Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06KABUL4432, Update on Japanese Ring Road

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06KABUL4432.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06KABUL4432 2006-09-28 11:48 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Kabul
VZCZCXRO3061
RR RUEHDBU RUEHIK RUEHYG
DE RUEHBUL #4432/01 2711148
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 281148Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY KABUL
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2852
INFO RUCNAFG/AFGHANISTAN COLLECTIVE
RHEHAAA/NATIONAL SECURITY COUNCIL WASHINGTON DC
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHINGTON DC
RHEFDIA/DIA WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/OSD WASHINGTON DC
RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHINGTON DC
RHMCSUU/JOINT STAFF WASHINGTON DC
RHMFIUU/HQ USCENTCOM MACDILL AFB FL
RHMFISS/HQ USEUCOM VAIHINGEN GE
RHMFIUU/COMSOCCENT MACDILL AFB FL
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 2879
RUEHNO/USMISSION USNATO 3012
RUEHGV/USMISSION GENEVA 6340
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 1689
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KABUL 004432 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS, SENSITIVE 
 
STATE FOR SCA/A, S/CT 
STATE PASS TO USAID FOR AID A-AA/ANE MARK WARD, CDHA/DG 
NSC FOR AHARRIMAN 
CENTCOM FOR CG CFC-A, CG CJTF-76, POLAD 
 
SENSITIVE, SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12598: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EAID PGOV PREL ELTN SNAR ASEC AF
SUBJECT: Update on Japanese Ring Road 
 
REF: A) KABUL 3850 B) KABUL 4388 
 
------- 
Summary 
------- 
 
1. (U) At the Embassy of Japan's request, Embassy and USAID staff 
have recently participated in discussions with the Japanese about 
the security situation in southern Afghanistan and its impact on the 
prospective start of Japan's segment of the ring road.  We have 
described approaches to operating in a high-risk environment and 
shared the names of Afghan contractors employed by the USG in that 
region.  Embassy also facilitated a security briefing by ISAF 
intelligence staff, which, while confirming a high threat level, 
also suggested approaches to mitigating risk.  Our Japanese 
counterpart indicated the GOJ intends to move forward with the road 
but is still figuring out how to get it done in a sustained 
high-threat environment.  End summary. 
 
------------------------------------------ 
Minimizing Risk and Lining up Alternatives 
------------------------------------------ 
 
2. (SBU) Econoff and USAID program manager for roads recently met 
with the Japanese Embassy's officer in charge of development issues, 
at his request, to discuss the status of the Japanese segment of the 
ring road in view of the security situation in southern Afghanistan. 
 Japanese Emboff Kenji Saito told us that the Indian contractor was 
becoming increasingly nervous over the security situation in the 
area where construction is to take place.  (NOTE: The Japanese 
segment is a 114-km stretch from Kandahar west to Gereshk, in 
eastern Helmand Province.  End note.)  The GOJ has no intelligence 
sources in southern Afghanistan and is trying to determine what the 
level of risk is; Saito was looking for any indication that 
Operation Medusa had improved the threat profile for the road area. 
To that end, Saito requested a briefing on the security situation in 
the South; the briefing was delivered at HQ ISAF on 24 September. 
 
3. (U) USAID's roads manager shared several approaches to mitigating 
risk on construction projects in high-risk areas: using local 
unskilled labor, pre-planning with tribal elders, and using of 
Afghan construction companies where possible.  Saito requested (and 
later received from USAID) the names of Afghan construction 
companies that the USG has used successfully.  He took care to 
emphasize that the current contractor has not backed out of the 
contract, but rather that lining up alternatives was simply a 
precautionary measure. 
 
------------------------------- 
A Tough Intelligence Assessment 
------------------------------- 
 
4. (SBU) At the security briefing, ISAF CJ2 staff described the 
threat in western Kandahar and eastern Helmand provinces as high. 
ISAF detailed a number of attacks on commercial and NGO vehicles and 
operations and described the probability of future attacks as high. 
On the positive side, the CJ2 thought the security situation would 
steadily improve in the months to come, given ISAF's commitment to 
follow up recent military operations against Taliban fighters with a 
significant reconstruction and development effort.  They also 
recommended careful negotiation with local tribal leadership as an 
integral part of the project. 
 
5. (SBU) Saito reacted calmly to the intelligence assessment, saying 
that the GOJ had already made a decision to go ahead with 
construction.  The questions now are how to do the work without 
using a Japanese company, which the GOJ is unused to doing, and how 
to ensure that the work is done to standards.  He also indicated 
that the GOJ has done work in hazardous circumstances before and 
knows how to go about it.  Nevertheless, Saito revealed deeper 
 
KABUL 00004432  002 OF 002 
 
 
doubts by asking point blank at the end of the conversation: Can 
commercial work proceed, given the security situation?  The answer 
he got--that it has to proceed--hardly seemed to address his concern 
and showed a sharply different perspective on the relative 
importance of risk and urgency. 
 
------------------------------------- 
COMMENT: Still Fishing for Assurances 
------------------------------------- 
 
6. (SBU) Judging from this series of conversations, the Embassy of 
Japan was still fishing for assurances that the Kandahar region will 
soon be "safe for commercial operations" at the same time that it 
was expressing its intention to build the road soon.  We hope that 
the security briefing has disabused the Japanese Embassy of the 
notion that it can be assured of any normal level of safety.  This 
would seem to be the first step to thinking about how to get it done 
in an unsafe environment.  As reported previously (reftel A), this 
matter may need continued encouragement at all levels. 
 
NORLAND