Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ROME1322, ITALY'S INTERIM RESPONSE: NO IMMEDIATE FUNDS FOR

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ROME1322.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ROME1322 2006-05-04 12:40 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Rome
VZCZCXRO4064
PP RUEHAG RUEHDF RUEHIK RUEHLZ
DE RUEHRO #1322 1241240
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
P 041240Z MAY 06
FM AMEMBASSY ROME
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 4636
INFO RUCNMEM/EU MEMBER STATES COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBUL/AMEMBASSY KABUL PRIORITY 0295
RUEHFL/AMCONSUL FLORENCE PRIORITY 1358
RUEHMIL/AMCONSUL MILAN PRIORITY 7024
RUEHNP/AMCONSUL NAPLES PRIORITY 1430
UNCLAS ROME 001322 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
BRUSSELS FOR PATRICIA LERNER 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAID PGOV PREL IT AF
SUBJECT: ITALY'S INTERIM RESPONSE: NO IMMEDIATE FUNDS FOR 
2009 ELECTION COSTS IN AFGHANISTAN 
 
REF: A. SECSTATE 57541 
 
     B. ROME 71 
     C. ROME 28 
     D. ROME 27 
 
1.  This is an action request.  Please see para 4. 
 
2.  EconOff delivered reftel demarche April 14 to Maria Pia 
Dradi, Afghanistan Desk Officer for MFA's Office of 
Development Cooperation (ODC); and PolOff delivered reftel 
demarche April 18 to Anna Della Croce, MFA's Coordinator for 
Afghanistan.  In a follow-up meeting April 20, Dradi informed 
EconOff that Della Croce and Alessandro Modiano, ODC's Office 
Director for Asia, Latin America, and the Caribbean, had 
discussed the election budget shortfall, and that Modiano 
would have further discussions with Guiseppe Deodato, ODC's 
Director General, on this issue.  Dradi noted Italy provided 
the United Nations Development Program (UNDP) a total of 15 
million euros to date for Afghan election support.  She 
thanked EconOff for bringing ODC's attention to the existing 
budget shortfall, as Italy had previously been unaware that 
the commission lacked the necessary funds to prepare for the 
2009 elections. 
 
3.  EconOff spoke again May 2 with Dradi, who said no 
decision had been reached.  Dradi promised she would inform 
EconOff immediately, once a decision is made.  COMMENT: The 
delay could be a result of Italy's recent elections and the 
current flurry of activity to form a new government. Italy's 
final response will be conditioned by recent severe cuts in 
the GOI foreign assistance budget (Reftels B, C, D).  END 
COMMENT. 
 
4.  ACTION REQUEST:  Italy is contending with a 27 percent 
decrease in its 2006 foreign assistance budget.  Our 
interlocutors wonder why we are requesting information on 
funding so soon before the 2009 elections.  Please provide 
that background and the deadline by which international 
donors must make a decision on funding to ensure 
Afghanistan's administration of the 2009 election is not 
hampered by insufficient funds.  End action request. 
SPOGLI