Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07WELLINGTON146, NEXT STEPS WITH ALLIES ON AFGHANISTAN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07WELLINGTON146.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07WELLINGTON146 2007-02-15 21:00 2011-04-28 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHWL #0146 0462100
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 152100Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3882
INFO RUEHXP/ALL NATO POST COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA IMMEDIATE 4739
RUEHPF/AMEMBASSY PHNOM PENH IMMEDIATE 0042
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO IMMEDIATE 0049
C O N F I D E N T I A L WELLINGTON 000146 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EAP/FO, EAP/ANP, EAP/RSP, EUR/FO, AND EUR/RPM 
PHNOM PENH FOR POLCOUNS MCKEAN 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/14/2017 
TAGS: MARR MOPS PINS PREL PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: NEXT STEPS WITH ALLIES ON AFGHANISTAN 
 
REF: SECSTATE 13880 
 
Classified By: DCM David J. Keegan, 
for reasons 1.4 (b) and (d) 
 
1.  (C) Summary:  The GNZ understands the pressures for more 
resources in Afghanistan and will review carefully our 
request for additional NATO/ISAF commitments.  Current NZ 
Defence Force (NZDF) deployments to Afghanistan will likely 
be extended through September 2009, but GNZ will probably not 
increase its commitments, either for the operational needs 
cited reftel or for a new Special Forces redeployment.  The 
Ministry of Defence says it cannot offer more because NZDF 
needs to be able to maintain its forces in the Solomons and 
in  E.Timor.  Australia has asked New Zealand to take on more 
of the burden in Timor, to help enable Australia to cover its 
efforts elsewhere.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (C) On February 14, Pol-Econ Couns and DATT met with 
Deputy Defence Secretary Chris Seed to discuss reftel request 
for further contributions to Afghanistan and NATO-ISAF.  Seed 
said our request was not unexpected.  Over the past months, 
senior NATO officials and  NATO member leaders have made more 
general requests to PM Clark, Defence Minister Goff, and 
Foreign Minister Peters.  NATO SG de Joop Scheffer also 
raised the issue during Minister Goff's January visit to 
Europe.  Canada and the UK have made specific requests for NZ 
contributions to their own operations in Afghanistan, and New 
Zealand Embassy officials have attended briefings at the 
State Department.  Seed said that as a result of these 
conversations, the GNZ fully understands the pressures ISAF 
is facing.  He promised to formally submit the list to 
Defence Minister Goff and senior Defence and Foreign Ministry 
officials, and said they would review it carefully. 
 
3.  (C) Seed said that he expects that GNZ Ministers will 
within the next few weeks agree  to extend NZDF's PRT 
deployment to September 2009, from its current mandate of 
September 2007.  It is also likely the Ministers will extend 
NZDF's other commitments, including  ISAF HQ liaisons, 
logistics assistance, and training for Afghan army and 
police.  It is not/not likely the GNZ can commit any new 
assets this year, particularly Special Forces, given NZDF's 
commitments in the Solomon Islands and E. Timor.  Seed said 
it appears especially likely that NZDF will need to remain in 
Timor at least through 2008, given the situation on the 
ground there.  Australia has also asked NZDF to take on more 
of the Coalition Task Force burden in Timor, to enable the 
Australians to cover their contributions elsewhere. 
 
4.  (C) This is the longest extension of an NZDF deployment 
to Afghanistan since the war began.  (The last extension was 
for eighteen months.)  Seed says this is because the GNZ 
wants to demonstrate its clear commitment to Afghanistan.  In 
addition, the next New Zealand general election will likely 
be held in late 2008, and the extra time will enable the new 
Government to avoid having to make a hasty decision about 
whether or not to extend the deployment again. 
 
 
5.  (C) Emboffs will also discuss reftel request with working 
level contacts at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and Trade 
and Ministry of Defence. 
McCormick