VZCZCXRO3151
RR RUEHFL RUEHKR RUEHLA RUEHMRE
DE RUEHTC #1441 1791215
ZNR UUUAA ZZH
R 281215Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY THE HAGUE
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 6172
INFO RUEHAK/AMEMBASSY ANKARA 0571
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS 0272
RUEHBW/AMEMBASSY BELGRADE 0627
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 1608
RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN 4028
RUEHSL/AMEMBASSY BRATISLAVA 0196
RUEHBS/AMEMBASSY BRUSSELS 8940
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST 1127
RUEHUP/AMEMBASSY BUDAPEST 0166
RUEHCH/AMEMBASSY CHISINAU 0110
RUEHCP/AMEMBASSY COPENHAGEN 6608
RUEHDL/AMEMBASSY DUBLIN 0213
RUEHHE/AMEMBASSY HELSINKI 1846
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KIEV 0430
RUEHKR/AMEMBASSY KOROR 0001
RUEHLI/AMEMBASSY LISBON 0487
RUEHLJ/AMEMBASSY LJUBLJANA 0257
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 1556
RUEHLE/AMEMBASSY LUXEMBOURG 5157
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 4999
RUEHNC/AMEMBASSY NICOSIA 0662
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 5060
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 1292
RUEHPG/AMEMBASSY PRAGUE 1103
RUEHRK/AMEMBASSY REYKJAVIK 0021
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA 0166
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 1971
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO 0091
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL 1337
RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE 0437
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 0426
RUEHSM/AMEMBASSY STOCKHOLM 4645
RUEHTL/AMEMBASSY TALLINN 0169
RUEHSI/AMEMBASSY TBILISI 0104
RUEHTV/AMEMBASSY TEL AVIV 2852
RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA 0492
RUEHVT/AMEMBASSY VALLETTA 0259
RUEHVI/AMEMBASSY VIENNA 0655
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS 0181
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 1991
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON 0313
RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB 1855
RUEHLA/AMCONSUL BARCELONA 0019
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE 0012
RUEHMRE/AMCONSUL MARSEILLE 0355
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 4122

UNCLAS THE HAGUE 001441 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL AORC EU EUN UNGA UNGA NL
SUBJECT: NETHERLANDS/UN:  UN REFORM AND LIFTING THE BUDGET 
CAP 
 
REF: STATE 105146 
 
¶1. (SBU) Poloff delivered demarche on UN management reform 
and lifting the budget cap to Alain Ancion at the Dutch MFA's 
Office of UN Management Reform Office on June 27.  Per 
instructions, Poloff also provided a copy of the draft 
resolution for the MFA to review. 
 
¶2. (SBU) Ancion was supportive of the U.S. initiative but 
pessimistic that it would succeed.  He said he was 
disappointed some of the proposed Dutch reforms -- such as a 
consolidated peace-keeping budget -- did not make it into the 
draft resolution, but recognized this was probably due to 
Japanese sensitivities.  Ancion expected stiff resistance to 
point 9 of the draft resolution, particularly from Russia. 
 
¶3. (SBU) Ancion expressed surprise that some countries with a 
history of working closely with Australia and Japan -- i.e., 
New Zealand and Canada -- had not participated more actively 
in drafting the the resolution.  He felt it was a missed 
opportunity for further consultations in finding more 
resolutions.  Ancion conceded, however, that the draft 
resolution was probably the most logical outcome of the 
consultations. 
 
¶4. (SBU) Finally, Ancion argued that the G-77 will remain 
highly suspicious of the EU, US, and UN, and predicted the 
group would take a minimalist approach while seeking a broad 
negotiation of the resolution.  The Dutch, on the other hand, 
view the link between UN reform and the budget cap as an 
ideal way to make progress in UN management reform.  Getting 
any resolution, he concluded, would be a good thing, but the 
process will clarify the limits of what sort of reforms in UN 
management can be achieved in the current environment. 
BLAKEMAN