Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05PARIS7234, USUNESCO: UNESCO ADOPTS PROGRAM AND BUDGET

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05PARIS7234.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05PARIS7234 2005-10-21 16:06 2011-08-24 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Paris
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

211606Z Oct 05
UNCLAS PARIS 007234 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FROM USMISSION UNESCO PARIS 
FOR IO/T, IO/S, L/UNA 
 
E.O. 12958:     N/A 
TAGS: ABUD FR UNESCO
SUBJECT:  USUNESCO: UNESCO ADOPTS PROGRAM AND BUDGET 
FOR 2006-07.  US VOTES NO. 
 
 
1. Summary:  The United States voted against adoption 
of the 2006-07 Program and Budget for the UN 
Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization 
(UNESCO).  The budget was adopted by vote, 126 in 
favor, 1 against (US), with no abstentions.  In 
explaining the U.S. vote, Ambassador Oliver, U.S. 
Permanent Representative to UNESCO, said that this 
budget does not sufficiently move funds away from 
ineffective activities toward effective program and 
activities.  Furthermore, this budget includes funding 
for the promotion and implementation of the Convention 
on the Protection and Promotion of the Diversity of 
Cultural Expressions.  End Summary. 
 
2. On October 21, the Plenary of the UNESCO General 
Conference convened in order to adopt the draft Program 
and Budget for 2006-07.  The Vice Chair (Japan) of the 
Administrative Commission provided an oral report of 
the meeting of the Commission in which the Commission 
recommended that the Plenary adopt the draft Program 
and Budget.  In his report, the Vice Chair noted that 
one delegation had referenced a previous objection to 
the budget as adopted by Commission IV (Culture).  The 
Vice Chair, who had previously appealed to the U.S. to 
avoid a vote on the budget, stressed in his oral report 
the importance of adopting the budget by consensus. 
Before the vote, the Ambassador of Japan noted that the 
vote should not be seen as a precedent for future 
Conferences. 
 
3.  The program and budget was then adopted by the 
Conference by vote, 126 in favor, 1 against (US), with 
no abstentions.  The United States took the floor to 
explain that the U.S. vote against the budget was the 
result of the failure of this budget, despite months of 
effort, to adequately move funds aware from ineffective 
activities.  Moreover, this budget includes funding for 
the implementation of the Convention on the Protection 
and Promotion of the Diversity of Cultural Expressions. 
The solemn mood of the meeting was then broken by an 
intervention from Cuba, which stated that the UNESCO 
had done well during the time that the United States 
was not a member.  Now that the United States has 
returned to UNESCO, the Cuban delegation continued, it 
should be more prepared to join other delegations in 
their work at UNESCO and to change its conduct.  He 
further claimed (inaccurately) that the United States 
is $75.2 million in arrears.  This intervention was 
followed by loud applause from the room.  Notably, 
Canada, Russia, the EU states, and Australia, plus a 
few others, did not join the applause.  The Secretary 
of the General Conference, several EU countries and 
Caribbean states came up to the U.S. delegation 
afterwards to apologize for the Cuban intervention. 
 
OLIVER