Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 143912 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AORC AS AF AM AJ ASEC AU AMGT APER ACOA ASEAN AG AFFAIRS AR AFIN ABUD AO AEMR ADANA AMED AADP AINF ARF ADB ACS AE AID AL AC AGR ABLD AMCHAMS AECL AINT AND ASIG AUC APECO AFGHANISTAN AY ARABL ACAO ANET AFSN AZ AFLU ALOW ASSK AFSI ACABQ AMB APEC AIDS AA ATRN AMTC AVIATION AESC ASSEMBLY ADPM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG AGOA ASUP AFPREL ARNOLD ADCO AN ACOTA AODE AROC AMCHAM AT ACKM ASCH AORCUNGA AVIANFLU AVIAN AIT ASECPHUM ATRA AGENDA AIN AFINM APCS AGENGA ABDALLAH ALOWAR AFL AMBASSADOR ARSO AGMT ASPA AOREC AGAO ARR AOMS ASC ALIREZA AORD AORG ASECVE ABER ARABBL ADM AMER ALVAREZ AORCO ARM APERTH AINR AGRI ALZUGUREN ANGEL ACDA AEMED ARC AMGMT AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU ABMC AIAG ALJAZEERA ASR ASECARP ALAMI APRM ASECM AMPR AEGR AUSTRALIAGROUP ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AIDAC AOPC ANTITERRORISM ASEG AMIA ASEX AEMRBC AFOR ABT AMERICA AGENCIES AGS ADRC ASJA AEAID ANARCHISTS AME AEC ALNEA AMGE AMEDCASCKFLO AK ANTONIO ASO AFINIZ ASEDC AOWC ACCOUNT ACTION AMG AFPK AOCR AMEDI AGIT ASOC ACOAAMGT AMLB AZE AORCYM AORL AGRICULTURE ACEC AGUILAR ASCC AFSA ASES ADIP ASED ASCE ASFC ASECTH AFGHAN ANTXON APRC AFAF AFARI ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AX ALAB ASECAF ASA ASECAFIN ASIC AFZAL AMGTATK ALBE AMT AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN AGUIRRE AAA ABLG ARCH AGRIC AIHRC ADEL AMEX ALI AQ ATFN AORCD ARAS AINFCY AFDB ACBAQ AFDIN AOPR AREP ALEXANDER ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI ATRD AEIR AOIC ABLDG AFR ASEK AER ALOUNI AMCT AVERY ASECCASC ARG APR AMAT AEMRS AFU ATPDEA ALL ASECE ANDREW
EAIR ECON ETRD EAGR EAID EFIN ETTC ENRG EMIN ECPS EG EPET EINV ELAB EU ECONOMICS EC EZ EUN EN ECIN EWWT EXTERNAL ENIV ES ESA ELN EFIS EIND EPA ELTN EXIM ET EINT EI ER EAIDAF ETRO ETRDECONWTOCS ECTRD EUR ECOWAS ECUN EBRD ECONOMIC ENGR ECONOMY EFND ELECTIONS EPECO EUMEM ETMIN EXBS EAIRECONRP ERTD EAP ERGR EUREM EFI EIB ENGY ELNTECON EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ECOSOC EEB EINF ETRN ENGRD ESTH ENRC EXPORT EK ENRGMO ECO EGAD EXIMOPIC ETRDPGOV EURM ETRA ENERG ECLAC EINO ENVIRONMENT EFIC ECIP ETRDAORC ENRD EMED EIAR ECPN ELAP ETCC EAC ENEG ESCAP EWWC ELTD ELA EIVN ELF ETR EFTA EMAIL EL EMS EID ELNT ECPSN ERIN ETT EETC ELAN ECHEVARRIA EPWR EVIN ENVR ENRGJM ELBR EUC EARG EAPC EICN EEC EREL EAIS ELBA EPETUN EWWY ETRDGK EV EDU EFN EVN EAIDETRD ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ ETEX ESCI EAIDHO EENV ETRC ESOC EINDQTRD EINVA EFLU EGEN ECE EAGRBN EON EFINECONCS EIAD ECPC ENV ETDR EAGER ETRDKIPR EWT EDEV ECCP ECCT EARI EINVECON ED ETRDEC EMINETRD EADM ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ETAD ECOM ECONETRDEAGRJA EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS ESSO ETRG ELAM ECA EENG EITC ENG ERA EPSC ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EIPR ELABPGOVBN EURFOR ETRAD EUE EISNLN ECONETRDBESPAR ELAINE EGOVSY EAUD EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EINVETRD EPIN ECONENRG EDRC ESENV EB ENER ELTNSNAR EURN ECONPGOVBN ETTF ENVT EPIT ESOCI EFINOECD ERD EDUC EUM ETEL EUEAID ENRGY ETD EAGRE EAR EAIDMG EE EET ETER ERICKSON EIAID EX EAG EBEXP ESTN EAIDAORC EING EGOV EEOC EAGRRP EVENTS ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ETRDEMIN EPETEIND EAIDRW ENVI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC EDUARDO EGAR EPCS EPRT EAIDPHUMPRELUG EPTED ETRB EPETPGOV ECONQH EAIDS EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM EAIDAR EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN ESF EINR ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN EIDN ETRK ESTRADA EXEC EAIO EGHG ECN EDA ECOS EPREL EINVKSCA ENNP ELABV ETA EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EUCOM EAIDASEC ENR END EP ERNG ESPS EITI EINTECPS EAVI ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EADI ELDIN ELND ECRM EINVEFIN EAOD EFINTS EINDIR ENRGKNNP ETRDEIQ ETC EAIRASECCASCID EINN ETRP EAIDNI EFQ ECOQKPKO EGPHUM EBUD EAIT ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ EWWI ENERGY ELB EINDETRD EMI ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EHUM EFNI EOXC EISNAR ETRDEINVTINTCS EIN EFIM EMW ETIO ETRDGR EMN EXO EATO EWTR ELIN EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EINVETC ETTD EIQ ECONCS EPPD ESS EUEAGR ENRGIZ EISL EUNJ EIDE ENRGSD ELAD ESPINOSA ELEC EAIG ESLCO ENTG ETRDECD EINVECONSENVCSJA EEPET EUNCH ECINECONCS
KPKO KIPR KWBG KPAL KDEM KTFN KNNP KGIC KTIA KCRM KDRG KWMN KJUS KIDE KSUM KTIP KFRD KMCA KMDR KCIP KTDB KPAO KPWR KOMC KU KIRF KCOR KHLS KISL KSCA KGHG KS KSTH KSEP KE KPAI KWAC KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPRP KVPR KAWC KUNR KZ KPLS KN KSTC KMFO KID KNAR KCFE KRIM KFLO KCSA KG KFSC KSCI KFLU KMIG KRVC KV KVRP KMPI KNEI KAPO KOLY KGIT KSAF KIRC KNSD KBIO KHIV KHDP KBTR KHUM KSAC KACT KRAD KPRV KTEX KPIR KDMR KMPF KPFO KICA KWMM KICC KR KCOM KAID KINR KBCT KOCI KCRS KTER KSPR KDP KFIN KCMR KMOC KUWAIT KIPRZ KSEO KLIG KWIR KISM KLEG KTBD KCUM KMSG KMWN KREL KPREL KAWK KIMT KCSY KESS KWPA KNPT KTBT KCROM KPOW KFTN KPKP KICR KGHA KOMS KJUST KREC KOC KFPC KGLB KMRS KTFIN KCRCM KWNM KHGH KRFD KY KGCC KFEM KVIR KRCM KEMR KIIP KPOA KREF KJRE KRKO KOGL KSCS KGOV KCRIM KEM KCUL KRIF KCEM KITA KCRN KCIS KSEAO KWMEN KEANE KNNC KNAP KEDEM KNEP KHPD KPSC KIRP KUNC KALM KCCP KDEN KSEC KAYLA KIMMITT KO KNUC KSIA KLFU KLAB KTDD KIRCOEXC KECF KIPRETRDKCRM KNDP KIRCHOFF KJAN KFRDSOCIRO KWMNSMIG KEAI KKPO KPOL KRD KWMNPREL KATRINA KBWG KW KPPD KTIAEUN KDHS KRV KBTS KWCI KICT KPALAOIS KPMI KWN KTDM KWM KLHS KLBO KDEMK KT KIDS KWWW KLIP KPRM KSKN KTTB KTRD KNPP KOR KGKG KNN KTIAIC KSRE KDRL KVCORR KDEMGT KOMO KSTCC KMAC KSOC KMCC KCHG KSEPCVIS KGIV KPO KSEI KSTCPL KSI KRMS KFLOA KIND KPPAO KCM KRFR KICCPUR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNNB KFAM KWWMN KENV KGH KPOP KFCE KNAO KTIAPARM KWMNKDEM KDRM KNNNP KEVIN KEMPI KWIM KGCN KUM KMGT KKOR KSMT KISLSCUL KNRV KPRO KOMCSG KLPM KDTB KFGM KCRP KAUST KNNPPARM KUNH KWAWC KSPA KTSC KUS KSOCI KCMA KTFR KPAOPREL KNNPCH KWGB KSTT KNUP KPGOV KUK KMNP KPAS KHMN KPAD KSTS KCORR KI KLSO KWNN KNP KPTD KESO KMPP KEMS KPAONZ KPOV KTLA KPAOKMDRKE KNMP KWMNCI KWUN KRDP KWKN KPAOY KEIM KGICKS KIPT KREISLER KTAO KJU KLTN KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KEN KQ KWPR KSCT KGHGHIV KEDU KRCIM KFIU KWIC KNNO KILS KTIALG KNNA KMCAJO KINP KRM KLFLO KPA KOMCCO KKIV KHSA KDM KRCS KWBGSY KISLAO KNPPIS KNNPMNUC KCRI KX KWWT KPAM KVRC KERG KK KSUMPHUM KACP KSLG KIF KIVP KHOURY KNPR KUNRAORC KCOG KCFC KWMJN KFTFN KTFM KPDD KMPIO KCERS KDUM KDEMAF KMEPI KHSL KEPREL KAWX KIRL KNNR KOMH KMPT KISLPINR KADM KPER KTPN KSCAECON KA KJUSTH KPIN KDEV KCSI KNRG KAKA KFRP KTSD KINL KJUSKUNR KQM KQRDQ KWBC KMRD KVBL KOM KMPL KEDM KFLD KPRD KRGY KNNF KPROG KIFR KPOKO KM KWMNCS KAWS KLAP KPAK KHIB KOEM KDDG KCGC
PGOV PREL PK PTER PINR PO PHUM PARM PREF PINF PRL PM PINS PROP PALESTINIAN PE PBTS PNAT PHSA PL PA PSEPC POSTS POLITICS POLICY POL PU PAHO PHUMPGOV PGOG PARALYMPIC PGOC PNR PREFA PMIL POLITICAL PROV PRUM PBIO PAK POV POLG PAR POLM PHUMPREL PKO PUNE PROG PEL PROPERTY PKAO PRE PSOE PHAS PNUM PGOVE PY PIRF PRES POWELL PP PREM PCON PGOVPTER PGOVPREL PODC PTBS PTEL PGOVTI PHSAPREL PD PG PRC PVOV PLO PRELL PEPFAR PREK PEREZ PINT POLI PPOL PARTIES PT PRELUN PH PENA PIN PGPV PKST PROTESTS PHSAK PRM PROLIFERATION PGOVBL PAS PUM PMIG PGIC PTERPGOV PSHA PHM PHARM PRELHA PELOSI PGOVKCMABN PQM PETER PJUS PKK POUS PTE PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PERM PRELGOV PAO PNIR PARMP PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PHYTRP PHUML PFOV PDEM PUOS PN PRESIDENT PERURENA PRIVATIZATION PHUH PIF POG PERL PKPA PREI PTERKU PSEC PRELKSUMXABN PETROL PRIL POLUN PPD PRELUNSC PREZ PCUL PREO PGOVZI POLMIL PERSONS PREFL PASS PV PETERS PING PQL PETR PARMS PNUC PS PARLIAMENT PINSCE PROTECTION PLAB PGV PBS PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PKNP PSOCI PSI PTERM PLUM PF PVIP PARP PHUMQHA PRELNP PHIM PRELBR PUBLIC PHUMKPAL PHAM PUAS PBOV PRELTBIOBA PGOVU PHUMPINS PICES PGOVENRG PRELKPKO PHU PHUMKCRS POGV PATTY PSOC PRELSP PREC PSO PAIGH PKPO PARK PRELPLS PRELPK PHUS PPREL PTERPREL PROL PDA PRELPGOV PRELAF PAGE PGOVGM PGOVECON PHUMIZNL PMAR PGOVAF PMDL PKBL PARN PARMIR PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PDD PRELKPAO PKMN PRELEZ PHUMPRELPGOV PARTM PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPEL PGOVPRELPINRBN PGOVSOCI PWBG PGOVEAID PGOVPM PBST PKEAID PRAM PRELEVU PHUMA PGOR PPA PINSO PROVE PRELKPAOIZ PPAO PHUMPRELBN PGVO PHUMPTER PAGR PMIN PBTSEWWT PHUMR PDOV PINO PARAGRAPH PACE PINL PKPAL PTERE PGOVAU PGOF PBTSRU PRGOV PRHUM PCI PGO PRELEUN PAC PRESL PORG PKFK PEPR PRELP PMR PRTER PNG PGOVPHUMKPAO PRELECON PRELNL PINOCHET PAARM PKPAO PFOR PGOVLO PHUMBA POPDC PRELC PHUME PER PHJM POLINT PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PAUL PHALANAGE PARTY PPEF PECON PEACE PROCESS PPGOV PLN PRELSW PHUMS PRF PEDRO PHUMKDEM PUNR PVPR PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PGGV PSA PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PGIV PRFE POGOV PBT PAMQ

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 04TEGUCIGALPA1577, Honduras Poised to Become Leader in Port Security

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #04TEGUCIGALPA1577.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
04TEGUCIGALPA1577 2004-07-16 18:02 2011-08-26 00:00 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Tegucigalpa
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS SECTION 01 OF 05 TEGUCIGALPA 001577 
 
SIPDIS 
 
FOR WHA/CEN AND WHA/PPC 
FOR EB/CBA AND EB/TRA 
FOR INL/LP AND S/CT 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EWWT EINV ETRD PBTS SNAR PTER BEXP ECON PGOV HO
SUBJECT: Honduras Poised to Become Leader in Port Security 
 
Ref: Tegucigalpa 404 
 
1. SUMMARY: Following a June visit to the ports of Honduras, 
a United States Coast Guard delegation confirmed that 
Honduras was taking the appropriate measures to ready its 
ports for certification on July 1, and to successfully 
comply with International Maritime Organization (IMO) 
requirements and the Maritime Transportation Security Act 
(MTSA).  The team visited Puerto Castilla, Puerto Cortes, a 
cruise ship dock in Roatan, and the port of San Lorenzo, 
leaving only the national port of La Ceiba uninspected by 
the Coast Guard.  Visits to the four international Honduran 
ports revealed that, despite some minor shortcomings, 
Honduras has made progress in improving port security worthy 
of regional emulation.  Upon conclusion of the port 
inspections, the Coast Guard delegation commended the 
Honduran authorities for their efforts to revamp port 
security, stating that when other countries doubt their 
ability to effect such rapid improvement in port security 
measures, the Coast Guard will highlight Honduras as an 
example of success.  On July 1, the National Commission for 
Port Protection successfully certified all four of the ports 
visited by the U.S. Coast Guard.  END SUMMARY 
 
------------ 
Introduction 
------------ 
 
2.  In May, the Government of Honduras (GOH), in 
collaboration with its newly established National Commission 
for Port Protection (CNPP), extended an invitation to the 
United States Coast Guard (USCG) to inspect ports within 
Honduran territory.  In response, on June 14, 2004 a ten- 
person delegation from the U.S. Coast Guard traveled to 
Honduras to inspect a series of ports on the Atlantic and 
Pacific coasts, as well as a cruise ship dock in the Bay 
Islands.  Honduras was the first country in the Western 
Hemisphere to voluntarily have their ports visited and 
evaluated by the U.S. Coast Guard. 
 
3.  The purpose of the inspection was to evaluate the 
implementation of new measures of protection established in 
the International Shipping and Port Facility Security (ISPS) 
Code set forth by the International Maritime Organization 
(IMO).  In addition, the USCG sought to conduct a mutually 
beneficial exchange of information and ideas with the GOH in 
order to identify successful practices, which could improve 
maritime security and counteract global terrorism.  Honduran 
ports had been working intensely to meet the IMO 
certification deadline of June 30 (Ref). 
 
4.  The delegation representing the U.S. Coast Guard, led by 
Lt. Cmdr. Joseph Lo Sciuto, included Lt. Cmdr. Oziel Vela, 
Mr. Michael Brown, Lt. Jeff Wasserman, Lt. Galia Kaplan, Mr. 
Peyton Coleman, Mr. Jeff Hoagland, and Ens. Nicolas 
Oliverie, with Mr. Nick Lakis from Transportation Security 
Administration and Ms. Dixie Faries from Customs and Border 
Protection.  The facilities subject to inspection were 
Puerto Castilla near Trujillo, Puerto Cortes north of San 
Pedro Sula, the cruise ship dock of Roatan, and the port of 
San Lorenzo. 
 
--------------------------------------------- ----------- 
Background on the National Commission of Port Protection 
--------------------------------------------- ----------- 
 
5.  In April, President Maduro approved the creation of the 
National Commission for Port Protection (CNPP), a Honduran 
governmental organization that acts as the principal 
authority on port security matters at the national level. 
The commission was granted full authority to certify all 
Honduran ports in agreement under the IMO's ISPS code. 
Certification of the vessels in the Honduran national ship 
registry is the responsibility of the General Direction of 
the Merchant Marine in accordance with the ISPS Code, which 
includes evaluations, elaboration of protection plans, and 
certification.  The GOH was aware that without 
certification, international maritime trade between Honduras 
and the U.S. would be jeopardized, as vessels originating 
from Honduras would, at a minimum, experience significant 
difficulties docking in the United States, and possibly be 
refused entry into U.S. waters and ports. 
 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
Introductory Meeting at the Presidential Palace 
--------------------------------------------- -- 
 
6.  Prior to the first Coast Guard inspection, the 
delegation met at the Presidential Palace with the GOH's 
high-level port security inspection team.  Those present 
included Minister of Trade and Industry Norman Garcia, 
Minister of Defense Federico Breve, Minister of Public Works 
and Transportation Jorge Carranza, Minister of Public 
Security Oscar Alvarez, Port Security Officer Dennis 
Chinchilla, Merchant Marine Chief Marco Augusto Hernandez, 
and Presidential Adviser Mauro Membreno. 
 
7.  Mr. Chinchilla gave the Coast Guard delegation a well- 
organized presentation outlining the background information 
and recent progress of each of the ports to be inspected. 
The presentation highlighted Honduras's favorable maritime 
location and demonstrated that the GOH established port 
security parameters consistent with ISPS and MTSA code.  He 
informed the USCG that as of the meeting, port assessments 
had been approved, with the audit timetable scheduled to be 
turned in the week of June 22.  Mr. Chinchilla reaffirmed 
the government's commitment to complete the certification 
process by June 30.  The presentation was followed by a 
question-and-answer period between the Honduran 
representatives and the Coast Guard delegation.  Lt. Cmdr. 
Joseph Lo Sciuto ably led the discussion and served as 
spokesperson on behalf of the Coast Guard throughout the 
meeting. 
 
------------------------ 
Visit to Puerto Castilla 
------------------------ 
 
8.  The Coast Guard visit got off to a very positive start 
with the inspection of Puerto Castilla (Standard Fruit/Dole 
facility).  The delegation praised the strict entry and exit 
procedures encountered on arrival.  Upon entrance, all 
occupants were required to exit from the vehicles for a 
thorough search at both the original entry point and the 
internal entrance to the facilities.  Employees all wore 
visible photo identification badges and were checked with 
metal detectors upon entrance and exit for every shift. 
 
---------------------- 
Visit to Puerto Cortes 
---------------------- 
 
9.  Puerto Cortes is the most important maritime customs 
facility in Honduras.  The port is the largest port on the 
Caribbean side of Central America.  Because Guatemalan ports 
can only dock up to four ships while Puerto Cortes can dock 
up to ten, use of the Honduran port is preferable and more 
efficient for sea freight shipping to the United States.  In 
2003, Puerto Cortes handled 7.6 million metric tons of 
cargo, or 577,000 containers. 
 
10.  At Puerto Cortes, the Coast Guard delegation 
acknowledged the effective security measures already in 
place, noting that the port sets a good example for other 
facilities.  They expressed some concern over the height of 
port lighting and the need to complete implementation of 
some entry/exit control points.  The team fully reviewed the 
port's security plan and found that it met the ISPS 
standards.  They suggested that the port authority could 
improve the plan by implementing and testing it, and 
ensuring full coordination with local municipal authorities. 
The GOH scheduled preliminary testing the week of June 22, 
after the USCG team departed, during which the CNPP 
conducted audits in order to verify compliance with the 
requirements of the ISPS code.  At this time, the CNPP found 
that minimum requirements were met.  In the future, the CNPP 
will conduct planned testing annually, in addition to 
unplanned testing periodically, to verify that the port 
stays in compliance with the code. 
 
--------------------------------------- 
Visit to the Cruise Ship Dock in Roatan 
--------------------------------------- 
 
11.  At the cruise ship dock in Roatan, the Coast Guard 
delegation found the security measures to be still under 
development.  They had temporary, rather than permanent, 
guards in place.  The team noted that the guards needed 
better training on the inner perimeter.  Improvements were 
also needed on the outer perimeter wall, especially by the 
main building.  Although the GOH had begun to implement a 
photo identification badge system, police were not checking 
tourists reentering for the cruise ships.  An Embassy 
Military Group officer noted that a local band playing 
beside a cruise ship entered with drums that had not been 
inspected and could pose a potential hazard.  The GOH 
officials said they would look into installing x-ray 
equipment for better checks in the future.  In addition, 
individual shipping facilities on the island were at varying 
stages of readiness.  Some have plans drawn up that would 
exceed minimum requirements while others do not appear to 
have begun preparation.  The CNPP told the team that none of 
those facilities would be certified until they come into 
compliance with ISPS code. 
 
---------------------------- 
Visit to Port of San Lorenzo 
---------------------------- 
 
12.  The Coast Guard delegation's final inspection took 
place at the port of San Lorenzo, located on the Pacific 
Coast in the Gulf of Fonseca.  Overall, the delegation 
approved of the measures in place.  The port had two 
entrances, both guarded by national police.  The group 
received clearance to enter at the external entrance and was 
escorted by a police officer to the internal entrance.  At 
the internal entrance, all occupants were required to exit 
the vehicle for inspection, which was the same procedure 
implemented for vehicles departing.  All port employees wore 
photo identification badges and visitors, including the 
delegation, were required to trade photo identification for 
visitor badges.  As previously noted, an identical procedure 
is used at Puerto Cortes and Puerto Castilla. 
 
13.  Upon inspection of the facility, the delegation made 
some suggestions for improvement.  For example, some foliage 
and containers lined the inside perimeter of the fence, 
revealing locations where outsiders may be able to climb 
over the fence and gain access to the port.  The Coast Guard 
extensively reviewed the security measures already in place. 
They were satisfied with the cooperation between the naval 
and police forces.  The delegation also verified that should 
the threat level rise, those in charge at the port would be 
able to take the necessary measures to provide sufficient 
security. 
 
------------------- 
Embassy Outbriefing 
------------------- 
 
14.  Upon completion of the port inspections, the Coast 
Guard delegation met with Embassy representatives and 
Ambassador Palmer to review the visit.  Lt. Cmdr. Lo Sciuto 
began by noting that the ISPS code has a baseline, and 
Honduras had set their standards above that baseline.  The 
delegation was impressed with the progress of the ports and 
their efforts to meet their self-implemented high standards. 
They were especially impressed with Puerto Castilla (the 
Dole fruit company facility), observing that it was very 
efficient and one of the best ports they visited.  The 
delegation found the security in place to be consistent with 
ISPS code standards, suggesting that temporarily increasing 
security when vessels come in would be sufficient. 
 
15.  Regarding future plans, Lt. Cmdr. Lo Sciuto stated that 
the full team would re-inspect the ports in three years; but 
prior to this visit, someone from the USCG would be back to 
inspect when the Honduran port authorities feel they have 
fully implemented all their security upgrades.  In the 
meantime, the Embassy plans to conduct unannounced visits to 
the ports throughout the summer to verify that the ports are 
not falling out of compliance. 
 
--------------------------------------------- 
Concluding Meeting at the Presidential Palace 
--------------------------------------------- 
 
16.  The Coast Guard delegation reconvened at the 
Presidential Palace for a final meeting with Honduran 
representatives.  Those present on behalf of the United 
States included the entire Coast Guard delegation and 
representatives from the Embassy.  Those representing the 
Honduran government included Minister of Trade and Industry 
Norman Garcia, Minister of Defense Federico Breve, Minister 
of Public Works and Transportation Jorge Carranza, Port 
Security Officer Dennis Chinchilla, Merchant Marine Chief 
Marco Augusto Hernandez, and Presidential Adviser Mauro 
Membreno. 
 
17.  Lt. Cmdr. Lo Sciuto began by reading a statement to the 
panel.  His statement highlighted Honduras's significant 
progress with port security.  He commented that Honduras was 
doing a great job implementing the requirements set forth in 
the ISPS code, but must keep progressing in order to 
establish themselves as the lead example in the region.  He 
clarified that the U.S. Coast Guard was not in Honduras to 
certify the ports, but rather to assess the implementation 
of the GOH's port security regime. 
 
18.  The GOH asked for future interaction between Honduras 
and the U.S. Coast Guard, and indicated an interest in 
testing its ability and decision-making process for 
elevating the ports' alert levels.  The USCG reassured the 
Ministers that they would maintain a partnership with 
Honduras, extending them an open invitation to visit and 
observe the port security process in place in the United 
States.  Ms. Dixie Faries, the U.S. Customs representative, 
stated that U.S. Customs intended to provide training and 
assistance to Honduras. 
 
19.  Lt. Cmdr. Lo Sciuto emphasized the importance of 
following through with their recommendations in order not to 
fall out of compliance with the code.  He made some 
specific, well-received recommendations to improve port 
security in Honduras even further.  The first suggestion 
involved increased interaction between the port authorities 
and the Frontier Police, either in a partnership or 
oversight capacity.  An additional suggestion concerned the 
lighting at Puerto Cortes, where the light towers currently 
in place are 55 feet tall, rather than the required 80 feet 
tall.  In conclusion, he stated that should Honduras 
continue along the same path, they would serve as a model 
for port security in the region. 
 
----------------------------------- 
Media Response to Coast Guard Visit 
----------------------------------- 
 
20.  Initially, the media misinterpreted the role of the 
U.S. Coast Guard visit to inspect the Honduran ports, 
thinking that the Coast Guard was responsible for 
certification of the ports.  The content of the initial 
reporting was otherwise accurate and objective.  After the 
final meeting at the Presidential Palace, an Embassy 
spokesperson, on behalf of the Coast Guard, read a statement 
in Spanish to the press noting Honduras's progress with port 
security.  In response to questions, he clarified that the 
Coast Guard was not in charge of certifying the ports; 
rather, that was the responsibility of the CNPP.  Media 
coverage following the Coast Guard visit was positive and 
optimistic, reflecting well upon the Honduran government and 
port security measures in place and under development. 
 
------- 
Comment 
------- 
 
21.  The U.S. Coast Guard visit proved successful and 
beneficial to Honduran and U.S. representatives, reaffirming 
once again that the relationship between Honduras and the 
U.S. is one of cooperation and collaboration.  GOH Ministers 
were extremely pleased with the Coast Guard's findings, 
voicing their intent to take into consideration all 
suggestions.  On July 1, the CNPP successfully certified all 
four of the ports visited by the U.S. Coast Guard.  The 
fifth remaining port in La Ceiba will likely be certified in 
the near future.  End comment. 
 
Palmer