Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ROME1996, ARMS SALES TO VENEZUELA

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ROME1996.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ROME1996 2006-07-13 09:20 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Rome
VZCZCXRO7540
OO RUEHFL RUEHNP
DE RUEHRO #1996 1940920
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 130920Z JUL 06
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5340
INFO RUEHCV/AMEMBASSY CARACAS PRIORITY 0742
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID PRIORITY 1704
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 1568
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 7353
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 1642
RUEKJCS/JOINT STAFF WASHDC PRIORITY
RUCPDOC/DEPT OF COMMERCE WASHDC PRIORITY
UNCLAS ROME 001996 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE PLEASE PASS TO ISN/CATR, EUR/PRA, AND EUR/WE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ETRD ETTC PARM SP VE IT
SUBJECT: ARMS SALES TO VENEZUELA 
 
REF: A. STATE 112031 
 
     B. STATE 110041 
     C. ROME 01915 
 
Sensitive but unclassified.  Not for internet distribution. 
 
1. (SBU) Summary. A/ECMIN met July 7 with Simone Bemporad, 
Finmeccanica's Senior Vice President for Media Relations and 
International Affairs, and Camillo Pirozzi, Head of Public 
Affairs and Institutional Relations, to discuss 
Finmeccanica's proposed sale of naval guns to the Venezuelan 
navy.  A/ECMIN orally delivered Ref A talking points, which 
Pirozzi and Bemporad said they would take back to 
Finmeccanica.  While they were receptive to our points, 
Bemporad and Pirozzi stopped short of saying Finmeccanica 
would not pursue this sale.  Post will report delivery of Ref 
B talking points regarding Finmeccanica's contract in Iran 
septel.  End Summary. 
 
2. (SBU) A/ECMIN began by thanking Finmeccanica for 
consulting the USG on the proposed sale. Drawing on Ref A 
points, she said that President Chavez was becoming 
increasingly authoritarian and was acquiring weapons in 
excess of Venezuela's legitimate self-defense needs.  She 
further noted the USG had demarched the Government of Spain 
(GOS) and Navantia (the Spanish company building the patrol 
boats on which the guns will be installed) on supplying arms 
to Venezuela.  She said we had not told the GOS clearly that 
we would not allow U.S. exports in support of the 
construction of these patrol boats. 
 
3. (SBU) A/ECMIN also noted the USG had designated Venezuela 
as not fully cooperating with U.S. anti-terrorism efforts 
and, for this reason, will not permit the export or 
retransfer of defense articles or defense services to 
Venezuela effective October 1, 2006.  Bemporad took A/ECMIN's 
points on board, stating "Now we have an answer," and said 
that he would relay these points to senior Finmeccanica 
management. 
 
4. (SBU) Comment. Although Finmeccanica sought USG views on 
the proposed sale, we note that neither Bemporad nor Pirozzi 
explicitly said Finmeccanica would not go forward with the 
sale.  As reported Ref C, it is Finmeccanica policy to seek 
USG approval before entering into contracts with states of 
concern or in cases where the USG might object for foreign 
policy reasons.  We asked Finmeccanica to inform us of the 
final decision on the proposed sale, and we will follow up 
with Finmeccanica.  End comment. 
SPOGLI