Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06AITTAIPEI4146, MEDIA REACTION: DPRK

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06AITTAIPEI4146.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06AITTAIPEI4146 2006-12-19 01:05 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXYZ0004
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHIN #4146 3530105
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 190105Z DEC 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3473
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 6108
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 7339
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 004146 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - DAVID FIRESTEIN 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: DPRK 
 
 
ΒΆ1. Summary:  Taiwan's major Chinese-language dailies focused their 
coverage December 19 on Taiwan's new regulations on international 
air tickets.  The issue is that abbreviations, codes, and 
information regarding weight allowances on international tickets are 
hard to understand.  Taiwan's Civil Aeronautics Administration has 
therefore summoned airlines for a meeting, and they reached an 
agreement to add Chinese-language explanations to these tickets 
starting July 2007. In terms of editorials and commentaries, 
Commentator Antonio Chiang opined in the mass-circulation "Apple 
Daily" that the Six-Party Talks are never-ending but in vain. 
Chiang elaborated that this is because the Bush administration has 
become a lame duck, and it cannot deal with the nuclear issue in 
Iran and on the Korean Peninsula at the same time.  Chiang suggested 
that the United States allow all countries in East Asia to join the 
nuclear club [in order to solve the DPRK issue].  End summary. 
 
A) "Never Ending Talk" 
 
Commentator Antonio Chiang opined in the mass-circulation "Apple 
Daily" [circulation: 500,000] that (12/19): 
 
"... The United States originally took a strong position toward Iraq 
in terms of the development of nuclear weapons, but now it can do 
almost nothing.  In order to improve the situation in Iraq, some 
have proposed that the United States should improve relations with 
Iran, or even cooperate with Iran.  The Bush administration has 
become a lame duck, and it cannot deal with the nuclear issue in 
Iran and on the Korean Peninsula at the same time. 
 
"Although China and South Korea do not hope that North Korea 
develops nuclear weapons, they are more worried about the disaster 
that will happen after the collapse of the North Korean regime. 
Hence, China and South Korea can only persuade North Korea 
indirectly, and the international pressure has not really pressured 
North Korea. 
 
"Several U.S. experts consider that the United States cannot control 
this situation [of developing nuclear weapons] even if it wants to. 
Why not just let China and South Korea face directly the 
consequences of nuclear weapons [development] in North Korea? Why 
not just let Japan, South Korea, or even Taiwan develop nuclear 
arms, and let them all join the nuclear club?" 
 
WANG