This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.

UNCLAS ROME 003885 
 
SIPDIS 
 
 
FROM THE U.S. MISSION TO THE UN AGENCIES IN ROME 
 
USDA FAS FOR U/S BOST, JBUTLER, MCHAMBLISS, LREICH 
STATE FOR IO DAS MILLER, IO/EDA, OES/E, E, EB; 
AID FOR EGAT, DCHA/OFDA, DCHA/FFP 
PASS USTR AND PEACE CORPS 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR AORC ETRD EAID PHUM FAO
SUBJECT: 30TH SESSION OF THE FAO COMMITTEE ON WORLD FOOD 
SECURITY, 20-23 SEPTEMBER 2004 
 
REF:  (A) ROME 2810;  (B) USUN NEW YORK 2189, 
C) ROME 3669;  (D) ROME 3681 
 
¶1.  Summary.  The annual session of FAO's Committee on 
World Food Security (CFS) discussed the world food 
security situation and follow-up to the World Food Summit 
(WFS), noting uneven progress among countries and 
regions.  The Committee: 
 
-- asked that a working group of experts be convened to 
discuss options for improving the WFS reporting format; 
 
-- agreed to hold a stakeholder dialogue at the next CFS 
meeting (in May 2005) to prepare for a 2006 Special Forum 
to review WFS progress; 
 
-- heard a progress report on the International Alliance 
Against Hunger; and 
 
-- unanimously approved a set of "Voluntary Guidelines to 
Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to 
Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security." 
 
¶2.  Among the related activities for CFS delegates were 
an Oversight Panel that reviewed progress by FAO's 
Special Program for Food Security, and a USG-sponsored 
side event that highlighted the G8 commitments to help 
increase agricultural productivity in Africa.  In plenary 
statements and other discussions, the U.S. delegation 
emphasized the role of good governance, rule of law, 
integration into the global economy, increased 
productivity, and HIV/AIDS prevention in solving problems 
of food insecurity.  End summary. 
 
OVERVEW 
 
¶3.  The CFS held its 30th Session on SeptQmber 20-23, 
2004, at FAO Headquarters in Rome  The CFS is a forum 
within the United Nation3 system for discussing world 
food security and is responsible for monitoring progress 
towrd the international commitment made at the WFSin 
1996 to halve the number of undernourishedby 2015. 
 
¶4.  The US delegation was led by Eric Bost, Under 
Secretary for Food, Nutrition an Consumer Services, U.S. 
 
SIPDIS 
Department of AgrQculture (USDA), and Ambassador Tony P. 
Hall oQ the U.S. Mission to the UN Agencies for Food and 
Agriculture.  Alson the delegation were Darakel and Earl 
Gast of thQesca Bravo and Brenda Qis 
and Sharon Kotok,The session was attend5 out of 
116 members ofrepresentatives and 
obsQand intergovernmental aernmental organizationolved 
considering an aessment of the world fod a 
biennial progress Q 
 
¶6.  Election of the C d`vpMl`cQ`d out 
that about 70% @ives in countries 
thaeeting international poverls.  Where progress has been 
insufficient, 
it most often has been in states whose leaders have not 
embraced good governance, the rule of law, and 
integration into the global economy, or where conflict 
and state failure have made that choice impossible. 
Success in these states, the Ambassador noted, is not a 
matter of donor funds.  He also highlighted USG 
contributions towards meeting the WFS goal, such as U.S. 
spending on school feeding programs in the developing 
world, programs to increase agricultural productivity, 
the Millennium Challenge Account, and the President's 
Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief. 
 
¶8.  In other interventions, U/S Bost and other U.S. 
delegation members: (a) offered practical suggestions on 
how to improve and simplify the existing format for 
national reporting on progress in implementing WFS goals; 
(b) noted the unique contribution of an alliance to 
orchestrate civil society and private sector efforts with 
those of government to address hunger and poverty; and 
(c) stressed that a lasting solution to poverty and 
hunger requires the difficult work of improving domestic 
policies and institutions, increasing productivity, 
protecting private assets and incomes, providing 
appropriate market incentives for food production and 
distribution, fostering economic growth, and ensuring 
peace and stability. 
 
CFS CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 
 
¶9.  Assessment of World Food Security Situation.  The CFS 
noted the uneven progress in the fight against food 
insecurity among countries and regions.  It reaffirmed 
that strategies aimed at poverty and hunger reduction 
need to be considered in the broader context of 
development.  Delegates welcomed FAO's special coverage 
of trade in its latest assessment report, and recommended 
that this be one of the ongoing elements in future 
reports. 
 
¶10.  Revised WFS Progress Reporting Format.  Concerns 
were widely shared among delegations about the revised 
reporting format and process.  Many said that there were 
too many indicators and that the reporting requirements 
were burdensome and duplicative of reporting to other UN 
agencies, including for monitoring progress toward the 
goals of the Millennium Declaration.  It was pointed out 
that the process does not adequately draw on existing 
work on Food Insecurity and Vulnerability Information and 
Mapping Systems (FIVIMS).  Delegates put forward a number 
of proposals to improve the format, including: reducing 
the frequency of reporting; avoiding duplication of 
information on indicators by using the above-mentioned 
databases and formulating a set of key indicators; 
focusing on priority issues; and including new indicators 
on water and other natural resources.  The Committee took 
note of these proposals and agreed that the Secretariat 
should convene a regionally balanced working group of 
experts to review various options.  Following such 
review, the Secretariat should prepare a revised format 
for consideration by the CFS Bureau. 
 
¶11.  FIVIMS.  The Committee, at the suggestion of the 
U.S. delegation, made the recommendation that FAO 
continue to enhance FIVIMS and cooperation among its 
partners in order to improve its assessment of world food 
security.  Delegates, including the United States, 
recommended that FIVIMS work should inform selection of 
food security indicators of the WFS reporting as well as 
development of an appropriate analytical methodology and 
framework.  It was also recommended that the CFS 
Secretariat work more closely with the FIVIMS Secretariat 
 
SIPDIS 
in that regard. 
 
¶12.  Special Forum in 2006 to Review WFS Progress.  The 
Committee reaffirmed the WFS decision to convene, in 2006 
and within existing resources, a Special Forum within the 
32nd Session of the CFS to undertake a progress 
assessment of the implementation of the WFS Plan of 
Action.  This would include a mid-term review of progress 
toward the target of halving the number of malnourished 
people by 2015.  The CFS also agreed to hold, within 
available resources, a multi-stakeholder dialogue during 
the next CFS meeting (May 2005) to prepare for the 2006 
Special Forum.  This dialogue -- which was proposed by 
Brazil -- would involve governments, international 
organizations and civil society.  NGO participation would 
be in accordance with FAO policies and ECOSOC Resolution 
1996/31 on the Consultative Relationship between the UN 
and NGOs. 
 
¶13.  International Alliance Against Hunger (IAAH).  The 
CFS considered a progress report regarding the IAAH.  The 
CommitteI?called on governments and all others concerned 
 
 
with combating hunger, to continue to use all means 
possible, including National Alliances in their 
countries, to fight hunger, but cautioned against 
duplication of efforts and proliferation of meetings. 
The Committee found the interactive website and register 
of IAAH member activities to be efficient ways to make 
connections and share information among food security 
stakeholders.  It agreed on the voluntary nature of the 
Alliance and favored a cost-effective operation.  Some 
delegates requested more information on the cost of the 
proposed IAAH annual meeting. 
 
"RIGHT TO FOOD" VOLUNTARY GUIDELINES 
 
¶14.  The CFS approved the "Voluntary Guidelines to 
Support the Progressive Realization of the Right to 
Adequate Food in the Context of National Food Security." 
These guidelines were foreseen in the 1996 World Food 
Summit Plan of Action and were under negotiation by an 
Intergovernmental Working Group (IGWG) for the past two 
years (ref A).  IGWG delegates -- most of them also CFS 
delegation members -- met in an informal "friends of the 
chair" format concurrently with the CFS to conclude the 
negotiation of the Guidelines. 
 
¶15. In the last round of the IGWG, the U.S. delegation 
achieved all USG objectives.  Most notably, we were able 
to resolve language on the law of war in a way approved 
by the Departments of State and Defense, language on 
unilateral measures that was modeled on standard language 
found in non-binding multilateral declarations (such as 
the World Summit on Sustainable Development and World 
Summit on the Information Society), and language on the 
international dimension that mirrored existing non- 
binding language negotiated in various multilateral fora. 
 
¶16.  A final IGWG session was convened in the middle of 
the CFS proceedings on 23 September to adopt the 
Guidelines and formally transmit them to the CFS.  The 
last IGWG report and final text of the guidelines will be 
available at www.fao.org shortly.  The United States was 
able to join consensus, but submitted a written statement 
for the record that included the following clarification: 
[quote] 
In joining in the adoption of these Voluntary 
Guidelines, the United States does not 
recognize any change in the current state of 
conventional or customary international law 
regarding rights related to food.  The United 
States believes that the attainment of any 
"right to adequate food" or "fundamental 
freedom to be free from hunger" is a goal or 
aspiration to be realized progressively that 
does not give rise to any international 
obligations nor diminish the responsibilities 
of national governments toward their 
citizens. 
[end quote] 
 
OTHER ISSUES RAISED 
 
¶17.  "Summit of World Leaders for Action Against Hunger 
and Poverty."  The Brazilian delegation at the CFS 
actively promoted the September 20 meeting of leaders and 
officials at UN Headquarters in New York (ref B).  In the 
CFS Drafting Committee, the U.S. delegation was 
successful in restraining Brazilian attempts to 
characterize the New York "Summit" and ensuing 
Declaration within the CFS report in a manner that would 
convey broader international acceptance than was actually 
the case. 
 
¶18.  Africa Locust and Caribbean Hurricane Crises. 
Special attention was drawn by many delegations to the 
locust crisis afflicting vast swathes of western and 
northern Africa, although this was not formally on the 
agenda.  U.S. Mission had been active in the weeks prior 
to the CFS to call greater attention to this problem and 
to deficiencies in FAO's response thus far (refs C, D). 
Some delegates highlighted the food security implications 
of the destruction caused in recent weeks by Jeanne and 
other hurricanes in the Caribbean region.  These 
discussions prompted the Committee to recommend that FAO 
include "immediate threats to food security" as an agenda 
item at future CFS meetings. 
 
 
ADDITIONAL RELATED EVENTS 
 
¶19.  CFS Lecture.  Nobel Laureate Norman Borlaug 
delivered a lecture to the CFS on "The Green Revolution - 
An Unfinished Agenda."  Dr. Borlaug highlighted the 
importance of agricultural research for increasing 
productivity and sustainable use of land and water 
resources, the role of biotechnology in further 
nutritional and productivity gains, and the importance of 
leadership skills for scientists to ensure adoption of 
promising technology. 
 
¶20.  G8 Initiative Side Event.  U.S. Mission organized a 
panel discussion on the G8 commitments to Africa with a 
special focus on increasing agricultural productivity 
through capacity building (septel). 
 
¶21.  Other Side Events.  A "High-Level Dialogue with 
Civil Society Leaders and Member Countries' National 
Alliance Leaders on the Development of the IAAH as a 
Leading Global, Political and Moral Force to End Hunger" 
was held.  There was also a Seminar on Actions and 
Initiatives for Food Security. 
 
¶22.  Special Program for Qood Security (SPFS) Oversight 
Panel.  U.S. deQegates were also observers at the SPFS 
Oversight Panel, which met concurrently with CFS on 0-21 
September.  SPFS is an FAO program aimedat increasing 
food production in low-income, Qood-deficit countries by 
emphasizing nationalownership, public participation, 
technology transfer, social equity, sustainability and 
Suth-South cooperation.  The Panel commended theQ 
progress made since SPFS began ten years ago. It 
supported moving 30 countries from the pilot phase to 
national-level programs, and recomeilot phase in newly apel 
requested additioQ to determine 
which up-scaling to a national 
program, and calledfor stronger linkages with research 
institutins.  It also recommended more emphasis on high- 
risk groups such as women, and creation of "prductive 
safety nets" by stimulating production for local markets. 
 
CLEVERLEY 
 
 
NOTE: GARBLE THROUGHOUT TEXT 
NNNN 
2004ROME03885 - Classification: UNCLASSIFIED