Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 05TAIPEI88, MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #05TAIPEI88.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
05TAIPEI88 2005-01-11 08:36 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS TAIPEI 000088 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPARTMENT FOR INR/R/MR, EAP/RSP/TC, EAP/PA, EAP/PD - 
ROBERT PALLADINO 
DEPARTMENT PASS AIT/WASHINGTON 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: OPRC KMDR KPAO TW
SUBJECT: MEDIA REACTION: U.S.-CHINA-TAIWAN RELATIONS 
 
A) "China's `Anti-secession Law' Will Destroy Status 
Quo and Trigger Tensions in the Taiwan Strait; [Taiwan] 
Must Ensure that the United States and Japan Fully 
Understand [China's Threats to Taiwan]" 
 
The pro-independence "Taiwan Daily" editorialized 
(1/11): 
 
". Washington has repeatedly expressed its opposition 
since China said it would enact an `anti-secession 
law,' because the enactment itself is a concrete action 
to `change the status quo in the Taiwan Strait.'  Thus 
we hope that [Academia Sinica President] Lee Yuan-tseh, 
when leading a delegation to attend U.S. President 
George W. Bush's inauguration ceremony, will explain to 
Washington and the international community the fact 
that China's `anti-secession law' will destroy the 
status quo in the Taiwan Strait and will spark regional 
tensions.  The international community needs to 
understand the serious consequences once such a law is 
approved.  Only public outrage from the international 
community can stop China from acting recklessly now." 
 
B) "ROC Is Taiwan Status Quo" 
 
The conservative, pro-unification, English-language 
"China Post" said in an editorial (1/11): 
 
". Next week, Taipei will send a high-profile 
delegation to Washington to attend President George W. 
Bush's inauguration on January 20. 
 
"Wu Jau-shieh, chairman of Taipei's Mainland Affairs 
Council, is a delegate and expected to relay Taipei's 
concerns over Beijing's legislative move [for the anti- 
secession law] and Washington's non-opposition to it. 
 
"Wu has already called upon the world, especially the 
U.S., to strongly oppose Beijing's legislative plan 
because it will provide a legal basis for Beijing to 
attack Taiwan and unilaterally change the status quo. 
 
"But such argument, which is no different from the 
reasoning for Taiwan independence, will have little 
effect because of Washington's long-standing one China 
policy, which is also subscribed by 163 of the world's 
190 countries." 
 
PAAL