Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06TOKYO3911, JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/13/06

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TOKYO3911.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06TOKYO3911 2006-07-13 05:35 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tokyo
VZCZCXRO7313
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3911/01 1940535
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 130535Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4281
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 9786
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 7190
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 0490
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 7064
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 8330
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 3266
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9413
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1154
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 08 TOKYO 003911 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA; 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
 
SUBJECT: JAPANESE MORNING PRESS HIGHLIGHTS 07/13/06 
Part-1 
Index: 
1) Top headlines 
 
2) Editorials 
 
3) Prime Minister's daily schedule 
 
4) 68 PERCENT  of public recognize SDF contributions to Iraq, 59 
PERCENT  appreciate the dispatches in Yomiuri poll 
5) Mainichi survey of 158 companies finds 37 favoring Shinzo  Abe, 
17 favoring Yasuo Fukuda for next prime minister 
 
6) Prime Minister Koizumi unveils new peace-supporting initiative 
during Middle East tour 
 
7) China comes up with own draft UNSC resolution critical of North 
Korea, seeks compromise from US, Japan 
 
8) Alarm in Japan that effort in the UN Security Council to slap 
North Korea for missile launches going along at China's pace 
 
9) Japan feels sense of stalemate on North Korea sanctions issue 
 
10) Government gives a certain amount of credit to China for efforts 
on North Korea, scrutinizing its draft UNSC resolution 
 
ARTICLES: 
1) TOP HEADLINES 
 
Asahi, Mainichi, and Yomiuri: 
China, Russia to circulate draft resolution on North Korea at UNSC 
 
Nihon Keizai: 
Bank of Japan to end zero-interest-rate policy tomorrow 
 
Sankei: 
Japan rejects France's proposal of "two-step approach" to North 
Korea 
 
Tokyo Shimbun: 
Former Mizutani Kensetsu Co. chairman arrested 
 
2) EDITORIALS 
 
Asahi: 
(1)Didn't Toyota neglect safety? 
(2)Growing superpower India suffering from terrorist attacks 
 
Mainichi: 
(1)Presidents of four postal services companies decided: Political 
responsibility is still grave 
(2)Has Prime Minister Koizumi lost political energy? 
 
Yomiuri: 
(1)North Korea will be puffed up with delay in adoption of UNSC 
resolution 
(2)Competitive tender bid should be breakthrough to review 
"government jobs" 
 
Nihon Keizai: 
(1)Japan should show its presence through Middle East diplomacy 
(2)Terrorist attack on the core of India's economy 
 
TOKYO 00003911  002 OF 008 
 
 
 
Sankei: 
(1)Adoption of UNSC resolution needed 
(2)Government should support four postal corporation presidents 
responsibly 
 
Tokyo Shimbun: 
(1)Toyota ignored defects: Safety important above anything else 
(2)India-Pakistan relations should be improved without yielding to 
terrorism 
 
3) Prime Minister's Official Residence (Kantei) 
 
Prime Minister's schedule, July 11 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 2) (Full) 
July 13, 2006 
 
Night: 
Arrived at Ben Gurion Airport in Tel Aviv, Israel. Spent an 
overnight at the David Citadel Hotel. 
 
July 12 
 
Morning: 
Toured the Holocaust Memorial. 
Attended a welcome reception at the prime minister's office. Held 
talks with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert. 
Afterward held a joint press conference at the prime minister's 
official residence 
Noon: 
Attended a luncheon meeting hosted by Prime Minister Olmert. 
Afternoon: 
Held talks with Israeli and Palestinian youths at the David Citadel 
Hotel. 
Evening: 
Met President Moshe Katzav at his office. 
Met Foreign Minister Tzipi Livni and persons familiar with 
Japan-Israel relations at the David Citadel Hotel. 
 
4) Poll: 68 PERCENT  see SDF as helpful to Iraq reconstruction, 59 
PERCENT  positive about deployment 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Abridged) 
July 13, 2006 
 
The Yomiuri Shimbun conducted a face-to-face nationwide public 
opinion survey on July 8-9, in which respondents were asked if they 
thought the Self-Defense Forces' activities in Iraq contributed to 
Iraq's reconstruction. In response to this question, "yes," 
including "very much" and "somewhat," totaled 68 PERCENT , with "no" 
reaching 28 PERCENT . As seen from the figures, positive answers 
markedly outnumbered negative ones. In the survey, respondents were 
also asked about the Koizumi cabinet's sending of SDF troops to 
Iraq. In response, positive answers accounted for 59 PERCENT , 
showing an increase of 8 percentage points over the 51 PERCENT 
rating in this April's survey. 
 
Questions & Answers 
 
TOKYO 00003911  003 OF 008 
 
 
(Figures shown in percentage.) 
 
Q: The government has decided to withdraw Ground Self-Defense Force 
personnel engaged in humanitarian assistance activities in Iraq. In 
addition, the government has also decided to continue and expand the 
scope of the Air Self-Defense Force's backup activities including 
airlift missions. Do you support the Koizumi cabinet's sending of 
SDF members to Iraq for humanitarian reconstruction assistance? 
 
Very much    19.0 
Somewhat    39.9 
Not very much   23.7 
Not at all   13.9 
No answer (N/A)  3.4 
 
Q: How much do you think the SDF has contributed to Iraq's 
reconstruction? 
 
Very much    14.6 
Somewhat    53.0 
Not very much   22.1 
Not at all   5.5 
N/A     4.9 
 
Q: Japan has deployed SDF members in Iraq for humanitarian 
reconstruction assistance. Do you support Japan's continued sending 
of SDF members overseas for humanitarian reconstruction assistance? 
 
Yes       23.1 
Yes to a certain degree   27.2 
No to a certain degree   23.6 
No       22.3 
N/A       3.8 
 
Polling methodology 
Date of survey: July 8-9. 
Subjects of survey: 3,000 persons chosen from among all eligible 
voters throughout the country (at 250 locations on a stratified 
two-stage random sampling basis). 
Method of implementation: Door-to-door visits for face-to-face 
interviews. 
Number of valid respondents: 1,867 persons (62.2 PERCENT ). 
 
5) 37 firms pick Abe, 17 firms prefer Fukuda for next premiership 
 
MAINICHI (Page 1) (Abridged) 
July 13, 2006 
 
The Mainichi Shimbun conducted a questionnaire survey of 158 leading 
companies' top executives and asked them to give the name of the 
politician they thought would be appropriate for the next prime 
minister. In response to this question, 37 companies picked Chief 
Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe, with 17 companies choosing Yasuo 
Fukuda, one of Abe's predecessors in the CCS post. 
 
The survey was conducted from late June through early July, and 
answers were obtained from 144 companies. Abe ranked top in the 
survey's popularity rating. In the business community, an increasing 
number of top executives are also pinning their hopes on Abe, who 
 
TOKYO 00003911  004 OF 008 
 
 
has been leading all other post-Koizumi candidates in various public 
opinion surveys. Among other politicians, three companies favored 
Economic and Fiscal Minister Kaoru Yosano, with two companies naming 
Finance Minister Sadakazu Tanigaki. No companies picked Foreign 
Minister Taro Aso, former Liberal Democratic Party Vice President 
Taku Yamasaki, or Senior Vice Justice Minister Taro Kono. Among the 
responding companies, however, 80 companies withheld their answers, 
apparently assuming a wait-and-see attitude. 
 
6) Koizumi to make new Middle East peace proposal to Israeli 
counterpart 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 1) (Full) 
July 13, 2006 
 
Mutsumi Aoki, Jerusalem 
 
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi, currently visiting Israel, met 
with Prime Minister Ehud Olmert on the morning of July 12, local 
time, at the Prime Minister's Office and proposed creating a 
"corridor to peace and prosperity" as a medium- to long-term 
challenge for Japan to bring about peace in the Middle East. He then 
proposed that Japan, Israel, the Palestinian Authority, and Jordan 
set up a four-party council. Koizumi also urged Israel to make 
efforts to reach a peace accord with the Palestinian Authority. 
 
Koizumi stated in reference to the recent clash between the Israeli 
military and Palestinian armed insurgents in the Gaza Strip: "I am 
concerned about the deteriorated situation. A chain of hatred will 
benefit neither Israel nor the Palestinian authority. I hope both 
sides will exercise the utmost self-restraint with the aim of 
co-existence and co-prosperity." 
 
Prime Minister Olmert adamantly replied: "Israel takes a firm 
position. I understand such a stance brings pain." 
 
The "corridor to peace and prosperity" is to show Japan's 
willingness to earnestly cooperate in attaining peace in the Middle 
East. The concept will lead to confidence building among the 
countries concerned through the promotion of economic development 
that would have people enjoy the "dividend of peace." 
 
Under this concept, the four-party council would be established and 
an agricultural complex would be built on the western side of the 
Jordan Valley with Japan's official development assistance (ODA) 
funds. Farm products grown there would be shipped to various 
places. 
 
After meeting with Olmert, Koizumi emphasized that the concept is to 
support the Middle East in a different way from that of the US and 
Europe. He said that Olmert agreed to the concept, but under the 
tense situation in the Middle East, it is likely to take time for it 
to take shape. 
 
Prime Minister Koizumi plans to explain this concept to Palestinian 
leader Abbas and Jordan King Abdallah II, whom he will meet on July 
ΒΆ13. 
 
7) China to submit to UNSC its own draft resolution on North Korean 
 
TOKYO 00003911  005 OF 008 
 
 
missile launches, moving closer to Japan, US 
 
YOMIURI (Top Play) (Almost Full) 
July 13, 2006 
 
New York, Yoshikazu Shirakawa 
 
Chinese Ambassador to the UN Wang Guangya on the morning of July 12 
(midnight on the same day, Japan time) told reporters that China 
would introduce a draft resolution on North Korea's missile launches 
to the UN Security Council (UNSC). The specifics of the resolution 
have yet to be unveiled, but it appears to be based on the draft 
presidential statement, which it had already introduced. China has 
apparently been pressed to make further concessions, facing the 
hard-line stance of Japan and the US, which are determined not to 
accept the presidential statement proposal, and the Chinese mission 
having difficulty in persuading North Korea. 
 
Possibility of not referring to sanctions 
 
UNSC resolutions are binding and carry more weight than presidential 
statements. US Ambassador to the UN John Bolton underscored to 
reporters his government's policy of aiming to adopt the sanctions 
resolution sponsored by Japan, the US, and other countries. He also 
praised China's move to introduce a draft resolution as a new step 
forward. He noted, "If China has agreed that the UNSC needed a 
resolution, it is progress." 
 
However, Wang has thus far opposed a binding resolution that invokes 
Chapter VII of the UN Charter. As such, there is a strong 
possibility that the draft resolution sponsored by China does not 
refer to Chapter VII, and therefore it is in fact a condemnation 
resolution. The focus will now move to how to find a settlement in 
line with the sanctions resolution presented by Japan, the US and 
other countries, which invokes Chapter VII. 
 
The UNSC adopts a Chapter VII resolution when it recognizes the 
situation as a threat to international peace and security. The 
British and French ambassadors to the UN, which are trying to find a 
compromise between Japan and the US, and China and Russia, hold that 
the resolution should at least define the missile launches by 
Pyongyang as a threat. 
 
8) Scope column - Japan wary about China's move over Japan-sponsored 
resolution against North Korea 
 
TOKYO SHIMBUN (Page 2) (Full) 
July 13, 2006 
 
Time goes on, leaving the fate of the resolution submitted by Japan 
and some other countries to the United Nations Security Council 
(UNSC) unclear. Most UNSC members still wait to see the outcome of 
China's efforts to persuade North Korea, so Japan's call for an 
early vote on the resolution seems unlikely to draw attention. The 
Japanese government is increasingly wary about Japan losing momentum 
to China, which is opposed to the resolution. 
 
Undermining solidarity 
 
 
TOKYO 00003911  006 OF 008 
 
 
"This must be settled as swiftly as possible. We need to make a 
decision at some point to put the resolution to a vote." This remark 
came from Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe during at a press 
conference yesterday, in which he emphasized the necessity of 
putting the sanctions-based resolution against North Korea to a vote 
as quickly as possibly. 
 
A vote on this resolution had been initially set for late at night 
on July 10, Japan time. But China called on the UNSC to postpone 
voting, citing its efforts to persuade North Korea. Many UNSC 
members then thought it would be wise to wait to see what will 
happen to China-North Korea negotiations; as a result, voting has 
been postponed. Abe had explained: "Such talks would be given at 
least 48 hours." 
 
China-North Korea talks have run into difficulties, and their fate 
still remains unknown. UNSC members aside from Japan and the United 
States are beginning to look for ways to avoid voting instead of 
taking a vote. 
 
What the Japanese government is most worried about is, according to 
a high-level government official, "China's moves to undermine the 
solidarity of UNSC members." The resolution has been endorsed by 13 
of the 15 UNSC member nations, but China wants to replace it with a 
less binding chairman's statement, and it is reportedly approaching 
Middle Eastern and African UNSC members in trying to undermine their 
solidarity with other UNSC members. Some in the Japanese government 
take the view that China-North Korea negotiations are merely a tool 
to buy time to undermine that solidarity. Late last night, the news 
came to the government that China would submit an alternative 
resolution without binding force. 
 
At the same time, France, which holds the UNSC presidency, on July 
11 proposed a two-stage action to adopt first a tough chairman's 
statement before a resolution on sanctions. Britain came around to 
France's idea. Their move is apparently intended to avoid a split in 
the UNSC, but it has become another cause for concern for Japan. 
 
Close coordination confirmed 
 
The government aims to get the resolution adopted before the Group 
of Eight (G8) industrialized nations summit at St. Petersburg (St. 
Petersburg Summit) starts on July 15. It continues "working on other 
UNSC member nations in Tokyo and at various levels," according to 
Abe. 
 
Yesterday evening, Abe invited US Ambassador to Japan Thomas 
Schieffer to the Prime Minister's Official Residence, and 
afterwards, Foreign Minister Taro Aso talked to US Secretary of 
State Condoleezza Rice on the phone. They have reaffirmed that Japan 
and the United States would work in close cooperation for a vote on 
the resolution. 
 
Yesterday afternoon, Aso held a teleconference with French Foreign 
Minister Philippe Douste-Blay and asked him to take a vote on the 
resolution immediately if China-North Korea talks failed. But 
Douste-Blay went no further than to say: "In order to prevent North 
Korea from repeating another provocative action, it's important for 
the UNSC to stand together and take a specific action." There seems 
 
TOKYO 00003911  007 OF 008 
 
 
to be no wild card available for now. 
 
Some in the government are becoming less optimistic about an early 
vote on the resolution, as a senior Foreign Ministry official said, 
"(A chairman's statement) is not necessarily something 
meaningless." 
 
9) Japan unable to find an effective move over sanctions-based 
resolution on North Korea, relies on US for negotiations with China, 
North Korea 
 
MAINICHI (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
July 13, 2006 
 
Nobutake Yamashita 
 
The Japanese government appears to be at a stalemate in dealing with 
North Korea's missiles. Now that diplomatic maneuvering among the 
United States, China, and North Korea has begun aiming at resuming 
the six-party talks, all Japan can do now is to call for an early 
vote on the sanctions-based resolution against North Korea at the 
United Nations Security Council (UNSC) while working in close 
coordination with the US, given that Japan has difficulties in 
holding direct talks with China and North Korea. At the UNSC, 
France, which chairs the council, has proposed a two-stage scheme to 
issue first a chairman's statement and then discuss the resolution. 
China is likely to couterpropose a resolution condemning North Korea 
without sanctions on the afternoon of July 12, local time. The 
Japanese government is increasingly frustrated at the current 
situation. 
 
Foreign Minister Taro Aso late last night talked with US Secretary 
of State Condoleezza Rice on the phone. Referring to slow progress 
in China-North Korea negotiations, Aso indicated his intention to 
call for a vote on the resolution before the Group of Eight (G8) 
summit in St. Petersburg, Russia, which will start on July 15. But 
Rice did not shift her stance of watching China's diplomatic efforts 
and hinted at the possibility of making modifications to the 
resolution. 
 
Afterwards, Aso, when asked by reporters about the two-stage 
proposal, dismissed it, noting, "We won't support it." All Japan can 
do for now is call for an early vote on the resolution but not to 
force it and work in close coordination with the United States, 
which is waiting for China-North Korea talks to bear fruit. 
 
"It's all right even if China uses its veto," someone said at a 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) staff meeting on July 7. MOFA 
then decided to aim to put the resolution to a vote on July 8, even 
though China opposes it. This decision came, following the 
determination that it would become more difficult to get the 
resolution adopted as time passes. But later the US turned around to 
wait for the outcome of China's efforts to persuade North Korea. 
Japan then accepted the postponement of a vote on the resolution. 
 
10) China proposes submission of own draft proposal; Government to 
closely examine contents 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full) 
 
TOKYO 00003911  008 OF 008 
 
 
July 13, 2006 
 
China has indicated that it would present to the United Nations 
Security Council (UNSC) its own draft resolution to impose sanctions 
on North Korea for its recent missile launches. The Japanese 
government now intends to closely examine its contents and then to 
decide whether or not to support the Chinese resolution. 
 
A senior Foreign Ministry official praised China's proposal to some 
extent early this morning, remarking: "Given that North Korea has 
not responded to China's efforts to bring it back to the six-party 
talks, China might have come closer to Japan's call by upgrading a 
chairman's statement to a resolution." 
 
The government remained unwavering in its stance to seek a binding 
UNSC resolution even after France came up with a proposal for a 
"two-step approach." Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi emphatically 
stated in a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert 
yesterday: "I hope the resolution (submitted by the United States, 
Japan and other countries) will be adopted as soon as possible." 
Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe also said in a press briefing 
yesterday: "Japan will continue to work with other countries 
concerned to have the international community's message be expressed 
in the form of a resolution." 
 
Foreign Minister Taro Aso held a telephone conference with French 
Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy last evening, in which Aso 
said: "If China's diplomatic efforts end in failure, Japan will 
promptly resume the process to adopt the resolution." His French 
counterpart indicated a negative view about the idea of adopting the 
resolution without support from China and Russia, remarking: "It is 
important for the UNSC to unite in taking action." 
 
The governments of Japan and the US agreed with China engaged in 
negotiations with North Korea to put off a vote on the condition 
that Pyongyang accept these three terms: North Korea should (1) 
freeze missile tests; (2) unconditionally return to the negotiating 
table; and (3) abide by the joint statement issued in the six-party 
talks last September. The Japanese government intends to seek the 
UNSC adopting the resolution if North Korea does not meet the three 
conditions, based on the judgment that "North Korea will never take 
a forward-looking stance unless the international community apply 
pressure to it by adopting a legally binding resolution," according 
to a government source. 
 
SCHIEFFER