Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06ANKARA2214, LOCAL G8 COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTION GROUP MEETING IN

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06ANKARA2214.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06ANKARA2214 2006-04-21 13:13 2011-08-24 01:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Ankara
VZCZCXYZ0000
OO RUEHWEB

DE RUEHAK #2214/01 1111313
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 211313Z APR 06
FM AMEMBASSY ANKARA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5021
INFO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 5399
RUEHOU/AMEMBASSY OUAGADOUGOU 0023
RUEHTH/AMEMBASSY ATHENS 7118
RUEHBP/AMEMBASSY BAMAKO 0001
RUEHNM/AMEMBASSY NIAMEY 0003
RUEHBM/AMEMBASSY BUCHAREST 0857
RUEHDK/AMEMBASSY DAKAR 0031
RUEHDJ/AMEMBASSY DJIBOUTI 0011
RUEHVB/AMEMBASSY ZAGREB 0167
RUEHIL/AMEMBASSY ISLAMABAD 0883
RUEHKM/AMEMBASSY KAMPALA 0024
RUEHKT/AMEMBASSY KATHMANDU 0024
RUEHLM/AMEMBASSY COLOMBO 0024
RUEHNK/AMEMBASSY NOUAKCHOTT 0009
RUEHKA/AMEMBASSY DHAKA 0088
RUEHRY/AMEMBASSY CONAKRY
RUEHCO/AMEMBASSY COTONOU 0004
RUEHLC/AMEMBASSY LIBREVILLE 0006
RUEHPC/AMEMBASSY LOME 0001
RUEHUJA/AMEMBASSY ABUJA 0024
RUEHTO/AMEMBASSY MAPUTO 0008
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0397
RUEHVJ/AMEMBASSY SARAJEVO 0015
RUEHSQ/AMEMBASSY SKOPJE 0352
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 1034
RUEHTI/AMEMBASSY TIRANA 0240
RUEHRL/AMEMBASSY BERLIN 4096
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO 0918
RUEHLO/AMEMBASSY LONDON 2990
RUEHMD/AMEMBASSY MADRID 0401
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0229
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA 0245
RUEHFR/AMEMBASSY PARIS 5221
RUEHRO/AMEMBASSY ROME 6522
RUEHSW/AMEMBASSY BERN 0302
RUEHBS/USEU BRUSSELS
UNCLAS ANKARA 002214 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PTER TU
SUBJECT: LOCAL G8 COUNTER-TERRORISM ACTION GROUP MEETING IN 
TURKEY 
 
REF: STATE 58471 (NOTAL) 
 
1. (SBU) The Russian Embassy in Ankara convened a meeting of 
G8 Embassies plus Australia, Switzerland and the European 
Commission on April 12 as the local Counter-Terrorism Action 
Group (CTAG).  Most Missions were represented at the 
counselor level.  Russian Ambassador Petr Stegniy opened the 
session, noting the importance of NGOs and civil society in 
countering extremist terrorism.  Following Ambassador 
Stegniy's remarks, Russian Political Counselor Viacheslav 
Kunakov chaired the meeting, beginning with a review of 
Russian-Turkish counterterrorism cooperation.  Each 
delegation was invited to review its CT cooperation with 
Turkey.  Our presentation incorporated reftel talking points. 
 The Russian Embassy prepared minutes of the meeting (text at 
para 3) intended to contribute to the preparations for the 
April 28 CTAG meeting in Moscow. 
 
2. (SBU) Comment: Most delegations appeared to be lacking 
instructions and, while describing on-going CT efforts in and 
with Turkey, were not prepared to brainstorm on new ways to 
engage the GOT.  End comment. 
 
3. (SBU)  Begin text of minutes of the local CTAG meeting in 
Ankara (please note internal numbering): 
 
MINUTES of the Local CTAG Meeting 
(Embassy of Russia, Ankara, 12th April 2006, Wednesday) 
 
Present: 
Mr. Elbrus Kargiyev, Minister-Counsellor, Embassy of the 
Russian Federation (Chair) 
Mr. Viacheslav Kunakov, Counsellor, Embassy of the Russian 
Federation 
Mr. Oleg Rogoza, Counsellor, Embassy of the Russian Federation 
Mr. Vladimir Zharkikh, First Secretary, Embassy of the 
Russian Federation 
Mr. Andrey Yakovlev, Third Secretary, Embassy of the Russian 
Federation 
Mr. Reginald King, Counsellor, Embassy of Canada 
Ms. Jeannette Menzies, Second Secretary, Embassy of Canada 
Ms. Elisabeth Barsacq, First Counsellor, Embassy of the 
French Republic 
Mr. Thomas Bagger, Counsellor, Embassy of the Federal 
Republic of Germany 
Mr. Santo Antignani, Attach, Embassy of Italy 
Mr. Katsuyoshi Hayashi, Minister-Counsellor, Embassy of Japan 
Mr. James Edward McKee, Second Secretary, Embassy of the 
United Kingdom 
Mr. Timothy A. Betts, Counsellor, Embassy of the United 
States of America 
Mr. James R. Sopp, Second Secretary, Embassy of the United 
 
States of America 
Mrs. Jennifer Rachel Hayward-Jones, First Secretary, Embassy 
of Australia 
Mr. Carlos Saenz De Tejada, Minister-Counsellor, Embassy of 
Spain 
Mr. Urs Beer, First Secretary, Embassy of Switzerland 
Mrs. Ulrike Hauer, Charge d'Affaires a.i., Representation of 
the European Commission to Turkey 
 
The local CTAG meeting under the Russian G8 Presidency held 
in Ankara on 12th April 2006, chaired by Elbrus Kargiyev, DHM 
of the Russian Embassy. 
 
1. An introductory note on Russia-G8 CTAG cooperation was 
presented by Petr Stegniy, Russian Ambassador to Turkey.  The 
Ambassador stressed G8's role in the fight against terror, 
with CTAG being an important instrument for that.  The 
purpose of the local CTAG meeting it to contribute to the 
preparations for the 2nd CTAG Conference in Moscow, focusing 
on the ideological aspects of anti-terrorism with reference 
to the UN Resolution 1624/2005.  The importance of NGOs and 
the civil society in general in the fight against terror was 
also stressed. 
 
2.  Briefing on the current situation in Turkey and the 
Russian-Turkish counter-terrorist cooperation was then 
presented by Viacheslav Kunakov.  It has been noted that 
terror (including ethnic separatism, religious and leftist 
political extremism) is officially considered a major threat 
to the Republic.  Decades of Turkey's fight against terror 
have provided it with valuable experience thereof, one of its 
outcomes being the adoption of a solid counter-terrorist 
legislation, 
 
Over the years, Russia has been developing its 
counter-terrorist ties with Turkey over a wide range of 
issues, including ideological counter-terrorism.  Form 
perspective, the relations between the two countries' Muslim 
communities are of special importance.  A number of events 
have been organized in order to promote such contacts. 
 
Preparations are also underway for the establishment of the 
Russia-Islamic World Common Strategic Vision Group with a 
mission to promote peace and tolerance in all spheres, 
including education. 
 
The Dialogue Eurasia Platform of Turkey has also rendered its 
support for the international conference called "From Terror 
to Universal Ethics", which took place in Moscow in June 2005. 
 
Another important anti-terror component is the media 
cooperation.  Back in 2005, the Turkish national broadcasting 
 
company, the TRT, was represented at the "Media in the Fight 
Against Terror" international conference in Russia.  Russian 
media has been also actively involved in the process of 
consolidating the efforts for fighting radicalism and 
extremism in Eurasia (Antalya Confrence, April 2006). 
 
3. Summary of the discussion: 
 
Canada:  Past assistance for counter-terrorism projects in 
Turkey include Forensic Document Examination, Turkish police 
reform (including Cyber-Crime Investigative Techniques and 
Incident commander/Crisis Negotiators Course) and an Under 
cover Operations training course.  Although no projects are 
currently underway, a 15-million-dollar Counter-Terrorism 
Capacity Programme has been launched by the Government of 
Canada (including 19 government departments, administered by 
the Department of Foreign Affairs) to provide state 
assistance in areas of training, funding, equipment, 
technical and legal assistance.  The program will enable 
Canada to share our experience in border and transportation 
security; human rights and counter-terrorism training; law 
enforcement, security, military and intelligence training; 
Chemical/Biological/Nuclear Terrorism prevention, mitigation, 
preparedness, response and recovery; cyber security and 
combating the financing of terrorism. 
 
Australia:  Anti-terror cooperation with Turkey is currently 
concentrated on the data exchange and information assistance. 
 Australia listed the PKK as a terrorist organization under 
the counter-terrorism provisions of the Australian Criminal 
Code Act 1995 in December 2005. 
 
European Commission:  The European Community does not have a 
specific counter-terrorism policy nor a specific budget line 
for counter-terrorism related assistance.  The EC rather has 
a composite policy consisting of a variety of separate policy 
areas.  In the case of Turkey projects conducted in the 
context of pre-accession assistance contribute directly or 
indirectly to the strengthening Turkey's capacity in the 
fight against terrorism.  These projects are mainly conducted 
in the field of Justice and Home Affairs covering general 
Policing, Fight Against Organized Crime and Police 
Corruption, Fight Against Money Laundering and Corruption, 
Fight Against Drug Trafficking, Schengen and External Border, 
Visa Policy and Practice, External Migration and Asylum, 
Trafficking in Human Beings.  A comprehensive judicial 
modernization programme is conducted jointly with the Council 
of Europe. 
 
Spain:  In relation to the proposed separation of the Turkish 
border security service from the national gendarmerie, a 
joint Spanish-French-Turkish instruction programme has been 
 
launched focusing on the EU's existing border security 
institutions, regulations and practice, which, however, does 
not include any special anti-terrorist component.  Spain, 
together with Turkey, also co-chairs the UN "Alliance of 
Civilizations" initiative. 
 
United Kingdom:  The Istanbul terrorist attacks of November 
2003 came as a shock to everyone, but eventually gave a 
powerful impetus to the bilateral counter-terrorist 
cooperation, which by now can be characterized as extremely 
positive. 
 
Germany:  The German-Turkish anti-terrorist cooperation has 
been developing over a wide range of issues and has been 
really productive for the both sides.  Consultations on 
CT-efforts have been held at ambassadorial level.  The daily 
coordination of the ongoing anti-terror and police 
interaction activities is carried out by a resident police 
coordinator with the German Embassy in Ankara.  One of the 
practical problems that need to be tackled is that the 
terrorist extradition request files prepared by the Turkish 
authorities often do not meet the existing requirements for 
them to be accepted for examination by German courts.  In the 
case of Islamist extremist Metin Kaplan this problem was 
finally overcome.  In other cases it still persists. 
 
United States:  Military and intelligence instruments of 
national power are essential in the fight against extremism, 
but are not enough.  Law enforcement cooperation is also 
important. 
 
Operational coordination of bilateral anti-terror activities 
are conducted by a number of different agencies represented 
at the US Embassy in Ankara.  Turkey cooperates with the US 
against both international and domestic Turkish terrorist 
groups.  The problems Gerany experienced with extradition 
requests had been also the case with the US until the US 
government explained US courts' standards to Turkey.  The US 
is planning to assign to the Embassy in Ankara a Department 
of Justice European law expert to work with Turkish officials 
in developing extradition requests acceptable to European 
courts.  Other areas of counter-terrorist cooperation with 
Turkey include active police training programmes, 
nonproliferation (including the Proliferation Security 
Initiative), border security enhancement, the improvement of 
expertise over financial crimes, personnel support to the 
military's Center of Excellence - Defense Against Terrorism, 
etc.  Turkey has agreed to include Izmir in the US Container 
Security Initiative under which containers in Izmir will be 
screened before they depart port. 
 
The fight against the PKK threat is a constant element of 
 
US-Turkish counter-terrorist interaction.  While media 
reports emphasize the Turkish side's requests that the US 
step up efforts to suppress PKK activities in Northern Iraq, 
the two countries work closely together to counter PKK 
activities elsewhere. 
 
Reaching out to moderate voices in Muslim communities and 
encourage dialogue between Muslims and those of other faiths 
are also important.  We appreciate Turkey's role in the 
Broader Middle East and North Africa Initiative in 
co-chairing the Democracy Assistance Dialogue, as well as its 
co-sponsorship of the Alliance of Civilizations. 
 
Japan:  Currently, Japan's cooperation is focused on 
capacity-building in the fields such as customs and 
immigration control applied to Asian countries. 
 
France:  The current bilateral cooperation on 
counter-terrorism, which includes the exchange of the related 
data, is well on track.  The problems with the Turkish side's 
extradition request files are also important. 
 
Switzerland:  In relation to the Turkish Side's requests that 
PKK should be officially recognized a terrorist organization, 
it has been noted that the existing national legal system of 
Switzerland implies that each case involving a person charged 
with terrorism should be evaluated separately, and the Swiss 
Side therefore has no such practice of preparing a 
consolidated list of terrorist organizations. 
 
Italy:  Counter-terrorist information exchange between the 
two sides has been put on the regular basis, but no special 
cooperation projects are being conducted at the moment. 
 
End text of minutes of the local CTAG meeting in Ankara. 
 
 
Visit Ankara's Classified Web Site at 
http://www.state.sgov.gov/p/eur/ankara/ 
 
WILSON