Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06TUNIS2776, RSVP: EXTRANCHECK: POST-SHIPMENT VERIFICATION;

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TUNIS2776.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06TUNIS2776 2006-11-17 16:08 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Tunis
VZCZCXYZ0019
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHTU #2776 3211608
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 171608Z NOV 06
FM AMEMBASSY TUNIS
TO RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
INFO RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 1668
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 0726
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 2234
UNCLAS TUNIS 002776 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR EB/ESP AND NEA/MAG FOR MAYA HARRIS 
ICE HQ FOR STRATEGIC INVESTIGATIONS 
PARIS AND ROME FOR ICE ATTACHE 
USDOC FOR 3131 FOR FCS/OIO REGIONAL DIRECTOR GREGORY LOOSE 
USDOC FOR OEA/532/M.HAMES/DORIS JOHNSON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: BEXP ETRD ETTC IT TS
SUBJECT: RSVP: EXTRANCHECK: POST-SHIPMENT VERIFICATION; 
MINISTRY OF INTERIOR TUNISIA, LA D.A.A.F.(D335242) 
 
REF: USDOC 04782 
 
1. (SBU)  EconOff was unable to conduct requested 
Post-Shipment Verification (reftel) despite numerous attempts 
to do so.   The ultimate Consignee for this shipment of L72 
laser sights was the Tunisian Ministry of Interior (MOI). 
 
2. (SBU)  The MOI has been reluctant to schedule an on-site 
visit to verify that the purchased equipment is on location 
and being used in accordance with the export license 
agreement.  Post has followed the required formalities and 
has repeatedly requested an on-site visit.  The point of 
contact number listed in reftel led to Mr. Sassi Labben, the 
Administrative Director at the MOI.  The invoice number and 
other relevant information were subsequently faxed to Mr. 
Labben along with an explanation of the verification process 
and a request that an on-site visit be permitted within a few 
days.  When no response was forthcoming, commercial 
specialist again called Mr. Labben and was told that he had 
passed the information on to his superiors and was waiting 
for their permission.  EconOff next brought the verification 
issue up with the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, North America 
Division (MFA).  The MFA was reluctant to get involved and 
recommended that Post continue to pursue this matter directly 
with MOI.  EconOff, through the Embassy's Regional Security 
Office, contacted Mr. Labben and Mr. Tahar Fellous of the 
International Affairs Department of the MOI, explained the 
verification requirement and again requested that an on-site 
visit be scheduled to carry out the verification.   Mr. 
Fellous replied that the MOI misunderstood Post's initial 
request for an on-site visit and explained that MOI was ready 
to send a reply confirming that they had received the 
equipment in question.  RSO interlocutor explained that 
EconOff is required to physically observe that subject 
equipment had been received and that it was being used in 
accordance with the export license.  Mr. Fellous indicated 
that he would check on whether an on-site visit would be 
allowed and that he would get back to EmbOff.  To date, there 
has been no response from the MOI. 
 
3. (SBU)  EconOff also sent a diplomatic note to the MFA 
requesting its assistance in arranging the on-site visit at 
the MOI.  The diplomatic note informed the MFA that if the 
verification was not conducted by Monday, November 13, Post 
would be required to file a negative report regarding the MOI 
laser sight procurement.  During a follow-up call on Tuesday, 
November 14,  the MFA indicated that it was still working on 
scheduling the EconOff's on-site visit to MOI. 
 
4. (SBU)  Recommendation:  Post cannot verify that the 32 L72 
laser sights have been received by the MOI, nor that they are 
being used in accordance with the terms of the export license 
(number D335242).  Post will continue to press the GOT to 
allow EconOff to conduct this verification.  For the moment, 
in the absence of an on-site verification, Post does not 
consider the MOI to be a good candidate to receive sensitive 
U.S. technology based on the inability to conduct the on-site 
verification. 
GODEC