Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06WELLINGTON226, A PUBLIC INDISCRETION RAISES QUESTIONS OF

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06WELLINGTON226.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06WELLINGTON226 2006-03-23 19:06 2011-04-28 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Wellington
VZCZCXRO9698
RR RUEHNZ
DE RUEHWL #0226 0821906
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 231906Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 2561
RUEHNZ/AMCONSUL AUCKLAND 0697
UNCLAS WELLINGTON 000226 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
SENSITIVE 
STATE FOR EAP/ANP - DAN RICCI 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV NZ
SUBJECT: A PUBLIC INDISCRETION RAISES QUESTIONS OF 
INTERNAL DIVISIONS IN THE LABOUR-LED GOVERNMENT 
 
REF: Wellington 220 
05 Wellington 58. 
 
 
1. (SBU) A new public attack by one Labour minister on another could 
be a sign of increasing internal division in Prime Minster Helen 
Clark's Government. 
 
A public display of dissent. 
--------------------------- 
 
2. (SBU) That the Minister of State Dover Samuels broke ranks with a 
cabinet colleague over a matter of policy is not a bombshell in 
itself. Rather, it is that he revealed he did so publicly and during 
an interview with The Independent, a business weekly. In the 
interview, Samuels said that at a recent caucus meeting he strongly 
challenged the propriety of Conservation Minister Chris Carter in 
using his veto powers to block court approval of the development of 
a long-anticipated marina development in the north of New Zealand. 
Because Carter based his veto decision on marine preservation, 
Samuels' remarks called into question the government's oceans policy 
and its commitment to economic development as well as its respect 
for judicial authority. 
 
Minister broke the golden rule. 
------------------------------ 
 
3. (SBU) In publicly questioning his party on a political decision, 
Samuels, a senior Minister, broke the convention of collective 
responsibility. This requires all Cabinet ministers to publicly 
uphold all Cabinet decisions, even if they oppose them. Since Clark 
took charge of the Labour Party in 1993, she has always demanded 
unity in her MPs' public utterances. Since coming to power in 1999, 
this convention has become all the more sacrosanct. 
 
Not the first time Labour's laundry has been publicly aired. 
--------------------------------------------- -------- 
 
4. (SBU) Samuels was quick to back track, albeit rather awkwardly, 
on his statement. Realizing that he erred in taking his concerns 
public, he tried hard to portray solidity with Carter and diffuse 
any notion of a schism within Labour ranks. The episode does, 
however, evoke another public expression of discord within Labour by 
own of its own. 
 
5. (SBU) Still fresh in the memory of many is former Labour MP John 
Tamihere's infamous interview within an investigatory magazine in 
which he launched into a vitriolic and deeply personal attack on 
some of his Labour colleagues(ref B). This caused much embarrassment 
to Labour and led to Tamihere, once considered as a possible party 
leader, to leave parliament. The question now is whether Samuels' 
outburst was a single incident or signs of strains within Labour 
that are beginning to come to the surface. 
 
Samuels' remarks unlikely to make a difference in themselves. 
--------------------------------------------- ---- 
 
6. (SBU) Samuels holds Associate Ministerial roles in a number of 
different policy areas but he does not command much, if any, real 
influence or authority in any one of them. As a Maori, Samuels' 
influence within Labour comes with his strong identification with 
the Maori-arm of the party. That is where he is most valued by 
Clark, although even then there are more influential Maori Labour 
MPs in front of him. His opinion on matters of economic development, 
judicial, or oceans policy is unlikely to carry much weight within 
his caucus. Samuels has also had some misadventures, notably having 
to relieve himself in an Auckland hotel hallway after being unable 
to open his door.  This results in other parties not taking Samuels 
too seriously. Nonetheless, he is still a cabinet minister who 
publicly contested the decision of another. This alone guarantees 
media coverage, and thus -- close on the heels of cabinet minister 
David Parker's resignation (ref A) -- another embarrassment for the 
Government.  It also makes some analysts question whether Clark's 
ship of state is springing some leaks in its third term in office.