

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06AITTAIPEI1545, MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN SHUI-BIAN'S TRANSITS IN THE
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06AITTAIPEI1545 | 2006-05-04 12:28 | 2011-08-23 00:00 | UNCLASSIFIED | American Institute Taiwan, Taipei |
VZCZCXYZ0027
RR RUEHWEB
DE RUEHIN #1545/01 1241228
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 041228Z MAY 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0026
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 5161
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 6365
UNCLAS AIT TAIPEI 001545
SIPDIS
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - ERIC BARBORIAK
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON
SIPDIS
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: PRESIDENT CHEN SHUI-BIAN'S TRANSITS IN THE
UNITED STATES
¶1. Summary: Taiwan's dailies continued significant coverage May 4 of
transit plans for President Chen Shui-bian, who planned to depart on
a trip to Paraguay and Costa Rica Thursday morning. Two prominent
Taiwan papers, the pro-unification "United Daily News" and Taiwan's
biggest daily, the pro-independence "Liberty Times" reported on
their front and second pages, respectively, that Chen had decided
not to transit the United States. The UDN headlined its article
"Itinerary Changed: Bian Will Not Transit U.S. on His Way
Overseas." The LT said "U.S. Says Bian Will Not Transit Alaska."
Other papers front-paged the U.S. decision to allow Chen refueling
stops in Anchorage on his way to and from Central and South America.
The pro-status quo "China Times" ran a front-page banner headline
that read: "Bian Lashes out in Dissatisfaction with U.S. Transit
Arrangements When Meeting with AIT Director, While the United States
Forcefully Makes Final Decision." The newspaper also carried a
separate new story on page three with the headline: "State
Department Suggests Transit in Miami, Bush Turns It Down."
¶2. Several papers continued to editorialize on Chen's U.S. transits
and the current status of Taipei-Washington relations. A "Liberty
Times" editorial urged Washington to support Taiwan and not succumb
to China's threats. An editorial in the pro-independence "Taiwan
Daily" also called on the United States to value Taiwan's friendship
and handle issues related to Taiwan more prudently. An editorial in
the mass-circulation "Apple Daily" said Washington knows for sure
that Taiwan needs the United States, no matter what, and there is
nothing Taiwan can do if Washington wants to humiliate Taiwan's
president. An editorial in the pro-unification "United Daily News,"
however, attributed the U.S. government's ignoring Chen's transit
request to its displeasure with his decision to end the functions of
the National Unification Council and his deteriorating approval
rating. National Taiwan University Professor Philip Yang opined in
the "United Daily News" that Chen's inadequate credibility has
resulted in Washington's decision to adopt preventive diplomacy.
End summary.
A) "How Can Politicians and Media Rejoice over the President's
Setback with Regard to His Transits in the United States?"
The pro-independence "Liberty Times" [circulation: 600,000]
editorialized (5/4):
"... President Chen's failure to enter the U.S. mainland during his
transits this time must be viewed as a regression in Taiwan-U.S.
relations. ... But we must remind the United States that in the
wake of China's rise, which was cloaked in the colors of peace,
Beijing's warmongering attitude, its increasing military buildup,
and its totalitarian dictatorship have cast shadows over global
peace and stability. When it comes to East Asian issues, Washington
should support Taiwan, which is also a democracy like the United
States, and consolidate its security alliance with Japan. This is
the fundamental way to maintain regional peace. Excessively bowing
to China's threats is akin to bringing in a troublemaker and will
cause endless trouble [for the United States] in the future. ..."
B) "Chiang Kai-shek Is the Originator That Makes Taiwan Unable to
Walk off the Island and Promote [Its] Foreign Relations. Only under
the Name 'Taiwan' Can [the Island] Pave a New Road in Diplomacy"
The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" [circulation: 100,000]
editorialized (5/4):
"... Even though we are not totally pleased [with U.S. transit plans
for President Chen Shui-bian], we must understand that the United
States has its own position. However, we must remind the United
States of the fact that China mistakenly believes it can do whatever
it wants with Taiwan as long as it exerts pressure. Taiwan's
democratic achievements have won recognition around the world. The
United States, which is a leader of the world's democracies, must
value Taiwan's friendship more and handle Taiwan issues more
carefully from now on. ..."
C) "Bian Turned down for His Wooing"
The mass-circulation "Apple Daily" [circulation: 500,000]
editorialized (5/4):
"... It certainly was not easy for [Chen] to annoy U.S. President
George W. Bush so much as to turn him from being a big supporter of
Taiwan to someone who feels bad about the island! It looks like
Chen is more powerful than China in sabotaging Taiwan-U.S.
relations. The [effects] of recent events such as the meeting
between Bush and Chinese President Hu Jintao, the Iranian nuclear
crisis, and Chen's decision to cease the functions of the National
Unification Council, as well as Chen's remarks and behavior ever
since he assumed office, have all rebounded on Chen and is reflected
in his transits this time. ... Washington knows for sure that Taiwan
needs the United States, no matter what. There is nothing that
Taiwan can do if Washington wants to humiliate Taiwan's president.
This is a fact, but Washington will be going too far if it
humiliates Taiwan just to curry favor with China. ..."
D) "'Journey of Uncertainty': What Is Chen Shui-bian's Diplomatic
Strategy?"
The pro-unification "United Daily News" [circulation: 400,000] wrote
in an editorial (5/4):
"... This newspaper also must remind the ruling DPP that the U.S.
government's negligence [of Taiwan] this time not only manifested
[U.S. President George W.] Bush's impatience toward the 'cessation
of Taiwan's National Unification Council' but was also related to
the evident deterioration of President Chen's administrative
performance and personal image. The United States' high-profile
treatment [of Chen during his U.S. transits] five years ago showed
Washington's expectations and encouragement of the leader of a young
democracy, and Washington's cold shoulder this time shows that it no
longer wants to speak to a stupid, stubborn and unpopular state
leader. This is a message of which both Chen and the DPP must stay
alert. ..."
E) "Inadequate Credibility Results in United States' Preventive
Diplomacy"
Professor Philip Yang of National Taiwan University's Department of
Political Science opined in the pro-unification "United Daily News"
[circulation: 400,000] (5/4):
"To judge from Washington's perspective, its refusal of President
Chen's transit of the continental U.S. is actually a [result of]
crisis management and preventive diplomacy. In the wake of the
cessation of Taiwan's National Unification Council (NUC), the gap
between Taipei and Washington with regard to their interpretations
and perceptions of the [NUC] event still remain. As a result of
this gap, plus Chen's record of [inadequate] credibility as shown in
his handling of Taipei-Washington ties, Washington was seriously
concerned that Taipei would misinterpret the U.S. decision regarding
Chen's transits and infer that the NUC event is over. Washington
was even worried that Taipei would think that the United States has
accepted the latter's clarifications about the NUC matter, a move
that would lead people to think that the United States has accepted
Taipei's unilateral definition of the status quo [across the Taiwan
Strait]. Such a development, of course, does not meet U.S. policy
and interests.
"In addition, Washington is concerned that Chen's transits and his
interpretation [of the U.S. decision] afterwards, plus the many
diplomatic gaffes that happened during [Chinese President] Hu
Jintao's visit to Washington, would send a wrong message to the
Beijing government and cause Chinese misunderstanding and
misjudgment. China, as a result, might think that Washington is
playing the Taiwan card in terms of its cross-Strait policy, and
that it tends to use Taipei to counterbalance Beijing. ...
"Chen's move is of course aimed at testing the waters, seeking to
use his transits to figure out Washington's policy changes. ... But
the United States knows clearly the seriousness of the consequences
if it allows Chen to transit the U.S. In the meantime, it is aware
that it can use Chen's transits to make the Taiwan people understand
the extent to which Taipei-Washington ties have deteriorated, and
also find a vent for Beijing to release its displeasure with Hu's
U.S. trip. ..."
YOUNG