Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06JAKARTA11892, TIMIKA TRIAL: WITNESS SNAFU CAUSES DELAY

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06JAKARTA11892.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06JAKARTA11892 2006-09-26 11:07 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Jakarta
VZCZCXRO0500
OO RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHJA #1892 2691107
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 261107Z SEP 06
FM AMEMBASSY JAKARTA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 0529
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS IMMEDIATE
RUEHPB/AMEMBASSY PORT MORESBY IMMEDIATE 3227
RHHMUNA/CDRUSPACOM HONOLULU HI IMMEDIATE
RHMCSUU/FBI WASHINGTON DC IMMEDIATE
RHEHNSC/NSC WASHDC IMMEDIATE
RUEAWJB/DEPT OF JUSTICE WASHDC IMMEDIATE
UNCLAS JAKARTA 011892 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
FBI PLS PASS CTD/ITOS I, CTD/ITOS II, GOU 
SECSTATE FOR EAP/MTS, DS/DSS, DS/IP/EAP, DS/EAP/ITA, AND 
CA/OCS/ACS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PGOV ASEC CASC KJUS PHUM ID
SUBJECT: TIMIKA TRIAL: WITNESS SNAFU CAUSES DELAY 
 
REF: JAKARTA 11845 (TNI PERSONNEL TESTIFY) 
 
1. (SBU) On September 26, the trial of suspects charged in 
the 2002 murder of two Americans and one Indonesian near 
Timika, Papua, resumed.  It emerged that there was either a 
misunderstanding or a disagreement between the prosecution 
and defense teams about the order of the day's testimony. 
The prosecution intended to call three Indonesian victim 
witnesses, drivers working for Freeport who had been present 
during the ambush.  However, because of logistical 
difficulties involved in locating them and bringing them to 
Jakarta, the prosecution could not produce these witnesses 
until September 29.  The prosecution suggested the day's 
session be used instead for defense witnesses.  The defense 
team objected to this, saying their witnesses were not ready, 
and should not appear in any case until all victim witnesses 
had testified.  The judge then adjourned the trial until 
September 29, instructing both the defense and the 
prosecution to have witnesses prepared to testify at that 
time.  Ms. Patsy Spier attended the session as usual. 
 
2. (SBU) There was also some discussion of the health of the 
defendant Hardi Sugimol, who, according to prosecutors, was 
recovering from an illness and therefore not present.  They 
produced a letter from a doctor to this effect.  This 
statement was contested by the defense, who claimed that 
Sugimol was sick but was not recovering because he had not 
received proper medical attention.  The defense demanded to 
see the doctor's letter.  In all, these proceedings took 
about an hour. 
 
3. (SBU) Papuans attending the trial demonstrated loudly both 
before and during today's session.  In the courtroom, they 
sang, chanted and ranted against the court, calling for the 
removal of the judge and promising to return in greater 
numbers on Friday.  The prosecution advised us afterwards to 
take extra precautions for Ms. Spier when she attends the 
next session.  We are taking the necessary steps. 
HEFFERN