Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 06MINSK25, Latest Polling: Milinkevich Creeps Ahead in Polls, But Not

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #06MINSK25.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
06MINSK25 2006-01-12 12:48 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Minsk
VZCZCXYZ0000
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHSK #0025/01 0121248
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 121248Z JAN 06
FM AMEMBASSY MINSK
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 3597
INFO RUEHMO/AMEMBASSY MOSCOW 3274
RUEHKV/AMEMBASSY KIEV 3075
RUEHVL/AMEMBASSY VILNIUS 3496
RUEHWR/AMEMBASSY WARSAW 3154
RUEHRA/AMEMBASSY RIGA 1515
UNCLAS MINSK 000025 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT ALSO FOR INR 
KIEV ALSO FOR USAID 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PINR PREL BO
 
SUBJECT: Latest Polling:  Milinkevich Creeps Ahead in Polls, But Not 
Enough To Catch Lukashenko 
 
 
1. Summary:  The results of IISEPS' latest polling shows 
that Lukashenko retains high ratings, around 53 percent. 
Opposition support remains low, even for the 10+ opposition 
candidate Aleksandr Milinkevich.  Although Milinkevich's 
approval ratings did climb several points to 6.6 percent, a 
growing majority of Belarusians polled support Lukashenko's 
re-election.  Most respondents believe they live better than 
people in Russia and admit that they would like to have 
living conditions similar to those in EU.  However, 60 
percent would choose a closer union with Russia over a union 
with the EU, which is largely due to Belarusians negative 
opinion of the West.  Moreover, respondents showed greater 
support for the political policies of Russian President 
Vladimir Putin and Cuban leader Fidel Castro over those of 
President Bush and Belarus' neighbors, Poland and Lithuania. 
Most respondents continue to believe state-controlled media 
and do not trust independent and foreign news sources. 
While Lukashenko's popularity appears to be significant, it 
still is not an overwhelming as the state media portrays. 
End Summary. 
 
2. IISEPS polling service gave poloffs results of two 
surveys conducted in November-December (I) and December (II) 
respectively.  Survey I interviewed 1448 people and survey 
II interviewed 1514 people.  Below are the results. 
 
Presidential Support Is High, Opposition Low 
-------------------------------------------- 
 
3. Fifty-three percent of respondents in survey I believe 
President Lukashenko should be elected to a third term and 
35 percent disagreed.  Fifty-three percent would vote for 
the president and 12.5 percent would vote for an opposition 
candidate. Survey II showed that 49.2 percent of respondents 
would vote in the presidential election, most for 
Lukashenko.  Thirty-eight percent believe it was time to 
give someone else a chance: 
 
"If elections were tomorrow, who would you vote for?" 
 
Survey I                   Survey II 
 
Answer        %            Answer          % 
------       ----          ------         ---- 
Lukashenko   51.2          Lukashenko     52.6 
Milinkevich   3.5          Milinkevich     6.6 
Lebedko        .8          Lebedko         2.4 
 
4. Milinkevich's support jumped three percentage points in 
less than one month.  If just Milinkevich and Lukashenko 
were on the ballots, 54.8 percent of respondents in survey 
II would chose Lukashenko, but 18.1 percent would chose 
Milinkevich.  No other opposition leader received as high a 
rating when paired with Lukashenko as did Milinkevich. 
Aleksandr Voitovich, former MP, received 7.3 percent, MP and 
leader of the liberal Democratic Party Sergei Gaidukevich 
received 9.2 percent, leader of the Belarusian Social 
Democratic Party (Gramada) Aleksandr Kozulin received 9.7, 
and General Frolov received 8.6.  If Milinkevich was not 
allowed to be on the presidential ballot, only 8 percent of 
respondents would protest.  Although most respondents showed 
no interest in Milinkevich, 30.9 percent would like more 
information about him and his campaign. 
 
5. In survey I, 49.5 percent of those polled believe the 
elections would be free and fair whereas 28.9 percent 
disagreed.  Survey II showed similar percentages.  In survey 
II, 42.3 percent of respondents believe that the current 
election codex did not prevent free and fair elections and 
should not be changed, however 39.2 percent thought 
otherwise. If election results turned out to be falsified, 
73 percent of respondents in survey I would not take part in 
street protests.  Percentages were approximately the same in 
Survey II. 
 
Human Rights Exist, Sort Of 
--------------------------- 
 
6. Fifty-three percent of respondents in survey I were 
satisfied with the development of democracy in Belarus 
whereas 34.8 percent were not.  Fifty-nine percent thought 
that Belarus observes human rights, but 75.2 percent believe 
people were afraid to voice their opinions: 
 
"What do you think about the readiness of people in Belarus 
 
to express their political opinions?" 
 
Answer                         % 
------                        ---- 
 
No one is afraid              14.0 
Few people afraid             27.1 
Many people afraid            41.0 
All people afraid              7.2 
 
7. When told about opposition leaders Nikolai Statkevich, 
Pavel Severinets, and Andrei Klimov's incarceration for 
staging protests against the GOB, 35 percent of respondents 
in survey II responded negatively to their imprisonment and 
only 16.5 percent were in favor.  Thirty-four percent had no 
opinion on the matter. 
 
Standard of Living 
------------------ 
 
8. The two surveys indicated that 58 and 60 percent of 
respondents (respectively) did not see any difference in 
their material situation within the last three months. 
Survey II indicated that 38 percent of respondents were 
concerned with material needs, such as money and the low 
standard of living.  Eighteen percent worry about health and 
14 percent were concerned with unemployment.  Survey II 
showed that 48.5 percent of respondents were able to buy 
enough food on their wages, but 47.6 percent found it 
difficult to afford clothes and 79.6 percent were not able 
to make larger purchases, such as cars and furniture.  In 
survey I, respondents compared the standard of living in 
Belarus with that of other former USSR countries: 
 
Country        Higher    Same    Lower 
-------        ------    ----    ----- 
 
Poland         55.0(%)   14.1     6.6 
Latvia         42.4      14.0    10.5 
Lithuania      40.5      15.5    10.9 
Russia         21.7      35.4    24.5 
Ukraine         4.2      21.9    55.1 
 
9. In survey I, 55.7 percent of respondents believe it was 
important to maintain the current situation in Belarus and 
survey II showed 54.6 percent of respondents answered 
likewise. 
 
"Do you think the situation in Belarus is developing on the 
right path or the wrong path?" 
 
Answer         Survey I     Survey II 
------         --------     --------- 
 
Right path       62.4          55.0 
Wrong path       20.7          29.7 
 
10. Although the majority of Belarusians believe their 
country was on the right path, only 35 percent of survey II 
respondents believe Belarus' social-economic situation would 
change in the future, whereas 39 percent believe it would 
not change and 15 percent agreed it would worsen. 
 
Russia over EU 
-------------- 
 
11. IISEPS discovered that 48 percent of survey I 
respondents did not want to see a revival of the USSR, but 
did want closer relations with Russia over the EU.  Sixty- 
seven percent of those polled believe they live better than 
Russians, but 51 percent believe people live better in the 
EU than in Belarus.  Sixty-three percent would like to have 
a living standard similar to that in the EU, 81 percent 
favor Belarusians receiving an education in EU, and 64 
percent favor letting Belarusians work in the EU. 
 
12. Despite better living and working conditions in the 
West, survey II showed that 60 percent of respondents would 
rather have a union with Russia than with the EU.  This 
phenomenon could be attributed to the negative image 
Belarusians have of the West thanks to GOB-controlled 
propaganda (see para 14).  IISEPS asked the following 
questions in survey I: 
 
"Do you think the West looks at Belarus as an enemy and that 
Belarusians should beware?" 
 
Answer          % 
------         ---- 
No             41.9 
Yes            40.0 
 
"Do you think life for citizens of Belarus' neighbors 
(Poland, Latvia, Lithuania) has improved or worsened since 
they became part of the EU in May 2004?" 
 
Worse          23.7 
No Change      25.2 
Better         19.4 
 
"Have you been to any EU countries in the last five years?" 
 
No             83.0 
Yes            16.8 
 
"What presents a greater threat to Belarus' development? 
(survey II)" 
 
The West       34.2 
The GOB        18.0 
The Opposition 14.6 
Russia          4.1 
No Threat      27.7 
 
13. Fifty-two percent of survey I respondents prefer a union 
with Russia in which both governments remain independent 
with close political and economic connections.  Twenty 
percent believe relations should remain the same and only 12 
percent believe the two nations should become one. 
 
"Soon there will possibly be a referendum between Belarus 
and Russia on the Constitutional Act, which would provide a 
closer integration between the two governments.  How would 
you vote?" 
 
Answer         Survey I      Survey II 
------         --------      --------- 
 
For              27.4(%)       41.7 
Against          10.3          11.2 
Depends on 
circumstances    37.2          29.7 
Will not 
participate       8.9          10.8 
 
"In your opinion, which country has made more progress 
creating a democratic government and civil society?" 
 
Answer          % 
------        ---- 
 
Belarus       35.1 
Russia        29.5 
No Answer     35.4 
 
"In your opinion, does the Russian government want Belarus 
to become part of Russia and cease being an independent 
country?" 
 
Yes           46.9 
No            26.5 
No Answer     26.6 
 
"Who will Belarus be closer to in 10 years, Russia or the 
EU?" 
 
Russia        63.1 
EU             8.7 
No Answer     28.2 
 
"Do you accept or not accept the political course of the 
following countries?" 
 
Country       Accept    Not Accept 
-------       ------    ---------- 
Russia         74.8        15.9 
Belarus        72.0        22.3 
Germany        70.8        16.4 
China          53.2        30.3 
Kazakhstan     46.6        36.5 
Poland         46.0        39.1 
Cuba           36.0        45.1 
South Korea    31.6        48.9 
Ukraine        26.9        59.2 
U.S.           25.2        61.7 
Iran           20.4        61.6 
 
"Who out of today's top leaders coincides with your 
political ideals?" (More than one answer) 
 
Lukashenko          51.8 
Putin               51.8 
Chirac              13.1 
Blair                6.4 
Castro               6.2 
Merkel               5.4 
Yushchenko           3.8 
Bush                 3.7 
Frieberg (Latvia)    0.9 
Akhmadinijad (Iran)  0.8 
 
Information Access 
------------------ 
 
14. Belarusians have little access to news sources other 
than the state-controlled media.  Although some independent 
sources exist within Belarus, few people listen or trust 
them. 
 
"Which of the following do you have access to at work and/or 
at home?" (More than one answer) 
 
Answer                  Survey I    Survey II 
------                  --------    --------- 
Belarusian TV channels    86.1        86.1 
FM Radio                  46.7        53.2 
Cable TV                  36.9        38.6 
Medium/Long Wave Radio    14.2        15.9 
Internet                  13.6        14.6 
Short Wave Radio          13.2        12.5 
Satellite TV               6.9         8.9 
 
"What source of information do you believe more?" (Survey I) 
 
Answer                            % 
------                           ---- 
GOB-controlled Media             58.2 
Russian Media                    35.2 
Belarusian Independent Media     12.0 
European and Western Media       10.2 
Internet                          8.8 
 
15. IISEPS discovered in survey I that fewer than 35 percent 
of respondents use a computer and less than 24.7 percent use 
the internet.  In survey II, those figures were 33.5 and 
22.6 respectively.  Less than ten percent of respondents 
listen to Western radio, such as Radio Liberty, BBC, Voice 
of America, Ukrainian radio, etc.  Fifteen percent listen to 
Russian radio broadcasts daily and 16.3 percent listen to 
Russian radio several times per week.  Forty-nine percent of 
those polled would like to receive independent radio and 
television broadcasts from surrounding countries, but 34 
percent believe foreign radio broadcasts, for example, would 
not portray the truth where as only 25.4 believe it would. 
 
16. Forty-five percent of those polled believe GOB- 
controlled TV is truthful about Western activities and how 
people live in the West.  Survey II showed that 64.7 percent 
of respondents trust GOB-controlled TV channel ONT, 60.8 
percent - Belarusian National Television BT, and 44 - 
Stolichnaye TV.  Twenty-five percent do not believe the 
internet, 43 percent do not believe Belarus' independent 
newspapers and 45 percent do not trust Western radio 
broadcasts. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
17. Although Milinkevich's ratings increased, Lukashenko 
still retains a strong lead over any potential opponent. 
Even without election falsifications, Lukashenko would 
theoretically win the elections if they were held tomorrow. 
With the help of his propaganda and lack of independent 
information, Lukashenko continues to successfully convince a 
significant portion of the population that Belarus is better 
off under his rule, despite the better living conditions in 
the EU, and that the West seeks to destroy Belarus' course 
of development. 
 
18. The polling results reinforce the point that democratic 
change is not likely in the short term, nor without access 
to independent media.  In the current information vacuum, 
most Belarusians are unable to make the connection between 
their economic situation and the country's political- 
economic policies.  It is also worth noting that despite 
Lukashenko's continued popularity, it is not as overwhelming 
as the state media presents, and the depth of that support 
is suspect if a strong alternative could ever emerge. 
 
KROL