Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06PARIS4390, UNESCO LITERACY PRIZES - BACKGROUND ON PRICES AND

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS4390.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06PARIS4390 2006-06-26 14:08 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS PARIS 004390 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SCUL CU CH UNESCO
SUBJECT:  UNESCO LITERACY PRIZES - BACKGROUND ON PRICES AND 
 
REF: PARIS 4296 
 
1.  (U) The 2006 UNESCO Literacy Prize Winners were announced 
yesterday, 21 June 2006.  The winners are:  Cuba, Morocco, Pakistan, 
Rajastan (India), and Turkey. 
The prizes are expected to be presented on 8 September 2006, 
International Literacy Day. 
 
2. (U) The UNESCO International Reading Association prize was 
awarded to Pakistan (National Commission for Human Development NCHD, 
for its National Literacy Program, which aims to increase the 
literacy ration by the year 2015 to meet EFA goals. 
 
3. (U) One of the two UNESCO King Sejong Prizes was awarded to 
Turkey (Mother Child Education Foundation).  The other UNESCO King 
Sejong Prize was awarded to Cuba (Youth and Adult Literacy and 
Education Chair of the Latin American and Caribbean Pedagogical 
Institute) for its work to advance individual and social potential 
through innovative teaching methods with successful outcome in 15 
countries, notably in Ecuador and Venezuela. 
 
4. (U) One of the two UNESCO Confucius Prizes was awarded to Morocco 
(Ministry of National Education).  The other UNESCO Confucius Prize 
was awarded to Rajastan (India) (Directorate of Literacy and 
Continuing Education for its Useful Learning through Literacy and 
Continuing Education Program 
 
5. (U) Prize winners are designated by the Director General on the 
recommendation of a jury, made up of least five persons of different 
nationalities appointed by the Director General for a minimum of 
three years.  Mr. Shigeru Aoyagi and Ms. Namtip Aksornkook are the 
two education sector staff members who have been responsible for the 
program. 
 
6. (U) Jury members for the International Reading Association, King 
Sejong and Confucius prizes: 
Alan Farstrup, (US) 
Choi Un Shil (Korea) 
Ghada Ragheb Al-Jabi (President) (Syria) 
Gorgui Sow (Senegal ) 
Mirian Masaquiza (Ecuador) 
Dong Jiang Song (China) new member added because of the Confucius 
prize 
 
7. (SBU) According to a conversation with Alan Farstrup, the US 
member of the jury, 47 candidatures were reviewed, having been 
nominated by NGO's or National Commissions.  He said that overall, 
they were of poor quality, with only six candidates really worth 
considering.  One other candidate, an Africa project, was ruled out, 
as it had been nominated by Spain, and not by an NGO or National 
Commission, according to the prize rules. 
 
8. (SBU) Farstrup indicated that there was a great deal of pressure 
from Ecuador to award a prize to Venezuela, but he was able to 
counter the push successfully.  He said that the rules of procedure 
are questionable, and need to be looked at, regarding term limits, 
conflict of interest, and selection of candidate for prizes. 
 
9. (SBU) As already reported, apparently at least two members of 
UNESCO's ED/BAS/LIT staff, pushed the prize nominations to the 
Director General's office without going through channels, which 
included Peter Smith, ADG, Education, and Jim Kulikowski. 
Oliver