Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05QUITO417, PROTEST MARCH SPURS DIALOGUE ON COURT ISSUE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05QUITO417.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05QUITO417 2005-02-18 19:34 2011-05-02 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Quito
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS QUITO 000417 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV PREL EC
SUBJECT: PROTEST MARCH SPURS DIALOGUE ON COURT ISSUE 
 
REF: QUITO 390 
 
1.  (SBU) The peaceful February 16 protest march (reftel) has 
spurred new debate over whether to reverse Congress' packing 
of the judiciary in December, and has prompted alternative 
proposals to resolve the festering court controversy. 
Protest groups led by Quito mayor Paco Moncayo have announced 
they will send a list of demands/proposals to President 
Gutierrez and Congress shortly.  GOE sources have indicated 
willingness to consider adding elements of this proposal to 
the president's referendum proposal, currently pending before 
Congress.  Congressional opinion on the proposal remains 
divided, but there are already indications that dialogue has 
indeed begun across the aisles.  We will continue to 
encourage dialogue and compromise to strengthen democratic 
institutions.  End Summary. 
 
2.  (U) The Assembly of Quito, an ad-hoc group composed of 
municipal, civil society, and opposition political party 
representatives, which was formed to coordinate the February 
16 protest march, is reportedly finalizing a manifesto to 
demand change in the courts.  Quito mayor Moncayo described 
the demands during his address in San Francisco square, at 
the culmination of the protest:  1) congressional action to 
rescind its previous resolutions naming a new Supreme Court, 
Constitutional Court and Supreme Electoral Tribunal; 2) 
resignation of the deposed courts; 3) passage of a new law 
appointing a special ethical commission to nominate new 
justices, composed of civil society representatives; and 4) 
the naming of a new, politically-neutral court. 
 
3.  (SBU) After it became apparent that the protest march 
numbers would exceed expectations, GOE insiders privately 
indicated that President Gutierrez would seek dialogue with 
the opposition.  Presidential Advisor Carlos Polit has since 
publicly expressed willingness to consider modifications to 
the President's pending referendum proposal, to permit 
citizens to choose between the president's proposed way 
forward (new electoral colleges composed of different civil 
society groups) and the Assembly's proposal.  Press are 
already reporting signs of division (principally among 
independent members) within the pro-government congressional 
alliance on how to react to the opposition's proposals, which 
have not been formally received. 
 
Comment 
------- 
 
4.  (SBU)  We expect this issue to play out over at least the 
next several weeks, and discount the possibility of the 
congressional majority reversing itself in the near term. 
The GOE's willingness to dialogue is limited by its working 
alliance with the PRIAN, whose leader Alvaro Noboa has shown 
no flexibility on changing the status quo in newly-occupied 
judicial institutions.  We will continue to urge dialogue and 
compromise to achieve democratic strengthening. 
Chacon