

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287
Articles
Brazil
Sri Lanka
United Kingdom
Sweden
00. Editorial
United States
Latin America
Egypt
Jordan
Yemen
Thailand
Browse latest releases
Browse by creation date
Browse by origin
Browse by tag
Browse by classification
Community resources
courage is contagious
Viewing cable 06KHARTOUM721, PARTICIPANTS GIVE SOUTHERN SUDAN INVESTMENT AND
If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs
Reference ID | Created | Released | Classification | Origin |
---|---|---|---|---|
06KHARTOUM721 | 2006-03-22 13:58 | 2011-08-24 16:30 | UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY | Embassy Khartoum |
VZCZCXRO8048
RR RUEHROV
DE RUEHKH #0721/01 0811358
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 221358Z MAR 06
FM AMEMBASSY KHARTOUM
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 1982
INFO RUCNIAD/IGAD COLLECTIVE
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING 0012
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI 0004
RUEHKL/AMEMBASSY KUALA LUMPUR 0001
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 02 KHARTOUM 000721
SIPDIS
SIPDIS, SENSITIVE
E.O. 12958: N/A
TAGS: EINV ECON EPET PGOV SU
SUBJECT: PARTICIPANTS GIVE SOUTHERN SUDAN INVESTMENT AND
DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE LOW MARKS
¶1. (SBU) Summary: A putative Southern Sudan investment
conference in Nairobi March 14-16 scored well on
quantity, but missed the qualitative mark. Most
participants outside of the petroleum sector were there
in search of contracts, not to invest, and those who had
come to network with the top echelons of the Government
of Southern Sudan (GoSS) were disappointed when the
senior leadership did not show. GoSS presentations on
investment possibilities were vague and full of
unanswered questions about regulatory codes and
requirements for Sudanese equity partnership. End
Summary.
--------------------------
No Shows and Few Investors
--------------------------
¶2. (SBU) The Investment/Development Conference attracted
nearly 300 paying participants, who each paid a fee of
USD 2,200 to attend. CWC Associates Ltd., the conference
organizers, had advertised the following headliners from
Sudan: GoSS President Salva Kiir, Government of National
Unity (GNU) Energy Minister Al Jaz, GNU Minister of
Investment Malik Agar, GoSS Vice President Riek Machar,
and GNU State Minister for Energy Angelina Teny. None of
them showed. In fact, no one from the GNU attended,
North or South. GoSS speakers included lesser luminaries
such as Energy, Mines and Industry Minister Albion Akol
Akol, Agriculture and Forestry Minister Martin Elia,
Minister of Commerce Trade and Supply Anthony Lino, GoSS
Minister of Finance Chol, and Minister of Culture and
Youth John Luk Jok, one of five GoSS members on the
National Petroleum Commissi%n.
¶3. (SBU) The paid participants for the most part were
construction, logistics, aviation, and oilfield service
contractors looking for business opportunities. There
were a handful of legitimate investors from Khartoum
looking for possibilities, and a few representatives of
the banking/financial sector, but the vast majority of
serious investors were from the petroleum sector, and
most represented companies already involved in Sudan:
India's Reliance, Total, White Nile Ltd., Equator,
Malaysia's Petronas, H Oil and Minerals Ltd., and South
Africa's PetroSA. Chinese petroleum companies were
notoriously absent, or at least low profile.
-------------
Who Said What
-------------
¶4. (SBU) There were a number of speakers from the EU,
DFID, the UN, the IBRD, and various NGOs and expert
consultants. For the most part, the presentations were
informational and academic in nature, more geared to
development than investment. The need for transparency
and a proper regulatory environment were underlying
themes.
¶5. (SBU) The GoSS speakers fared less well. Jok was the
most cogent in addressing the key area of interest --
petroleum -- but he publicly took the line that Super
Block B contested between Total and White Nile Ltd.
should be partitioned into smaller concessions.
Ministers Lino and Makana called for investment in
agriculture, forestry, and mining as well as petroleum,
but none could offer specifics, including what the
regulatory environment would look like. Makana said that
there was a draft investment code ready for ratification
by the Southern Legislative Assembly that required
Sudanese participation in foreign investment schemes,
although he could provide no details.
-----------------
No One Left Happy
-----------------
¶6. (SBU) Paying participants who had come to make high-
level contacts expressed displeasure with the
proceedings, and some demanded their money back. Total,
which (unlike White Nile Ltd.) had agreed to provide
conference funding and an elaborate dinner for the
participants, was reportedly put out that it gained no
access to high-level GoSS officials to plead Total's
case. Smaller participants, including a Dubai freight
forwarder who paid USD 3,000 for a booth and was given a
small folding table outside the front door (and demanded
a refund), were also unhappy. Another participant said
that Makana's statement that foreigners would need local
KHARTOUM 00000721 002 OF 002
partners to help them move things through the GoSS
bureaucracy was tantamount to saying that the investment
climate was poor.
------------------------------------
Shoddy Organization and Money Making
------------------------------------
¶7. (SBU) A senior official of the Southern Sudan Chamber
of Commerce and Industry (SSCCI) blamed the organizers
for the outcome. He said that Al Badr International
Development Co. out of Kuwait was the chief culprit. In
2005, this company invited Riek Machar, Taban Ding, and
two other senior GoSS members to Kuwait for a visit. Al
Badr representatives had subsequently visited Juba,
bestowing generous gifts on a number of prominent
southerners, although to date no investments had
followed. Al Badr had hired CWC Associate Ltd. to stage
the conference, and Prime Resource Ltd., a consultant
firm, to identify speakers. Neither the SSCCI nor most
line ministers had been consulted - SSCCI suspected that
invitations had gone to senior officials and their names
used to advertise the conference before confirmation of
attendance was received.
¶8. (SBU) The SSCCI official pointed out that the
conference had been a significant money-spinner for CWC.
In addition to participation and display fees, CWC had
convinced various companies to fund representational
events and had organized, for a fee, one on one meetings
between GoSS officials and conference participants,
although for the most part the latter did not show. He
added that -- while it had not been announced -- the
investment code would require foreign investors to take
on southern Sudanese partners to the tune of 51 percent
equity shares.
-------
Comment
-------
¶9. (SBU) The conference missed the mark as far as
investment was concerned. There were few serious
investors around, few of the top GoSS officials, limited
flirtation between the two sides, and certainly no
consummation of deals. Networking was minimal. It was
abundantly clear that until mining, forestry, and
investment codes are in place, the GoSS will not able to
showcase what it has to offer. If the investment code
does indeed cede to investors the majority of the risk in
joint ventures, but only a minority voice in ownership,
the utility of future conferences of this nature remains
in doubt.
STEINFELD