PBT
PAMQ
PINF
PSEPC
POSTS
PAHO
PHUMPGOV
PGOC
PNR
RS
RP
RU
RW
RFE
RCMP
RIGHTSPOLMIL
REFORM
RO
REACTION
REPORT
ROW
ROBERT
REL
RIGHTS
RA
RELATIONS
REGION
RAFAEL
REGIONAL
RAY
ROBERTG
RPREL
RAMONTEIJELO
RM
RATIFICATION
RREL
RBI
RICE
ROOD
RODENAS
RUIZ
RELFREE
RODHAM
RGY
RUEHZO
RELIGIOUS
RODRIGUEZ
RUEUN
RELAM
RSP
RF
REO
ROSS
RENE
RUPREL
RI
REMON
RPEL
RSO
SCUL
SENV
SOCI
SZ
SNAR
SO
SP
SU
SY
SMIG
SYR
SA
SW
SG
SF
SR
SYRIA
SNARM
SPECIALIST
START
SNIG
SCI
SI
SGWI
SE
SIPDIS
SANC
SADC
SELAB
SN
SETTLEMENTS
SENVENV
SCIENCE
SENS
SPCE
SENC
SCOM
SPAS
SECURITY
SL
SOCIETY
SOSI
SENVEAGREAIDTBIOECONSOCIXR
SEN
SPECI
ST
SENVCASCEAIDID
SC
SECRETARY
STR
SNA
SOCIS
SEP
SK
SHUM
SYAI
SMIL
STEPHEN
SNRV
SKCA
SENSITIVE
SECI
SCUD
SCRM
SGNV
SECTOR
SAARC
SENVSXE
SASIAIN
SWMN
STEINBERG
SOPN
SOCR
SCRS
SILVASANDE
SWE
SARS
SNARIZ
SUDAN
SENVQGR
SNARKTFN
SAAD
SD
SAN
SIPRNET
SM
STATE
SFNV
SSA
SPCVIS
SOFA
SCULKPAOECONTU
SPTER
SKSAF
SENVKGHG
SHI
SEVN
SPSTATE
SMITH
SH
SNARCS
SNARN
SIPRS
TBIO
TW
TRGY
TSPA
TU
TPHY
TI
TX
TH
TIP
TC
TSPL
TNGD
TS
TZ
TP
TK
TURKEY
TERRORISM
TPSL
TINT
TRSY
TERFIN
TPP
TT
TF
TECHNOLOGY
TE
TAGS
TECH
TRAFFICKING
TN
TJ
TL
TO
TD
TREATY
TR
TA
TIO
THPY
TPSA
TRAD
TNDG
TVBIO
TWI
TV
TWL
TWRO
TAUSCHER
TRBY
TSPAM
TREL
TRT
TNAR
TFIN
TPHYPA
TWCH
THOMMA
THOMAS
TERROR
TRY
TBID
UK
UNESCO
UNSC
UNGA
UN
US
UZ
USEU
UG
UP
UNAUS
UNMIK
USTR
UY
UNSCD
USUN
UV
UNDC
UNRWA
UNPUOS
USAID
UNSCR
UNODC
UNHCR
UNRCR
UNDP
UNCRIME
UA
UNHRC
UNEP
UNBRO
UNCSD
UNO
UNCND
UNCHR
USTRUWR
USAU
UNICEF
UNCC
USPS
UNOMIG
UNESCOSCULPRELPHUMKPALCUIRXFVEKV
UNFICYP
UR
UNAMA
UNCITRAL
UNVIE
USTDA
USNC
USTRPS
USCC
UNEF
UNGAPL
UNSCE
USSC
UEU
UNMIC
UNTAC
USDA
UNCLASSIFIED
UNA
UNCTAD
UNMOVIC
USGS
UNFPA
UNSE
USOAS
USG
UE
UAE
UNWRA
UNION
UNCSW
UNCHS
UNDESCO
UNC
UB
UNSCS
UKXG
UNGACG
UNHR
USPTO
UNCHC
UNFCYP
UNIDROIT
WHTI
WIPO
WTRO
WHO
WI
WFP
WHA
WTO
WMO
WEET
WZ
WBG
WS
WE
WA
WEF
WAKI
WILLIAM
WHOA
WSIS
WCI
WCL
WMN
WEBZ
WW
WWBG
WMD
WWT
WWARD
WITH
WMDT
WTRQ
WCO
WALTER
WEU
WB
WBEG
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07TAIPEI740, INPUT FOR 2007 TIP REPORT - TAIWAN
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
- The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
- The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
- The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07TAIPEI740.
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07TAIPEI740 | 2007-03-30 11:21 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
VZCZCXRO9930
PP RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHIN #0740/01 0891121
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 301121Z MAR 07
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4696
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 6554
RUEHHI/AMEMBASSY HANOI PRIORITY 3262
RUEHJA/AMEMBASSY JAKARTA PRIORITY 4030
RUEHML/AMEMBASSY MANILA PRIORITY 9986
RUEHPF/AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH PRIORITY 0587
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 8608
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU PRIORITY 1766
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU PRIORITY 0106
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG PRIORITY 7800
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI PRIORITY 0932
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG PRIORITY 5736
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RHMFIUU/DEPT OF HOMELAND SECURITY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEHC/DEPT OF LABOR WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 35 TAIPEI 000740
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
SIPDIS
STATE FOR G/TIP, G, INL, DRL, PRM, EAP/RSP
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV TW
SUBJECT: INPUT FOR 2007 TIP REPORT - TAIWAN
REF: 06 STATE 202745
¶1. (SBU) This is AIT/T's 2006-07 Trafficking in Persons (TIP)
report. The report is presented according to reftel
sections, beginning with paragraph 27 A.
27 A. Overview of Taiwan's Activities to Eliminate
Trafficking in Persons
Taiwan is a source country for a limited number of women
trafficked to Japan. Taiwanese citizens do not need visas to
visit Japan and can legally travel to Japan via commercial
flights. According to the International Police division of
Taiwan's Criminal Investigation Bureau, Taiwanese women are
lured to Japan by newspaper advertisements in Taiwan placed
by local employment agencies with ties to organized crime
rings in Japan. The ads promise employment and free
transportation to Japan. Once the Taiwanese women arrive in
Japan, they are forced into prostitution or other forms of
labor and threatened with bodily harm to prevent them from
going to authorities. One officer in Taiwan's Representative
Office in Tokyo is charged with cooperating with Japanese
authorities to identify Taiwanese trafficking victims and
return them to Taiwan. The Taiwan National Immigration
Agency (NIA) reported that 59 female trafficking victims were
returned to Taiwan in 2006. This is an increase over the
total 68 women returned to Taiwan during 2004 and 2005. NIA
was unable to provide an official estimate of the total
number of Taiwanese women trafficked to Japan in recent
years.
There is reason to believe that Taiwan is also a source
country for a limited number of women trafficked to the
United States. Over the past ten months, AIT's consular
section fraud prevention unit identified at least 100
Taiwanese women who appear to have traveled to the U.S. in
2006 to work as prostitutes. All were female except one, and
most were between 23 and 40 years of age. Ongoing
investigations by Diplomatic Security and U.S. local law
enforcement suggest that most of the participants knew they
would be working as prostitutes and were willing to be
transported to the U.S. for that purpose. However, ongoing
investigations suggest some participants may have been
subjected to exploitative working conditions to which they
did not consent, including forced confinement or relocation,
confiscation of travel documents, and withholding of pay.
Taiwan is not a transit point for a significant number of
internationally trafficked persons. Taiwan is a transit
point for a small number of illegal Mainland Chinese seeking
to enter the United States. Taiwan criminal gangs use
fraudulent Taiwan travel documents and Taiwan-operated
vessels to smuggle these illegal immigrants. Although these
illegal aliens are voluntary migrants, some of them may
become trafficking victims as a result of debt bondage,
forced prostitution, or other schemes upon reaching Taiwan or
the United States.
Taiwan is primarily a destination country for Southeast Asian
and PRC men and women trafficked into forced labor or sexual
exploitation. Traffickers also use fraudulent marriages
between Taiwanese men and PRC or Southeast Asian women
(primarily Vietnam), to traffick women into Taiwan for labor
and sex exploitation.
Taiwan's geographic proximity to the PRC and Southeast Asia,
large demand for foreign workers, and lucrative sex industry
provide opportunities for traffickers to exploit victims.
Many female trafficking victims are forced into prostitution.
Both men and women are subjected to forced labor or
involuntary servitude. In many cases, a victim's passport is
seized, and he or she may be subjected to physical abuse or
other forms of coercion to prevent them from attempting
escape or seeking assistance from the authorities.
TAIPEI 00000740 002 OF 035
According to the National Immigration Agency (NIA), 1,596 PRC
citizens (925 men and 671 women) and 1,701 Southeast Asian
citizens were deported from Taiwan in 2006. More than
340,000 foreign workers and 370,000 foreign spouses live in
Taiwan. These large numbers make it difficult to obtain
reliable estimates of the number of persons being trafficked
within Taiwan.
According to women's rights groups involved in rehabilitating
girls and women rescued from Taiwan's sex industry, the
number of trafficking victims under 18 years of age is low.
According to NIA, as of February 2007, the 14 PRC women held
at the Ilan Detention Center are all adults. There is a
clear consensus among government officials and NGOs that
trafficking of minors for prostitution has declined
dramatically since the passage of the 1995 Child and Youth
Sexual Transaction Prevention Act (CYSTPA). However, there
were continuing reports of a small number of teenage girls
being forced into prostitution after responding to misleading
employment advertisements.
The Ministry of Interior (MOI), Ministry of Justice (MOJ),
National Immigration Agency (NIA) (formerly the Immigration
Bureau of the National Police Agency), National Police
Administration (NPA), Council for Labor Affairs (CLA),
academics, human rights groups, women's rights groups and
advocacy groups for foreign labor and foreign spouses are the
primary sources for information about trafficking in persons.
These sources are all generally reliable and often cooperate
with each other to combat trafficking. These sources agree
that it is extremely difficult to estimate the number of
trafficked persons in Taiwan.
27 B. General Overview and Changes
The Taiwan Coast Guard (CGA) intercepted fewer PRC immigrants
being smuggled to Taiwan by boat in 2006. During the first
ten months of the year, 294 men and 31 women were intercepted
while trying to enter Taiwan illegally by boat. In 2005, 369
men and 72 women were caught before landing on Taiwan.
CGA officials reported that illegal Chinese male immigrants
are seeking construction jobs in Taiwan (women cannot legally
perform certain kinds of construction work in Taiwan).
According to CGA, most male PRC illegal immigrants seeking
these jobs come to Taiwan under the guise of working aboard
Taiwan fishing boats. Once the boats dock in Taiwan, the PRC
men disappear. In September 2006 the Ministry of Justice
(MOJ) reported that the whereabouts of more than half of the
2,000 Chinese fishermen hired by Suao Harbor fishing
companies were unknown. Law enforcement officials suspected
the missing fishermen had found illegal work inside Taiwan.
The number of female illegal PRC immigrants smuggled by boat
has dropped, CGA officials say, because smugglers connected
to Taiwan's sex industry are using other channels, including
fraudulent marriages, to circumvent increased coastal
patrols. PRC citizens can only legally enter Taiwan to
conduct tourism or business, or to be the spouse of a
Taiwanese citizen.
Ninety percent of illegal PRC immigrants, male and female,
come from Fujian province, situated only 90 miles across the
Taiwan Strait. According to the NIA, of those illegal PRC
immigrants apprehended on Taiwan soil in 2006, 75 percent
were found in northern Taiwan. Seventy-three percent of PRC
illegal immigrants arrested in Taiwan were found after living
in Taiwan six months or less. Almost half of those detained
admitted to performing some kind of temporary labor while in
Taiwan.
Human smuggling groups in Sichuan and Fujian provinces
actively recruit men, women, and girls willing to work in
TAIPEI 00000740 003 OF 035
Taiwan. Others, seeking economic opportunities, may initiate
contact with the smugglers in hopes of finding better work in
Taiwan. Chinese fishing boats are used to transport
passengers to certain locations in the Taiwan Strait, where
they are transferred to Taiwanese fishing boats. Smugglers
often force their passengers to discard luggage before
boarding, in order to be able to fit more people into the
boats. After landing in Taiwan, most of the men and some of
the women will seek illegal work in the Taiwan economy.
Other women will be delivered to secret locations, where
auctions arranged by sex traffickers will take place.
Brothel operators and others from Taiwan's commercial sex
industry attend the auctions, where they "buy" women for
their illegal operations. After a woman has been sold, she
is transported to a designated workplace, or to an apartment
near the area where she will work.
According to the National Police Agency, many PRC women know
they are coming to Taiwan to work as prostitutes, but many do
not. In many cases, both those women who volunteer to work
as prostitutes and those who do not are subjected to
exploitative working conditions, physical or mental abuse,
confinement, and other forms of coercion. NGOs told AIT that
women who are smuggled to Taiwan must pay between US
$3,500-6,500 in fees to smugglers, and that local sex or
labor traffickers can sell each woman for between US
$5,000-6,000.
Taiwan continued to improve the protections and services
afforded to trafficked PRC women. NGOs report that the law
requires police and other law enforcement officials to
consider all girls under 18 years of age to be trafficking
victims, not criminals. Once trafficking victims are taken
into custody, police and other government officials are
required to protect them from further harm. During the
initial intake process at the one remaining Detention
Facility in Ilan, immigration authorities apply a
standardized TIP victim screening system, which considers
information from the initial police interview, the
circumstances of the migrant's arrival in Taiwan, and other
evidence obtained by investigators. After the initial intake
is completed, a second interview is conducted with the
assistance of social workers to ensure that victims are
properly identified and afforded appropriate protections.
Trafficking victims have regular access to NGOs and social
workers, and recreational activities are provided and
encouraged. Both NGOs and religious social workers visit
victims at the Ilan facility at least twice a week, and can
visit more frequently if needed. Taiwan authorities
encourage trafficked women to cooperate with officials to
prosecute traffickers.
NGOs told AIT that immigration officials are increasingly
distinguishing PRC trafficking victims from PRC criminals,
and affording victims better protection and treatment.
According to the Taiwan Women's' Rescue Foundation, when PRC
citizens are repatriated to China, the Taiwan immigration
officials notify PRC authorities which individuals were
victims of trafficking. NGOs told AIT that, although there
is still considerable room for improvement, the Taiwan
government is increasingly willing to incorporate NGO
suggestions into its anti-trafficking policy and training
programs, and law enforcement officials are consulting NGO
representatives on difficult cases more frequently.
NGOs were invited by the Taiwan government to participate in
drafting the "Prevention of Trafficking in Persons Action
Plan" (the "Plan") issued on November 8, 2006. NGO
representatives, academics, and foreign and local experts
participated in eight separate meetings with senior-level
Taiwan government officials from twelve different ministries
and agencies, including MOI, MOJ, NIA, CLA, and NPA. While
NGOs criticized the Action Plan for offering too few specific
changes, NGO representatives continue to participate in
TAIPEI 00000740 004 OF 035
bi-monthly Task Force meetings convened by the MOI to
supervise and evaluate ongoing anti-trafficking efforts.
The Taiwan government acknowledges that fraudulent marriages
are commonly used by traffickers to introduce foreign women
into Taiwan for labor or sexual exploitation. Many women
from China, Vietnam, and other Southeast Asian countries are
willing to marry Taiwan men in order to enjoy Taiwan's higher
standard of living, and to earn money to assist relatives
back home. Traffickers disguised as marriage brokers exploit
such motivations and lure many women to Taiwan in order to
force them into prostitution or exploitative labor upon their
arrival. Other women may knowingly enter into a false
marriage in hopes of finding gainful employment in Taiwan.
These women do not intend to become prostitutes, but upon
arrival are often coerced by traffickers into the sex trade
or forced labor. In some cases, women, particularly from the
PRC, knowingly enter into false marriages in order to work in
Taiwan's sex industry. These women are often subjected to
exploitative working conditions to which they did not
consent, including forced confinement or relocation, physical
or mental abuse, and unfair withholding of pay.
Traffickers of PRC women prefer using fraudulent marriages
over smuggling by boat because it is safer and carries a
lower risk of detection. Trafficking syndicates in Vietnam,
Indonesia, Thailand and other Southeast Asian countries use
fake marriages to circumvent restrictions on certain classes
of laborers, or to introduce women into Taiwan's sex
industry.
Some Taiwan men are willing to serve as bogus husbands
because of the financial rewards, despite the risks
associated with getting caught. In facilitating a "bride's"
residence in Taiwan, a typical "husband" can receive a free
round trip to the bride's home country and as much as US
$1,000 per month for up to one year. Under current fraud and
forgery laws, a man convicted of fraudulent marriage can face
up to three years in prison. He may also be convicted of
aiding and abetting crimes furthered by the sham marriage,
including forced prostitution and pimping. A defendant
convicted of marrying a PRC woman under false pretenses can
be charged with violating the "Act Governing Relations
Between Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area"
(the Taiwan-PRC Relations Act), and can face a sentence of
one to seven years. Typical sentences for first-time
offenders range between one to one-and-a-half years. Many
traffickers solicit mentally or physically disabled or
destitute men to serve as husbands. Courts often punish such
men with sentences of less than one year. Penalties for
traffickers are higher, but traffickers themselves rarely
enter into fraudulent marriages. In 2004, one trafficker was
sentenced to seven years for brokering several false
marriages to traffick PRC women into Taiwan in violation of
Taiwan-PRC Relations Act. The conviction was overturned on
appeal in 2007.
According to MOI statistics, in 2006 one quarter of new
marriages in Taiwan involved a foreign-born mother. There are
approximately 133,000 spouses from Southeast Asia (100,000 of
them from Vietnam) and another 233,000 spouses from the PRC
living in Taiwan.
Non-PRC citizen foreign spouses can apply for residency
immediately, which entitles them to work legally in Taiwan.
They cannot apply for full citizenship until they have
resided in Taiwan for three consecutive years, and usually do
not obtain citizenship until their fourth year of residence
in Taiwan. PRC spouses are eligible to apply for dependent
resident status after two years, but cannot apply for
permanent residence or permission to work until after six
years in Taiwan. A foreign spouse without citizenship risks
deportation if he or she divorces or does not live with his
or her Taiwanese spouse. Traffickers use the threat of
TAIPEI 00000740 005 OF 035
deportation to coerce and control women brought into Taiwan
under the guise of marriage.
Taiwan authorities have taken significant steps to discourage
traffickers from abusing the spouse-visa program. All
foreign spouses must first apply to a Taiwan Bureau of
Consular Affairs (BOCA) Overseas Office to obtain a visitor's
visa to enter Taiwan. In September 2003, Taiwan reinstated
the face-to-face interview requirement for all PRC spouses
seeking a visitor's visa to enter Taiwan. Beginning in
January 2005, face-to-face interviews were required of all
prospective spouses from Burma, Cambodia, Indonesia, the
Philippines, Thailand, and Vietnam. Interviews must be
conducted by two BOCA staff members, chosen at random and
rotated regularly to prevent collusion with applicants. Once
in Taiwan, each foreign spouse must apply for an Alien
Residency Card (ARC). At this stage, BOCA officials will
interview the foreign spouse again, and his or her putative
wife or husband. The NIA maintains 39 interview rooms in
Taiwan's five major cities, two international airports, and
on Kinmen and Matsu islands, adjacent to the PRC's Fujian
province. Applicants found to be in sham marriages are
immediately deported.
The face-to-face interview requirement has helped to detect
and deter fraudulent "marriages of convenience." From 2004
to 2005, the number of visitor's visas issued to Vietnamese
spouses dropped from 11,953 to 7,062. In 2006, the total
number of visas issued to Vietnamese spouses dropped again,
to 3,864. The refusal rate for Vietnamese applicants has
climbed from 10 percent in 2004 to 37 percent now. PRC
marriage visa applicants have dropped by a third over the
past two years, and refusal rates have climbed from 12
percent to above 30 percent.
The Taiwan authorities have also adopted other measures to
cut down on the trafficking of foreign spouses. In 2003, the
legislature amended the Taiwan-PRC Relations Act to increase
penalties for Taiwanese entering into fraudulent marriages
with PRC citizens. In May 2005, the Taiwan government
stipulated that Vietnamese women marrying Taiwan men must be
at least 20 years old, and the age difference between the
bride and groom must be less than 20 years. The number of
arranged marriages between Vietnamese women and Taiwan men
dropped by 40 percent over the next several months. Also in
2005, the government began requiring both the foreign and
Taiwan spouse to attend a mandatory two-hour session on their
respective rights under Taiwan law. In June 2006, the Taiwan
government banned the formation of new cross-border
matchmaking companies, and announced that existing firms
would be subject to stricter regulations and monitoring. In
October 2006, a hotline was established to provide consulting
services to foreign spouses in Chinese, English, Indonesian,
Thai, and Vietnamese. Over the past year, Taiwan authorities
have also increased the number and frequency of surprise
visits and phone calls to check on the whereabouts of persons
involved in suspect cross-border marriages.
The Taiwan government does not have reliable statistics on
the number of women trafficked into Taiwan through fraudulent
marriage. According to a November 2006 report from the
Immigration Bureau of the National Police Agency (now part of
the recently-established National Immigration Agency), over
the past three years immigration officials discovered 16,819
PRC citizens in fraudulent marriages with Taiwan citizens,
amounting to 12.6 percent of the 133,305 Chinese spouses who
had entered Taiwan from September 2003 to October 2006.
NGOs assert that the government does too little to educate
migrants, including foreign spouses, about rights and
protections available to them under Taiwan law. This leaves
them distrustful of authority, and vulnerable to
misinformation and abuse from spouses, employers, and
traffickers. Traffickers are able to operate with relative
TAIPEI 00000740 006 OF 035
impunity, NGOs say, because law enforcement resources
dedicated to combat trafficking are still inadequate.
In August 2005, 1,700 Thai laborers working on the Kaohsiung
area rapid transit system rioted over management conditions,
withholding of pay, and poor living conditions. The riot
revealed the existence of a significant labor trafficking
problem in Taiwan, and highlighted the need for changes to
Taiwan's foreign labor importation system.
According to MOI, there are approximately 340,000 foreign
workers in Taiwan, primarily from the Philippines, Thailand,
Vietnam, and Indonesia. Fifty percent of these workers are
employed in the manufacturing industry, and 45 percent are
employed as nursing caregivers.
Foreign workers in the industrial and manufacturing sectors,
including construction workers, fishermen, and caregivers
employed by hospitals or other commercial institutions are
covered by the Taiwan Labor Standards Law (LSL). The LSL
prohibits forced labor, establishes limits on premature
contract termination, ensures basic minimum wage and overtime
rates, sets limits on the work-day and work-week, and
guarantees breaks and minimum time off.
The protections offered by the LSL do not extend to the
150,000 foreign workers employed as private nursing
caregivers and domestic helpers. They are covered instead by
the Employment Services Act (ESA), which does not guarantee
the minimum wage or overtime pay, does not set limits on the
work-day or work-week, and does not provide for minimum
breaks or vacation time. NGOs report many cases of foreign
domestic helpers and nursing caregivers working 16-18 hours
per day, and being given only one day per month or less of
free time. Some employers forbid their employees from
leaving the employer's residence, except on days off. In
this forced isolation, foreign domestic helpers and nursing
caregivers are extremely vulnerable to abuse, including
physical or mental abuse, and sexual assault. The ESA does
not afford foreign workers any protection against the
employer's arbitrary termination of their contract.
In November 2006, the CLA considered extending LSL coverage
to foreign workers employed as private nursing caregivers and
domestic helpers. The proposal encountered stiff opposition
from the League of Welfare Organizations for the Disabled,
who argued that extending LSL coverage to these categories of
workers would make care services for disabled family members
unaffordable for about one-third of those families who
currently employ such workers. The CLA withdrew the
proposal, but did not rule out its future reconsideration.
To reduce the likelihood of labor trafficking and the
incidence of employer abuse, on October 24, 2006, the CLA
promulgated the "Living Conditions and Management Standards
for Employment of Class B Foreign Workers," which establishes
mandatory living conditions, including meals, free time, and
a right to privacy, for all foreign workers. Starting
November 1, 2006, all employers must submit to local labor
authorities a "Foreign Worker's Life Management Plan" for
each foreign worker, within three days of the worker's
arrival in Taiwan. Local labor inspectors are required to
conduct an inspection of the worker's living environment and
working conditions within two months of receiving the
employer's "Life Management Plan." By the end of December
2006, employers had submitted 6,287 plans for newly arrived
foreign workers.
Taiwan has no law to protect foreign workers from being
forcibly repatriated. Under current laws, an employer can
repatriate foreign workers at any time. NGOs report that
foreign workers who raise concerns or seek legal help are
regularly deported without due process. CLA changed its
regulations to address this problem. Beginning November 1,
TAIPEI 00000740 007 OF 035
2006, employers who wish to terminate a foreign worker's
contract before its expiration date must request and obtain
approval from an appropriate local government labor official.
If the labor official discovers a labor-management dispute,
or that the worker is being forcibly repatriated, the
employer will not be able to recruit a new worker to fill the
vacancy until the dispute is resolved.
The Taiwan government grants commercial and private employers
the right to employ a certain number of foreign workers per
year. Employers sell these "quotas" to the highest-bidding
brokerage firm, which then recruits foreign workers to fill
the quota, charging each worker exorbitant job placement and
brokerage fees. In order to preserve lucrative relationships
with employers, brokers often help to control troublesome
employees through threats, physical abuse, and other forms of
punishment. Brokers also often help employers to forcibly
deport foreign workers -- the employer gets rid of a
problematic employee, and the broker can fill the empty quota
with a new foreign worker. The higher the turnover rate for
foreign workers, the more money brokerage firms can make,
since each new crop of workers can be charged new placement
and brokerage fees.
High brokerage fees and other charges frequently turn foreign
workers into virtual indentured servants. According to a
2006 NGO report, foreign workers must pay combined placement,
service fees, and food and boarding charges of between NT
$254,000-$433,000 (US $8,200-$14,000) for a three-year
factory or construction job contract. Factory and
construction workers are covered by the LSL and are
guaranteed a minimum monthly salary of NT $15,840 (US $511),
plus overtime. Regular overtime must be paid at 1.33 times
the regular hourly rate for the first two hours of overtime
per day, and for every hour thereafter, special overtime must
be paid at 1.66 times the hourly rate. The average factory
worker earning the minimum monthly salary plus 10 hours of
regular overtime and 10 hours of special overtime per month
would need 12.5 months to pay off average fixed debts of NT
$343,500, leaving no money for himself.
Domestic helpers and nursing caregivers are entitled to NT
$15,840 monthly minimum salary, but typically are not paid
overtime wages, since they are not covered by the LSL. The
same 2006 NGO report indicated that foreign workers must pay
combined placement, service fees, and food and boarding
charges of between NT $104,000-$293,000 (US $3,400-$9,500) to
secure a three-year domestic helper or nursing caregiver job.
With no prospect of overtime wages, the average domestic
helper or nursing caregiver would need 12.5 months to pay off
average fixed debts of NT $198,500, leaving no money left
over for other expenses.
Taiwan regulations allow an employer, with the foreign
worker's consent, to deduct up to 30 percent of the foreign
worker's monthly salary to be placed in a bank account in the
worker's name. The employer holds the bank book and the
worker has no access to this account. The money, which
typically amounts to around NT $3,000 per month, is only
returned to the worker at the completion of his or her
contract. If the company goes bankrupt, the worker loses the
money. This practice is called "forced savings" because if
the worker does not consent to the arrangement, the worker is
sent home.
Because the debts owed to brokers and employers are so great,
most workers expect to save little or nothing during the
first two years of their contracts. In many cases, the
financial pressure prompts workers to run away from their
broker and employer in order to seek more profitable
employment elsewhere. Workers also flee to escape difficult
or dangerous work, or to escape abuse by the broker or
employer. According to a 2005 NGO survey of 118 migrant
workers who had quit their legal employment to begin working
TAIPEI 00000740 008.2 OF 035
illegally, 36 percent had quit because their take-home salary
was too low after deductions for brokerage fees, food, board,
tax, health and labor insurance, and forced savings.
Eighteen percent had quit because the work was too difficult
or dangerous.
Foreign workers in Taiwan do not have the right to transfer
to a new employer at will. The ESA authorizes foreign
workers to transfer to a new employer only under certain
conditions: (1) the employer or person to be cared for dies
or departs Taiwan; (2) the vessel on which the worker is
employed sinks, is under repair, or has been seized; (3) the
factory or other work location is shut down, has suspended
business, or is unable to pay the worker's salary; (4) the
worker can prove he has suffered physical, sexual, or severe
verbal abuse from the employer; (5) the worker reports that
he has been forced by his legal employer to work for an
illegal employer; and (6) after a previous warning from the
government, the employer has forced the worker to again
perform work outside the scope of his work permit or
employment contract, or to work in an unauthorized workplace
("illegal work").
Before January 2002, an employee was entitled to an immediate
transfer upon proving that his employer had forced him to do
illegal work. In 2002, Article 72 of the ESA was revised to
give an employer a chance to correct the illegal work
situation within a specified period. Now, a worker is only
entitled to a transfer (and his employer will only be
punished) after the employer's second illegal work violation.
This puts the foreign worker in a catch-22: a worker
reporting a first violation risks destroying his relationship
with the employer, who can retaliate by canceling the
worker's contract and deporting him. If the worker chooses
not to report the illegal work, he risks being caught by the
police and deported for working illegally (see further
discussion at para. 29 (C), below).
Assuming a foreign worker is entitled to transfer to a new
employer for one of the enumerated reasons, domestic helpers
and nursing caregivers must typically wait 6-8 weeks before
the transfer is approved. Factory and construction workers
usually wait 3-4 weeks. While waiting to transfer to a new
employer, foreign workers are not allowed to work. If they
cannot find a new employer, they must depart Taiwan.
If a foreign worker leaves his or her legal employer for any
reason not authorized by the ESA, the worker automatically
enters "illegal status" and can be subject to immediate
deportation. According to Taiwan officials, foreign workers
in illegal status can earn higher wages from illegal
employers willing to hire them (US $800 per month versus US
$511). By hiring foreign workers in illegal status, illegal
employers can circumvent the foreign worker quota system,
taxes, and other financial burdens the government imposes on
legal employers of foreign workers. Although they may be
able to earn more money, foreign workers in illegal status do
not have a contract, are not protected by the LSL or ESA, and
are not covered by health or labor insurance. Because they
fear deportation, foreign workers in illegal status rarely
report employer misconduct to law enforcement or other
government officials. This makes them extremely vulnerable
to employer abuse, including but not limited to physical or
mental abuse and sexual assault. Some illegal status foreign
workers, desperate for any type of gainful employment, end up
trafficked into forced labor or Taiwan's sex industry.
NGOs reported that foreign workers often fell victim to labor
trafficking -- having contracted to perform one type of work
but forced to perform another type of work upon arrival in
Taiwan. Employers use this tactic to circumvent hiring
limits on certain classes of workers, or workers from certain
countries. Employers and brokers both profit from it:
brokers charge workers more to secure high-wage-plus-overtime
TAIPEI 00000740 009 OF 035
factory jobs than they do for low-wage domestic caretaker
jobs. Employers can pay foreign workers bound by domestic
helper contracts less than those who signed factory worker
contracts. Since they are performing work outside the scope
of their work permits and original contracts, foreign workers
often believe they are in illegal status. Many of these
workers do not report labor trafficking violations to
authorities because they do not know their rights and are
fearful of deportation. Other workers, in debt to brokers
and possibly the employer, do not wish to lose what gainful
employment they have. In any event, the ESA grants employers
one chance to "cure" certain violations, including forcing an
employee to perform unauthorized work or to work at an
unauthorized location, without penalty (see above). If the
foreign worker reports the violation, he risks retaliation
from the employer, who will likely not be punished.
According to the Council of Labor Affairs (CLA), from
December 2005 to December 2006, the number of foreign workers
in illegal status decreased by 2.6 percent, to 21,051. The
number of Filipino workers in illegal status dropped by 6
percent (2,982), and the number of illegal workers from
Thailand and Vietnam also dropped, by 30 percent (1,839) and
11 percent (10,711), respectively. The number of Indonesian
workers in illegal status rose by 39 percent, to 5,512. Due
to high "runaway" rates among Vietnamese workers, a ban on
Vietnamese fishermen has been in effect since May 2004, and a
ban on Vietnamese domestic helpers and nursing caregivers has
been in place since January 2005. For similar reasons, a ban
on Indonesian workers had been in effect from August 2002 to
December 2004.
In April 2006, CLA announced guidelines for heavier fines for
those who employ or arrange employment for illegal foreign
workers. Administrative fines for labor violations are
imposed and collected by local city and county governments.
CLA urged local governments, which assess and collect these
fines, to follow the new guidelines to heavily punish those
who employ illegal workers. Stiffer penalties were also
announced for illegal foreign workers themselves. The CLA
emphasized that trafficking victims forced into illegal
status by mistreatment or exploitation would not be
repatriated, and their right to work in Taiwan would be
preserved. Despite the CLA's April 2006 new penalty
guidelines, most city and county governments continued to
assess minimum instead of maximum fines. CLA officials told
AIT the new penalty guidelines were non-binding
recommendations, and that local governments retained
discretion over labor violation fines. (Please see para. 29
(C) below for further discussion.)
In January 2007, CLA implemented new measures to simplify the
re-hiring of foreign nursing caregivers and domestic helpers.
Under this "direct re-hiring program," employers can now
file applications to re-hire the same foreign worker before
the expiration of the worker's current contract. The
paperwork required of the foreign worker has been simplified,
and time required out of Taiwan to renew the work permission
has been shortened to one day from three weeks. Brokers are
not involved in arranging the contract renewal, saving the
foreign worker a second brokerage fee and other charges often
demanded by brokers.
In March 2007, CLA revised the rules governing cash rewards
for those who report violations of the Employment Standards
Law (ESL). Informants can receive NT $50,000 for reporting
illegal employment or brokerage of foreign workers, up from
NT $5,000. The reward for information leading to the arrest
of a "runaway" worker has been increased from NT $2,000 to NT
$5,000. The reward for reporting an illegal foreign worker
remains unchanged at NT $2,000. NGOs strongly condemn
rewards for the capture of "runaway" workers. Workers who
flee their employers because of exploitation or abuse are not
criminals, NGOs argue, and should not have bounties placed on
TAIPEI 00000740 010 OF 035
their heads.
CLA also announced a new reward structure to encourage the
public to report cases of mistreatment of foreign workers.
Under the new rules, depending upon the size of the company,
informants can receive up to NT $100,000 for reporting poor
management of foreign workers by local companies. In
addition, NT $50,000 will be paid to anyone reporting sexual
harassment of foreign workers by their employers.
Government leaders have demonstrated strong political will to
combat trafficking in persons. This commitment is best
demonstrated by the "Executive Yuan Action Plan for
Suppressing Trafficking in Persons" (the "Action Plan"),
published by the EY on November 8, 2006. Thirteen government
ministries and agencies and NGOs cooperated in drafting the
Plan, which directs: (1) strengthening Taiwan's existing net
of anti-trafficking laws; (2) implementing an island-wide
standard procedure to identify trafficking victims; (3)
exempting trafficking victims from punishment for non-violent
crimes occasioned by their victimization; (4) allowing
trafficking victims to switch jobs or employers; (5)
assigning special task forces and special prosecutors to
increase the investigation, prosecution, and conviction of
traffickers; and (6) enhancing penalties for convicted
traffickers. By May 2007, each relevant government agency
must submit its detailed proposal to meet Plan goals. A
Cabinet-level Minister without Portfolio, appointed by and
responsible to the Executive Yuan, oversees and coordinates
the multi-agency task force, which met for the first time in
March 2007. The Plan requires a comprehensive
anti-trafficking strategy to be fully implemented by December
¶2008.
In an effort to streamline immigration policies and to
improve immigration enforcement, the Taiwan government on
January 2, 2007 launched the National Immigration Agency
(NIA). The NIA replaces the National Police Agency's (NPA)
Immigration Bureau and Foreign Affairs Department, and the
Aviation and Harbor Police Bureaus. The NIA has also absorbed
immigration-related duties from MOI, the Council for Labor
Affairs (CLA), and several other government agencies. The
NIA is now responsible for formulating and implementing all
policies and procedures relating to foreign workers, foreign
spouses, and legal and illegal immigrants. To improve
accessibility to immigration services, in January 2007 the
NIA opened 25 new immigration service offices in cities and
counties across the island. NIA also hired an additional 160
immigration officers to speed handling of immigration
matters.
On December 11, 2006, the Legislative Yuan Home and Nations
Sub-Committee approved the revised draft of the Immigration
Act, which includes a new chapter on "Cross-Border Human
Trafficking Prevention and Victim Protection." The
Immigration Act bill is currently under consideration by the
Legislative Yuan, and is expected to be passed before the end
of this legislative session in June 2007 (see 29.A below).
27 C. Limitations on Taiwan's Ability to Address TIP
Until last year, Taiwan's difficult relationship with PRC had
been its greatest handicap in fighting trafficking from the
Mainland. China and Taiwan signed the Kinmen Accord in
September 1990, under which the PRC agreed to accept
returning illegal immigrants from Taiwan within 20 days.
According to Taiwan authorities, the complicated cross-Strait
relationship, the lack of normal communication channels and
the PRC's refusal to cooperate contributed to increasingly
longer periods of detention for growing numbers of illegal
PRC immigrants. In 2004, nearly 5,000 PRC citizens were
awaiting repatriation in Taiwan's four detention facilities.
By February 2006, that number had been reduced to
approximately 1,200 people detained in four separate
TAIPEI 00000740 011 OF 035
facilities. As of February 2007, only 128 PRC citizens are
being held in detention, in the one remaining facility in
Ilan.
According to NIA and Taiwan academics, the drastic decrease
in the number of PRC detainees awaiting repatriation is the
result of enhanced communication with Chinese authorities and
improved cross-Strait relations. During several large
repatriation operations from November 2006 to February 2007,
Taiwan returned an additional 370 illegal immigrants to the
PRC, bringing the total number of detainees in Taiwan to its
lowest level in 15 years. Taiwan has closed three of its
four detention facilities, leaving open only the Lotung
facility in Ilan, which can accommodate 2,000 people.
Taiwan faces few budget or personnel shortages that would
hinder its ability to combat labor and sex trafficking from
Southeast Asian source countries. Taiwan also has sufficient
resources to provide adequate protections and services for
trafficking victims. A central NGO complaint is that
although the central government has mandated that certain
protections and services for trafficking victims be available
island-wide, the treatment afforded to trafficking victims
varies considerably from place to place. NGOs told AIT that
central government police and labor authorities often
establish beneficial new policies or procedures that are only
partially implemented or simply ignored by local labor and
law enforcement officials. This problem is especially marked
in the more rural areas of southern Taiwan. Central and
local government officials acknowledge this situation, and
emphasize government plans to counteract it through increased
training and education on TIP-related issues.
Foreign labor brokerage companies operate across national
borders, and Taiwan's ability to restrain abusive practices
in source countries is limited. Brokers in Taiwan are in
direct communication with their counterparts in Vietnam,
Thailand, the Philippines, and other source countries.
Source country governments often do not closely monitor the
fees and other conditions imposed on workers by labor brokers
in their territory. This gives foreign labor brokers in
Taiwan and in the various source countries ample opportunity
to exploit the workers through inflated fees, and to coerce
them by threatening family or property left behind in the
worker's home country. The Taiwan government is working to
improve cross-border cooperation with source country
governments, but progress has been slow.
Corruption may be impeding reform of the exploitative labor
brokerage system. Following the 2005 Kaohsiung labor riots,
Taiwan politicians and media outlets investigated whether
legislators and high-level government officials had received
kickbacks from the brokerage companies involved in the
scandal. According to press reports from November 2005,
elected officials at the central and local government levels
had lobbied on behalf of 70 different foreign labor brokerage
companies to obtain a portion of the foreign labor "quotas"
needed by the Kaohsiung Rapid Transit project. There was
speculation that legislators, especially members of the
legislature's Sanitation, Environment and Social Welfare
Committee, were personally involved in and profiting from the
importation of foreign labor to Taiwan. Sources have told
AIT that, even though in their view it would be desirable to
eliminate the foreign labor brokerage system, they believed
this could not be done because several legislators would
oppose it for personal financial reasons.
Taiwan's existing incentive system for police may need to be
changed. Officers receive large incentive payments for
arrests involving drugs or firearms, and these kinds of cases
weigh heavily in deciding promotions. Trafficking cases take
more time to investigate than drug or gun crimes, but
trafficking arrests garner less incentive money and do little
to boost an officer's chances for promotion. A Foreign
TAIPEI 00000740 012 OF 035
Affairs Police bureau chief suggested trafficking
investigations and arrests would increase if the incentive
system were recalibrated.
27 D. Taiwan Monitoring of Anti-Trafficking Efforts
Taiwan now systematically monitors its anti-trafficking
efforts on all three fronts -- prevention, protection, and
prosecution. The Action Plan requires the multi-agency task
force to convene every two months to report to the presiding
Minister without Portfolio, who is required to monitor and
evaluate progress toward anti-TIP goals. The multi-agency
task force convened for the first time on March 7, 2007.
Following the meeting, the Executive Yuan delivered to AIT
the "Executive Yuan Report on Prevention of Trafficking in
Persons." The Report detailed government plans to prevent
trafficking through education and early detection, to improve
protections and services for trafficking victims, and to
intensify prosecution and punishment of traffickers. The
Report also established anti-TIP benchmarks and reported
progress made toward reaching those goals since the Action
Plan was approved on November 8, 2006.
The MOJ issued its own internal "Human Trafficking Prevention
Concrete Implementation Plan" on December 27, 2006. Pursuant
to this plan, in January 2007 the Taiwan High Court
Prosecutor's Office established a unit of six senior-level
prosecutors to supervise lower District Court handling of
trafficking cases. Each of Taiwan's 21 District Court
prosecutor's offices was required to designate a senior-level
prosecutor to manage trafficking cases at the local level.
Before 2007, the Ministry of Justice tracked investigations,
prosecutions and convictions via the principal Criminal Code
section or other law used to charge or convict the defendant.
Taiwan does not have a comprehensive anti-trafficking law,
so prosecutors use existing sections of Taiwan's Criminal
Code, labor and immigration laws, the Taiwan-PRC Relations
Act, and the CYSTPA to punish labor- and sex-trafficking
offenses. MOJ statistics did not distinguish between actual
trafficking cases and "trafficking-related" offenses like
smuggling and prostitution. In January 2007, in cooperation
with District Court prosecutors and local law enforcement,
the Taiwan High Court began tracking trafficking cases based
on the facts of the cases themselves; specifically, whether a
given case involves the control, coercion, and exploitation
typical of trafficking cases. These new statistics have been
provided to AIT.
The Council for Labor Affairs (CLA) maintains and reports
statistics on the number of requests for assistance received
by the 24 Foreign Worker Service Stations located around
Taiwan, and those received by the Foreign Worker Assistance
Center located at Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport. CLA
tracks and reports the number of calls received by the
various foreign worker telephone hotlines. CLA and the MOI
also track the number of foreign workers assisted by
government-subsidized NGO shelters. CLA tracks and reports
the number of employers and brokers fined for violating
foreign worker labor regulations. CLA also tracks and
reports the number of foreign workers in "illegal status,"
according to their country of origin.
The National Immigration Agency (NIA), the Ministry of
Foreign Affairs (MOFA), the National Police Administration
(NPA), and the Coast Guard monitor and report statistics on
the number of illegal foreign immigrants to Taiwan, including
those from the PRC, Vietnam, Thailand, and other Southeast
Asian countries. MOFA and NIA also maintain and report
statistics on foreign spouse visa interviews, refusal and
issuance rates, and the number of spouses found to be in
fraudulent marriages.
In 2006, the MOI authorized the Central Police University to
TAIPEI 00000740 013 OF 035
study international human trafficking patterns, and to
investigate and analyze statistics on human trafficking in
Taiwan. According to the EY, the results of this project
will be available to government authorities to guide further
efforts to combat trafficking.
The government began monitoring trafficking of children and
minors in 1995. The 1995 Child and Youth Sexual Transaction
Prevention Act (CYSTPA) created an interagency taskforce
composed of the ministries of Interior, Justice, Defense,
Economic Affairs, Transportation, Education, the Department
of Health, the Mainland Affairs Council, and the Council of
Labor Affairs. Together with key NGOs, this task force
continues to monitor implementation of the CYSTPA and
provides guidance to member agencies through semi-annual
written reports.
Section 2 - PREVENTION
28 A. Taiwan Acknowledgment of the Problem
The government recognizes that PRC and Southeast Asian men
and women, and sometimes minors, are trafficked to Taiwan for
forced labor and sexual exploitation. The government
acknowledges that Taiwan is also a transit point for the
smuggling of PRC nationals to other countries. Taiwan
authorities acknowledge that Taiwan is a source country for a
small number of women trafficked to other countries,
particularly Japan. The central and local governments are
actively working to prevent trafficking, to assist
trafficking victims, and to punish traffickers.
The Executive Yuan has acknowledged that, before the
promulgation of the Action Plan, the Taiwan government "did
not go far enough in identifying and protecting human
trafficking victims." The EY has admitted that, in the past,
traffickers had too often received only minor punishments.
The stated objective of the Action Plan is to rationalize and
integrate the government response to the trafficking problem,
coordinating efforts between different agencies at both the
national and local level.
28 B. Taiwan Agency Structure for Anti-Trafficking
The following government agencies are involved in the fight
against trafficking: the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA),
Ministry of Justice (MOJ), Ministry of Education (MOE),
Ministry of Transportation and Communication (MOTC),
Department of Health, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC), the
Council for Labor Affairs (CLA), the Government Information
Office (GIO), the Council of Cultural Affairs, the Council of
Indigenous Peoples, the Council of Agriculture, the Financial
Supervisory Commission, the Coast Guard Administration, and
the Ministry of Interior (MOI), which includes the National
Immigration Agency (NIA) and the National Police
Administration (NPA). A Cabinet-level Minister without
Portfolio, appointed by and responsible to the Executive
Yuan, is charged with supervising the interagency
implementation of an island-wide Action Plan to combat
trafficking.
28 C. Information, Education and Communication
The Taiwan government conducts anti-trafficking information
and education campaigns that target potential and actual
victims of trafficking, both domestically and abroad.
In January 2006 the government opened a special service
counter at the Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport to
disseminate labor rights information to arriving workers and
to hear grievances and to provide emergency assistance to
laborers about to depart Taiwan. NGOs argue that the
location of the service counters in the non-secure,
pre-immigration area of the airport enables brokers to
TAIPEI 00000740 014 OF 035
physically prevent workers from reporting problems. CLA
officials respond that workers can also use emergency phones
located in the airport's secure post-immigration area to
report complaints. NGOs counter that the emergency phones
are not marked for that purpose, rendering them useless to
uninformed workers. NGOs also charge that the airport
service counter staff are poorly trained, and that the
counters often run out of informational pamphlets. CLA
contends the service counter's usefulness to foreign workers
is demonstrated by the 270 emergency petitions and 94,000
service requests processed during the 2006 calendar year.
The 2006 CLA budget for the Taoyuan Service Center was US
$645,000. There are plans in place to open a second worker
service counter at the international airport in Kaohsiung.
CLA supports 24 Foreign Labor Consultant Service Centers
located around Taiwan. The Centers, operated by local
governments with CLA funding, provide counseling, legal aid,
and labor dispute resolution services. The Centers also
publish and disseminate worker rights handbooks, conduct
legal seminars and language training courses, host social and
cultural events, and sponsor radio and television programs
and advertisements to inform foreign workers of their rights
and remedies under Taiwan law. In 2006, CLA budgeted US $1.3
million to subsidize the centers. In 2007, CLA increased its
annual budget for the service centers to US $2.1 million, to
ensure that city and county governments had sufficient
resources to defray attorney fees, court costs, and other
fees associated with litigating foreign workers' legal
claims.
In 2006, CLA gave US $923 thousand to city and county
governments and private organizations to host 128 social
events for foreign workers. The events were designed to
bring foreign workers together, where government and NGO
representatives could inform them of their rights and
obligations under Taiwan law. According to CLA, more than
62,000 foreign workers attended these events.
To increase foreign workers' awareness of their rights under
Taiwan law, the CLA published a booklet entitled "Legal
Workers are Good Workers," which used pictures to depict
legal and illegal conduct by workers and employers. CLA also
disseminated 90,000 employer handbooks and 255,000 foreign
worker handbooks, translated into English, Vietnamese,
Indonesian, and Thai. CLA also helped city and county
governments defray expenses associated with foreign labor
affairs reporting, reform of foreign labor regulations, and
training conferences for local law enforcement and social
services personnel. CLA's 2006 budget for publications and
foreign labor-related assistance to local governments was US
$1 million. The 2007 budget was increased by 75 percent, to
US $1.76 million.
The Action Plan requires MAC to continue and expand its
"Mainland Spousal Guidance Program," which uses town
hall-style meetings, social events, information hotlines,
websites and printed handbooks to inform Mainland-born
spouses of their rights under Taiwan law. MAC is also
required to continue and expand its subsidies to NGOs to
continue dialogue with the PRC on anti-trafficking efforts
and other related cross-Strait exchanges.
The Taiwan government subsidizes NGO-run domestic trafficking
prevention outreach programs targeting minors and Southeast
Asian women married to Taiwanese men. The Action Plan
obligates MOI to establish by October 2007 a formal mechanism
to accept and evaluate NGO requests for government subsidies
for programs to combat trafficking.
Taiwan government representative Overseas Offices in
Thailand, Indonesia, the Philippines and Vietnam conduct
pre-entry counseling seminars for foreign spouses of Taiwan
citizens. The seminars are conducted by experienced local
TAIPEI 00000740 015 OF 035
counselors, and contain information on the rights and
obligations of foreign spouses living in Taiwan. In 2006,
6,200 Southeast Asian foreign spouses had participated in
these seminars. After the PRC, Vietnamese citizens constitute
the majority of foreign spouses married to Taiwan citizens.
For this reason, the Overseas Office in Ho Chi Minh city has
created a website to help Vietnamese spouses obtain necessary
information. By January 2007, the site had received 30,000
hits.
The Action Plan obligates MOI by June 2007 to develop and
implement programs and publish materials to increase the
general public's awareness of human trafficking, and to
increase foreign laborers' understanding of their rights and
remedies under Taiwan law.
28 D. Other Programs to Prevent Trafficking
Taiwan authorities at the central and local government level
are active in combating many of the social ills which
predispose individuals to becoming victims of trafficking.
All city and county governments maintain violence prevention
and control centers to address domestic and sexual violence
and child abuse, environmental factors which can contribute
to homelessness, thereby increasing an individual's
vulnerability to sex or labor exploitation. Victims of
abuse, including foreign born-spouses and foreign workers,
can receive medical treatment, emergency assistance, shelter,
legal and family counseling, language education and other
forms of training.
CLA regularly conducts publicity campaigns to inform young
people, first-time job seekers, and other workers of their
labor rights and remedies, and to increase awareness of the
labor- and sex-trafficking risks associated with deceptive
job offers.
In 2006, the Taiwan central and local governments began a US
$100 per month per child subsidy program to reduce financial
stress on lower-income families deemed to be at higher risk
for child abuse. The central government paid 70 percent of
the US $6.4 million program and local governments paid the
rest. The program was expected to help as many as 15,000
underprivileged children. The central government allocated
an additional US $1 million to hire an additional 140 social
workers to manage child welfare cases. The MOI tripled
funding for social welfare NGOs to US $3 million to assist
their efforts to increase public awareness of child abuse and
domestic violence, and to identify and assist children and
families deemed at high risk. In January 2007, the government
also offered a US $100 per month rental subsidy for
low-income families unable to afford decent housing.
Adults and children are provided subsidized health care under
the national health insurance plan. In January 2007, the
Taiwan government assumed responsibility for paying the
insurance premiums for family members of jobless insured
workers.
Education for children between six and 15 years of age is
free, universal, compulsory and enforced. According to
government statistics, 99 percent of eligible children attend
primary and junior high school. The Department of Education
tracks school dropouts, provides counseling, and encourages
these students to return to school. The Action Plan requires
the Department of Education to submit a proposal to improve
the effectiveness of this program by December 2007. The
government recently decided to extend compulsory education
from nine to twelve years, starting in 2009.
The government continues to financially support a program
sponsored by End Child Prostitution, Pornography and
Trafficking (ECPAT) in which counselors visit teenage girls
TAIPEI 00000740 016 OF 035
in shelters once a week to ensure they do not become
trafficking victims. In 2005, local police forces around
Taiwan joined forces with ECPAT to combat Internet child
pornography. With assistance from local Internet service
providers, over the past two years the operation shut down
2,442 websites, and 69 cases were referred to the Central
Investigative Bureau for further investigation.
28 E. Taiwan Relationship with NGOs, Civil Society, Relevant
Organizations on Trafficking
The Taiwan government has a strong working relationship with
a number of NGOs and other civic organizations involved in
anti-trafficking efforts, including the Women's Rescue
Foundation, ECPAT Taiwan, the Presbyterian Church, the
Catholic Society of Jesus, the Good Shepherd Sisters, the
Hope Workers' Center, the Stella Maris International Service
Center, the Color Page Women's Volunteer Organization, the
Chinese Muslim Association, the Chunghua Foundation for
Persons with Intellectual Disabilities, the United Way, and
the Garden of Hope Foundation.
NGOs were involved in the drafting of Taiwan's anti-TIP
Action Plan. The Action Plan requires MOI, MOJ, NIA, and
other involved government agencies to include NGO
representatives in regular policy-making discussions, and to
incorporate NGO recommendations into a "comprehensive and
integrated" anti-TIP strategy. Government agencies are also
required by the Action Plan to include NGO input in anti-TIP
informational materials, educational seminars, and other
activities.
NGOs contend that although they have been included in
anti-TIP policy discussions, too few of their suggestions
have been adopted. This has prompted some NGO leaders to
criticize the government for being more interested in
improving its image than in actually solving Taiwan's sex-
and labor-trafficking problem.
The Taiwan central government subsidizes 11 NGO-operated
shelters for trafficking victims; the Kaohsiung and Taipei
City governments subsidize two more. The NIA, CLA/BLA,
national and local police agencies, and the national and
local prosecutors' offices cooperate with NGOs and civic
organizations to identify trafficking victims and to place
them in appropriate shelter environments. NGO
representatives are permitted to accompany victims to police
interviews, labor hearings, and court appearances, and to
provide interpretation and other services. Several NGOs have
received permission from the NIA to monitor the living
conditions of PRC women and girls detained while awaiting
repatriation to China, and to conduct social and educational
programs for them.
The Taiwan government sponsors NGO participation in
international anti-trafficking meetings and exchanges.
Taiwan will host an international anti-trafficking seminar in
August 2007, and will invite NGOs and academics to
participate. Taiwan Overseas Offices cooperate with NGO
representatives overseas and provide them as much assistance
as possible. MOFA subsidizes domestic NGOs that assist the
safe return of trafficking victims to their home countries.
Domestic NGOs that conduct exchanges with the PRC to reduce
PRC-to-Taiwan trafficking are also eligible to apply for
subsidies.
28 F. Taiwan Border Control Screening and Monitoring of
Emigration/Immigration Patterns for Evidence of TIP
In an effort to streamline immigration policies and to
improve immigration enforcement, the Taiwan government on
January 2, 2007 launched the National Immigration Agency
(NIA). The NIA replaces the National Police Agency's (NPA)
Immigration Bureau and Foreign Affairs Department, and the
TAIPEI 00000740 017 OF 035
Aviation and Harbor Police Bureaus. The NIA has also absorbed
immigration-related duties from MOI, the Council for Labor
Affairs (CLA), and several other government agencies. The
NIA is now the lead agency for formulating and implementing
all policies and procedures relating to foreign workers,
foreign spouses, and legal and illegal immigrants.
The NIA, NPA and other government agencies collect and
compile statistics on legal and illegal immigration to study
human trafficking trends and to formulate future policy.
NIA, MOFA, NPA, and the Coast Guard monitor and report
statistics on the number of illegal foreign immigrants
apprehended in Taiwan, including those from the PRC, Vietnam,
Thailand, and other Southeast Asian countries. NIA and NPA
also record and report the number of foreign citizens
arrested for various kinds of offenses, including
prostitution, and the number and nationality of those foreign
citizens deported each year. CLA tracks and reports the
number of foreign workers in "illegal status," according to
their country of origin. MOFA maintains and reports
statistics on foreign spouse visa interviews, refusal and
issuance rates. NIA and NPA track the number of foreign
spouses found to be in fraudulent marriages. Government
officials use all of these indicators to try to gauge the
scope and nature of human trafficking in Taiwan, but do not
have reliable estimates.
In order to discourage the fraudulent use of marriage visas
to traffick women into Taiwan, spouse visa applicants from
the PRC, Burma, Cambodia, Indonesia, Thailand, the
Philippines, and Vietnam must undergo interviews in their
home countries before departing for Taiwan. All foreign
spouses and their prospective mates must undergo a second
interview process upon their arrival in Taiwan. Those who
fail the interview process are barred from entering Taiwan
and are immediately returned to their countries of origin.
28 G. Existence of Trafficking and Corruption Task Forces
Taiwan has established an official mechanism to exchange
information at the national level regarding trafficking in
persons. The Action Plan requires MOI, MOJ, MOFA, NIA, NPA,
CLA, and other government agencies to convene every two
months to coordinate and evaluate ongoing anti-trafficking
efforts. A Cabinet-level Minister without Portfolio has been
appointed to oversee the task force. The MOI has also
appointed a vice-minister to serve as the single point of
contact for TIP-related inquiries.
Taiwan also has a multi-agency task-force aimed at preventing
the trafficking of under-age girls. The 1995 Child and Youth
Sexual Transaction Prevention Act (CYSTPA) created an
interagency taskforce composed of the ministries of Interior,
Justice, Defense, Economic Affairs, Transportation,
Education, the Department of Health, the Mainland Affairs
Council, and the Council of Labor Affairs. Together with key
NGOs, this task force monitors implementation of the 1995
statute and provides guidance to member agencies through
semi-annual written reports.
In addition to the inter-agency taskforce stipulated by the
CYSTPA, the Foundation of Women's Rights Promotion and
Development (WRP) also serves as a platform to discuss all
women-related issues. The WRP is an NGO funded by the
Executive Yuan (EY). It is chaired by the Premier and
includes the ministers of Interior, Education, Justice,
Personnel Administration, Government Information Office,
Health, and Labor as well as academics and representatives of
NGOs.
The Taiwan High Prosecutor's Office maintains an
Anti-Corruption Center dedicated to investigating and
prosecuting corruption cases involving legislators,
government ministers and other senior government officials,
TAIPEI 00000740 018 OF 035
and high-ranking military officials.
28 H. National Plan of Action
Taiwan has a national plan of action to combat trafficking in
persons. The Action Plan tasks government agencies to meet
various goals by specific deadlines. Goals not specifically
mentioned elsewhere in this report include:
Protection
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) must (1) enhance
efforts to detect and deter fraudulent visa applicants,
especially spouse visa applicants, at its Overseas offices;
(2) improve efforts to crack down on cross-border marriage
brokerage companies suspected of trafficking, and (3) improve
cooperation and communication between Taiwan's Overseas
Offices, the National Immigration Agency, local law
enforcement, and NGOs to combat trafficking rings. These are
ongoing projects.
The Education Department must enhance current efforts to
provide guidance counseling and social services for young
people no longer attending school to help them find lawful
employment and to avoid becoming victims of trafficking.
The targeted implementation date for these new programs is
December 2007.
MOI was tasked to supervise the revised draft of the
Immigration Act, which includes a new chapter on
"Cross-Border Human Trafficking Prevention and Victim
Protection." The Immigration Act bill is currently under
consideration by the Legislative Yuan, and is expected to be
passed before the end of this legislative session in June
¶2007.
MOI has also been tasked to: (1) develop a formal policy for
granting government subsidies to NGOs involved in assisting
victims of human trafficking; (2) establish a mechanism to
evaluate trafficking victims' requests to be returned to
their home countries; (3) formulate a policy to postpone the
repatriation of trafficking victims who may face bodily harm
in their home countries; and (4) submit proposed revisions to
existing immigration laws to allow foreign national
trafficking victims legal residence in Taiwan if they agree
to assist in the investigation, prosecution, and conviction
of alleged traffickers. These tasks must be completed by
October 2007.
On an ongoing basis, MOI must supervise and assist local
government efforts to increase the number of short-term and
emergency shelters for trafficking victims, and to provide
medical care, counseling, legal aid, and other necessary
assistance.
The Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) and MOI must review and
revise the laws governing relations with the PRC, Hong Kong,
and Macau, and submit proposed revisions to allow victims of
trafficking from those regions to extend their stay in Taiwan
or to obtain legal residence in exchange for assisting in the
investigation, prosecution, and conviction of alleged
traffickers. These proposals must be submitted by October
¶2007.
The Action Plan tasks the Council for Labor Affairs (CLA) to
review existing foreign labor shelter facilities and to
submit a proposal to increase the number of available
shelters. CLA has also been instructed to work with local
governments to update databases of multilingual employees, to
create an island-wide network of interpreters to assist
foreign workers. These tasks must be completed no later than
March 2007.
In order to improve protections for foreign workers against
TAIPEI 00000740 019 OF 035
excessive service fees and other side agreements, CLA has
proposed to commission NGOs and other non-profit
organizations to evaluate rules used by other countries to
regulate cross-border employment agencies and to control
contract fees, and to recommend changes to CLA's existing
rules. To protect the rights of foreign workers during
investigation and trial, CLA and MOI have proposed
establishing "victim advocacy units" to provide legal counsel
to workers during the investigative process, starting with
initial questioning. CLA must submit plans to accomplish
these goals no later than December 2007.
MOFA is working to sign bilateral agreements with labor
source country governments to establish mechanisms for the
safe return of trafficking victims to their home countries,
and to increase cross-border cooperation to combat
trafficking. MOJ has sent a draft "Taiwan and Vietnam
Judicial Mutual Assistance Agreement" to Vietnam for review.
MOJ plans to send officials to Vietnam to complete
negotiations and sign the agreement.
Prevention
CLA must enhance training for local government labor
inspectors and counseling personnel to improve their ability
to identify and protect trafficking victims. This includes
requiring all inspectors and counselors to attend special
training sessions to identify and assist victims of
trafficking, and equipping each inspector and counselor with
a handbook and standard operating procedure for identifying
trafficking victims. These goals must be achieved by June
¶2007.
To enhance the quality of medical services available to
foreign workers, including those who are victims of
trafficking, the Health Ministry must draft a multilingual
handbook of common medical issues. The handbook must be
posted on the Health Ministry website, so health
professionals island-wide can use it to inform foreign worker
patients. This must be completed by April 2007.
Prosecution
MOJ has been tasked to train police, immigration officials,
and other law enforcement personnel how to protect a
trafficking victim during an investigation, and how to
conduct trafficking investigations to increase the
probability of conviction at trial. MOJ must submit its
proposed training plan by April 2007.
Section 3 - INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS
29 A. Laws Specifically Prohibiting Trafficking in Persons
Taiwan does not have a comprehensive TIP law, but trafficking
in persons is specifically prohibited by the 1995 Child and
Youth Sexual Transaction Prevention Act (CYSTPA) and Articles
296 and 296-1 of the Criminal Code. According to MOJ, in
2006 three people were indicted for violating Article 23,
paragraph 2 of the CYSTPA and 74 people were indicted for
violating Criminal Code Article 296.
On December 11, 2006, the Legislative Yuan Home and Nations
Sub-Committee approved the revised draft of the Immigration
Act, which includes a new chapter on "Cross-Border Human
Trafficking Prevention and Victim Protection." The
Immigration Act bill is currently under consideration by the
Legislative Yuan, and is expected to be passed before the end
of the legislative session in June 2007.
The "Cross-Border Human Trafficking Prevention and Victim
Protection" chapter requires prosecutors, law enforcement,
and other government officials involved in the investigation
and prosecution of trafficking offenses to protect
TAIPEI 00000740 020 OF 035
trafficking victims' privacy and personal security. The
government is required to provide medical assistance,
psychological counseling, shelter, translation, and legal
services to victims of trafficking, and to secure their
personal belongings. If the victims are children or minors,
a social worker must be appointed to accompany the child or
minor through all stages of police questioning, and if
necessary, investigation and trial of the alleged
traffickers.
The chapter further provides that if trafficking victims
agree to cooperate with prosecutors, who deem their
cooperation necessary and useful to the prosecution, victims
will be afforded all protections available under Taiwan's
"Witness Protection Act." Prosecutors are instructed to
waive prosecution for any crimes occasioned by the
trafficking, and to punish leniently other misconduct by the
trafficking victim. If a victim's testimony is required by
prosecutors, the victim should be issued a temporary
residence permit of six months or less, which should be
extended if necessary. The victim is to be returned to his
or her home country safely upon conclusion of the trial. The
chapter encourages agencies involved in anti-trafficking
efforts to cooperate with NGOs and source country governments
to promote anti-trafficking efforts.
The Home and Nations Sub-Committee also approved a proposed
revision to Article 31 of the Immigration Act, to allow
foreign workers to legally remain in Taiwan until pending
claims against their employer are fully resolved. This
amendment is also being considered by the current legislative
session, which ends on June 2007.
In 2004, Taiwan amended the Act Governing Relations Between
Peoples of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (the "Act")
to increase punishments for cross-Strait smugglers. Article
79 of the Act stipulates that any person convicted of
smuggling Mainland Chinese into Taiwan for profit in
violation of Article 15 of the Act shall be sentenced to at
least three and not more than ten years in jail, and fined up
to US $150,000. Under Articles 79 and 80, boat owners and
crewmembers involved in smuggling are subject to a prison
term of up to 3 years and/or a US $30,000-$200,000 fine and
confiscation of the boat used in the smuggling operation.
29 B. Penalties for Sexual Exploitation-Related Trafficking
Article 23 of the CYSTPA states:
-- One who seduces, permits, facilitates, helps, or by other
means causes a person under the age of eighteen to engage in
a sexual transaction shall be sentenced to more than one year
but fewer than seven years in prison, and fined not more than
NT $3,000,000.
-- One who intends to profit by committing this crime shall
be sentenced to more than three years but less than ten years
in prison, and fined not more than NT $5,000,000.
Article 24 of the CYSTPA states:
-- One who uses coercion, threats, drugs, fraud, hypnotism or
other means to make a person under the age of eighteen engage
in a sexual transaction shall be sentenced to more than seven
years in prison, and fined not more than NT $2 million (US
$57,100).
-- One who intends to profit by committing this crime shall
be punished with imprisonment of more than ten years, and
fined not more than NT $7 million (US $200,000).
-- One who habitually commits this crime shall be punished
with life imprisonment or imprisonment of not less than 10
years, and fined not more than NT $10 million (US $285,700).
TAIPEI 00000740 021 OF 035
Article 25 of the CYSTPA states:
-- One who intends to make a profit by involving a person
under the age of eighteen in sexual transactions through
trafficking, pawning or other means of the same nature shall
be punished with imprisonment of more than seven years, and
fined not more than NT $7 million (US 200,000).
Chapter 26 of the Criminal Code, "Offenses Against Personal
Liberty" provides an all-encompassing statute against
trafficking. Chapter 26, Article 296, "Forcing a Person into
Slavery," states that:
-- A person who enslaves another or places another in a
position without freedom similar to slavery shall be punished
with imprisonment of not less than one and not more than
seven years.
In 1999, the Criminal Code was revised to include Article
296-1, "Trafficking in Persons," which states that:
a) A person who buys, sells, or holds another person in
custody shall be punished with imprisonment of not less than
five years, and fined not more than NT $500,000 (US $16,000).
b) A person who commits the aforementioned offense to cause a
female or male person to have sexual relations with another
person shall be punished with imprisonment of not less than
seven years, and fined not more than NT $500,000 (US $16,000).
c) A person who forces, intimidates, extorts, controls, uses
drugs or other illegal means to commit the offenses described
in (a) or (b) shall receive the punishment prescribed by (a)
or (b), with prison time and fines increased up to one half.
d) A person who introduces, accommodates, or conceals a
victim of the crimes specified in (a)-(c) shall be punished
with imprisonment of not less than one year and not more than
seven years, and fined not more than NT $300,000 (US $9,600).
e) A person who habitually commits any of the crimes
specified in (a)-(d) shall be punished with a minimum of ten
years and a maximum of life in prison and fined not more than
NT $700,000 (US $22,500).
f) A public official who conceals a person who has committed
any of the crimes specified by (a)-(e) shall receive the
punishment prescribed by (a)-(e), with prison time and fines
increased up to one half.
The 1999 revision to the Criminal Code also added Article
231-1, which stipulates:
1) A person who for profit coerces, threatens, intimidates,
controls, drugs, hypnotizes or uses other methods to overcome
the will of a female or male person in order to have that
person engage in sexual relations or obscene conduct with a
third person shall be punished with imprisonment of not less
than seven years, and fined not more than NT $300,000 (US
$9,600).
2) A person who introduces, accommodates, or conceals a
person who has committed the crime specified by (1) shall be
punished with imprisonment of not less than one year and not
more than seven years.
3) A person who habitually commits the crimes specified in
(1) or (2) shall be punished with imprisonment of not less
than ten years, coupled with a fine of not more than NT
$500,000 (US $16,000).
4) A public official who conceals a person who has committed
any of the crimes specified by (1)-(3) shall receive the
punishment prescribed by (1)-(3), with prison time and fines
TAIPEI 00000740 022 OF 035
increased up to one half.
According to MOJ, 36 sex-trafficking cases were prosecuted in
2006, involving 229 defendants. Because Taiwan has no
specialized anti-trafficking law, prosecutors resorted to
various criminal statutes to prosecute alleged traffickers.
Three individuals were charged with violating Article 15 of
the Taiwan-PRC Relations Act (smuggling PRC nationals into
Taiwan, illegal or unauthorized work or conduct), and four
were accused of violating Article 79 (violating the Act for
profit).
Three individuals were prosecuted for violating Article 23 of
the CYSTPA (soliciting or facilitating child prostitution).
Under the Criminal Code, seventeen individuals were charged
with violating Article 216 (using forged government
documents), and twenty-one were charged for violating Article
214 (inducing a public official to perform a false or
dishonest act.) Twenty-eight individuals were charged with
violating Article 231 (procurement) and eighteen were charged
with violating Article 231-1 (forced prostitution).
Seventy-four were charged with violating Article 296
(slavery), one defendant was charged under Article 304 (use
of violence or coercion to compel another), one defendant was
charged under Article 221 (rape), and one defendant was
charged under Article 185-4 (vehicular homicide). Eight of
the aforementioned defendants were charged under recidivist
statutes, mandating prison time of up to five years.
According to MOJ, from the start of 2007, an additional 41
trafficking cases, involving 274 people, have been
investigated. Thirty-nine cases were filed against 253
defendants. Eighteen individuals have been convicted and
taken into custody.
Thirty-eight individuals were charged with violating Article
15 of the Act (smuggling PRC citizens into Taiwan or illegal
employment), and 131 were accused of violating Article 79
(smuggling and/or trafficking of PRC citizens). Three
individuals were also charged with violating Article 82-1 of
the Act (recruiting PRC students without government
permission).
Three individuals were prosecuted for violating Article 23 of
the CYSTPA (soliciting or facilitating child prostitution),
and 35 were charged for violating Article 24 (forcible
prostitution of a minor).
Under the Criminal Code, eleven individuals were charged with
violating Article 216 (using forged government documents),
and eight were charged for violating Article 218 (forging
official seals on public documents.) One individual was
charged with perjury under Article 168. Seventeen
individuals were charged with violating Article 231
(procurement for prostitution).
One individual was charged with violating Article 24 of the
Passport Act (counterfeiting or tampering with passport
documents causing damage to the public).
29 C. Punishment of Labor-Related Trafficking
In Taiwan, labor trafficking offenses can be punished by
administrative fines, jail time, or both. Administrative
punishments for labor trafficking are governed by Articles
44, 45, 57, 63 and 64 of the Employment Service Act, and by
Articles 5 and 75 of the Labor Standards Law.
Employment Service Act
Article 44: No one may let a foreign worker stay and work
illegally.
TAIPEI 00000740 023 OF 035
Article 45: No one may refer a foreign worker to work for an
unauthorized employer.
Article 57: An employer of a foreign worker shall not:
(1) Employ a foreign worker without obtaining an Employment
Permit, or employ a foreign worker after the employer's
Employment Permit has expired, or employ a foreign worker
that has been authorized to work for another employer;
(2) Cause an authorized foreign worker to work for an
unauthorized employer;
(3) Cause a foreign worker to engage in work not within the
scope of the employer's Employment Permit;
(4) Cause a foreign worker employed as a fisherman, household
assistant to change his or her workplace without obtaining
prior government approval;
(5) Fail to arrange for the employed foreign worker to
undergo health examinations, or fail to timely submit health
examination reports to the Competent Health Authority;
(6) Dismiss or lay off a national worker as a result of
having employed a foreign worker;
(7) Coerce, threaten, or by the use of any illegal means
force a foreign worker to engage in work contrary to the
worker's free will;
(8) Illegally withhold the passport or residence certificate
of a foreign worker, or embezzle belongings of a foreign
worker.
(9) Violate any other provisions of the Employment Standards
Act or regulations promulgated pursuant to the Employment
Standards Act.
Article 63: Anyone that violates Article 44 or Subparagraph
(1) or (2) of Article 57 shall be fined at least NT $150,000
and at most NT $750,000; anyone who repeats a violation of
the same provisions within five years shall be imprisoned for
a term not to exceed three years, or be detained for hard
labor, and/or fined an amount not to exceed NT $1,200,000.
Article 64: Anyone who violates the provisions of Article 45
shall be fined an amount of at least NT $100,000 and at most
NT $500,000; anyone who repeats a violation within five years
shall be imprisoned for a term not to exceed one year, or be
detained for hard labor, and/or fined an amount not to exceed
NT $600,000.
Anyone who violates the provisions of Article 45 in order to
profit therefrom shall be imprisoned for a term not to exceed
three years, or be detained for hard labor, and/or fined an
amount not to exceed NT $1,200,000.
Anyone who violates as a usual practice the provisions of
Article 45 shall be imprisoned for a term not to exceed five
years, and in addition, may also be fined an amount not to
exceed NT $1,500,000.
Article 72, subparagraph (3) operates to give an employer a
limited time to correct illegal work situations prohibited by
Article 57, subparagraphs (3) and (4). Article 72 reads in
relevant part:
Where any of the following circumstances has arisen or
existed, the Employer's Recruitment Permit and Employment
Permit shall be annulled in whole or in part:
(1) Any of the circumstances as referred to in Article 54,
TAIPEI 00000740 024 OF 035
paragraph (1) has arisen or existed;
(2) Any of the circumstances as referred to in Article 57,
subparagraphs (1), (2), (6)-(9) have arisen or existed;
(3) The employer has failed to rectify within the specified
period any of the circumstances referred to in Article 57,
subparagraphs (3) and (4).
Labor Standards Law
Article 5: No employer may, by force, coercion, detention, or
other illegal practice, compel a worker to do work.
Article 75: An employer who violates the provisions of
Article 5 shall be imprisoned for a term not exceeding five
years, detained for hard labor, and/or fined NT $50,000.
In April 2006, CLA announced guidelines for heavier fines for
those who employ or arrange employment for illegal foreign
workers. Administrative fines for labor violations are
imposed and collected by local city and county governments.
CLA urged local governments to heavily punish those who
employ illegal workers. Under the new guidelines, an
individual who knowingly hires an illegal foreign worker for
over 30 days or employs two or more illegal foreign workers
for more than 15 days should pay the maximum fine of US
$25,000 (NT $750,000). If an employer commits two offenses
within a five year period, he should face up to three years
in jail and the maximum fine of up to US $40,000 (NT $1.2
million). One who knowingly arranges work for an illegal
foreign worker, or unknowingly arranges work for two or more
illegal foreign workers, should be fined the maximum US
$16,000 (NT $500,000).
Stiffer penalties were also announced for illegal foreign
workers themselves. Any foreign worker who has stayed in
Taiwan illegally for more than six months now faces a maximum
fine of US $5,000, in addition to repatriation and permanent
exclusion from Taiwan. The CLA emphasized that trafficking
victims forced into illegal status by mistreatment or
exploitation would not be repatriated, and their right to
work in Taiwan would be preserved.
Despite the CLA's April 2006 new penalty guidelines, most
city and county governments continued to assess minimum
instead of maximum fines. According to CLA, an employers
found to have illegally changed the place or nature of a
foreign worker's employment were typically fined US $1,000,
not the $5,000 maximum. Employers found to have hired
illegal foreign workers or to have transferred a legal
foreign worker to an unauthorized employer were fined $5,000,
one-fifth of the $25,000 maximum. CLA officials told AIT the
new penalty guidelines were non-binding recommendations, and
that local governments retained discretion over assessing and
collecting labor violation fines.
According to MOJ, in 2006 law enforcement officials referred
to MOJ for possible prosecution 41 cases of labor brokers
illegally detaining workers or improperly demanding
extra-contractual payments, 308 cases of employers illegally
harboring foreign workers, 1584 cases of employers hiring
foreign workers without proper permit, 110 cases of employers
allowing their approved foreign workers to work for an
unauthorized third party, and 618 cases of employers
assigning foreign workers to perform unauthorized work or to
relocate to an unauthorized work site. The majority of these
cases were punished administratively pursuant to Articles 57
and 63 of the ESA, which specifies that illegal employment
and detention of foreign workers can be punished by fines of
NT $150,000-750,000 (US $5,000-25,000), and their licenses to
recruit and employ foreign laborers can be partially or fully
revoked.
TAIPEI 00000740 025 OF 035
Of the aforementioned 2006 ESA violations, district
prosecutors from January 2006 through February 2007 filed 62
criminal cases against 122 defendants for ESA violations.
Twenty-one individuals were convicted of violating Article 63
(illegal employment of a foreign worker). Eight of those
defendants were sentenced to less than six months in prison,
eight were imprisoned for hard labor, and five were fined
between NT $150,000-750,000. Another fourteen individuals
were convicted of violating Article 64 (illegal transfer of a
foreign worker to a third party). All fourteen defendants
were sentenced to less than six months in prison, two were
assigned to hard labor, and five were fined between NT
$100,000-500,000.
29 D. Penalties for Rape or Forcible Sexual Assault
Taiwan's Criminal Code prescribes the following penalties for
those found guilty of the offenses of rape, forcible sex, and
obscene conduct:
Article 221 (normal punishment): Any person who has forced,
intimidated, or threatened any man or woman into having
carnal relations, or has done so by inducing hypnosis or
other means against his or her freewill, shall be punished
with a prison term of not less than three years and not more
than 10 years. An attempt to commit the above offense is
punishable.
Article 222 (enhanced punishment): A person who has committed
the above offense under one of the following circumstances
shall be punished with life prison or a prison term of more
than seven years:
Committing the offense together with one or more persons;
Committing the offense against anyone under the age of 14;
Committing the offense by administering drugs; Committing
the offense and torturing the victim; Committing the offense
while employed on a means of public transportation;
Committing the offense after breaking into an inhabited
building or vessel; Committing the offense with the help of
weapon(s).
Article 224 (normal punishment): A person who has forced,
intimidated, or threatened any man or woman into committing
an indecent act, or has done so by inducing hypnosis or other
means against his or her freewill, shall be punished with a
prison term of not less than six months and not more than
five years.
Article 224 (Section 1) (offenses subject to enhanced
punishment): Any person who has done so under one of the
circumstances prescribed in Article 222 shall be punished
with a prison term of not less than three years and no more
than 10 years.
Article 225 (committing the offense by taking advantage of
the victim's mental or physical disabilities or incapacity):
Any person who has committed the offense of rape against any
man or woman by taking advantage of his or her mental or
physical disabilities or incapacity shall be punished with a
prison term of more than three years and less than 10 years.
Any person who has committed an indecent act against any man
or woman by taking advantage of his or her mental
disabilities or incapacity shall be punished with a prison
term of more than six months but less than five years. Any
attempt to commit the above offense is punishable.
Article 226 (enhanced punishment): Any person who has
committed rape or has committed an indecent act, which has
resulted in the death or his or her victim, shall be punished
with life in prison or a prison term of more than 10 years.
A person who injures his or her victim while committing the
offense shall be punished with a prison term of more than 10
years. The defendant shall be sentenced to a prison term of
TAIPEI 00000740 026 OF 035
more than 10 years if a victim commits suicide or injures
himself due to her sense of shame.
Article 226 (Section 1) (multiple offenses): Any person who
has committed one of the offenses specified in Article
221-225 and has intentionally killed his or her victim shall
be punished with death or life in prison. Any person who has
committed rape or has committed an indecent-act, and has
purposely injured his or her victim shall be punished with
life in prison or a prison term of more than 10 years.
Article 227: Any person who has carnal relations with any
male or female person under the age of 14 shall be punished
with a prison term of not less than three years and not more
than 10 years. Any person who commits an indecent act against
a male or female person under the age of 14 shall be punished
with a prison term of not less than six months and not more
than five years. Any person who has carnal relations with
any male or female person aged 14-16 shall be punished with a
prison term of less than seven years. Any person who commits
an indecent act against a male or female person aged 14-16
shall be punished with a prison term of not more than three
years. Any attempt to commit any of the above offenses is
punishable.
Article 227 (Section 1) (lighter punishment for the offender
under the age of 18): An offender who is under the age of 18
may have his punishment reduced or commuted.
Article 228: Any person who has committed rape against anyone
under his jurisdiction at an institution or facility shall be
punished with a prison term of not less than six months and
not more than five years. Any person who has committed an
indecent act against anyone under his jurisdiction shall be
punished with a prison term of not more than three years.
Article 229 (committing the offense by cheating): Any person
who by fraudulent means induces a person to mistake him or
her for a spouse and then has carnal relations with him or
her shall be punished with a prison term of not less than
three years and not more than 10 years. An attempt to commit
the above offense is punishable.
Article 229 (Section 1) (indictment upon request): Any person
who has committed rape against his or her spouse, or any
person who has committed the offense before reaching the age
of 18, shall be indicted by the prosecutor upon receiving a
request from the victim. The penalties for trafficking are at
least as heavy if not heavier than the penalties for rape and
forcible sexual assault.
From January 2006 to February 2007, 5 employers (or members
of their family) were prosecuted for sexually assaulting
foreign laborers. Prosecutors sought sentences from 7-12
years for each defendant.
29 E. Legalization/Decriminalization of Prostitution
Taiwan criminalized prostitution in 1997. It remained legal
in Taipei City on a small scale until 2001.
According to Article 80 of the Social Order Maintenance Law
(passed in 1991), anyone found to have traded sex for a
reward, financial or otherwise, shall be punished with three
days in jail, or a fine of no more than NT $30,000 (US $910).
Brothel owners, pimps, and enforcers are also subject to the
punishments prescribed in Article 231 and 232 of the Criminal
Code. These laws are enforced.
Article 231: A person who induces, retains, or introduces a
female or male person to have sexual relations with a third
person, or any person who retains her or him for that
purpose, shall be imprisoned for no more than five years, and
fined not more than NT $100,000 (US $3,200).
TAIPEI 00000740 027 OF 035
Article 232: A person who commits an offense specified in
paragraph (1) of Article 231, or paragraphs (1) or (2) of
Article 231-1 against a person subject to his supervision,
assistance, or care as specified in Article 228, or a husband
who commits such an offense against his wife, shall receive
the punishment prescribed by those Articles, with prison time
and fines increased up to one half.
According to August 2006 press reports, former legal
prostitutes and others in Taipei called for prostitution to
be de-criminalized. No formal action has been taken by the
central or local governments.
29 F. Prosecutions
According to MOJ, in 2006, law enforcement officials reported
to MOJ 41 cases of labor brokers illegally detaining workers
or improperly demanding extra-contractual payments, 309 cases
of employers harboring foreigners, 1584 cases of employers
hiring foreign workers without proper permit, 110 cases of
employers allowing their approved foreign workers to work for
an unauthorized third party, and 618 cases of employers
assigning foreign workers to perform unauthorized work or to
relocate to an unauthorized work site. The majority of these
cases were punished administratively pursuant to Articles 57
and 63 of the ESA, which specifies that illegal employment
and detention of foreign workers can be punished by fines of
NT $150,000-750,000 (US $5,000-25,000), and their licenses to
recruit and employ foreign laborers can be partially or fully
revoked.
From January 2006 through February 2007, district prosecutors
filed 62 criminal cases against 122 defendants for violations
of the ESA. Twenty-one individuals were convicted of
violating Article 63 (illegal employment of a foreign
worker). Eight defendants were sentenced to less than six
months in prison, eight were imprisoned for hard labor, and
five were fined between NT $150,000-750,000. Another
fourteen individuals were convicted of violating Article 64
(illegal transfer of a foreign worker to a third party). All
fourteen defendants were sentenced to less than six months in
prison, two were assigned to hard labor, and five were fined
between NT $100,000-500,000.
According to the EY Report on the Prevention of Trafficking,
five human trafficking rings were investigated in 2006,
including four sex-trafficking operations and one labor
trafficking scheme. Thirty-three illegal brokers were caught
during these operations.
According to MOJ, 36 sex-trafficking cases and two
labor-trafficking cases were prosecuted in 2006, involving
229 defendants altogether. Because Taiwan has no specialized
anti-trafficking law, prosecutors resorted to various
criminal statutes to prosecute alleged traffickers.
Three individuals were charged with violating Article 15 of
the Taiwan-PRC Relations Act (smuggling PRC nationals into
Taiwan, illegal or unauthorized work or conduct), and four
were accused of violating Article 79 (violating the Act for
profit).
Three individuals were prosecuted for violating Article 23 of
the CYSTPA (soliciting or facilitating child prostitution).
Under the Criminal Code, seventeen individuals were charged
with violating Article 216 (using forged government
documents), and twenty-one were charged for violating Article
214 (inducing a public official to perform a false or
dishonest act.) Twenty-eight individuals were charged with
violating Article 231 (procurement) and eighteen were charged
with violating Article 231-1 (forced prostitution).
Seventy-four were charged with violating Article 296
TAIPEI 00000740 028 OF 035
(slavery), one defendant was charged under Article 304 (use
of violence or coercion to compel another), one defendant was
charged under Article 221 (rape), and one defendant was
charged under Article 185-4 (vehicular bodily
harm/manslaughter). Eight of the aforementioned defendants
were charged under recidivist statutes, mandating prison time
of up to five years.
The EY Report on the Prevention of Trafficking also stated
that from January through the end of February 2007, law
enforcement officials had investigated 23 additional human
trafficking operations, including four labor exploitation and
19 sexual exploitation rings. According to the EY, 160
traffickers have been apprehended.
The Taiwan legislature is currently considering a proposal to
amend the Passport Statute to punish those who confiscate the
passports of Taiwan nationals with up to five years of jail
time and a fine not to exceed NT $500,000.
29 G. Information on Traffickers and Beneficiaries of
Trafficking
Trafficking of PRC nationals into Taiwan is largely
controlled by smugglers (snakeheads) affiliated with
organized crime syndicates of varying sizes and
sophistication. There are also instances of freelance
Taiwanese traffickers who collude with marriage brokers to
arrange fraudulent marriages with women from the PRC and
other Southeast Asian countries. These women often who
become victims of trafficking upon arrival in Taiwan.
Contract labor brokers are also responsible for much of the
labor trafficking in Taiwan. There are no clear numbers to
indicate what percentage of victims are trafficked into
Taiwan by what means.
There were few official reports of government involvement in
trafficking, although NGOs have accused local police
officials of cooperating with marriage and labor brokers to
block trafficking investigations. There is also no
indication of where profits from trafficking are being
channeled.
29 H. Taiwan Investigation of Trafficking Cases
The Taiwan government actively investigates cases of
trafficking. The National Immigration Agency (NIA), National
Police Administration (NPA), the Criminal Investigation
Bureau, Coast Guard Agency, prosecutors, and local law
enforcement cooperatively plan and implement investigations
and sting operations to interdict labor and sex trafficking
cases. To the extent permitted by domestic law, law
enforcement officials use a variety of techniques and
resources to gather information and evidence against
traffickers, including but not limited to electronic
surveillance, undercover operations, paid informants, and the
use of mitigated punishment and immunity for suspects who
assist with investigations and prosecutions.
From January to late March 2007, Taiwan authorities disrupted
four trafficking operations, including one labor trafficking
operation and three sex-trafficking rings. Altogether,
police arrested 83 suspects in Ilan, Kaohsiung, Keelung, and
Taipei. More than 40 trafficking victims were rescued from
sex- or labor-trafficking exploitation.
29 I. Specialized Training for Taiwan Government Officials
CLA and BLA train local government labor inspectors and
counseling personnel to identify and protect trafficking
victims. All inspectors and counselors attend special
training sessions to identify and assist victims of
trafficking, and are provided with guidelines and standard
operating procedures for identifying trafficking victims.
TAIPEI 00000740 029 OF 035
MOJ prosecutors periodically train police, immigration
officials, and other law enforcement personnel how to
identify and protect trafficking victims during
investigations and how to conduct trafficking investigations
to increase the probability of conviction at trial.
MOFA conducts regular training of its consular officers to
assist them in detecting and preventing the fraudulent use of
marriage visas to traffick women into Taiwan.
NIA and NPA regularly conduct training of immigration and
police officers to improve their ability to detect and assist
trafficking victims.
29 J. International Cooperation in TIP Enforcement
The United States and Taiwan signed an "Agreement on Mutual
Legal Assistance in Criminal Matters" on March 26, 2002.
With U.S. assistance, Taiwan prosecutors indicted an
individual for smuggling PRC nationals into the United States.
29 K. Taiwan Extradition of Traffickers
Taiwan has an informal repatriation agreement with the
People's Republic of China. Under the Kinmen Accord of 1990,
Taiwan and Mainland China repatriate convicted and suspected
criminals, as well as illegal immigrants, to each other's
jurisdiction.
Taiwan has extradition agreements with Costa Rica, the
Dominican Republic, Dominique, Malawi, Paraguay, South
Africa, and Swaziland. Taiwan and the United States have
agreed to a legal assistance framework.
If the extradition candidate is a Taiwan citizen, Taiwan law
requires the government to refuse the request, and refer the
candidate to Taiwan's legal system for prosecution.
According to the MOI and NIA, the lack of formal diplomatic
relations with other countries from which persons are
trafficked hinders Taiwan's ability to extradite persons who
are charged with trafficking.
29 L. Evidence of Taiwan Government Tolerance or Involvement
in TIP
There is no evidence of widespread government involvement in
or tolerance of trafficking in persons. NGOs report that the
level of government competency and awareness of TIP at the
local level is uneven. NGOs also claim that some local
officials are corrupt and work with brokers to turn a blind
eye to trafficking.
Incidents of Taiwan authorities supporting trafficking
directly or indirectly are rare, but incidents do occur. In
October 2006, authorities charged a senior immigration
official with cooperating with a brothel owner to smuggle
more than 80 Chinese prostitutes into Taiwan. In February
2007, police arrested a Kaohsiung city councilmember for
coercing Vietnamese women into prostitution.
There were press reports in 2005 alleging that legislators
and high-level government officials had received kickbacks
from the labor brokerage companies involved in the Kaohsiung
Rapid Transit Company foreign labor scandal. There was
speculation that legislators were personally involved in and
profiting from the importation of foreign labor to Taiwan.
Sources have told AIT that they believe legislators would
oppose elimination of the foreign labor brokerage system for
personal financial reasons.
29 M. Steps to End Official Participation in TIP
TAIPEI 00000740 030 OF 035
Aside from the two cases mentioned in paragraph 29 L, there
have been no reported cases of government officials directly
involved in trafficking. The law provides enhanced penalties
for government officials convicted of trafficking offenses.
29 N. Taiwan as a Child Sex Tourism Destination
Taiwan does not have an identified child sex tourism problem.
The CYSTPA imposes criminal penalties on Taiwan citizens
arrested abroad for having or attempting to have sexual
relations with minors.
29 O. Taiwan Ratification of International Instruments
As a non-UN member, Taiwan is unable to become a party to the
1989 UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. However, the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced in 1995 that it would
respect the "spirit and principles" of the Convention. In
1999, a Child Welfare Bureau was established within the
Ministry of Interior to bolster Taiwan's ability to implement
the Convention on the Rights of the Child and to coordinate
with NGOs. In April 2001, President Chen reiterated that
Taiwan would abide by the Convention.
For the same reasons, Taiwan is also unable to become a party
to the ILO Conventions 29, 105, 182 the UN Convention Against
Transnational Organized Crime, and the Protocol to Prevent,
Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, but the
authorities make every effort to abide by the principles of
those Conventions and Protocols. In November 2006, a
proposal was submitted to the Legislative Yuan recommending
that Taiwan comply with the UN Convention Against
Transnational Organized Crime and the Protocol to Prevent,
Suppress and Punish Trafficking in Persons, even if Taiwan
cannot join. The proposal is still under consideration.
Section 4 - PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS
30 A. Taiwan Assistance to Victims
After being taken into custody by law enforcement officials,
all trafficking victims from the PRC are housed at the
remaining PRC-citizen-only detention facility in Ilan while
awaiting repatriation. Women and underage trafficking
victims are separated from the general detention facility
population. Trafficking victims from other countries, such
as Vietnam, Indonesia, and the Philippines, are housed at the
Sanhsia facility in Taipei County, or are held in local
jails. Trafficking victims are kept apart from the general
population in local jails. The detention centers and local
jails provide victims with temporary shelter, and access to
medical and counseling services while they are awaiting
repatriation. Trafficking victims can be transferred to
local hospitals for further medical treatment if necessary.
NGOs protest the incarceration of trafficking victims, and
continue to lobby the government to halt this practice,
arguing that trafficking victims are not criminals and should
not be deprived of their personal liberty. NIA and NPA
counter that incarceration is necessary to protect
trafficking victims from possible retaliation by brokers or
employers. NGO representatives are permitted to meet with
trafficking victims in detention facilities or local jails.
NGOs urge trafficking victims detained in this manner to
request permission to be sheltered at NGO-operated
facilities. These requests are sometimes granted for non-PRC
citizens.
Taiwan central and local governments subsidize 13 NGO
operated shelters for victims of trafficking. During 2006,
4,447 foreign workers sought shelter in these facilities.
CLA supports 24 Foreign Labor Consultant Service Centers
located around Taiwan. The Centers, operated by local
TAIPEI 00000740 031 OF 035
governments with CLA funding, provide counseling, legal aid,
and labor dispute resolution services.
30 B. Taiwan Funding of NGOs Providing Services to Victims
The central government subsidizes the operation of 11
NGO-operated shelters for trafficking victims. The Taiwan
central government directly subsidizes these shelters, at US
$15 per person per day. During 2006, 4,447 foreign workers
sought shelter in CLA-sponsored facilities, and CLA
contributed NT $8.7 million (US $300,000) for that purpose.
CLA's 2007 annual budget for temporary shelters is NT $9.6
million (US $310,000). The Taipei and Kaohsiung City
governments fully fund one shelter each, operated by NGOs in
their respective districts.
30 C. Identification and Referral of Trafficking Victims
The Ministry of Justice, Prosecutorial Division has completed
a draft guideline for the identification of victims of
trafficking, as required by the Action Plan. According to
NIA, the Action Plan multi-agency task force has already
approved the guideline, which must be approved by the
Executive Yuan before it can be implemented. NIA expects the
guideline to be approved and disseminated to Taiwan law
enforcement, labor officials, and NGOs by mid-April 2007.
The guideline reads as follows:
Trafficking victims are identified as those:
¶1. Scouted, recruited, transported, sheltered, or introduced
to or removed from Taiwan through the use of coercion,
threat, intimidation, spying, or through restraint by the use
of drugs, hypnotism, fraud, debt or any other form of
restraint for the purposes of sexual exploitation, forced
labor, or removal of organs;
¶2. Those under the age of 18 found conducting sexual
transactions should be treated as trafficking victims
regardless of the minor's consent or voluntary participation;
¶3. During the investigation or disruption of suspected human
trafficking rings, police, prosecutors, and other law
enforcement officials are required to pay special attention
to the following types of individuals to determine if they
are victims of trafficking:
(a) Children under the age of 18;
(b) Those subjected to involuntary transportation or
transfer to a different place or employer;
(c) Those subjected to abuse during their transportation to
Taiwan or transfer to another location within Taiwan. Abuse
includes but is not limited to forced confinement or
restricted communication with others, physical violence,
coercion, threat or intimidation, and sexual assault.
(d) Those subjected to abuse at their residence or work
location. Abuse includes but is not limited to forced
confinement or restricted communication with others, physical
violence, coercion, threat or intimidation, and sexual
assault.
(e) Those whose travel or identity documents have been
confiscated by another;
(f) Those who have had excessive amounts withheld from their
earnings, or who have not received fair pay for their work;
(g) Those who have been forced to perform work different
from that which they were agreed to do, or those who have
been forced to transfer to a different employer;
TAIPEI 00000740 032 OF 035
(h) Any other person who can demonstrate he or she is a
victim of trafficking.
¶4. Law enforcement officers are required to conduct
questioning of potential trafficking victims with
interpreters and social workers, if necessary. If the
investigating officer is uncertain of whether an individual
is a trafficking victim, he or she is required to contact the
prosecutor's office for further guidance.
¶5. Trafficking victims must be clearly identified as such
during the booking and detention process, and must be
separated from other involved suspects for their protection.
Once individuals are identified as trafficking victims, law
enforcement officials must contact the appropriate social
welfare and labor services entities to arrange for
appropriate accommodations. Law enforcement officials must
inform trafficking victims of measures available for their
assistance and protection, and request their cooperation in
identifying and prosecuting the traffickers involved.
¶6. If prosecutors determine during further investigation
that an individual is not a victim of trafficking, the
prosecutor shall notify law enforcement for placement of the
individual in an appropriate detention facility.
End of Guideline
Taiwan local governments do not have a process in place to
refer trafficking victims from law enforcement custody to
NGOs that provide short- or long-term care. All PRC citizens
identified as trafficking victims are transferred to the Ilan
Detention Facility. At present, PRC citizen trafficking
victims are not eligible for transfer to NGO-operated shelter
facilities.
Non-PRC trafficking victims are housed at the Sanhsia
facility in Taipei and the Hsinchu detention facility
formerly used to house PRC nationals awaiting repatriation.
Some trafficking victims are also held by local police
departments. NGOs report that, thus far, the Taiwan
government has been unwilling to release trafficking victims
from the Sanhsia and Hsinchu facilities to the custody of NGO
shelters. However, NGOs also report that certain local
police departments have been willing to do so on a number of
occasions, strictly on an ad-hoc basis. NGOs allege the
government, focused on prosecuting traffickers, does too
little to inform detainees of their own legal rights and
remedies against their traffickers.
NGOs report that many trafficking victims presently in
NGO-operated shelters were referred to the shelters by local
law enforcement or Bureau of Labor Affairs (BLA) officials.
If a foreign worker reports illegal work, exploitative
working conditions, or other abuse to the police, the police
will refer the worker to the BLA who will assume
responsibility for the case. In the event of a police
referral, or if the worker complains directly to BLA, BLA is
required to arrange for a labor inspector and police officer
to visit the worksite and investigate the alleged illegal
work or abuse. BLA will also refer the worker to an
appropriate NGO-run shelter. NGOs complain that the
investigation can take longer than six months, during which
time the foreign worker is forbidden from working.
The local BLA office in Taoyuan has established an informal
policy that all victims of trafficking are to be sent
directly to NGO shelters, are not to be incarcerated, and are
not to be returned to the custody of their brokers or
employers. NGOs continue to lobby the CLA and local BLA
offices to institute this practice island-wide.
30 D. Rights and Treatment Afforded to Trafficking Victims
TAIPEI 00000740 033 OF 035
The minority of trafficking victims are housed by
NGO-operated shelters. The majority of trafficking victims
are typically held in special detention facilities or local
jails. Until recently, PRC detainees, some of them
trafficking victims, were held in excess of a year before
being repatriated to the PRC. With recent improvements in
cross-Strait relations, waiting times for PRC citizens
awaiting repatriation are much shorter. While in detention,
victims are provided food and shelter, medical assistance and
psychological counseling, legal assistance, and entertainment
activities. NGOs are granted regular access to detainees,
and are allowed to conduct social and cultural activities.
Any foreign worker who has stayed in Taiwan illegally for
more than six months faces a maximum fine of US $5,000, in
addition to repatriation and permanent exclusion from Taiwan.
The CLA has emphasized that trafficking victims forced into
illegal status by mistreatment or exploitation would not be
repatriated, and their right to work in Taiwan would be
preserved.
In October 2006, CLA amended its regulations to exclude time
spent at a shelter from a foreign worker's permitted work
stay in Taiwan. Foreign workers are permitted to work in
Taiwan for up to three years at a time, for a maximum of six
years total. Before the rule change, the period of stay in a
shelter was counted toward this three/six year limit.
Because working is forbidden while awaiting the outcome of a
labor dispute, and because many foreign workers are in debt
to their brokers, many foreign workers chose to flee the
shelter and seek illegal work.
In January 2007, CLA extended by one month the legal
residency period of all foreign workers with pending labor
disputes. Many foreign workers were confronted with having
their claims dismissed because their Taiwan residency period
had or would soon expire.
The "Cross-Border Human Trafficking Prevention and Victim
Protection" amendment to the Immigration Act now under
consideration in the legislature chapter provides that if
trafficking victims agree to cooperate with prosecutors,
prosecutors can request MOJ permission to waive prosecution
for any crimes occasioned by the trafficking (i.e.,
immigration offenses, illegal work, prostitution, false
documents), and to punish leniently other misconduct by the
trafficking victim.
30 E. Victim Participation in Investigation and Prosecution
of Traffickers
The government encourages victims to assist in the
investigation and prosecution of trafficking crimes. If a
district prosecutor deems the testimony of a trafficking
victim to be necessary to a prosecution, the prosecutor can
arrange for the victim's legal residency period to be
extended. The trafficking victim will most likely be housed
in a detention facility or local jail during this process.
Victims are not allowed to obtain other employment or to
leave the country while serving as witnesses in court cases.
Trafficking victims may ask for compensation by attaching a
civil suit to the criminal prosecution against the
trafficker, but this happens infrequently. Once they have
been arrested, most trafficking victims wish to leave Taiwan
as soon as possible, and few wish to stay or take legal
action against their traffickers or former employers. Taiwan
has increased funding to the Legal Affairs Foundation to
assist trafficking victims with the pursuit of claims against
traffickers.
Taiwan entitles those who have been injured, or the family of
one who has been killed, to request compensation from the
government. With the exception of the PRC, this law extends
TAIPEI 00000740 034 OF 035
to foreign nationals on a reciprocal basis. Taiwan uses its
anti-money laundering law to seize traffickers' assets and to
make those assets available to satisfy trafficking victims'
claims.
Alleging criminal misconduct against an employer carries
significant risk for a foreign worker. Under current law, if
the prosecutor decides not to indict or prosecute the
employer, or if after prosecution fails to convict the
employer, the foreign worker is automatically repatriated.
30 F. Protection of Victims and Witnesses
Trafficking victims are placed in protective custody at
detention centers or in local jails while serving as
witnesses in court cases. The government has a witness
protection law that protects women from retaliation and helps
encourage their cooperation in investigating trafficking
rings. Trafficking victims are permitted to conceal their
identity while giving testimony.
All PRC citizens identified as trafficking victims are
transferred to the Ilan Detention Facility. At present, PRC
citizen trafficking victims are not eligible for transfer to
NGO-operated shelter facilities. Non-PRC trafficking victims
are housed at the Sanhsia facility in Taipei and the Hsinchu
detention facility formerly used to house PRC nationals
awaiting repatriation. Some trafficking victims are also
held by local police departments. On an ad-hoc basis, local
police are sometimes willing to release trafficking victims
to the custody of NGO shelters.
30 G. Taiwan Specialized Training for Officials Dealing with
Trafficking, Especially Related to Victim Protection
In June 2006, the MOJ sponsored six seminars organized by the
Taiwan Women's Rescue Foundation to provide professional
training for prosecutors assigned to trafficking cases. From
November 2006 to January 2007, the Taiwan government funded
three seminars on the resettlement and protection of human
trafficking victims. The events were organized by a
coalition of NGOs to bring together foreign and local
experts, academics, social workers, and government
representatives from the National Police Agency, Council for
Labor Affairs, Health Department, and Ministry of Justice.
During 2006, NGO personnel were regularly invited to speak to
police officers, prosecutors, immigration officials and
others to enhance their understanding of the needs of
trafficking victims.
The NIA, CLA/BLA, national and local police agencies, and the
national and local prosecutors' offices cooperate with NGOs
and civic organizations to identify trafficking victims and
to place them in appropriate shelter environments. NGO
representatives are permitted to accompany victims to police
interviews, labor hearings, and court appearances, and to
provide interpretation and other services.
MOFA conducts regular training of its consular officers to
assist them in detecting and preventing the fraudulent use of
marriage visas to traffick women into Taiwan.
NIA and NPA regularly conduct training of immigration and
police officers to improve their ability to detect and assist
trafficking victims.
30 H. Taiwan Assistance to Repatriated Nationals who are
Victims of Trafficking
The Taiwan National Immigration Agency (NIA) reported that 59
female trafficking victims were returned from Japan to Taiwan
in 2006. The Taiwan government provided medical and
financial assistance, counseling, and other aid to help these
women return to normal lives.
TAIPEI 00000740 035 OF 035
30 I. NGOS Working with Trafficking Victims in Taiwan and
Cooperation with the Taiwan Government
The Garden of Hope Foundation, End Child Prostitution,
Pornography and Trafficking (ECPAT) Taiwan, the Taipei
Women's Rescue Foundation (TWRF), Hope Workers' Center, the
Center for Migrants' Concerns, the Vietnamese Migrant Workers
and Brides Office (VMWBO), the Taiwan Grassroots Women
Workers' Center, the Taiwan International Workers'
Association, the Stella Maris International Service Center,
the Catholic and Presbyterian Churches, and other religious
and secular NGOs are at work in Taiwan to provide shelter,
counseling, legal, medical, and financial assistance, public
advocacy, social and cultural activities, repatriation
assistance, and other services to Taiwan's foreign worker
community, including victims of sex and labor trafficking.
The Taiwan government has a strong working relationship with
NGOs, and is generally open to their input and criticism.
NGOs also receive substantial funding from central and local
government authorities to perform services for trafficking
victims.
¶2. (SBU) TIME SPENT ON REPORT:
FN-10, 10 hours
FN-09, 20 hours
FO-03, 130 hours
FO-02, 3 hours
FE-MC, 1 hour
¶3. (U) POST TIP POINT OF CONTACT:
Brad S. Parker
Political Officer
American Institute in Taiwan
Taipei, Taiwan
Phone: (011) (886) (2) 2162-2086
Fax: (011) (886) (2) 2162-2241
Email: parkerbs@state.gov
WANG