Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06PRETORIA3722, NUCLEAR FUEL SUPPLY ASSURANCES

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PRETORIA3722.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06PRETORIA3722 2006-09-07 13:53 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Pretoria
VZCZCXRO3770
RR RUEHDU RUEHJO
DE RUEHSA #3722 2501353
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 071353Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY PRETORIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 5544
INFO RUEHTN/AMCONSUL CAPE TOWN 3300
RUEHDU/AMCONSUL DURBAN 8092
RUEHJO/AMCONSUL JOHANNESBURG 5188
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHINGTON DC
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0129
UNCLAS PRETORIA 003722 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ENRG KNNP PARM PREL SF
SUBJECT: NUCLEAR FUEL SUPPLY ASSURANCES 
 
REF: STATE 129965 
 
1. (U) Sensitive but Unclassified; Protect Accordingly.  Not 
for Internet Distribution. 
 
2. (SBU) Incoming and outgoing Econ M/C's and Econoff 
presented August 31 reftel points and concept paper to 
Department of Mineral and Energy's Tseliso Maqubela, Chief 
Director, Nuclear Energy and Mahlatsi Koma, Deputy Director, 
International Relations.  Noting that he had not previously 
seen the IAEA concept paper, Maqubela expressed several 
general reservations.  He noted that a conventional nuclear 
energy program is a long-term undertaking, as much as 65 
years, and the international environment could change 
dramatically in that period.  He added that equity among 
countries was a key principle for South Africa and any 
arrangement should not perpetuate inequality.  The concept 
sounded like a group even more closed than the Nuclear 
Suppliers Group.  Personally, he thought the Generation IV 
structure represented a balanced approach.  In closing, 
Maqubela stated that Minerals and Energy Minister Sonjica 
would present the offficial South African view of the concept 
during the IAEA Special Event on Assurances in Vienna. 
 
3. (SBU) Asked about press reports that the Minister had 
stated that South Africa would enrich uranium, Maqubela said 
that the news media had not correctly quoted the Minister and 
provided econoffs with a copy of the Minister's August 25 
speech, which he had helped write.  Maqubela noted that news 
media were not present at the speech and that the Department 
of Minerals and Energy subsequently distributed the speech. 
Noting the expected rapid expansion of the nuclear energy 
industry worldwide and a predicted shortage of enriched 
uranium, Maqubela said South Africa would look at the uranium 
enrichment issue strictly in economic terms.  In an August 
25th conversation (septel) DFA DDG Abdul Minty told visiting 
USUNVIE COM Schulte that South Africa had made no decisions 
regarding possible uranium enrichment, but did not want to 
foreclose any options.  (Note: in her August 25 speech at the 
launch of the South African Young Nuclear Professionals 
Society, the Minister said, inter alia, quote: I therefore 
believe that time has come for South Africa to conduct a cost 
benefit analysis into the beneficiation of uranium.  I will 
soon be making certain announcements in this regard.  It goes 
without saying that beneficiation of uranium comes with its 
own responsibilities and sensitivities and we would pursue 
this within our national and international obligations.  End 
quote.  Full text of speech sent to AF/S  END NOTE). 
Bost