Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 64621 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 03HARARE619, Business and the Stayaway

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #03HARARE619.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
03HARARE619 2003-03-26 14:19 2011-08-24 16:30 UNCLASSIFIED Embassy Harare
This record is a partial extract of the original cable. The full text of the original cable is not available.
UNCLAS HARARE 000619 
 
SIPDIS 
 
STATE FOR AF/S 
NSC FOR SENIOR AFRICA DIRECTOR JFRAZER 
USDOC FOR 2037 DIEMOND 
PASS USTR ROSA WHITAKER 
TREASURY FOR ED BARBER AND C WILKINSON 
STATE PASS USAID FOR MARJORIE COPSON 
 
E. O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: ECON EINV ETRD ZI
SUBJECT: Business and the Stayaway 
 
1. Summary: Zimbabwe's business sector remained mostly 
neutral during the opposition-led stayaway March 19-20. 
Most companies sympathize with many opposition aims, but 
are unwilling to test the wrath of the GOZ.  End summary. 
 
2. We have spoken to over a dozen multinational and local 
company heads about the stayaway.  These firms paid 
employees who were prevented from working during the 
stayaway.  Company reps acknowledged their operations 
suffered losses but none seemed overtly hostile to the 
opposition tactic.  However, several businessmen were 
uncomfortable with the prospect of further stayaways, 
arguing that industry could not sustain additional 
hardship. 
 
Cost of Stayaways 
----------------- 
3. Local economists agree that the cost of stayaways is 
formidable.  Using very crude data of 70 percent 
production stoppage for two of 250 annual workdays, an 
industry economist suggested the stayaway may have shaved 
as much as .4 percent from 2003 GDP.  Since many 
companies are already operating at less than full 
capacity, however, they may be able to recoup production 
losses over the next weeks, mitigating any negative 
impact on national output. 
 
The Discomfort of Taking Sides 
------------------------------ 
4. A senior Barclays executive received a phone call from 
a high MDC official urging that Barclays not open on the 
strike's second day.  In part due to its British origins, 
this made Barclays extremely uncomfortable, although the 
bank was largely closed on the second day anyway. 
Another businessman, Anthony Mandiwanza, head of the 
Dairiboard as well as the Confederation of Zimbabwe 
Industries, said the stayaway was not relevant for 
businesses the day before the strike.  He took heavy 
criticism in the independent press for this remark. 
 
Comment 
------- 
5. Contending with a government that intuitively 
distrusts the private sector, companies are loath to 
publicly support stayaways or other political protest. 
White commercial farmers paid dearly for backing the 
Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) in last year's 
elections.  GOZ officials have already argued that pro- 
MDC firms "shut out" employees from work.  Where 
possible, we expect the private sector will continue to 
steer clear of open political engagement. 
 
Sullivan