VZCZCXRO8894
PP RUEHFK RUEHKSO RUEHNAG RUEHNH
DE RUEHKO #3732/01 1860805
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 050805Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY TOKYO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 3977
INFO RUEKJCS/SECDEF WASHDC PRIORITY
RHEHAAA/THE WHITE HOUSE WASHINGTON DC PRIORITY
RUEAWJA/USDOJ WASHDC PRIORITY
RULSDMK/USDOT WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/USDOC WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEAIIA/CIA WASHDC PRIORITY
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC//J5//
RHHMUNA/HQ USPACOM HONOLULU HI
RHHMHBA/COMPACFLT PEARL HARBOR HI
RHMFIUU/HQ PACAF HICKAM AFB HI//CC/PA//
RHMFIUU/COMUSJAPAN YOKOTA AB JA//J5/JO21//
RUYNAAC/COMNAVFORJAPAN YOKOSUKA JA
RUAYJAA/COMPATWING ONE KAMI SEYA JA
RUEHNH/AMCONSUL NAHA 9648
RUEHFK/AMCONSUL FUKUOKA 7037
RUEHOK/AMCONSUL OSAKA KOBE 0327
RUEHNAG/AMCONSUL NAGOYA 6930
RUEHKSO/AMCONSUL SAPPORO 8192
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 3110
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 9255
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 1004

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 09 TOKYO 003732 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR E, P, EB, EAP/J, EAP/P, EAP/PD, PA 
WHITE HOUSE/NSC/NEC; JUSTICE FOR STU CHEMTOB IN ANTI-TRUST DIVISION; 
TREASURY/OASIA/IMI/JAPAN; DEPT PASS USTR/PUBLIC AFFAIRS OFFICE; 
SECDEF FOR JCS-J-5/JAPAN, 
DASD/ISA/EAPR/JAPAN; DEPT PASS ELECTRONICALLY TO USDA 
FAS/ITP FOR SCHROETER; PACOM HONOLULU FOR PUBLIC DIPLOMACY ADVISOR; 
CINCPAC FLT/PA/ COMNAVFORJAPAN/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR KPAO PGOV PINR ECON ELAB JA
SUBJECT:  DAILY SUMMARY OF JAPANESE PRESS 07/05/06 
 
 
INDEX: 
 
(1) Japan, US unite against DPRK, aim to refer missile launch to 
UNSC and work together to impose economic sanctions against 
Pyongyang 
 
(2) Main points from a statement by the chief cabinet secretary on 
North Korea's missiles launches and a press conference by the 
defense chief 
 
(3) Government to ban entry of Mangyongbong-92 into Japanese ports 
for six months, limit personnel exchanges 
 
(4) Multilayered relationship with US indispensable for post-Koizumi 
government 
 
(5) Editorial: Japan, US urged to establish relationship going 
beyond reliance on "friendship" 
 
(6) Ozawa-Hu meeting: China clearly distinguishes Japanese 
politicians understanding China's stance over Yasukuni issue from 
others 
 
(7) Editorial: US-India nuclear agreement; Prime Minister should not 
consent to it 
 
ARTICLES: 
 
(1) Japan, US unite against DPRK, aim to refer missile launch to 
UNSC and work together to impose economic sanctions against 
Pyongyang 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Excerpts) 
Eve., July 5, 2006 
 
The Japanese government has taken North Korea's launching of 
ballistic missiles this time as an extremely deplorable act that is 
a threat to Japan's security. Tokyo intends to work in closer 
cooperation with the US government to step up pressure on North 
Korea swiftly. The challenge facing Japan ahead of referring the 
matter to the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) is how to get 
cooperation from China and Russia, which are both friendly with 
North Korea. 
 
Main points of the measures for the Japanese government to take 
against DPRK 
 
¶1. Measures against North Korea 
 
(1) Japan calls for a moratorium on North Korea's missile-launching 
and demands that North Korea return to the six-party talks on its 
nuclear programs quickly and unconditionally. 
(2) Japan prohibits the North Korean ship Man Gyong Bong from 
calling at Japanese ports. 
(3) Japan basically bans re-entries into Japan by North Korean 
officials and North Korean ship crews. 
(4) Japan bans re-entries into Japan by North Korean officials 
residing in Japan who are now in North Korea. 
(5) Japan cancels plans for Japanese government officials to visit 
North Korea and ask the Japanese public to refrain from traveling to 
North Korea. 
(6) Japan bans charter flights from North Korea to Japan. 
(7) Japan applies more strict export controls on products relating 
 
TOKYO 00003732  002 OF 009 
 
 
to North Korea's missiles and nuclear programs. 
(8) Japan rigorously applies laws to illegal acts. 
(9) Japan considers more punitive measures while watching the moves 
of North Korea. 
 
¶2. Cooperation with other countries 
 
(1) Japan works in closer cooperation with the United States. 
(2) Japan works on the United Nations Security Council to take 
proper steps. 
(3) Japan makes coordination and exchanges views with other 
countries at such fora as the six-party talks on North Korea's 
nuclear programs and the Group of Eight industrialized nations 
summit conference. 
 
(2) Main points from a statement by the chief cabinet secretary on 
North Korea's missiles launches and a press conference by the 
defense chief 
 
YOMIURI (Page 2) (Full) 
Evening, July 5, 2006 
 
A statement by Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe 
 
¶1. North Korea launched a number of ballistic missiles or some types 
of projectiles in the early hours of July 5. The government is 
making every effort to take actions in response. 
 
¶2. From the viewpoints of the nonproliferation of weapons of mass 
destruction, Japan's security, and the peace and stability of the 
international community, it was grave that North Korea conducted the 
launches despite prior warnings by countries concerned, including 
Japan. The launches conflict with a joint statement issued by the 
members of the six-party talks (proclaiming the peace and stability 
of Northeast Asia). Japan will sternly protest North Korea and 
express regret. Japan will strongly urge North Korea to take action 
by abiding by the missile-launch moratorium (specified in the 
Japan-DPRK Pyongyang Declaration) and return to the six-party talks 
swiftly and unconditionally. 
 
¶3. Japan will take stern actions and speedily decide on measures 
according to law. 
 
¶4. The international community must harshly condemn the launches. 
Japan will continue to coordinate closely with countries concerned, 
including the United States, Japan's ally, to get the United Nations 
Security Council deal with the matter appropriately. 
 
At a press conference 
 
Question: Is there a possibility that the North will launch more 
missiles? 
 
Abe: We cannot rule out that possibility. 
 
Question: Is Japan going to invoke economic sanctions against North 
Korea? 
 
Abe: Of course, we have such an option in mind. We will consider any 
sanctions Japan can take against the North. 
 
Question: How do you find the effectiveness of the Japan-DPRK 
Pyongyang Declaration? 
 
TOKYO 00003732  003 OF 009 
 
 
 
Abe: (The missile launches are) a violation of the declaration. 
 
Question: How do you think the upcoming G-8 summit will deal with 
the matter? 
 
Abe: There is every reason for the summit to address the issue. 
 
Main points from a press conference by Defense Agency Director 
General Fukushiro Nukaga 
 
Nukaga: As a result of studying intelligence comprehensively, we 
believe the first, second, fourth, fifth, and sixth missiles were 
launched from the southeastern part of North Korea. The third one 
was launched from the Taepodong area. We also believe that the 
first, second, fourth, fifth, and sixth missiles were Scud or Rodong 
missiles, and the third a Taepodong. 
 
Question: Was it a Taepodong-2? 
 
Nukaga: We believe it was a Taepodong-2. 
 
Question: It flew only a short distance. 
 
Nukaga: It might have failed on its own. 
 
Question: Has the Taepodong-2 missile on the launch pad gone? 
 
Nukaga: We have yet to confirm it. 
 
Question: Are there any chances for the North to launch additional 
missiles? 
 
Nukaga: Intelligence gathering is underway. We are still confirming 
such likelihood. 
 
Question: Did you expect for the North to launch more than one 
ballistic missile? 
 
Nukaga: In the process of gathering intelligence, we did not think 
specifically about how the North would launch a Scud, Rodong, or 
Taepodong. However, we had anticipated every possible situation. 
 
(3) Government to ban entry of Mangyongbong-92 into Japanese ports 
for six months, limit personnel exchanges 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 1) (Full) 
Evening, July 5, 2006 
 
The Japanese government severely protested to North Korea through 
the North Korean Embassy in Beijing this morning against its missile 
launches, claiming: "The missile launches directly affect our 
nation's security and violate the Japan-North Korea Pyongyang 
Declaration (that calls for extending the missile-launch 
moratorium)." The North Korean embassy replied: "We will report it 
to our home government." Japan-North Korea relations have already 
been cooled down over abduction and other issues, but the bilateral 
relations will unavoidably be stranded further. The future of the 
six-party talks on North Korea's nuclear development problem is also 
unclear. 
 
In a meeting of its Security Council this afternoon, the government 
decided to take nine sanction measures, including those to: (1) ban 
 
TOKYO 00003732  004 OF 009 
 
 
North Korean officials from entering Japan; (2) prohibit North 
Korean officials now in Japan from re-entering Japan after heading 
to North Korea; (3) have Japanese public servants refrain from 
traveling to North Korea for the time being; and (4) ban the entry 
of chartered flights from North Korea into Japan; in addition to 
barring the North Korean ferry Mangyongbong-92 for six months. 
 
The port entry ban is based on the specified vessels' port-entry 
prohibition law. To invoke the law, a cabinet decision is necessary. 
The government has received a cabinet approval prior to the Security 
Council meeting. 
 
The government has also such options as halting the remittance of 
money from Japan to North Korea and suspending trade activities, 
based on the revised Foreign Exchange and Foreign Trade Control Law. 
But it has decided not to take these measures this time. The 
government intends to take additional steps while carefully watching 
Pyongyang's moves. 
 
The government set up a taskforce in the Prime Minister's office at 
4:00 a.m. and held two meetings of the Security Council. Prime 
Minister Junichiro Koizumi instructed the participants in the 
meetings to "give accurate information to the public." 
 
Chief Cabinet Secretary Abe issued a statement criticizing North 
Korea's actions as a violation of the Japan-North Korea Pyongyang 
Declaration, international law, as well as the joint statement 
issued by the six-party talks. 
 
(4) Multilayered relationship with US indispensable for post-Koizumi 
government 
 
NIHON KEIZAI (Page 1) (Full) 
July 1, 2006 
 
With the adoption of a joint statement called the Japan-US Alliance 
of the New Century by Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi and US 
President George W. Bush, the Japan-US relationship has now entered 
a new age. The future course of bilateral relations depends on how 
far Tokyo and Washington will be able to expand the scope of 
cooperative ties. 
 
On June 29, the two leaders met in the Oval Office at the White 
House. They had to leave there soon for another meeting in the next 
large room. But Bush was reluctant to get out of the room with 
Koizumi. So was Koizumi. They went on with their conversation. 
 
Koizumi does not like to take anything written for him to read. He 
prefers doing ad-lib. Prior to the first Koizumi-Bush meeting in 
June 2001, an administrative official suggested Koizumi not play a 
catch because it would be dangerous if he missed a catch. But he did 
not listen to the advice and started paying a catch with Bush. He 
did not have any scenario for the recent meeting with Bush. The two 
leaders, who have good chemistry, concurred on dealing with the 
international situation that was changed by the 9/11 terrorist 
attacks on the US. The Ground Self-Defense Force troops he 
dispatched to Iraq are now about to return home safely. Such a turn 
of fortune's wheel and luck led to strengthening the Japan-US 
alliance. 
 
Bush weighed cooperation in the war on terror. Koizumi decided to 
have a Maritime Self-Defense Force fleet continue refueling US naval 
vessels operating in the Indian Ocean and keep an Air Self-Defense 
 
TOKYO 00003732  005 OF 009 
 
 
Force squadron in the Middle East. This decision has heightened 
Japan's presence. 
 
From the standpoint of attaching importance to its relations with 
the United States, Koizumi immediately decided to support 
Washington's war on terrorists. He, however, did not build a 
honeymoon-like friendship with Bush by only offering cooperation. 
Koizumi told a senior Foreign Ministry official last fall: "Don't 
you think we will be able to withdraw the SDF from its backup 
mission for Afghanistan?" The official said to Koizumi: "Since the 
SDF mission to the Indian Ocean is participation in international 
antiterrorism measures, the international community highly values 
Japan's participation." Koizumi was then quoted as saying, "If so, I 
will pull the GSDF out of Iraq during my tenure as prime minister." 
 
Before the opening of the Iraq war, Koizumi explained behind the 
scenes the need for a resolution by the United Nations, saying, "The 
United Nations has authority. It is important to respect the 
authority of the UN." Bush then questioned Koizumi, "Does it mean 
legitimacy?" Koizumi quickly answered, "That's right." 
 
Koizumi even refused the president's request for a teleconference. 
When making international decisions, Bush reportedly said to the 
leaders of other countries, however, "Would you wait for a second. I 
will inform Koizumi of this by phone." Based on accumulated frank 
exchanges, Bush extended the unprecedented red carpet treatment to 
Koizumi, but it's not a result of Japan's solely tilting toward the 
United States. 
 
Concern about lack of Japan experts 
 
In the first term of the Bush administration, there were 
communication channels between Japanese and US officials, in 
addition to the relationship of trust between the two leaders. With 
then Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and other US 
governments officials, communication channels between the White 
House and the Prime Minister's office, between the State Department 
and the Foreign Ministry, between the Defense Department and the 
Defense Agency, worked well. 
 
In the second term of the Bush administration, however, Deputy 
Secretary of State Zoellick would not meet with Japanese government 
 
SIPDIS 
officials. Therefore, vice minister-level talks were discontinued 
and it seems that only one communication channel between Koizumi and 
Bush remains. 
 
On June 28, Koizumi and Japanese officials arrived at the Blair 
House, the president's guesthouse. They were filled with deep 
emotion, wondering if there was any other Japanese prime minister 
who stayed at the Blair House three times and if there will be any 
other Japanese premier in the future to do so. They felt slight 
concern that whether the post-Koizumi government would be able to 
build a good relationship with Bush. 
 
US government officials who supported the friendly ties between 
Koizumi and Bush have already left the Bush administration. 
Bilateral economic issues have yet to be completely resolved. 
 
In an attempt to get through the greatly changing international 
situation, Japan has no realistic choice but to strengthen the 
alliance with the United States. Japan, therefore, needs to build a 
multilayered relationship between Japanese and US government 
officials, not just the friendship between the two leaders. 
 
TOKYO 00003732  006 OF 009 
 
 
 
(5) Editorial: Japan, US urged to establish relationship going 
beyond reliance on "friendship" 
 
MAINICHI (Page 5) (Full) 
July 1, 2006 
 
Prime Minister Junichiro Koizumi visited the US and met with United 
States President George W. Bush at the White House. In their 
meeting, the two leaders confirmed the achievements the two 
countries have produced through bilateral cooperation. They also 
issued a joint document titled: "The Japan-US Alliance of the New 
Century." 
 
The summit between Koizumi and Bush marked the 13th, following the 
one in Kyoto last November. This was the first official visit by a 
Japanese prime minister in seven years since Prime Minister Keizo 
Obuchi went there and the last official US visit for Koizumi prior 
to leaving office in September. The two leaders aimed to put the 
finishing touches to the bilateral relations over the past five 
years and to pave the way for the current favorable bilateral 
relations to be maintained even after Koizumi steps down. 
 
Koizumi and Bush issued the first joint document since they released 
in their first meeting in June 2001 the joint statement highlighting 
"the unshakable alliance partnership." In the joint document this 
time, the two leaders used the expression that "the Japan-US 
alliance under a global context." This expression was used in the 
Koizumi-Bush meeting held at Bush's private residence in Texas in 
May 2003 but was included in a document for the first time. 
 
The change of the wording expressing Japan-US relations from 
"unshakable alliance" into "alliance under a global context" 
reflects major changes in the international community, like the 
terrorist attacks on the US in September 2001 and the subsequent US 
war on terror, North Korea's nuclear ambitions, as well as China's 
military build-up. 
 
Given an increasing number of elements destabilizing the region, the 
role of rocksolid ties between Japan and the US, based on their 
security arrangement, is becoming more essential to maintain peace 
and stability in the Asia-Pacific region. Prime Minister Koizumi, on 
the strength of his close personal ties with Bush, succeeded in 
solidifying the relations between Japan and the US over the past 
five years. His contribution merits appreciation. 
 
Prime Minister Koizumi, though, failed to utilize the favorable 
relations with the US in carrying out international politics, as 
represented by Japan's failure to acquire a permanent seat on the 
United Nations Security Council (UNSC). In addition to China's 
adamant opposition, Washington's cool response was decisive, 
resulting in exposing the limit of Koizumi diplomacy lacing a 
comprehensive strategy while relying only on the personal ties 
established between the two leaders. 
 
The stagnation in his policy toward East Asia offset the 
achievements Koizumi produced in relations with the US. North Korea 
reportedly is preparing to launch a long-range Taepodong-2 missile. 
In negotiations on the abduction issue, too, there has been no 
progress made. Despite such circumstances, Japan remains unable to 
hold summit meetings with China and South Korea. This situation is 
quite irritating. As long as Japan continues unusual relations with 
its neighbors, Japan will be placed at a disadvantage in Asia and 
 
TOKYO 00003732  007 OF 009 
 
 
the US will not benefit, either. 
 
The joint document specified Japan-US relations as "one of the most 
accomplished bilateral relationships in history." It also advocated 
the advancement of universal values such as freedom, human rights, 
and democracy, as well as the war on terrorism. The document also 
highlighted the "Japan-US alliance under a global context" based on 
such common interests as the promotion of market mechanisms. 
 
It is natural for the two countries to expand cooperation in wider 
areas, including natural disasters, bird flu, and energy 
development, but the problem is cooperation between the US forces in 
Japan and the Self-Defense Forces (SDF) after realignment plans are 
implemented. Under this context, the issue of creating a permanent 
law for SDF missions overseas is likely to float up in the future. 
But Koizumi is about to step down as prime minister without 
explaining about such key issues, leaving such heavy challenges to 
his successor. 
 
(6) Ozawa-Hu meeting: China clearly distinguishes Japanese 
politicians understanding China's stance over Yasukuni issue from 
others 
 
YOMIURI (Page 4) (Full) 
July 5, 2006 
 
Chinese President Hu Jintao has refused to meet Prime Minister 
Junichiro Koizumi because of his visits to Yasukuni Shrine, but he 
met Minshuto (Democratic Party of Japan) President Ichiro Ozawa on 
July 4. The dominant view in the government is that the meeting was 
intended to apply pressure on Japanese officials who are supportive 
of Prime Minister Koizumi and his visits to Yasukuni Shrine. Some 
are reacting to China's stance of distinguishing politicians 
understanding China's position from others. Meanwhile, some 
officials are paying attention to the fact that President Hu 
sidestepped the Yasukuni issue in the meeting with Ozawa. 
 
Asked for his comment on the view dominant in the government that 
the Chinese president's meeting with Ozawa was intended to put 
pressure on Prime Minister Koizumi, the prime minister told 
reporters last night, expressing displeasure: "I do not think so. 
There is no need for me to be shaken up." 
 
President Hu has refused to meet with Koizumi since April last year, 
citing his visits to Yasukuni Shrine as the main reason. When former 
Minshuto head Seiji Maehara, who defined China as a threat, visited 
China, Hu also refused to meet him. 
 
Meanwhile, President Hu met with representatives from seven 
Japan-China friendship groups, including former Prime Minister 
Hashimoto, when they traveled to China this March. This time, too, 
Hu invited to China Ozawa and other senior Minshuto members critical 
of the enshrinement of Class-A war criminals at Yasukuni Shrine. The 
Chinese president thus has apparently sorted out Japanese 
politicians. 
 
Chief Cabinet Secretary Shinzo Abe criticized the Chinese 
president's stance, remarking: "Holding a summit is important for 
the two countries. Under matured relations, both sides, if they find 
perception differences existing between them, should recognize the 
other side's position." 
 
The contents of the president's remarks, though, have slightly 
 
TOKYO 00003732  008 OF 009 
 
 
changed recently. In a meeting with incoming Ambassador to China 
Yuji Miyamoto, Hu indicated his eagerness to visit Japan, saying: "I 
hope that conditions will be arranged and I will be able to visit 
your country at a proper time," without referring to the Yasukuni 
issue. Hu also sidestepped the Yasukuni issue in the meeting with 
Ozawa. A senior Foreign Ministry official commented: "President Hu 
is exploring ways to set down the load called Yasukuni issue and to 
improve the strained relations with Japan." 
 
In a meeting with Liberal Democratic Party's Commission on the 
Constitution Chairman Hajime Funada, Chinese Foreign Vice Minister 
Wu Tawei made a remark that approved visits to Yasukuni Shrine by 
politicians other than the prime minister, the chief cabinet 
secretary, and the foreign minister. Some observers analyze the 
 
SIPDIS 
remark as a breaking ball directed at a successor to Koizumi, with 
an eye to the upcoming LDP presidential election. 
 
Abe, the most likely candidate as successor to Prime Minister 
Koizumi, said in a press conference yesterday: "The freedom of 
religion and the freedom of offering condolences to those who lost 
their lives for the state must not be violated." 
 
The government and the ruling coalition are also critical of Ozawa 
for his meeting with Chinese President Hu. Ozawa told Hu in their 
meeting: "Relations among Japan, the US, and China must be an 
isosceles triangle." Foreign Minister Taro Aso reacted fiercely to 
this remark yesterday: "Japan and the US share universal values. A 
triangle is inconceivable." Abe also emphatically said: "Japan-China 
relations are important, but the two countries are not allies." 
 
(7) Editorial: US-India nuclear agreement; Prime Minister should not 
consent to it 
 
ASAHI (Page 3) (Full) 
June 28, 2006 
 
Prime Minister Koizumi has left Japan for his last visit to the US 
as prime minister. In talks with President Bush, the two leaders 
will likely praise the honeymoon period between the two countries, 
which they have enjoyed over the past five years. However, a knotty 
issue has emerged. That is a nuclear agreement signed between the US 
and India this March. 
 
India carried out a nuclear test in 1998, openly challenging the 
efforts of the international community to prevent nuclear 
proliferation. It did not join the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty 
(NPT), criticizing it as an unfair treaty. 
 
However, the Bush administration has agreed to cooperate with India 
for its utilization of nuclear energy, by providing nuclear fuel and 
technology. The US is now calling on European nations and Japan to 
endorse this agreement. It is said that President Bush himself will 
likely call for Japan's cooperation on this agreement during the 
upcoming summit. 
 
This is apparently a double standard. The NPT authorizes the 
possession of nuclear arms only be the US, Russia, Britain, France 
and Asia. Other countries are allowed to use nuclear energy and 
receive international cooperation instead of possessing nuclear 
arms. If only India is made an exception to this rule, the 
non-proliferation framework will have another major inconsistency. 
 
The US administration's logic is: India is a democratic country. 
 
TOKYO 00003732  009 OF 009 
 
 
There is no concern that nation will sell nuclear technology to 
other countries. If it tries to meet its sharply increasing demand 
for energy resources with oil, the supply and demand of oil in the 
world could be thrown into chaos. That is the reason why the US 
should assist India for its use of atomic energy. 
 
Then, what will the US do, if Pakistan, which carried out a nuclear 
test in the same year, seeks similar treatment? The international 
community is now working hard on Iran, which has said it would join 
in the NPT and undergo international inspection, to abandon its 
nuclear development program. It is out of the question to allow such 
an overt double standard. 
 
The US-India nuclear agreement is bound to have a negative impact on 
the six-party talks designed to have North Korea abandon its nuclear 
development program. If the US says that it is all right to provide 
nuclear cooperation to a democratic country, then it could encourage 
Japanese and South Korean advocates of their countries arming 
themselves with nuclear weapons. 
 
International cooperation on the peaceful use of nuclear energy 
should be promoted, based on a non-nuclear principle. It is 
impermissible to break the major non-proliferation principle with 
such an agreement. The prime minister should clearly notify 
President Bush of this position of Japan. 
 
The US Congress is also concurred about the double standard. There 
is no prospect for revising a related law, a procedure needed in 
order to implement the agreement. 
 
The strategic importance of this agreement for India, which has a 
population of 1.1 billion and whose economy is rapidly developing, 
is understandable. India is now the largest recipient of Japan's 
assistance. Interest in its market is also growing. It is an 
indispensable player for the stability and development of Asia. 
 
However, it is consistent for Japan to maintain the 
non-proliferation stance, while strengthening ties with that nation. 
Japan should work on India to abandon its nuclear arms, while 
talking about Asia for its future coexistence. 
 
Japan, the only atomic-bombed country, cannot participate in a move 
to cause a major setback of the NPT regime. 
 
SCHIEFFER