Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06TAIPEI1400, Police Raids Human Trafficking Ring in Southern Taiwan

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06TAIPEI1400.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06TAIPEI1400 2006-04-21 08:53 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
VZCZCXRO0335
RR RUEHCN RUEHGH
DE RUEHIN #1400 1110853
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 210853Z APR 06
FM AIT TAIPEI
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 9832
INFO RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 5104
RUEHGZ/AMCONSUL GUANGZHOU 9260
RUEHHK/AMCONSUL HONG KONG 6305
RUEHSH/AMCONSUL SHENYANG 5172
RUEHGH/AMCONSUL SHANGHAI 0071
RUEHCN/AMCONSUL CHENGDU 1213
UNCLAS TAIPEI 001400 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR EAP/PD AND EAP/TC 
 
FROM AIT KAOHSIUNG BRANCH OFFICE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: SNAR TW KS KCRM
SUBJECT: Police Raids Human Trafficking Ring in Southern Taiwan 
 
 
1.  (U)  Working on a tip, on April 19 the Kaohsiung criminal police 
raided a human trafficking ring that had arranged for Chinese women 
to enter into Taiwan by means of sham marriages.  The "brides" were 
actually coming to work in the sex trade.  The police arrested the 
head of the trafficking ring, Wu Hong-meng (Chinese Telegraph code 
0702 7703 1322), Wu's Chinese wife, five other members of the 
trafficking ring, and seven PRC women who had been brought to Taiwan 
by the ring. 
 
2.  (SBU)  Kaohsiung Police had been conducting surveillance on Wu 
and his organization since December of last year.  According to the 
police, the seven Chinese women entered sham marriages with 
Taiwanese men and came to Taiwan in late 2005 and early 2006.  After 
their arrest, the seven Chinese women told the Police that they were 
aware before they came to Taiwan that they were destined for the sex 
trade.  According to the police, Wu has brought at least twenty 
other PRC women to Taiwan to engage in prostitution.  Local Police 
suspect that Wu is cooperating with mainland Chinese gangsters to 
run the trafficking ring. 
 
3.  (SBU)  Prosecutor Wu Hsieh-chan said that the "husbands" would 
be charged with "uttering a false public document," which carries a 
maximum penalty of seven years imprisonment.  Due to their 
cooperation, the women will not likely be prosecuted for 
prostitution, but rather processed for deportation. 
 
4.  (SBU)  Comment.  Charging the "husbands" under the public 
document statutes is an important departure from previous practice. 
Generally, charges are filed under the marriage statutes, which 
carry a maximum penalty of not more than three years.  Since all 
sentences of three years or less are converted to fines, usually at 
the rate of one thousand NT Dollars(U.S. $31.75) per year, the 
charges do little to deter fraudulent marriages.  Using the public 
document charge, perpetrators face the prospect of jail time, which 
may help Taiwan authorities get a handle on the problem.  End 
Comment. 
 
 
Thiele 
 
Young