Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 07THEHAGUE343, DUTCH VIEWS ON ADDITIONAL IRANIAN DESIGNATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #07THEHAGUE343.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
07THEHAGUE343 2007-02-23 15:31 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy The Hague
VZCZCXRO6311
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ RUEHROV
DE RUEHTC #0343 0541531
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 231531Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 8296
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 1987
RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PRIORITY 1709
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1748
RUEHAT/AMCONSUL AMSTERDAM PRIORITY 2327
RUEHFT/AMCONSUL FRANKFURT PRIORITY 3646
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASH DC PRIORITY
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 000343 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR ISN, T, EUR, EAP, NEA 
TREASURY FOR TFFC AND OFAC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KNNP PREL PARM KTFN KN IR NL
SUBJECT: DUTCH VIEWS ON ADDITIONAL IRANIAN DESIGNATIONS 
 
REF: A. STATE 19366 
 
     B. THE HAGUE 00304 
 
THIS MESSAGE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED. PLEASE HANDLE 
ACCORDINGLY. 
 
1. (SBU) Both Foreign Affairs and Finance officials say the 
Dutch will not sanction additional Iranian entities until the 
EU completes negotiations over implementing regulations for 
UNSCR 1737. Huib Mijnarends, Senior Policy Officer 
responsible for sanction issues, Terrorism and New Threats 
Unit, Dutch Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA), told Econoff 
February 21 he had passed the nonpaper (ref A) to Dutch 
PermReps in Brussels. Mijnarends said that the EU started 
negotiating implementing regulations February 19, which would 
probably go "even further" than UNSCR 1737 in two main areas: 
first, by denying student visas to any Iranians linked to 
Iran's proliferation or WMD programs; and second, by 
providing the option for member states to suggest additional 
entities beyond those in UNSCR 1737. Since negotiations are 
ongoing, Mijnarends noted the GONL is not ready to discuss 
additions to the annex -- including those designated by the 
USG under E.O. 13382. 
 
2. (SBU) In a February 22 conversation, Erik Ligthart, Deputy 
Director, Financial Integrity Unit, Ministry of Finance (MOF) 
confirmed Mijnarend's assessment that EU implementing 
legislation needed to be completed before the Dutch would 
consider additional entities. He added that MFA would lead 
any GONL action regarding UNSCR 1737. Ligthart also declined 
to comment on the specific entities designated in ref A, but 
said MOF would not oppose future proposals that include 
adequate identifiers -- such as date of birth and passport 
numbers -- and in the case of bulk designations, adequate 
justification (see ref B for earlier post reporting on 
identifiers). 
BLAKEMAN