Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06BRASILIA1252, BRAZIL RESPONDS TO NAM MINISTERIAL DEMARCHE NOTING DISTRUST

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06BRASILIA1252.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06BRASILIA1252 2006-06-22 15:42 2011-07-11 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Brasilia
VZCZCXRO7673
PP RUEHRG
DE RUEHBR #1252 1731542
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 221542Z JUN 06
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 5850
INFO RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 2330
RUEHSO/AMCONSUL SAO PAULO 7254
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 5008
RUCNDT/USMISSION USUN NEW YORK 0149
UNCLAS BRASILIA 001252 
 
SIPDIS 
 
PLEASE PASS TO BFRIEDMAN AND BPOPP WHA/BSC, LWEISS WHA/PPC 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL AORC UNGA UNGA BR
SUBJECT: BRAZIL RESPONDS TO NAM MINISTERIAL DEMARCHE NOTING DISTRUST 
OF REFORM INITIATIVE AMONG THE G-77 
 
REF: STATE 83898 
 
1. Poloff delivered Reftel's talking points, June 21, to Bruno Brant 
of the MFA's Division for UN Affairs.  In a revealing conversation 
about a prevailing mood of "distrust" within the UN, Brant noted 
that the GoB tends to be one of the moderating influences among the 
G-77, but that hard-line USG and EU positions have made it difficult 
for Brazil to be a tempering influence.  In regard to Resolution 
60/260 Brant averred that Brazil had tried to breach differences and 
had actually been very close to a deal with EU members.  The GoB 
believes that there is very little that separates the developed 
nations from the rest but that a spirit of "political distrust" has 
invaded the UN, and this stems from the spending cap. 
 
2. Brant claimed that there is a perception of blackmail among some 
members of the G-77, as reform is being "held hostage" to the budget 
measures.  This impression, he reiterated, makes it difficult to 
moderate radical elements of the developing country block.  In a 
succinct evaluation of the situation Brant noted there are two 
elements vying in the UN, the power of the purse and the power of 
the vote. 
 
3. Addressing the reform measures highlighted in the talking points, 
Brant said he believes that there is a general consensus that the 
proposed package is very positive.  The GoB had few if any arguments 
with the purported reforms and believes that consensus would be 
easily achieved; if, of course, the U.S. and EU were willing to 
separate the two issues (Reform and the Budget).  When pressed as to 
whether the GoB would again vote with the G-77 in a deadlock, Brant 
demurred and said that he did not know the answer to that question. 
He believed, however, that the ball is in the U.S. court and that 
confidence building measures would help to avert a crisis.  In 
closing, Brant was upbeat stating that there is a strong desire and 
willingness to discuss reform, and that consensus was imminently 
possible. 
 
CHICOLA