Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06PARIS7478, DEMARCHE TO RESETTLE PROTECTED MIGRANTS FROM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS7478.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06PARIS7478 2006-11-21 13:41 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
VZCZCXYZ0001
PP RUEHWEB

DE RUEHFR #7478 3251341
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 211341Z NOV 06
FM AMEMBASSY PARIS
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3250
INFO RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS PRIORITY 0670
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN PRIORITY 6444
RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN PRIORITY 1860
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS PRIORITY 5951
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON PRIORITY 1015
RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG PRIORITY 0373
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS PRIORITY 0259
RUEHPU/AMEMBASSY PORT AU PRINCE PRIORITY 0686
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME PRIORITY 8099
RUEHTC/AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE PRIORITY 2625
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA PRIORITY 1638
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA PRIORITY 2539
UNCLAS PARIS 007478 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREF FR SMIG SZ
SUBJECT: DEMARCHE TO RESETTLE PROTECTED MIGRANTS FROM 
GUANTANAMO 
 
REF: STATE 181903 
 
1. (SBU)  Poloff delivered reftel points November 14 to MFA 
Office Director-equivalent for Asylum and Immigration Pierre 
Brethes, MFA Desk officer-equivalent for the United States 
Sameh Safty, and MFA Desk officer-equivalent for Cuba Othman 
El Kashtoul, urging the French government to consider 
resettling annually up to a fixed number of protected 
migrants from the Guantanamo Bay Migrant Operations Center. 
 
2.  (SBU)  Brethes and Safty posed the several follow-up 
questions concerning the request that would need to be 
answered before France could even begin to consider receiving 
one or more of the migrants: 
 
-- How large is the group of individuals from which the 
United States government chooses those to resettle? 
 
-- Are the individuals being resettled in danger of 
persecution by groups other than their home governments? 
 
-- What is the specific, official status of the individuals 
being resettled in the United States?  Refugee, illegal 
immigrant, or other? 
 
-- By what means do U.S. authorities determine that the 
individuals being resettled have a "well-founded fear of 
persecution or torture"? 
 
3. (SBU)  While Barthes did not explicitly reject the 
possibility of participating in resettlement of migrants, he 
nonetheless emphasized that France has a standing policy 
against quota-based immigration and would only consider 
candidates on a case-by-case basis.  Brethes noted in the 
same context that France was second only to the United States 
in its openness to immigration and that Haitians already 
figured among the most numerous immigrant populations in 
France. 
 
4.  (SBU)  Comment: It was not entirely clear whether the 
GOF's questions were aimed to make possible or foreclose 
accepting any migrants.  What did seem clear is that the GOF 
would accept only a small number at a maximum, and under no 
circumstances will commit to receiving any predetermined 
number on an annual basis. 
 
Please visit Paris' Classified Website at: 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/paris/index.c fm 
STAPLETON