Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04TAIPEI3728, TAIWAN MULLING OVER THERMISTOR CLASSIFICATION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04TAIPEI3728.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04TAIPEI3728 2004-11-22 07:36 2011-08-23 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED American Institute Taiwan, Taipei
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS TAIPEI 003728 
 
SIPDIS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON ETRD EIND
SUBJECT: TAIWAN MULLING OVER THERMISTOR CLASSIFICATION 
 
REF: SECSTATE 243653 
 
 1.  Summary:  AIT Econ Chief delivered reftel demarche to 
Ministry of Economic Affairs Vice Minister Steve Chen on 
November 17, 2004.  Chen was familiar with the case and said 
that Taiwan has about a month before it would need to submit 
a report to the World Customs Organization.  Apparently, 
Taiwan has yet to make a final determination on the proper 
classification of the Tyco thermistors.  End Summary. 
 
2.  On November 17, 2004, AIT Econ Chief used a previously 
scheduled meeting with Ministry of Economic Affairs Vice 
Minister Chen Ruey-long (Steve Chen) to deliver reftel 
demarche regarding Tyco's appeal of Taiwan Customs' 
classification of its electronic thermistor devices.  Even 
though we had not been able to give Chen advance notice of 
this topic, he was clearly familiar with the issues involved. 
 
 
3.  Citing the relevant Harmonized System tariff numbers from 
memory, he noted that the World Customs Organization had 
recommended that the devices be classified as resistors, but 
added that the WCO has some divergent views on this issue. 
As he explained it, the WCO recommends classifying the 
devices under HS 8533, but also believes that a case can be 
made for classifying them under HS 8536. 
 
4.  Chen said that he had chaired a recent meeting with the 
Ministry of Finance and Customs about Tyco's appeal of 
Customs' classification of the devices.  Clearly aware of 
Taiwan's obligations to respond to WCO rulings, Chen said 
that he has asked Taiwan Customs to review the case.  If 
Customs continues to believe that the devices should be 
classified as fuses rather than resistors, then he has 
requested Customs to prepare a report for the WCO explaining 
this decision.  Chen said that Taiwan has a two month period 
in which to provide comments to WCO and has about one month 
left before the report is due.  We expect that Taiwan will 
use the full two months to mull over this classification 
decision. 
 
5.  Finally, Chen noted that the issue is complicated by the 
fact that a Taiwan company has filed a case against Taiwan 
Customs over classification of the devices.  He also noted 
that a fine of some type has been levied against Tyco and 
that Tyco believes the fine is unjustified. 
PAAL