Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06OTTAWA2945, CANADA'S RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL FOR INTERNATIONAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06OTTAWA2945.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06OTTAWA2945 2006-09-27 22:07 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ottawa
VZCZCXRO2382
OO RUEHGA RUEHHA RUEHQU RUEHVC
DE RUEHOT #2945/01 2702207
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 272207Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY OTTAWA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 3957
INFO RUCNCAN/ALL CANADIAN POSTS COLLECTIVE IMMEDIATE
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST IMMEDIATE 0516
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS IMMEDIATE 0907
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA IMMEDIATE 0078
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS IMMEDIATE 0562
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK IMMEDIATE 0245
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 OTTAWA 002945 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR WHA/CAN AND INL FOR VERVILLE AND CLINE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON KCRM SNAR CA
SUBJECT: CANADA'S RESPONSE TO PROPOSAL FOR INTERNATIONAL 
CONVENTION ON DATA PROTECTION REFERENCE IN FRANCOPHONIE 
SUMMIT STATEMENT 
 
REF: STATE 159673 (NOTAL) 
 
1. (SBU) On September 27, Economic Minister-Counselor 
presented reftel demarche to Chantal de Varennes, Deputy 
Director, Francophonie Affairs Division, Foreign Affairs 
Canada (DFAIT), and Alain Tellier, Deputy Director, Criminal, 
Security and Treaty Law Division, DFAIT.  Both were familiar 
with the last minute French efforts to insert language 
calling for an international convention guaranteeing the 
effectiveness of data protection law in the final declaration 
of the September 28-29 Francophonie Summit in Bucharest, 
Romania. 
 
2. (SBU) Tellier provided Embassy with the text of the 
original French proposal: 
 
"Nous appelons a l'intensification des travaux de nature 
legislative, reglementaire et organisationnelle necessaires a 
la mise en oeuvre effective des regles de la protection des 
personnes, de leurs liberte et droits fondamentaux dans 
l'utilisation des fichiers et traitements de donnees a 
caractere personnel, et, conscients de developpement de la 
circulation de donnees personnelles a travers les frontieres, 
sommes resolu a examiner en profondeur l'elaboration d'une 
convention internationale garantissant, dans ces 
circonstances, l'effectivite de cette protection." 
 
3. (SBU) Our interlocutors agreed with the U.S. demarche that 
the data protection issue is not appropriate to appear in the 
final statement of the Francophonie Summit, Declaration of 
Bucharest, and had wanted to have the paragraph removed. 
However, the GOC eventually concluded for political reasons 
that the matter could not be dropped entirely.  Subsequently, 
experts and Francophonie Ministers on September 26 agreed to 
a reformulation of the paragraph, which Canada believes 
weakens its intent. 
 
4. (SBU) The revised language is as follows: 
 
"Nous appelons a l'intensification des travaux necessaires a 
l'adoption des legislations assurant la protection des 
personnes, de leurs libertes et de leurs droits fondamentaux 
dans l'utilisation des fichiers et traitements de donnees a 
caractere personnel et, conscients de l'accroissement de la 
circulation des donnees personnelles au-dela des frontieres, 
marquons notre interet pour examiner l'opportunite d'elaborer 
un instrument international garantissant, dans ces 
circonstances, le droits des personnes a la protection des 
donnees a caractere personnel, tout en tenant compte de nos 
objectifs legitimes en matiere de lutte contre le crime, la 
corruption et le terrorisme." 
 
5. (SBU) The new language will be given to the Chiefs of 
State and Heads of Government attending the Summit in 
Bucharest tomorrow.   The Canadians believe that it will be 
approved unchanged, and promised to contact the Embassy if 
there are any changes.  Note:  The Canadian delegation is 
headed by Prime Minister Stephen Harper and includes Minister 
for International Development and for la Francophonie and 
Official Languages Josee Verner, Quebec Premier Jean Charest 
and New Brunswick Premier Bernard Lord (who was defeated for 
re-election last week, but his successor Shawn Graham asked 
him to represent the province).  End note. 
 
6. (SBU) Tellier suggested that the revised language calling 
for an international "instrument" rather than a "convention" 
provides a great deal of flexibility.  An instrument, he 
Qprovides a great deal of flexibility.  An instrument, he 
explained, could be model legislation, a memorandum of 
understanding, or other type of less than binding 
undertaking.  Moreover, Tellier pointed out that the final 
sentence's reference to "taking account of our legitimate 
objectives in the war against crime, corruption and 
terrorism" was a great improvement.  He said that the 
International Law Commission (ILC) in New York may be 
contemplating work in the area of data protection.  Canada 
would support such efforts, which Tellier pointed out, could 
take many years and the final result could take many 
different forms. 
 
7. (U) Speaking more generally, the Canadians noted that the 
inclusion of language on data protection indicates that the 
Francophonie Summit, which meets every two years, is 
 
OTTAWA 00002945  002 OF 002 
 
 
expanding its scope from the promotion of the French language 
and culture to other issues, including politics, economics 
and human rights.  The next Francophonie summit will take 
place in Quebec City in 2008, as part of the celebration of 
the 400th anniversary of the French presence in Canada. 
 
Visit Canada's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/wha/ottawa 
 
WILKINS