Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06QUITO2457, ELECTIONS: DEBATE SHARPENS ECUADOR'S CHOICE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06QUITO2457.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06QUITO2457 2006-10-06 22:25 2011-05-02 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Quito
VZCZCXYZ0012
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHQT #2457/01 2792225
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 062225Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY QUITO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5414
INFO RUEHBO/AMEMBASSY BOGOTA PRIORITY 6047
RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 2073
RUEHLP/AMEMBASSY LA PAZ OCT 0131
RUEHPE/AMEMBASSY LIMA PRIORITY 1022
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHDC
RHMFISS/CDR USSOUTHCOM MIAMI FL
UNCLAS QUITO 002457 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
PLEASE PASS ALSO TO USOAS AND USAID/LAC 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KDEM PGOV EC
SUBJECT: ELECTIONS: DEBATE SHARPENS ECUADOR'S CHOICE 
 
 
1.  (SBU) Summary:  Despite the staid format of a televised 
CNN debate on October 5, the exchange sharpened contrasts 
among the top four contenders.  Alvaro Noboa, regarded as a 
fairly poor debater, exceeded expectations by taking the 
offensive against Correa, while Leon Roldos and Cynthia 
Viteri made little news courting their bases.  The debate 
probably helped Noboa emerge as the most viable alternative 
to a Correa victory in the first round.  Front-runner Rafael 
Correa also made headlines during and after the presidential 
debate denying the FARC is a terrorist group, provoking an 
immediate reaction from Bogota.  End Summary. 
 
Format, Dynamics 
---------------- 
 
2.  (U) The less than hour-long live debate was televised 
with commercial breaks by a local channel and on CNN in 
Espanol, with a potential audience of 20 million.  The format 
was somewhat stilted, with responses limited to one minute 
and follow-up questions not apportioned evenly.  All four top 
candidates responded to the same questions, with the 
exception of Viteri, who was cut off on the last question due 
to time constraints.  Noboa and Roldos chose to linger 
afterwards and mingle at the reception, packed with Quito's 
elites.  Roldos greeted pre-positioned cheering crowds from 
the balcony of Quito's elegant Teatro Sucre. 
 
Thrown Fruit--Noboa Takes the Offensive 
--------------------------------------- 
 
3.  (SBU) After a shaky start commenting on Correa supporters 
tossing tangerines outside the theater (effectively countered 
by Correa), Noboa regained his footing, drawing laughs with a 
promise to pelt Correa with bananas in the second round. 
More chuckles ensued among the elite audience, under strict 
orders of silence, with Noboa's sarcastic reference to Correa 
as "Colonel Correa," (a reference to Correa's links to 
Chavez).  It is less clear if Noboa, a self-financed 
billionaire, scored with his demands that the "millionairio" 
campaigns of Correa and Roldos reveal their list of donors 
and campaign spending.  (Noboa is outspending both). 
 
4.  (SBU) Noboa did win rare points for ideological clarity, 
saying flatly that his government would not seek relations 
with Venezuela or Cuba ("I'm no hypocrite") and that he would 
sign an FTA with the U.S. and not put the issue to a 
referendum.  Corrupt officials would be sent to Cuba as 
punishment, he joked, emphasizing his antipathy to Castro's 
regime.  Noboa added another jab at Correa late in the 
debate, noting that while "Ecuadorians are hungry, and are 
tired of the blah blah blah" of intellectuals like Correa. 
 
Correa Caught Out on FARC 
------------------------- 
 
5.  (SBU) Correa separated himself from the field on his 
plans for radical reform, a constituent assembly, and his 
anti-FTA stance.  He linked himself publicly to the full 
gamut of Latin American leftist leaders, including Chavez, 
and was the only candidate to defend instability, or more 
specifically the right of the people to overthrow presidents 
who have "betrayed" national interests or their campaign 
promises.  Pressed for having said a Constituent Assembly 
would be free to decide whether to ditch the dollar, Correa 
came off defensively trying to put the quote into context. 
He deflected a direct question about Chavez by noting that 
the U.S. is Venezuela's largest trade partner. 
 
6.  (U) Later, in a television interview the next day, Correa 
confirmed that he does not consider the FARC a terrorist 
organization, but rather "guerrilleros."  Correa decried 
ignorance on the topic and pointed out that the GOE has 
always stopped short of calling the FARC terrorists, saying 
that would be tantamount to involving themselves in a 
neighbor's internal conflict.  The Department's 
classification of the FARC as a terrorist organization, 
Correa claimed, was done to permit U.S. troops to deploy to 
any part of the world to combat them.  "The moment we 
classify the FARC as a terrorist group, we open the doors for 
a U.S. invasion and also declare war on the FARC, involving 
us in a problem that is not ours."  Correa's statements drew 
comment from Colombian VP Francisco Santos, who told the 
press that Correa's claim did "more harm to Ecuador than to 
Colombia." 
 
Roldos and Viteri Appeal to Stability, Women 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
7.  (U) Roldos' repeatedly emphasized his personal probity, 
stability and good governance and promoted "positive" change. 
 At one point Roldos held out to the cameras his "clean 
hands," citing his personal example and honesty.  Viteri, 
meanwhile, explicitly appealed for the women's vote, 
promising to "put a woman's face" on governance.  She joined 
Correa in demanding Colombian compensation for health effects 
of fumigations on the border. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
8.  (SBU) Correa's aides immediately sought to counter the 
blowback from his FARC statement (including by immediate 
clarifying text messages to journalists -- a sign of the 
campaign's effective Mexican-run "war room" operation) by 
pointing out (correctly) that his position went no further 
than that of the GOE, which also refuses to classify the FARC 
as terrorist.  But it made for a day of press attention that 
threw them off message.  In the debate, Correa appears to 
have been hurt by increasingly high expectations of his 
supporters.  Having outshone his opponents in wit and 
erudition in two previous televised debates, Correa seemed 
less impressive in this less flexible format.  Noboa, in 
contrast, probably won a bounce by exceeding low expectations 
based on his previous performances. 
JEWELL