Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 07SOFIA168, BULGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: ANOTHER ATTEMPT AT
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
07SOFIA168 | 2007-02-08 14:38 | 2011-08-26 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Sofia |
VZCZCXRO2078
PP RUEHAG RUEHAST RUEHDA RUEHDBU RUEHDF RUEHFL RUEHIK RUEHKW RUEHLA
RUEHLN RUEHLZ RUEHROV RUEHSR RUEHVK RUEHYG
DE RUEHSF #0168 0391438
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 081438Z FEB 07
FM AMEMBASSY SOFIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3177
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHINGTON DC
UNCLAS SOFIA 000168
SIPDIS
SIPDIS
SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: PGOV KJUS KCRM EUN BU
SUBJECT: BULGARIAN CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS: ANOTHER ATTEMPT AT
JUDICIAL REFORM
REF: 06 SOFIA 250
¶1. (SBU) SUMMARY: Bulgaria's latest batch of constitutional
amendments, approved [insert date] attempt to reform Bulgaria's
dysfunctional judicial system by creating an OIG-like entity within
the Supreme Judicial Council. (The sentence does not track as
originally written) Building on earlier core amendments???, seen as
a precondition???? for EU membership, the new changes seek to
strike a balance between judicial independence and accountability.
While 2-3-4 amendments, particularly those providing for fiscal
decentralization and abolishing conscription, are non-controversial,
critics have zeroed in on changes affecting the judiciary.
Opponents predict limited effectiveness and warn that
establishment of a judicial inspectorate chosen by parliament could
lead to political interference. END SUMMARY.
¶2. (U) On February 2, the National Assembly adopted a package of
amendments with a particular emphasis on reforming the judiciary.
This is the fourth change in the country's basic law, and the third
in less than four years aimed specifically at increasing the
transparency and accountability of the judicial system. The
European Commission criticized the last revisions, adopted in March
2006as injecting ambiguity into magistrates' independence (reftel).
The Commission's October 2006 report recommended that Bulgaria
address the shortcoming, identifying it as one area that could
potentially trigger EU safeguard clauses.
¶3. (SBU) The new amendments, adopted with broad political support,
strive to find a middle ground between judicial independence and
accountability. The Parliament confirmed the Supreme Judicial
Council (SJC) as the sole governing body over the judiciary,
solidifying its independence. At the same time, MPs limited the
magistrates' immunity to functional ??what, making it easier for
judges, prosecutors, and investigators to be prosecuted for actions
outside their official capacity. The parliamentarians' most
controversial decision was to establish an 11-member inspectorate
within SJC to check and monitor the judiciary's work. The
inspectorate's members will be elected (or selected ?? what is list
of candidates; by majority vote, super majority?) by Parliament to
four-year terms and will have authority to investigate all judicial
operations except those pertaining to case merit. Many leading
judicial figures openly expressed skepticism about the new body's
efficacy, highlighting its unclear mandate, its vulnerability to
political pressure, and the existence of a similar inspectorate
within the Ministry of Justice. Judges confided to us serious doubts
the new body will make much of a difference, especially in what they
characterized as the hierarchical - and often corrupt -- system
where the leadership "does not want to hear the word transparency."
Various EU embassies have warily eyed the judicial amendment,
uncertain of its usefulness or practicality.
¶4. (U) Along with judicial reform, the new constitutional amendments
also allow fiscal decentralization, enabling municipalities to set
local taxes and duties within the boundaries of the law; abolish
conscription and provide for a fully professional army as of January
1, 2008; give parliament budgetary independence; and eliminate the
requirement for a quorum to be present in parliament, except during
actual votes.
¶5. (SBU) COMMENT: While some of the constitutional amendments seem
of dubious merit, others unequivocally represent positive
developments. Fiscal decentralization has been a goal of USG
assistance for many years, with USAID-supported projects actively
advocating for more local budgetary autonomy. The limits on
magistrates' immunity should, over time, increase judicial
accountability and allow the system to rid itself of some of its
negligent and corrupt members. The inspectorate, if staffed by
dedicated, reform-minded officials, should help speed the
administration of justice, lessen internal resistance to change, and
limit the corruption that hobbles the system's effectiveness.
Implementation of the judicial reform will serve as a de facto
litmus test of how well the system self-regulates, but on balance
the amendments overall are a step in the right direction. END
COMMENT
KARAGIANNIS