Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ANKARA5952, TERRORISM FINANCE: COURT REJECTS GOVERNMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ANKARA5952.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ANKARA5952 2006-10-16 14:43 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ankara
VZCZCXRO0415
RR RUEHDA
DE RUEHAK #5952 2891443
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 161443Z OCT 06
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEAWJA/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC
RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9413
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
INFO RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN 0330
RUEHRH/AMEMBASSY RIYADH 0618
RUEHDA/AMCONSUL ADANA 1232
RUEHIT/AMCONSUL ISTANBUL 1469
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS ANKARA 005952 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
TREASURY FOR OTI RLOEFFLER AND JSERAFINI 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: KTFN PTER EFIN ETTC TU
SUBJECT: TERRORISM FINANCE: COURT REJECTS GOVERNMENT 
ATTEMPT TO WITHDRAW AL-QADI APPEAL 
 
REF: A. ANKARA 5440 
 
     B. SECSTATE 147545 
 
1. (SBU) On October 12, the Administrative Chamber of the 
Danistay (Council of State) rejected the Government's 
application to withdraw its appeal of the al-Qadi case. As 
explained reftel, the Government (Prime Ministry and MFA) had 
filed appeals of the Danistay's July 20 ruling that 
invalidated the Council of Ministers' 2001 freeze of 
al-Qadi's assets.  However, Prime Minister Erdogan later 
instructed his subordinates to withdraw the appeal (i.e. let 
the July 20 pro-al-Qadi ruling stand).  It is this 
application that the Administrative Chamber has now rejected. 
 
 
2. (SBU) A judge from the Administrative Chamber told us that 
the Chamber's action will allow the appeal process to go 
forward and that al-Qadi's assets remain frozen in the 
meantime.  During a thirty-day comment period, the Government 
or al-Qadi have an opportunity to comment, and the 
Administrative Chamber will then begin to consider the 
appeal.  MFA officials were unsure how long the appeals 
process would take. The Administrative Chamber cited the 
public interest in rejecting the withdrawal. 
 
3. (SBU) Comment: MFA officials were relieved that the court 
had allowed the appeal to go forward, thereby avoiding a 
situation in which the Prime Minister's action would have put 
Turkey out of compliance with UN Security Council Resolution 
1267.  The danger of such non-compliance remains, however, 
albeit at a later date, should the appeals court uphold the 
July 20 decision and unfreeze the assets. 
 
4. (SBU) Action request: In a meeting prior to the 
Administrative Chamber's latest decision, MFA Director 
General for Legal Affairs Cinar Aldemir was very interested 
in the possibility of additional information from U.S. 
experts on the issues of designation and listing, as well as 
de-listing under 1267 committee procedures. In particular, he 
is interested in how to strike a balance between deterring 
the financing of terrorism and human rights and due process 
concerns.  Given Aldemir and others' interest and the global 
implications of a court reversal of a 1267 freeze in Turkey, 
post requests a USG presentation on this topic, as offered in 
ref b. 
 
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/ 
 
WILSON