VZCZCXRO6718
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #5929/01 2850745
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 120745Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 7349
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 0960
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 8421
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 1796
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 8124
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 9495
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 4526
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 0644
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 2231

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 10 TOKYO 005929 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 10/12/06 
 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) How will Japan respond to maritime interdictions? 
 
(2) Shock waves of North Korea's nuclear test (Part 1): US weak spot 
hit -- "double standard" of looking kindly at "nuclear club," such 
as India, Pakistan 
 
(3) Shock waves from North Korea's nuclear test (Part 2): Bush 
administration under fire even in nation over hard-line stance 
 
(4) New prime ministerial secretaries enjoy deep confidence of Abe 
 
(5) Japan, China agree on closer cooperation in energy saving, 
environmental protection 
 
(6) Trend away from bid-rigging part 3: Surcharge leniency system is 
bringing about self-cleansing 
 
(7) JCP chief, other opposition leaders determined to win Okinawa 
election, stop new base 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) How will Japan respond to maritime interdictions? 
 
SANKEI (Page 2) (Full) 
October 11, 2006 
 
In the wake of North Korea's recent proclamation of its nuclear 
test, Japan's response over the advisability of inspecting ships to 
and from North Korea is now being floated as an issue at point. That 
is because the United States is insisting on the necessity of 
maritime intercept operations (MIO) in order to impose sanctions on 
North Korea. However, Japan is shackled with its legal constraints. 
The government therefore deems it difficult for Japan to take part 
in such maritime interdictions. Meanwhile, North Korea is presumably 
in a hurry to miniaturize nuclear warheads. Given such a situation, 
there is no time to lose in shielding Japan with a missile defense 
(MD) system. 
 
"There's no choice but to take action within the bounds of our 
country's laws, but the government has taken steps to control the 
flow of goods and money." With this, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, 
sitting yesterday on the House of Representatives Budget Committee, 
indicated that it would be difficult for Japan to raid and search 
North Korean ships. 
 
The Ship Inspection Operations Law-which stipulates legal grounds 
for Japan to inspect foreign vessels on the high seas-allows Japan 
to inspect ships on the high seas if and when the government 
recognizes a contingency in the neighborhood of Japan. In that 
event, the Maritime Self-Defense Force is allowed under the law to 
inspect ships in international waters near North Korea and back up 
US naval vessels inspecting ships at sea. 
 
The law provides that Japan may inspect foreign vessels at sea with 
consent obtained from the United Nations Security Council or 
otherwise from the governments of their countries. The United States 
has shown to the UNSC members its draft of a sanctions resolution, 
including inspecting all vessels to and from North Korea. If the 
UNSC adopts this draft resolution, the United States will likely ask 
Japan to carry out ship inspections. 
 
TOKYO 00005929  002 OF 010 
 
 
 
Even if North Korea's nuclear test is acknowledged as a contingency 
in the periphery of Japan, the government will have to make a 
cabinet decision on a masterplan incorporating ship inspection, 
rear-echelon support, and other measures. 
 
In point of fact, however, "situations in areas surrounding Japan 
are supposed to be synonymous with conflicts on the Korean 
Peninsula," a Foreign Ministry source notes. "It's considerably 
risky to recognize an underground nuclear test as a contingency in 
the neighborhood of Japan," another government source also says. 
"Japan is not thinking of going so far as to carry out maritime 
interdictions," Foreign Minister Taro Aso stressed in his recent 
press remarks. His remarks were in line with these views. 
 
If the UNSC adopted the US draft of a sanctions resolution, and if 
the United States asked Japan for cooperation, Tokyo would like to 
obtain Washington's understanding by explaining Japan's 
circumstances and invoking sanctions other than maritime 
interdictions. From the start, the legal term "situations in areas 
surrounding Japan" is defined as "situations that will have an 
important influence on Japan's peace and security." This definition, 
however, is vague in its meaning and makes the government's 
decision-making difficult. 
 
If North Korea was really successful in its nuclear test, that is 
truly a matter of life or death for Japan. For the rest, North Korea 
has only to miniaturize its nuclear bombs and payload its ballistic 
missiles with miniaturized nuclear bombs to complete nuclear 
missiles. 
 
There is no guarantee that North Korea will not use nuclear bombs. 
Suppose Japan comes under attack from North Korea with its 
nuclear-warheaded Rodong missiles. Such a worst-case scenario is no 
longer a fiction. 
 
"Generally speaking, we need considerably high technologies to 
miniaturize a nuclear bomb and load a missile with that bomb as a 
warhead. We've yet to find out that they have established such 
technologies." With this, Defense Agency Director General Fumio 
Kyuma indicated before the House of Representatives Budget Committee 
in its meeting yesterday that it would still take North Korea some 
time to develop weapons-grade nuclear bombs. However, he also 
expressed alarm, saying, "We must remain careful." 
 
Is there any means for Japan to defend itself against nuclear 
missiles? "As of today, Japan can do nothing on its own," a senior 
official of the Defense Agency said deprecatingly. 
 
One conceivable countermeasure against ballistic missiles is to 
build an MD system. The Defense Agency plans to deploy Patriot 
Advanced Capability 3 (PAC-3) missiles to the Air Self-Defense 
Force's Iruma base in Saitama Prefecture by March next year. 
 
Japan will defend its metropolitan area with the deployment of this 
intercept missile system as Japan's first ever antimissile system. 
"The defensive range of a PAC-3 battery covers a radius of several 
dozen kilometers," says an ASDF officer. This officer added, "If we 
deploy two PAC-3 batteries on the outskirts of Tokyo, it's well 
possible to defend Tokyo's 23 wards." The US military is also 
beginning to deploy PAC-3 batteries to its Kadena airbase in Okinawa 
Prefecture, and they will go operational within the year. 
 
 
TOKYO 00005929  003 OF 010 
 
 
The USS Shiloh, an Aegis-equipped cruiser of the US Navy, is loaded 
with the Standard Missile 3 (SM-3) as a sea-based MD system. In late 
August, the cruiser arrived at Yokosuka for deployment. The MSDF is 
also planning to mount SM-3 missiles on its Aegis destroyers by the 
end of next fiscal year. 
 
US Forces Japan and the Self-Defense Forces have role-sharing 
scenarios for their bilateral defense planning in anticipation of 
North Korea's missile launches, according to a senior official of 
the Defense Agency. It is critical to ensure the Japan-US alliance 
and its effectiveness in order to cope with North Korea's nuclear 
missiles. 
 
(2) Shock waves of North Korea's nuclear test (Part 1): US weak spot 
hit -- "double standard" of looking kindly at "nuclear club," such 
as India, Pakistan 
 
MAINICHI (Page 1) (Full) 
October 11, 2006 
 
North Korea has set off an underground nuclear test, but did it do 
so out of desperation, prepared to face the sanctions that would 
follow? Will the international community now recognize North Korea 
as a nuclear power? What is America's strategy? We examine in this 
series how the nuclear issue may now unfold. 
 
"Do they really think we will now accept North Korea as a nuclear 
power and respond to it with disarmament talks?" US Assistant 
Secretary of State Christopher Hill, the chief negotiator to the 
 
SIPDIS 
six-party talks, asked angrily after Pyongyang test detonated a 
nuclear bomb. "The DPRK will never be allowed to join the nuclear 
club, Hill said firmly, adding, "We'll let it realize fully how high 
a price it will have to pay for (setting off a nuclear blast)." It 
is questionable, however, whether America has the guts to 
substantiate its words toward North Korea in its policy. 
 
The nuclear club is under America's control. North Korea, once named 
by the US as a rogue state, has now become a nuclear power. This 
leaves Middle Eastern countries including Iran with the impression 
that the US indeed lacks a viable proliferation policy. 
 
North Korea had been suspected of developing nuclear weapons since 
the 1980s. The Korean Workers' Party in its Rodong Sinmun edition 
yesterday, the day marking the 61st anniversary of its foundation, 
tooted its own horn: "Our revolutionary armed force prepared 
everything." 
 
North Korea justified the test as a means to "denuclearize the 
Korean Peninsula," but that is nonsense in outsiders' eyes. 
 
Making the peninsula a nuclear free one is publicized as "the last 
instruction given by the late President Kim Il Sung and the firm 
will of General Secretary Kim Jong Il." But that idea has been with 
the preconditions: "removal of the threat of US nuclear attacks" and 
"normalization of diplomatic ties with the US." 
 
Incidentally, however, in China, there is a deep-seated view 
allowing North Korea to possess nuclear weapons. Shen Dingli, a 
political scientist at Fudan University, said: "Can you assert that 
America's possession of nuclear weapons is a good thing?" This 
remark gives a glimpse of rivalry with the superpower US. 
 
The six-party talks on the North Korean nuclear issue continued 
 
TOKYO 00005929  004 OF 010 
 
 
until last November. During the discussions, Japan, the US, and 
South Korea frequently failed to move in tandem. Japan prioritized 
the abduction issue, South Korea tended to be protective toward 
North Korea, and the US remained tough. The North, taking advantage 
of this difference in attitude, eventually stalled the talks. 
 
Analysts think that North Korea may have followed in the footsteps 
of Pakistan, which set off a nuclear test in 1998. Pakistan suffered 
for its nuclear explosion when the international community imposed 
economic sanctions, but after the 9/11 terrorist attacks in the US, 
Washington lifted the sanctions in view of the strategic importance 
of Pakistan as a partner in fighting the war on terror. Pakistan 
rejoined the international community as a new nuclear power. 
 
This summer the US reached a basic agreement with India to provide 
nuclear technical assistance for peaceful purposes, though that 
country is a nuclear power that has not yet signed the Nuclear 
Non-proliferation Treaty (NPT). This new development has undermined 
the NPT system that aims to stop countries other than the US, 
Britain, France, China, and Russia from going nuclear. The decision 
highlighted America's double standard, as evidenced by its soft 
treatment of Pakistan and India, showing that the US shifts its 
attitude depending on whether the country is viewed as an enemy or 
friend. It is thus no wonder that Pyongyang took advantage of that 
contradiction in setting its sights on becoming a future nuclear 
power. 
 
In 1993, North Korea declared it would withdraw from the NPT, and 
this move set off the first nuclear crisis in 1994. Pyongyang 
succeeded in holding a one-on-one dialogue with the US. In January 
2003, Pyongyang again declared it would withdraw from the NPT, and 
in February 2005 it announced its possession of nuclear arms. On the 
heels of firing Taepodong missiles in this July and conducting a 
nuclear test just recently, Pyongyang is triggering a second nuclear 
crisis. The North Koreans appear to be cleverly using the US-led NPT 
system against it. But whether the North can get membership in the 
nuclear club depends on what policy the US will form toward it in 
the months ahead. 
 
(3) Shock waves from North Korea's nuclear test (Part 2): Bush 
administration under fire even in nation over hard-line stance 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Full) 
October 12, 2006 
 
In defiance of strong international demands, North Korea has 
conducted an underground nuclear test. Following this development, 
the Bush administration in the United States has come under heavy 
fire for its tough stance toward the North. 
 
A former US official familiar with the negotiations between 
Washington and Pyongyang lashed out at the Bush administration for 
its rejection of direct negotiations with the "rogue state": "The 
nuclear test proves that the Bush administration's policy toward 
North Korea is a failure. The administration should have understood 
that the problem can only be settled by negotiations." 
 
This is not the first time for such criticism to be vented. When 
North Korea's alleged production of highly-enriched uranium was 
disclosed in 2002, a former US State Department official warned, 
"The nuclear issue will never be resolved as long as the US 
continues to turn the other cheek or refuse negotiations." 
 
 
TOKYO 00005929  005 OF 010 
 
 
The Bush administration has engaged in talks with North Korea only 
under the framework of six-party talks on the North's nuclear 
problem, 
 
On Nov. 11 of last year, North Korea withdrew from the six-party 
talks in reaction to Washington's financial sanctions. When the Bush 
administration was inaugurated in 2001, North Korea possessed 
plutonium for only one or two nuclear bombs. But US intelligence now 
estimates that the DPRK now has enough plutonium to build about 10 
bombs. 
 
Senior researcher Mitchell at the Center for Strategic and 
International Studies (CSIS) in Washington said, "The Bush 
administration should have shown some flexibility in its policy 
toward North Korea." The recent nuclear test must be a nightmare for 
the US, which places emphasis on preventing the proliferation of 
weapons of mass destruction. A growing number of observers are now 
questioning the Bush administration's rejection of direct talks with 
North Korea, even in face of a critical issue in terms of national 
security, that is, a nuclear threat. 
 
In Japan, former Defense Agency Director General Shigeru Ishiba 
expressed his concern about possible reckless moves by Pyongyang 
should it be driven into a corner by US economic sanctions. He said, 
"If war breaks out, Japan will inevitably be involved." If military 
tensions run high between the US and North Korea, the impact on 
Japan would be unfathomable. "We must consider it as a possibility 
that the US will respond to bilateral talks with North Korea," 
Ishiba said, but under the current situation, Japan cannot easily 
suggest to the US that it enter into bilateral negotiations with the 
North. 
 
Former South Korean President Kim Dae Jung, who promoted a policy of 
reconciliation with the North, exchanged views with President Roh 
Moo Hyun on Oct. 10 and stressed the need for dialogue between the 
US and North Korea. His suggestion represents the South Korean 
government's longtime dissatisfaction with the Bush administration's 
approach. 
 
But the US government apparently has no intention for now of 
reviewing its strategy toward North Korea. In a press conference on 
Oct. 10, White House Spokesman Snow reiterated that the government 
would continue the same policy line. 
 
CSIS' Mitchell said, "During the remaining two years of its term, 
the Bush administration can be expected to heighten its efforts to 
drive North Korea further into isolation through expanded 
cooperation with the remaining five members of the six-party talks 
and other countries." 
 
The view shared by experts is that North Korea, now prepared for 
"isolation," has mapped out a long-term strategy to become a nuclear 
power. The final goal of that strategy is to have the US sit down at 
the negotiating table to solicit a pledge guaranteeing the survival 
of the regime led by Kim Jong Il. 
 
In direct talks with North Korea (in October 1994), the US agreed to 
provide the North of two light-water reactors in exchange for 
Pyongyang's suspension of its nuclear development program. Pyongyang 
took this agreement as a major victory in its negotiations with the 
US. The agreement was abrogated when allegations that North Korea 
was engaged in a secret nuclear program emerged in 2002. But some 
observers, keeping the agreement in mind, speculate that the North 
 
TOKYO 00005929  006 OF 010 
 
 
might be hoping to hold similar negotiations again. 
 
The series of moves by North Korea starting with the missile 
launches in July indicates, in a sense, the North's desire to draw 
the US into nuclear disarmament negotiations this time, instead of 
those on scrapping its nuclear weapons program. 
 
Although the Bush administration has categorically said there will 
be no policy switch, it may find itself facing a real nuclear and 
missile threat in the near future. 
 
(4) New prime ministerial secretaries enjoy deep confidence of Abe 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 5) (Almost full) 
Evening, October 11, 2006 
 
With the inauguration of the cabinet of Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, 
all five prime ministerial secretaries were replaced. A noncareer 
bureaucrat, who enjoys the confidence of Abe, was picked as 
secretary for political affairs. Four career officials from the 
 
SIPDIS 
Ministry of Finance (MOF), the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA), 
the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry (METI), and the National 
Police Agency (NPA) were chosen as secretaries for administrative 
affairs, as before. All five secretaries have close relationships 
with Abe. Since Abe is ready to go up against the bureaucracy in 
order to accelerate his reform drive, the four secretaries will 
likely find themselves on the horns of a dilemma. 
 
"Cheers!" On the night of Sept. 29, three days after the launching 
of the Abe government, the prime minister and his five secretaries 
got together at a Japanese restaurant in Tokyo. When Abe started 
drinking Oolong tea, the five drank up their glasses of beer without 
hesitating. 
 
Unprecedented appointment of Yoshiyuki Inoue as chief secretary 
 
Yoshiyuki Inoue, 43, was appointed as secretary for political 
affairs. Inoue found a job in the now defunct Prime Minister's 
Office (currently the Cabinet Office) in 1988, after working for 
Japan National Railway (JNR) until it was privatized. He served as 
administrative secretary to then Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Abe 
from July 2000 to September 2003. He was named secretary for 
political affairs to then Chief Cabinet Secretary Abe in November 
¶2005. It is unprecedented for a noncareer bureaucrat to be appointed 
to the post of chief secretary to the prime minister. 
 
He gave up on attending a university for family reasons. After 
graduating from high school in 1981, he worked at JNR as an engine 
QQee@Wdriver for the Shinkansen bullet train. He graduated from the 
economics department of Nihon University through correspondence 
courses. He was placed in charge of reform of public interest 
corporations and the project of constructing a new official 
residence (Kantei). He also worked at the abduction issue liaison 
office in the Cabinet Secretariat. Abe praised him, saying, "He 
works for me and for the country wherever and whenever he can. He is 
a reliable person." 
 
Kazuho Tanaka, MOF official, has personal ties with many ruling 
party lawmakers 
 
Kazuho Tanaka, 51, a Ministry of Finance official, entered MOF in 
1979, worked at the Budget Bureau, Financial Bureau, and Secretariat 
Division. He also served as budget examiner for the Ministry of 
 
TOKYO 00005929  007 OF 010 
 
 
Health, Labor and Welfare. The point of contact between Tanaka and 
Abe was the health and welfare policy clique in the Liberal 
Democratic Party. Since he has personal ties with many ruling Diet 
members, he will be a key person in dealing with social security 
reform. 
 
Shigeru Kitamura, NPA official, handled North Korea's abduction 
issue 
 
Shigeru Kitamura, 49, joined the National Police Agency in 1980, was 
in charge of the abduction issue as director of the NPA Foreign 
Affairs Division after serving as Tokushima Prefectural Police head 
and NPA's Security Division chief. He reportedly gave helpful 
information to Abe, when he was on the Liberal Democratic Party's 
taskforce for the abduction Issue and was chief cabinet secretary. 
 
Hajime Hayashi, MOFA official, favorite of Vice Minister Yachi 
 
Hajime Hayashi, 48, entered the Foreign Ministry in 1982, serving in 
the North American Affairs Bureau and the Treaties Bureau. He is 
believed to be a favorite of Administrative Vice Minister Shotaro 
Yachi, who is close to Abe. 
 
Takaya Imai, METI official, worked at major bureaus, including the 
Manufacturing Industries Bureau 
 
Takaya Imai, 48, entered the Ministry of International Trade and 
Industry (MITI, which is now METI) in 1982. He is a nephew of 
Takashi Imai, honorary chairman of Nippon Steel, who chairs the 
study group of business leaders supporting Abe. He has handled such 
major issues as industrial policy and energy strategy. Since he 
assumed his current secretarial post, he has devoted himself to 
preparing Diet replies for Abe, working regularly until around 2:00 
a.m. 
 
The five secretaries serve as liaison bridges between the Kantei and 
government offices. However, under the Abe administration, they have 
to coordinate views also with special advisors to the prime 
minister. It is certain that their duties will increase as Abe 
intends to strengthen the Kantei-led management. 
 
(5) Japan, China agree on closer cooperation in energy saving, 
environmental protection 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 5) (Full) 
October 9, 2006 
 
In their joint news statement, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe and Chinese 
President Hu Jintao stressed the need to deepen cooperative 
relations in such areas as energy, environmental protection, 
financial services, information-communication technology, and 
protection of intellectual property rights. In order to keep a lid 
on possible trade friction as a result of economic relations 
becoming closer between Japan and China as a rising power, it is now 
imperative for the two governments to strengthen their cooperative 
setup. The statement noted, "The two countries will push ahead with 
talks at such levels as cabinet ministers and officials concerned, 
as well as dialogue between the public and private sectors." 
 
The Japanese and Chinese leaders cited energy as the sector in which 
the two countries strengthen cooperation for mutual benefits on a 
priority basis. China has become the second largest energy-consuming 
country, following the United States. Should China continue to use 
 
TOKYO 00005929  008 OF 010 
 
 
oil at the current pace, the security of Japan's procurement will be 
undermined. Keeping such a possibility in mind, the government has 
decided to help China to reduce its energy consumption. 
 
In the energy-saving area, the two countries have already started 
efforts to upgrade cooperative relations, including the holding of 
an international conference in May bringing together representatives 
from both the public and private sectors of the two countries. 
China's energy efficiency is said to be only one-10th of Japan's. 
The Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry intends to offer 
cooperation for China to improve its energy efficiency by offering 
advice on fuel efficiency standards for autos and energy-saving 
management of plants. 
 
As for development of alternative energy resources, the ministry 
will help China to effectively use coal. China uses coal for about 
70% of total primary energy consumption. Japan also plans to 
transfer its technology to liquefy coal at high temperatures or 
pressures and produce gasoline and other products. A plan to 
commercialize it in 2010 is also underway, and Japan hopes to grow 
it into a large-scale cooperative project. 
 
Since China is the largest producer of SO2, Japan might be seriously 
affected by acid rain. In the environment area, Japan plans to offer 
assistance to China on its policies and technologies to overcome 
public environmental hazard, based on its experience. 
 
Infringements by Chinese companies of Japan's intellectual property 
rights, such as technologies and trademarks, are likely to stand in 
the way of good bilateral economic ties. The Japanese government is 
willing to work on China to establish a rigid intellectual 
property-protection system, as well as to provide know-how to 
prevent Chinese firms from exporting fake brand-name products at the 
water's edge. 
 
(6) Trend away from bid-rigging part 3: Surcharge leniency system is 
bringing about self-cleansing 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 13) (Abridged slightly) 
September 23, 2006 
 
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries was the first company that was eligible 
for the leniency system. The company voluntarily reported its 
involvement in bid-rigging over a project to install tunnel 
ventilators sponsored by the former Metropolitan Expressway Public 
Corporation (now Metropolitan Expressway Company Ltd.). Senior 
Managing Director Hideo Egawa, who reported at the company's board 
meeting his decision to report the company's involvement in 
bid-rigging activities to the Fair Trade Commission (FTC), made this 
remark: "There were no arguments. No one opposed the idea." 
 
Morale remain dampened 
 
Being made the target of investigations many times over suspicion of 
violating the Antimonopoly Law, Mitsubishi Heavy Industries has been 
pointedly criticized as a regular participant in bid-rigging 
activities. A source connected with the company said, "Our employees 
are proud that their company launches rockets, but their morale was 
dampened when their company was called a bid-rigging company." 
 
The Tokyo High Public Prosecutors Office last May embarked on a 
forcible investigation into a bid-rigging case over the construction 
of a bridge. They arrested the then deputy manager of the Bridge 
 
TOKYO 00005929  009 OF 010 
 
 
Construction Department of Mitsubishi Heavy Industries. Following 
the incident, the company in August the same year set up an 
order-intake rationalization committee chaired by Senior Managing 
Director Egawa. The panel scrutinized all business sections and 
found that bid-rigging was carried out over the construction of 
tunnel facilities. 
 
After determining that bid-rigging was actually carried out, public 
prosecutors late last fall got hold of what actually happened 
through repeated hearings of the circumstances by attorneys. At that 
time, the details of a surcharge reduction system, which was to 
become one of the showcases of the revised Antimonopoly Law to be 
implemented early in the next year, were beginning to become known. 
The company decided to exploit this system, but Egawa remained 
reticent about the issue, simply saying, "It was a natural course of 
action." 
 
A source familiar with the internal affairs of the FTC said, "In 
order to demonstrate the revised Antimonopoly Law, too, public 
prosecutors wanted a leading company as the target of the first 
application of the leniency system." The FTC received a tip on 
bid-rigging over the construction of tunnel facilities in perfect 
harmony between public prosecutors and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, 
which wanted to apply for the application of the leniency system. 
 
The FTC charged five companies with bid-rigging over the 
construction of tunnel facilities. Of the five, Mitsubishi Heavy 
Industries, which first admitted to unfair trade practices, was 
exempted from paying surcharges. Ishikawajima-Harima Heavy 
Industries and Kawasaki Heavy Industries, which did so after they 
were subjected to raids by public prosecutors, were eligible for a 
30% reduction. Hitachi did not admit to unfair trade practices, 
since it was not aware that it was practicing bid-rigging." Ebara 
Corporation did so, but failed to become one of three applicants 
eligible for the application of the leniency system. Surcharges they 
paid totaled 1.097 billion yen. 
 
Voluntary restraint on "sweat-expending" rule 
 
A series of crackdowns on bid-rigging practices and the enforcement 
of the revised Antimonopoly Law have changed business practices in 
the plant-construction industry. For instance, the industry had a 
so-called sweat-expending rule, which determined successful bidders, 
based on to what extent bidders contributed to project sponsors, 
such as local governments and consulting companies, through prior 
cooperation for design. 
 
Power distribution is changing in the bridge construction field not 
only because a number of companies pulled out of this business or 
curtailed participation in it, but also because an open public 
bidding system is restoring its functions. Yokokawa Bridge has 
received orders for the construction of three bridges in Nagasaki 
since this spring. An executive of the company stressed the changes 
occurred: "Until now, Nagasaki has been the stronghold of Mitsubishi 
Heavy Industries, which has a shipbuilding yard. We have had no room 
to take part, but..." 
 
Companies are complaining: "The rate of a contract price to an 
estimated price is above the 60% level in most projects. This is 
indeed difficult." Another wave of the selecting out and 
reorganization of companies is about to come. 
 
(7) JCP chief, other opposition leaders determined to win Okinawa 
 
TOKYO 00005929  010 OF 010 
 
 
election, stop new base 
 
AKAHATA (Page 1) (Full) 
October 12, 2006 
 
A rally was held in Tokyo yesterday evening to encourage Keiko 
Itokazu, who will run in Okinawa Prefecture's Nov. 19 gubernatorial 
election, in which the question of whether to allow the US military 
to have a new base built in the island prefecture will be the 
biggest issue. The event was held with the participation of Kazuo 
Shii, chairman of the Presidium of the Japanese Communist Party, 
Yukio Hatoyama, secretary general of the Democratic Party of Japan 
(Minshuto), Mizuho Fukushima, president of the Social Democratic 
Party (Shaminto), and Yasuo Tanaka, representative of the New Party 
Nippon (Shinto Nippon). There were also many Dietmembers, labor 
union representatives, and citizens. They vowed to band together and 
win the election. 
 
"The campaign issue is whether we should let them build a new 
military base," Shii said in his encouragement of Itokazu. "The 
election is very important not only for the people of Okinawa 
Prefecture but also for the future of Japan," Shii stressed. He 
added: "Our five parties will enter into a sound policy agreement to 
aim for an Okinawa with no military bases, and we will never let 
them build any new base. We're now ready to struggle together. We 
will solidify this stance. I'm sure we can win if we deliver our 
voice to the population of Okinawa Prefecture. The Japanese 
Communist Party will do its best." 
 
At the same time, Shii emphasized: "If she wins, we can stop the 
realignment of US forces in Japan. So the other side is also 
desperate. Let us also struggle hard to back her up, and let us win 
without fail." 
 
Hatoyama criticized the government's plan to build a new base in a 
coastal area of Camp Schwab as "deceitful." He stated that the DPJ 
would do its best to win the election. 
 
Fukushima stressed, "Let us win back the prefecture's governorship 
for the first time in eight years, and let us change Japanese 
politics from Okinawa." 
 
Itokazu, appearing last, expressed her determination, and she 
criticized Governor Inamine who remains unable to show any clear-cut 
attitude although 75% of Okinawa Prefecture's people are opposed to 
building a new military base with a V-shaped pair of airstrips in 
Camp Schwab's coastal area. "The government has forced 75% of all US 
military bases (in Japan) on the people of Okinawa Prefecture, and 
the Constitution-guaranteed right to live has been trampled," 
Itokazu said, adding: "We will not let them build any more bases, 
and we will not let them leave the bases as the negative legacy for 
another 50 years or 100 years. So I made up my mind to run." She 
concluded, "Backed by the voice of Okinawa Prefecture's people, I 
want to struggle against the Japanese and US governments." 
 
SCHIEFFER