Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03THEHAGUE3060, DUTCH PARLIAMENT CONCURS WITH SFIR EXTENSION

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03THEHAGUE3060.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03THEHAGUE3060 2003-12-12 13:27 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy The Hague
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS THE HAGUE 003060 
 
SIPDIS 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: MOPS MARR PREL IZ NL
SUBJECT: DUTCH PARLIAMENT CONCURS WITH SFIR EXTENSION 
 
REF: THE HAGUE 2987 (NOTAL) 
 
1. (U) On December 11, the Dutch parliament concurred with 
the November 28 decision by the Cabinet to extend Dutch 
participation in the Stabilization Force in Iraq for six 
months.  The Dutch presently have approximately 1100 
military personnel (mostly Dutch Royal Marines) serving as 
part of the UK's Multi-National Division South-East in 
AlMuthanna Province.  Only the far-left opposition Green 
Left (GL) and Socialist (SP) Parties opposed the extension, 
as they are against Dutch involvement in Iraq altogether. 
While supporting the extension, the governing Christian 
Democrats (CDA), Liberals (VVD) and Liberal Democrats (D66) 
as well as the main opposition Labor Party (PvdA) all 
expressed concern about threats to Dutch troops' safety but 
accepted Defense Minister Kamp's assurances that measures 
had been taken to address them.  (Kamp recently dispatched 
70 Dutch Special Forces commandoes to perform reconnaissance 
missions in the Dutch sector.)  Members also accepted Kamp's 
assurances that the Dutch were receiving adequate 
information from the UK about possible threats (this had 
previously been a subject of parliamentary concern). 
 
2. (U) Kamp readily admitted that the security situation had 
become more difficult.  He said that measures had been taken 
to prevent terrorist attacks on Dutch forces but "we cannot 
reassure the Chamber as we are not reassured ourselves."  In 
concurring with the extension, Parliament expressed strong 
support for the Dutch troops' role in enhancing security by 
training Iraqi police and other security forces and thus 
facilitating the transfer of power to the Iraqi people. 
 
3. (SBU) Comment:  Support for the Cabinet's November 28 
decision was largely a foregone conclusion (a formal vote of 
approval is in fact not necessary in the Dutch system; 
however the Chamber always debates potentially controversial 
decisions).  Nevertheless both Kamp and parties on the 
center-right and center-left used yesterday's debate to make 
plain their concerns about the risk to Dutch forces should 
there be eventual Dutch casualties in Iraq.  End comment. 
 
Sobel