This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 ABU DHABI 002119 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR NEA/ARP; NEA/PPD; NEA/RA; INR/R/MR; PA; INR/NESA; 
INR/B; RRU-NEA 
IIP/G/NEA-SA 
WHITE HOUSE FOR PRESS OFFICE; NSC 
SECDEF FOR OASD/PA 
USCINCCENT FOR POLAD 
LONDON FOR MCKUNE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OIIP KMDR AE KPAO TC
SUBJECT:  MEDIA REACTION: APPEAL FOR THE RELEASE OF UAE 
DIPLOMAT/PROPOSED REGIONAL MISSILE DEFENSE SYSTEM 
 
 
¶1.  SUMMARY:   Three daily Arab newspapers appealed for the 
release of the kidnapped UAE diplomat.  A columnist in "Al-Bayan" 
warns Arabs against counting on America because its policies have 
always served Israeli interests.  An editorial in English daily 
"Gulf News" rejects the concept of a regional missile defense 
system.  End Summary. 
 
¶2.   Under headline "An Appeal from Al-Khaleej", Sharjah-based 
pan-Arab daily "Al-Khaleej" (circulation 85,000) wrote 5/21 
unsigned editorial: 
 
"This is another appeal, which Al-Khaleej sends to our brothers 
in Iraq, to quickly work on releasing the UAE Diplomat Naji Al- 
Nuami so that he can return safely to his family and resume his 
work helping the Iraqi people with the disastrous situation they 
face today...  This appeal, whether official, political or 
spiritual, is to reach the Arab and Muslim leaderships so that 
they can help release Al-Nuami.  Hopefully, this intervention 
could open a new era of stabilization, sovereignty and unity." 
 
¶3.   A UAE columnist, Abdulla Rasheed, wrote in his daily column 
5/22 in Abu Dhabi-based Arabic daily "Al-Ittihad" (circulation 
65,000): 
 
"Humanity appeals to those who kidnapped Naji Al-Nuami to examine 
the humanitarian deeds this person has accomplished, and into 
what his country has given to Iraq and Iraqis whom they strongly 
love without discriminating between one faction and another.  The 
UAE... is proud to belong to the Arab nations and is waiting for 
an initiative to save its innocent son Naji Al-Nuami and return 
him safely to his mother and his family." 
 
¶4.   Under headline "Naji Al-Nuami", a UAE columnist, Adel 
Mohamed Al-Rashed, wrote 5/22 op-ed in Arabic language daily 
"Emarat Alyoum" (circulation 20,000): 
 
"Naji Al-Nuami is simply a soldier following UAE's ideologies, 
who is concerned with his brother's concerns.  He and his friends 
are messengers of love and support; their simple goal and mission 
in Iraq is to help orphans and widows and try to meet the basic 
needs of Iraqis.  We hope that the UAE's role is not swept from 
Naji and his colleagues..." 
 
¶5.   Under headline "The futile reliance.. and the conciliation", 
an Egyptian columnist, Jalal Aref, wrote 5/21 op-ed in Dubai- 
based Arabic daily "Al-Bayan," (circulation 90,000): 
 
"Since the beginning, we have warned the Arabs of the futility of 
counting on Washington.  The USA knows more than anybody else 
that its political disagreement is with the Arab countries and 
that these countries will not swallow the American policies that 
its regimes are swallowing.  The Arabs will not accept to have 
their fate being decided by others.  Moreover, Arab countries 
will not forget Palestine, no matter what, and will not excuse 
the American policy...  Also not to be forgiven, are America's 
crimes committed daily against Iraq, which has up to now lost 
more than 100,000 citizen and who is being led to a civil war 
submerging the region in a sea of hatred and factional wars. 
This all serves the main political criminal, the Zionist lobby, 
governing Washington and Tel Aviv..." 
 
¶6.   Unsigned editorial in English language daily "Gulf News" 
under the headline "An American offer we must refuse," 5/22 
(circulation 95,000): 
 
"As if the region was not volatile enough, the U.S. now wants to 
install an advanced missile system in GCC states.  Officials 
argue that with such a system it will be able to deter any 
expansion plans in the region by Iran brought about by the 
development of any nuclear capacity. 
The U.S. is concerned that if there was any additional strife in 
the region, then, as countries in the region are major suppliers 
of oil, global markets could be affected and subsequently 
nations' economies. However, it should not be assumed that the 
concern by the U.S. was totally altruistic.  More realistically, 
it is for purely selfish reasons and the desire to suppress and 
contain Iran from its development of nuclear energy that Iran all 
along claims to be for peaceful purposes. 
In the absence of any information to the contrary, Gulf neighbors 
have been content to accept Iran's claim not only because they 
cannot prove otherwise, but also because they have no desire to 
ratchet up the equation to confrontation levels.  Yet it appears 
the U.S. is least concerned about increasing tensions in the 
region, presumably believing its alleged concern for U.S.- 
friendly Gulf countries will ensure acceptance of the proposed 
missile system and other security measures. 
Gulf countries already have enough problems trying to walk a 
narrow path between the various positions adopted by people of 
differing political persuasions and beliefs.  So there is no need 
to exacerbate things further by introducing into the region such 
controversial measures as heightened security controls and 
advanced missile systems.   Having such material can be seen as 
an act of aggression towards a neighboring country.  Once a 
nation adopts a more aggressive stance to its neighbors, the 
chance of relations escalating out of hand increases.  And with 
the increased armaments, the outcome could become even more 
frightening." 
 
 
 
 
SISON