Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ROME2195, ITALY: INVITATION TO BURMESE FM AN EU EXPERIMENT

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ROME2195.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ROME2195 2006-08-04 12:14 2011-04-24 00:00 CONFIDENTIAL Embassy Rome
VZCZCXRO0670
OO RUEHAG RUEHCHI RUEHDT RUEHHM
DE RUEHRO #2195 2161214
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
O 041214Z AUG 06
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5544
INFO RUEHZS/ASSOCIATION OF SOUTHEAST ASIAN NATIONS PRIORITY
RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 1622
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 7459
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 1718
C O N F I D E N T I A L ROME 002195 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/03/2016 
TAGS: PGOV PHUM FI BU EUN IT
SUBJECT: ITALY: INVITATION TO BURMESE FM AN EU EXPERIMENT 
 
REF: A. STATE 124139 
 
     B. BARRASSO-DERETIC 1/20/06 E-MAIL 
 
Classified By: Acting Political Minister-Counselor E. Candace Putnam fo 
r reasons 1.4 (b) and (d). 
 
1. (C) Poloff delivered Ref A demarche to Giuseppe Mistretta, 
MFA Office Director for Southeast Asia, August 2, stressing 
U.S. disappointment with the Finnish Government's decision to 
invite the Burmese Foreign Minister to the September ASEM 
meeting in Helsinki.  Mistretta responded that the invitation 
was a bit of an experiment within the EU, giving member 
states an opportunity to voice their concerns about human 
rights and the need for democracy building to a 
representative of the Burmese government, rather than just 
talking to themselves.  He noted that the EU did not want a 
repetition of the Rotterdam meeting and the potential 
negative impact on overall EU-ASEAN relations (Ref B). 
Poloff pointed out that recently ASEAN itself had been more 
critical of the Burmese regime, and that the Foreign Minister 
was not in a position to usefully convey back EU concerns. 
Mistretta asked if the U.S. had a particular official in mind 
as an alternative to the Foreign Minister. 
 
2. (C) Noting that Finland was on the pro-dialogue side of 
the internal EU debate, as was Italy, Mistretta said the EU 
countries who were opposed to contact with the Burmese regime 
(UK, Denmark, Netherlands) had compromised instead of making 
the difference of opinion public.  For Italy, according to 
Mistretta, Helsinki would provide an opportunity to create a 
"very" critical dialogue, rather than allowing Burma's 
leadership to become ever more isolated.  However, Mistretta 
reiterated that this decision was based on a compromise among 
EU states and he expected countries that had been critical of 
the current position to push for a reevaluation of EU policy 
before too long. 
SPOGLI