Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05LIMA5145, PERU REJECTS ECUADORIAN-CHILEAN POSITION ON

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05LIMA5145.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05LIMA5145 2005-12-02 16:39 2011-05-02 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Lima
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS LIMA 005145 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PREL PE CI EC
SUBJECT: PERU REJECTS ECUADORIAN-CHILEAN POSITION ON 
MARITIME LIMITS 
 
REF: A. LIMA 5037 
     B. LIMA 4662 
     C. SANTIAGO 2440 
 
1.  The Foreign Ministry, on 12/1, issued a communique 
rejecting the position taken by Ecuadorian President Alfredo 
Palacios and Chilean President Ricardo Lagos in their Joint 
Declaration on regional maritime limits issued that same day 
in Quito.  According to media reports, the Ecuadorian and 
Chilean leaders declared their, "firm adhesion to the 
treaties and other instruments regarding the Pacific 
South-East, in particular the Declaration on a Maritime Zone 
of 1952 and the Convention on a Special Frontier Maritime 
Zone of 1954, which establish the maritime delimitation 
between the parties through the geographic parallel." 
 
2.  The Peruvian communique in response reads as follows: 
 
"With respect to the Joint Declaration that the Presidents of 
Chile and Ecuador signed, on this date, in the city of Quito, 
the Government of Peru reiterates its Official Communique 
RE/13-05, of November 25, 2005, and reaffirms that the 
Declaration on a Maritime Zone of 1952 and the Convention on 
a Special Maritime Zone of 1954, to which Peru is a party, 
are not treaties on maritime limits. 
 
In this sense, the affirmation contained in paragraph 6 of 
the cited Joint Declaration with respect to the claim that 
the international instruments referred to establish the 
maritime delimitation between the parties through the 
geographic parallel, is an interpretation that is not in 
conformance with international law and, therefore, lacks all 
juridical effect." 
 
3.  The Foreign Ministry's communique referred to its prior 
communique on this issue (RE/13-05).  That communique was 
issued in response to a Joint Communique issued by the 
Ecuadorian and Chilean Foreign Ministers on 11/25.  As with 
the 12/1 Joint Declaration, the 11/25 Ecuadorian-Chilean 
Joint Communique declared that the 1952 and 1954 agreements 
delimited maritime limits, and the answering Peruvian 
communique rejected this interpretation, which it argued, 
"lacks all juridical effect."  This Peruvian communique also 
stated that, "The allusion to the geographic parallel as a 
method of maritime delimitation is only applicable on the 
Peruvian-Ecudorian frontier with respect to the existence of 
islands.  The Government of Peru reiterates that no maritime 
limit controversy exists with Ecuador.  Peru only has a 
maritime delimitation controversy on its southern frontier. 
The controversy referred to has been recognized by the 
Government of Chile and is being addressed by the respective 
diplomatic channels and eventually will be addressed by the 
corresponding jurisdictional channels, in conformance with 
international law." 
 
4.  COMMENT:  While the Peruvian Foreign Ministry was quick 
to react to the Ecuadorian-Chilean Joint Declaration's 
reference to regional maritime delimitation with an answering 
communique, GOP officials refrained from making public 
comments on the issue.  As the Foreign Ministry noted in its 
11/25 communique, the Peruvian Government appears content to 
handle this issue in diplomatic and legal channels, rather 
than renew the political aspects of the dispute (Refs).  END 
COMMENT. 
POWERS