Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06TAIPEI3736, Taiwan Southerners' Views on U.S. Arms Procurements

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TAIPEI3736.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06TAIPEI3736 2006-11-02 07:33 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXRO7118
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHIN #3736/01 3060733
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 020733Z NOV 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2872
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 5871
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 8170
RUEHGP/AMEMBASSY SINGAPORE 6662
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 8208
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 0503
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 1495
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 5463
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 9682
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 7091
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 TAIPEI 003736 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
DEPT FOR EAP/TC, INR/EAP, EAP/PD 
 
FROM AIT KAOHSIUNG BRANCH OFFICE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL SCUL TW
SUBJECT: Taiwan Southerners' Views on U.S. Arms Procurements 
 
 
SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED, PLEASE PROTECT ACCORDINGLY 
 
1. (SBU) Summary: On October 17, at a Legislative Yuan procedural 
committee meeting, Taiwan's Pan Blue legislators once again blocked 
the U.S. arms procurements bill from the agenda for the next 
legislative session.  Given that the Pan Blue opposition has blocked 
the special and supplemental defense budgets 62 times since 
September 2004, opinion leaders in southern Taiwan believe that U.S. 
arms procurements have become a political issue rather than a 
defense issue.  AIT's entry into the debate has further highlighted 
the political nature of the discussion.  They pointed out that the 
Pan Blue Camp, which holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, has 
been determined to block all bills proposed by the DPP 
administration since it lost power in the presidential election in 
2000.  Local elected officials in the south worry that the Pan Blue 
Camp's blocking U.S. arms procurements will sabotage U.S.-Taiwan 
relations.  End Summary. 
 
2.   (SBU) AIT/K discussed the arms procurements issue with a dozen 
contacts in southern Taiwan, including elected officials, scholars, 
businessmen, journalists and college students.  Those interviewed 
represent a full spectrum of political leanings, both green and 
blue.  All interviewees agree that U.S. arms procurements are 
necessary for Taiwan's ability to defend itself from possible attack 
by China.  They believe that Taiwan should possess good-quality 
weapons for the purpose of self-defense or, at least, for 
demonstrating its defense capability to the world.  The interviewees 
also stressed that the government authorities in Taipei should focus 
on trends in armaments to avoid wasting tax money on outdated U.S. 
arms procurements. 
 
3. (SBU) In response to the Pan Blue Camp's blocking the U.S. arms 
procurement bill, Samuel Hung, a university professor in Kaohsiung, 
pointed out that the Pan Blue is targeting the DPP administration, 
not the arms procurement bill.  Hung believed that the reasons held 
by the Pan Blue Camp are merely excuses made to justify its 
political maneuvering to achieve political ends.  Hung went on to 
say that in response to Pan Blue criticism of the price, quality and 
content of U.S. arms procurements, Taiwan's defense authorities 
should make a greater public relations effort to let the general 
public know that those weapons are not of inferior quality, but are 
necessary for Taiwan to meet its defense needs and to maintain 
cross-strait peace.  Hung said that the authorities should hold 
public hearings throughout Taiwan to send the message to the public 
that the most advanced weapons are not necessary to defend Taiwan. 
 
 
4. (SBU) Zhan Yuan-hsiang, an IV grantee in 2005, held that high 
profile public efforts such as debates, TV commercials and public 
hearings will help consolidate mainstream public opinion to pressure 
the Pan Blue camp to pass the U.S. arms procurement bill.  Zhan 
noted that given the fact that the opposition will not change its 
political stance on the arms procurement issue, the DPP 
administration should seek support from the general public by 
intensive and effective public diplomacy efforts. 
 
5. (SBU) Taiwan Solidarity Union Kaohsiung City Councilor Zhao 
Tian-lin stressed the need for Taiwan to acquire defensive weapons 
because China has deployed hundreds of missiles targeted at Taiwan. 
In response to recent media reporting on expensive commissions paid 
to arms dealers in Taiwan, Zhao said that government authorities 
should make the procurement process more open and transparent to 
convince the general public that, compared to other countries, 
Taiwan is not paying more money for the same kind of weapons. 
 
6.  (SBU) Zhao also noted that the general public has become more 
skeptical and inquisitive about all arms procurements since the 
Lafayette Class Frigates procurement scandal in the mid-1990's. 
Zhao predicted that the U.S. arms procurement bill will not be 
passed before the 2008 presidential election, since the Pan Blue 
Camp will continue to block it until then in the hope the KMT will 
recapture the presidency.  Zhao believed that KMT Chairman Ma 
Ying-jeou will take a tougher position on the arms procurement issue 
after he finishes his term as Taipei Mayor.  Now that AIT Director 
Young is seen as entering the political debate, Zhao said, he 
believed  the AIT Director was simply relaying a message for the 
U.S. government and said his remarks help to attract a much greater 
Taiwan audience to the arms procurement issue. Zhao said although 
AIT Director Young's remarks (described by Pan Blue politicians as 
 
TAIPEI 00003736  002 OF 002 
 
 
diplomatic intimidation and violating diplomatic protocol) may have 
upset many Taiwanese people, including some Pan Green supporters, 
the negative sentiment towards the U.S. government in Taiwan society 
will subside soon, since a majority of Taiwanese people believe that 
a solid, strong U.S.-Taiwan relationship is a warranty for Taiwan's 
national security. 
 
7. (SBU) In response to the AIT Director's remarks on the U.S. arms 
procurement bill, Samuel Hung, a research fellow of the Taiwan 
Japanese Research Institute, pointed out that the KMT would still 
continue to block the bill whether AIT entered into the debate or 
not, since the KMT is betting on the U.S. mid-term elections in the 
hope that the Democrats will win the election.  According to Hung, 
the KMT believes that Democrats will not press Taiwan on U.S. arms 
procurement since it encourages the policy of engagement with China 
and will avoid provoking China.  Hung noted that the KMT will wait 
for the results of the U.S. mid-term elections to decide its 
position on U.S. arms procurements.  Hung went on to say that KMT 
Chairman Ma Ying-jeou, under pressure from the U.S. government, will 
give the nod to the supplementary defense budget of NT$6.8 billion, 
currently under review by Taiwan's legislative branch, since Ma will 
not risk losing his perceived U.S. government support for his bid 
for the presidency. 
 
8. (SBU) Kaohsiung University Professor Chih Cheng-ching pointed out 
that recent nuclear tests by North Korea may help consolidate public 
opinion towards a higher-dollar defense budget in Taiwan.  Chih said 
that the new regional political movement in East Asia with possible 
military cooperation among China, Japan and South Korea will push 
the Taiwan government and its people to consider the theater missile 
defense program to safeguard the Taiwan Strait.  Chih went on to say 
that with a perception that Japan and China will increase their 
defense budgets to counter North Korea's nuclear threat, mainstream 
public opinion in favor of increasing its defense budget will soon 
prevail in Taiwan.  Chih also noted that the DPP administration 
should use this nuclear issue to promote U.S. arms procurement, 
since China, under pressure to deal with this issue, will have less 
interest in cross-strait affairs. 
 
9. (SBU) Comment: Although many U.S. arms procurements were proposed 
by the previous KMT administration, those procurements now are being 
criticized as wasteful and impractical by some in the Pan Blue 
opposition, especially the PFP.  Regardless of the opposition's 
justifications in blocking U.S. arms procurement, there is a loud 
voice calling on the opposition to resume a reasonable supervisory 
role instead of carrying on a boycott against legislative review of 
the arms procurement bill.  Many people in the south perceive that 
party interest has outweighed the national interest in this issue. 
They also believe that in the absence of effective government public 
relations efforts, the media and politicians in the north will 
continue playing a dominant role in interpreting this issue.  End 
Comment. 
 
THIELE 
 
WANG