Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06PARIS4305, MEDIA REACTION REPORT - U.S. - EU Summit

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06PARIS4305.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06PARIS4305 2006-06-22 11:15 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 03 PARIS 004305 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
DEPT FOR INR/R/MR; IIP/RW; IIP/RNY; BBG/VOA; IIP/WEU; 
AF/PA; EUR/WE /P/SP; D/C (MCCOO); EUR/PA; INR/P; INR/EUC; 
PM; OSC ISA FOR ILN; NEA; WHITE HOUSE FOR NSC/WEUROPE; DOC FOR 
ITA/EUR/FR AND PASS USTR/PA; USINCEUR FOR PAO; NATO/PA; MOSCOW/PA; 
ROME/PA. 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR FR
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION REPORT - U.S. - EU Summit 
Iraq North Korea 
PARIS - Thursday, June 22, 2006 
 
 
(A) SUBJECTS COVERED IN TODAY'S REPORT: 
 
U.S. - EU Summit 
Iraq 
North Korea 
 
B) SUMMARY OF COVERAGE: 
 
La Croix carries an op-ed by Ambassador Stapleton entitled "A Modern 
Day Fight to Abolish Slavery" in which he calls for an end "once and 
for all" to the blight of trafficking in persons. 
 
France's growth rate for the first half of 2006, a steady 2%, is a 
major front-page story. Commentators attribute this growth to 
worldwide economic dynamism, but also to increased consumption in 
French households. Domestic politics continue to dominate headlines 
and editorials, with Liberation headlining: "Why Chirac Puts Up With 
Villepin" "despite the PM's missteps and blunders..." 
 
International stories are dominated by Iraq and the fact that "The 
White House is on the Defensive" according to Le Figaro, after the 
discovery of the bodies of the two soldiers killed after having been 
abducted. A separate story is entitled "U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad 
Loses Confidence." (See Part C) 
 
The U.S.-EU Summit is today's second major international story. For 
Le Figaro, "Bush Justifies His War on Terror" while Liberation 
emphasizes the "Cordial Entente" between the two powers. Both quote 
President Bush: "I would like to close Guantanamo..." (See Part C) 
 
Pyongyang's stance is reported in Le Figaro: "Kim Jong Il has his 
finger on the trigger, but is ready to negotiate..." (See Part C) 
While Somalia's "risk of contagion" is analyzed in Liberation: "The 
irresistible rise in power of Somalia's Islamists, many of whom are 
members of Al-Qeda, is transforming the Horn of Africa into a powder 
keg and Somalia into the most sought after campground in the battle 
against terrorism." 
 
Left-of-center weekly Le Nouvel Observateur devotes its editorial to 
the controversy triggered by the attack on Israeli lobbies in the 
U.S. by John Mearshimer and Stephen Walt. Jean Daniel raises the 
question of the Aipac's, (the lobby in question) role in triggering 
the war in Iraq: "For the first time the question is raised about 
the role of the four men at the helm of Aipac in starting the war in 
Iraq with the objective not only of defending Israel, but of helping 
Israel occupy all of the Palestinian territories," and poses the 
question of Olmert's "true intentions regarding a Palestinian state. 
Because in Washington no one believes sincerely that Olmert will 
contribute to the building of a Palestinian state. This is allegedly 
already the opinion of Condoleezza Rice and of most of the State 
Department." 
 
Liberation carries an op-ed entitled "Hillary C's Resistible 
Ascension." Jacques Amalric analyzes her positioning to "the center, 
where elections are won..." which he says is "a strategy for a run 
off, which presupposes having won the first round, in this instance 
having been chosen by the Democrats: an uncertain outcome at this 
point... Despite her efforts, Hillary C. remains a very 
controversial figure... Even heavy Republican losses next November 
will not stand as a test of the Hillary Clinton effect." 
 
The World Cup Championship and this afternoon's match between the 
U.S. and Ghana leads Le Figaro correspondent Philippe Gelie to pen 
an analysis explaining why "On the Soccer Planet, the U.S. Remain A 
'Hypopower.'" "How is it possible that the military, political, 
economic and cultural hyperpower turns into a dwarf in the world of 
soccer? Why is the champion of globalization always behind when 
every four years the rest of world participates in this 
celebration?"  Gelie is of the opinion that for the Americans, 
"socialist and European soccer falls short of the democratic and 
capitalistic American football." And concludes: "Indeed, the other 
European invention which has never been adopted by the U.S. is 
socialism..." 
 
(C) SUPPORTING TEXT/BLOCK QUOTES: 
 
 
 
U.S. - EU Summit 
 
"Bush Justifies His War on Terror" 
Pierre Avril in right-of-center Le Figaro (06/22): "Because for 
President Bush, the best defense is offense, he did not wait to be 
questioned on Guanatanamo to justify, at least temporarily, the 
existence of the detention camp, while promising to set everything 
in motion to close it... The American President beat the Austrian 
President to the draw when he announced: 'I would like to close 
Guantanamo...' But the American President made no gesture of 
contrition... What President Bush did not appreciate were the 
results of a European poll indicating that the U.S. represented a 
threat to world peace... The U.S. President explained that for 
Americans, 9/11 changed their way of thinking. And his explanations 
seemed to satisfy his audience." 
 
"The Newly-Found Entente" 
Andre Schlecht in regional L'Alsace (06/22): "Upon looking at it 
closely, the U.S.- EU summit has resulted in only one agreement 
being signed. Although signed on the 'margins' of the summit, this 
agreement must not be ignored because it has to do with the 
important sector of education and training... As for disagreements, 
the summit's objective was to show that they had been overcome. That 
goal has been achieved. Not a word of disagreement filtered out to 
the press... This Viennese ball of velvet strokes is not just an 
exercise of fagade. It is the expression of a reality. Although 
chaos continues in Iraq and Afghanistan's ephemeral stability is 
threatened, and although the Middle East is stalled on the roadmap, 
the U.S. may have learned that it is best to lead its policy with 
Europe than despite it." 
 
"Bush and Europe Stake Out Trade Positions" 
Right-of-center Les Echos (06/22): "While President Bush's statement 
on the Doha Round was that 'we cannot let this round fail,' he did 
not make any concessions to the Europeans... The EU believes the 
U.S. needs to further reduce internal subsidies to agriculture... On 
the big diplomatic issues, however, the two powers showed their 
unity, illustrating the thawing of their relations after the long 
breach related to Iraq... Regarding Guantanamo, however George Bush 
limited himself to re-stating his desire to close it but that it was 
first necessary to know where to transfer the detainees." 
 
Iraq 
 
"The White House on the Defensive" 
Philippe Gelie in right-of-center Le Figaro (06/22): "After the good 
news of Zarqawi's elimination, harsh news from Iraq have taken over, 
with the discovery of the mutilated bodies of two U.S. soldiers and 
... the old but embarrassing episode involving two American soldiers 
killed by Iraqi troops... For President Bush, who hoped for a 
'reversal of the trend,' this week has marked a return to a 
defensive stance, with Japan announcing its troop pullout and 
Italy's previous similar announcement." 
 
"U.S. Ambassador to Baghdad Loses Confidence" 
Delphine Minoui in right-of-center Le Figaro (06/22): "President 
Bush could have done without this new slap in the face... The letter 
from Ambassador Khalizad to Secretary Rice depicts a dark picture of 
the everyday situation in Iraq, which contrasts with the habitual 
optimistic speeches coming from the Bush administration... The 
'sensitive' cable, which landed mysteriously on a Washington Post 
desk... bases its conclusions on the daily experiences of the U.S. 
Embassy in Iraq..." 
 
North Korea 
 
"Pyongyang Has Its Finger on the Trigger" 
Jean-Jacques Mevel in right-of-center Le Figaro (06/22): "Kim Jong 
Il has his finger on the trigger, but is ready to negotiate... For 
North Korea's Stalin-style regime, the opening of direct talks with 
Washington is an obsession and a matter of prestige. It would also 
mean recognition. Kim Jong Il is worried about his regime since 
President Bush put North Korea in the 'axis of evil.' Since then he 
keeps asking for guarantees for his country's security. But the Bush 
administration's response has never varied: Pyongyang cannot expect 
military or political dividends from the U.S. until it has 
unequivocally given up on the atomic bomb... But once again, the 
White House is facing an impossible choice: it cannot give in to 
slightest bit of blackmail and see its already diminished authority 
fall further. Yet intransigence towards Pyongyang invariably leads 
to the same diplomatic stalemate as with Iran: paralysis with 
temporary outbreaks of feverish skirmishes, leaving the adversary 
with plenty of time to build up his nuclear arsenal." STAPLETON