Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 251287 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
AEMR ASEC AMGT AE AS AMED AVIAN AU AF AORC AGENDA AO AR AM APER AFIN ATRN AJ ABUD ARABL AL AG AODE ALOW ADANA AADP AND APECO ACABQ ASEAN AA AFFAIRS AID AGR AY AGS AFSI AGOA AMB ARF ANET ASCH ACOA AFLU AFSN AMEX AFDB ABLD AESC AFGHANISTAN AINF AVIATION ARR ARSO ANDREW ASSEMBLY AIDS APRC ASSK ADCO ASIG AC AZ APEC AFINM ADB AP ACOTA ASEX ACKM ASUP ANTITERRORISM ADPM AINR ARABLEAGUE AGAO AORG AMTC AIN ACCOUNT ASECAFINGMGRIZOREPTU AIDAC AINT ARCH AMGTKSUP ALAMI AMCHAMS ALJAZEERA AVIANFLU AORD AOREC ALIREZA AOMS AMGMT ABDALLAH AORCAE AHMED ACCELERATED AUC ALZUGUREN ANGEL AORL ASECIR AMG AMBASSADOR AEMRASECCASCKFLOMARRPRELPINRAMGTJMXL ADM ASES ABMC AER AMER ASE AMGTHA ARNOLDFREDERICK AOPC ACS AFL AEGR ASED AFPREL AGRI AMCHAM ARNOLD AN ANATO AME APERTH ASECSI AT ACDA ASEDC AIT AMERICA AMLB AMGE ACTION AGMT AFINIZ ASECVE ADRC ABER AGIT APCS AEMED ARABBL ARC ASO AIAG ACEC ASR ASECM ARG AEC ABT ADIP ADCP ANARCHISTS AORCUN AOWC ASJA AALC AX AROC ARM AGENCIES ALBE AK AZE AOPR AREP AMIA ASCE ALANAZI ABDULRAHMEN ABDULHADI AINFCY ARMS ASECEFINKCRMKPAOPTERKHLSAEMRNS AGRICULTURE AFPK AOCR ALEXANDER ATRD ATFN ABLG AORCD AFGHAN ARAS AORCYM AVERY ALVAREZ ACBAQ ALOWAR ANTOINE ABLDG ALAB AMERICAS AFAF ASECAFIN ASEK ASCC AMCT AMGTATK AMT APDC AEMRS ASECE AFSA ATRA ARTICLE ARENA AISG AEMRBC AFR AEIR ASECAF AFARI AMPR ASPA ASOC ANTONIO AORCL ASECARP APRM AUSTRALIAGROUP ASEG AFOR AEAID AMEDI ASECTH ASIC AFDIN AGUIRRE AUNR ASFC AOIC ANTXON ASA ASECCASC ALI AORCEUNPREFPRELSMIGBN ASECKHLS ASSSEMBLY ASECVZ AI ASECPGOV ASIR ASCEC ASAC ARAB AIEA ADMIRAL AUSGR AQ AMTG ARRMZY ANC APR AMAT AIHRC AFU ADEL AECL ACAO AMEMR ADEP AV AW AOR ALL ALOUNI AORCUNGA ALNEA ASC AORCO ARMITAGE AGENGA AGRIC AEM ACOAAMGT AGUILAR AFPHUM AMEDCASCKFLO AFZAL AAA ATPDEA ASECPHUM ASECKFRDCVISKIRFPHUMSMIGEG
ETRD ETTC EU ECON EFIN EAGR EAID ELAB EINV ENIV ENRG EPET EZ ELTN ELECTIONS ECPS ET ER EG EUN EIND ECONOMICS EMIN ECIN EINT EWWT EAIR EN ENGR ES EI ETMIN EL EPA EARG EFIS ECONOMY EC EK ELAM ECONOMIC EAR ESDP ECCP ELN EUM EUMEM ECA EAP ELEC ECOWAS EFTA EXIM ETTD EDRC ECOSOC ECPSN ENVIRONMENT ECO EMAIL ECTRD EREL EDU ENERG ENERGY ENVR ETRAD EAC EXTERNAL EFIC ECIP ERTD EUC ENRGMO EINZ ESTH ECCT EAGER ECPN ELNT ERD EGEN ETRN EIVN ETDR EXEC EIAD EIAR EVN EPRT ETTF ENGY EAIDCIN EXPORT ETRC ESA EIB EAPC EPIT ESOCI ETRB EINDQTRD ENRC EGOV ECLAC EUR ELF ETEL ENRGUA EVIN EARI ESCAP EID ERIN ELAN ENVT EDEV EWWY EXBS ECOM EV ELNTECON ECE ETRDGK EPETEIND ESCI ETRDAORC EAIDETRD ETTR EMS EAGRECONEINVPGOVBN EBRD EUREM ERGR EAGRBN EAUD EFI ETRDEINVECINPGOVCS EPEC ETRO ENRGY EGAR ESSO EGAD ENV ENER EAIDXMXAXBXFFR ELA EET EINVETRD EETC EIDN ERGY ETRDPGOV EING EMINCG EINVECON EURM EEC EICN EINO EPSC ELAP ELABPGOVBN EE ESPS ETRA ECONETRDBESPAR ERICKSON EEOC EVENTS EPIN EB ECUN EPWR ENG EX EH EAIDAR EAIS ELBA EPETUN ETRDEIQ EENV ECPC ETRP ECONENRG EUEAID EWT EEB EAIDNI ESENV EADM ECN ENRGKNNP ETAD ETR ECONETRDEAGRJA ETRG ETER EDUC EITC EBUD EAIF EBEXP EAIDS EITI EGOVSY EFQ ECOQKPKO ETRGY ESF EUE EAIC EPGOV ENFR EAGRE ENRD EINTECPS EAVI ETC ETCC EIAID EAIDAF EAGREAIDPGOVPRELBN EAOD ETRDA EURN EASS EINVA EAIDRW EON ECOR EPREL EGPHUM ELTM ECOS EINN ENNP EUPGOV EAGRTR ECONCS ETIO ETRDGR EAIDB EISNAR EIFN ESPINOSA EAIDASEC ELIN EWTR EMED ETFN ETT EADI EPTER ELDIN EINVEFIN ESS ENRGIZ EQRD ESOC ETRDECD ECINECONCS EAIT ECONEAIR ECONEFIN EUNJ ENRGKNNPMNUCPARMPRELNPTIAEAJMXL ELAD EFIM ETIC EFND EFN ETLN ENGRD EWRG ETA EIN EAIRECONRP EXIMOPIC ERA ENRGJM ECONEGE ENVI ECHEVARRIA EMINETRD EAD ECONIZ EENG ELBR EWWC ELTD EAIDMG ETRK EIPR EISNLN ETEX EPTED EFINECONCS EPCS EAG ETRDKIPR ED EAIO ETRDEC ENRGPARMOTRASENVKGHGPGOVECONTSPLEAID ECONEINVEFINPGOVIZ ERNG EFINU EURFOR EWWI ELTNSNAR ETD EAIRASECCASCID EOXC ESTN EAIDAORC EAGRRP ETRDEMIN ELABPHUMSMIGKCRMBN ETRDEINVTINTCS EGHG EAIDPHUMPRELUG EAGRBTIOBEXPETRDBN EDA EPETPGOV ELAINE EUCOM EMW EFINECONEAIDUNGAGM ELB EINDETRD EMI ETRDECONWTOCS EINR ESTRADA EHUM EFNI ELABV ENR EMN EXO EWWTPRELPGOVMASSMARRBN EATO END EP EINVETC ECONEFINETRDPGOVEAGRPTERKTFNKCRMEAID ELTRN EIQ ETTW EAI ENGRG ETRED ENDURING ETTRD EAIDEGZ EOCN EINF EUPREL ENRL ECPO ENLT EEFIN EPPD ECOIN EUEAGR EISL EIDE ENRGSD EINVECONSENVCSJA EAIG ENTG EEPET EUNCH EPECO ETZ EPAT EPTE EAIRGM ETRDPREL EUNGRSISAFPKSYLESO ETTN EINVKSCA ESLCO EBMGT ENRGTRGYETRDBEXPBTIOSZ EFLU ELND EFINOECD EAIDHO EDUARDO ENEG ECONEINVETRDEFINELABETRDKTDBPGOVOPIC EFINTS ECONQH ENRGPREL EUNPHUM EINDIR EPE EMINECINECONSENVTBIONS EFINM ECRM EQ EWWTSP ECONPGOVBN
KFLO KPKO KDEM KFLU KTEX KMDR KPAO KCRM KIDE KN KNNP KG KMCA KZ KJUS KWBG KU KDMR KAWC KCOR KPAL KOMC KTDB KTIA KISL KHIV KHUM KTER KCFE KTFN KS KIRF KTIP KIRC KSCA KICA KIPR KPWR KWMN KE KGIC KGIT KSTC KACT KSEP KFRD KUNR KHLS KCRS KRVC KUWAIT KVPR KSRE KMPI KMRS KNRV KNEI KCIP KSEO KITA KDRG KV KSUM KCUL KPET KBCT KO KSEC KOLY KNAR KGHG KSAF KWNM KNUC KMNP KVIR KPOL KOCI KPIR KLIG KSAC KSTH KNPT KINL KPRP KRIM KICC KIFR KPRV KAWK KFIN KT KVRC KR KHDP KGOV KPOW KTBT KPMI KPOA KRIF KEDEM KFSC KY KGCC KATRINA KWAC KSPR KTBD KBIO KSCI KRCM KNNB KBNC KIMT KCSY KINR KRAD KMFO KCORR KW KDEMSOCI KNEP KFPC KEMPI KBTR KFRDCVISCMGTCASCKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KNPP KTTB KTFIN KBTS KCOM KFTN KMOC KOR KDP KPOP KGHA KSLG KMCR KJUST KUM KMSG KHPD KREC KIPRTRD KPREL KEN KCSA KCRIM KGLB KAKA KWWT KUNP KCRN KISLPINR KLFU KUNC KEDU KCMA KREF KPAS KRKO KNNC KLHS KWAK KOC KAPO KTDD KOGL KLAP KECF KCRCM KNDP KSEAO KCIS KISM KREL KISR KISC KKPO KWCR KPFO KUS KX KWCI KRFD KWPG KTRD KH KLSO KEVIN KEANE KACW KWRF KNAO KETTC KTAO KWIR KVCORR KDEMGT KPLS KICT KWGB KIDS KSCS KIRP KSTCPL KDEN KLAB KFLOA KIND KMIG KPPAO KPRO KLEG KGKG KCUM KTTP KWPA KIIP KPEO KICR KNNA KMGT KCROM KMCC KLPM KNNPGM KSIA KSI KWWW KOMS KESS KMCAJO KWN KTDM KDCM KCM KVPRKHLS KENV KCCP KGCN KCEM KEMR KWMNKDEM KNNPPARM KDRM KWIM KJRE KAID KWMM KPAONZ KUAE KTFR KIF KNAP KPSC KSOCI KCWI KAUST KPIN KCHG KLBO KIRCOEXC KI KIRCHOFF KSTT KNPR KDRL KCFC KLTN KPAOKMDRKE KPALAOIS KESO KKOR KSMT KFTFN KTFM KDEMK KPKP KOCM KNN KISLSCUL KFRDSOCIRO KINT KRG KWMNSMIG KSTCC KPAOY KFOR KWPR KSEPCVIS KGIV KSEI KIL KWMNPHUMPRELKPAOZW KQ KEMS KHSL KTNF KPDD KANSOU KKIV KFCE KTTC KGH KNNNP KK KSCT KWNN KAWX KOMCSG KEIM KTSD KFIU KDTB KFGM KACP KWWMN KWAWC KSPA KGICKS KNUP KNNO KISLAO KTPN KSTS KPRM KPALPREL KPO KTLA KCRP KNMP KAWCK KCERS KDUM KEDM KTIALG KWUN KPTS KPEM KMEPI KAWL KHMN KCRO KCMR KPTD KCROR KMPT KTRF KSKN KMAC KUK KIRL KEM KSOC KBTC KOM KINP KDEMAF KTNBT KISK KRM KWBW KBWG KNNPMNUC KNOP KSUP KCOG KNET KWBC KESP KMRD KEBG KFRDKIRFCVISCMGTKOCIASECPHUMSMIGEG KPWG KOMCCO KRGY KNNF KPROG KJAN KFRED KPOKO KM KWMNCS KMPF KJWC KJU KSMIG KALR KRAL KDGOV KPA KCRMJA KCRI KAYLA KPGOV KRD KNNPCH KFEM KPRD KFAM KALM KIPRETRDKCRM KMPP KADM KRFR KMWN KWRG KTIAPARM KTIAEUN KRDP KLIP KDDEM KTIAIC KWKN KPAD KDM KRCS KWBGSY KEAI KIVP KPAOPREL KUNH KTSC KIPT KNP KJUSTH KGOR KEPREL KHSA KGHGHIV KNNR KOMH KRCIM KWPB KWIC KINF KPER KILS KA KNRG KCSI KFRP KLFLO KFE KNPPIS KQM KQRDQ KERG KPAOPHUM KSUMPHUM KVBL KARIM KOSOVO KNSD KUIR KWHG KWBGXF KWMNU KPBT KKNP KERF KCRT KVIS KWRC KVIP KTFS KMARR KDGR KPAI KDE KTCRE KMPIO KUNRAORC KHOURY KAWS KPAK KOEM KCGC KID KVRP KCPS KIVR KBDS KWOMN KIIC KTFNJA KARZAI KMVP KHJUS KPKOUNSC KMAR KIBL KUNA KSA KIS KJUSAF KDEV KPMO KHIB KIRD KOUYATE KIPRZ KBEM KPAM KDET KPPD KOSCE KJUSKUNR KICCPUR KRMS KWMNPREL KWMJN KREISLER KWM KDHS KRV KPOV KWMNCI KMPL KFLD KWWN KCVM KIMMITT KCASC KOMO KNATO KDDG KHGH KRF KSCAECON KWMEN KRIC
PREL PINR PGOV PHUM PTER PE PREF PARM PBTS PINS PHSA PK PL PM PNAT PHAS PO PROP PGOVE PA PU POLITICAL PPTER POL PALESTINIAN PHUN PIN PAMQ PPA PSEC POLM PBIO PSOE PDEM PAK PF PKAO PGOVPRELMARRMOPS PMIL PV POLITICS PRELS POLICY PRELHA PIRN PINT PGOG PERSONS PRC PEACE PROCESS PRELPGOV PROV PFOV PKK PRE PT PIRF PSI PRL PRELAF PROG PARMP PERL PUNE PREFA PP PGOB PUM PROTECTION PARTIES PRIL PEL PAGE PS PGO PCUL PLUM PIF PGOVENRGCVISMASSEAIDOPRCEWWTBN PMUC PCOR PAS PB PKO PY PKST PTR PRM POUS PRELIZ PGIC PHUMS PAL PNUC PLO PMOPS PHM PGOVBL PBK PELOSI PTE PGOVAU PNR PINSO PRO PLAB PREM PNIR PSOCI PBS PD PHUML PERURENA PKPA PVOV PMAR PHUMCF PUHM PHUH PRELPGOVETTCIRAE PRT PROPERTY PEPFAR PREI POLUN PAR PINSF PREFL PH PREC PPD PING PQL PINSCE PGV PREO PRELUN POV PGOVPHUM PINRES PRES PGOC PINO POTUS PTERE PRELKPAO PRGOV PETR PGOVEAGRKMCAKNARBN PPKO PARLIAMENT PEPR PMIG PTBS PACE PETER PMDL PVIP PKPO POLMIL PTEL PJUS PHUMNI PRELKPAOIZ PGOVPREL POGV PEREZ POWELL PMASS PDOV PARN PG PPOL PGIV PAIGH PBOV PETROL PGPV PGOVL POSTS PSO PRELEU PRELECON PHUMPINS PGOVKCMABN PQM PRELSP PRGO PATTY PRELPGOVEAIDECONEINVBEXPSCULOIIPBTIO PGVO PROTESTS PRELPLS PKFK PGOVEAIDUKNOSWGMHUCANLLHFRSPITNZ PARAGRAPH PRELGOV POG PTRD PTERM PBTSAG PHUMKPAL PRELPK PTERPGOV PAO PRIVATIZATION PSCE PPAO PGOVPRELPHUMPREFSMIGELABEAIDKCRMKWMN PARALYMPIC PRUM PKPRP PETERS PAHO PARMS PGREL PINV POINS PHUMPREL POREL PRELNL PHUMPGOV PGOVQL PLAN PRELL PARP PROVE PSOC PDD PRELNP PRELBR PKMN PGKV PUAS PRELTBIOBA PBTSEWWT PTERIS PGOVU PRELGG PHUMPRELPGOV PFOR PEPGOV PRELUNSC PRAM PICES PTERIZ PREK PRELEAGR PRELEUN PHUME PHU PHUMKCRS PRESL PRTER PGOF PARK PGOVSOCI PTERPREL PGOVEAID PGOVPHUMKPAO PINSKISL PREZ PGOVAF PARMEUN PECON PINL POGOV PGOVLO PIERRE PRELPHUM PGOVPZ PGOVKCRM PBST PKPAO PHUMHUPPS PGOVPOL PASS PPGOV PROGV PAGR PHALANAGE PARTY PRELID PGOVID PHUMR PHSAQ PINRAMGT PSA PRELM PRELMU PIA PINRPE PBTSRU PARMIR PEDRO PNUK PVPR PINOCHET PAARM PRFE PRELEIN PINF PCI PSEPC PGOVSU PRLE PDIP PHEM PRELB PORG PGGOC POLG POPDC PGOVPM PWMN PDRG PHUMK PINB PRELAL PRER PFIN PNRG PRED POLI PHUMBO PHYTRP PROLIFERATION PHARM PUOS PRHUM PUNR PENA PGOVREL PETRAEUS PGOVKDEM PGOVENRG PHUS PRESIDENT PTERKU PRELKSUMXABN PGOVSI PHUMQHA PKISL PIR PGOVZI PHUMIZNL PKNP PRELEVU PMIN PHIM PHUMBA PUBLIC PHAM PRELKPKO PMR PARTM PPREL PN PROL PDA PGOVECON PKBL PKEAID PERM PRELEZ PRELC PER PHJM PGOVPRELPINRBN PRFL PLN PWBG PNG PHUMA PGOR PHUMPTER POLINT PPEF PKPAL PNNL PMARR PAC PTIA PKDEM PAUL PREG PTERR PTERPRELPARMPGOVPBTSETTCEAIRELTNTC PRELJA POLS PI PNS PAREL PENV PTEROREP PGOVM PINER PBGT PHSAUNSC PTERDJ PRELEAID PARMIN PKIR PLEC PCRM PNET PARR PRELETRD PRELBN PINRTH PREJ PEACEKEEPINGFORCES PEMEX PRELZ PFLP PBPTS PTGOV PREVAL PRELSW PAUM PRF PHUMKDEM PATRICK PGOVKMCAPHUMBN PRELA PNUM PGGV PGOVSMIGKCRMKWMNPHUMCVISKFRDCA PBT PIND PTEP PTERKS PGOVJM PGOT PRELMARR PGOVCU PREV PREFF PRWL PET PROB PRELPHUMP PHUMAF PVTS PRELAFDB PSNR PGOVECONPRELBU PGOVZL PREP PHUMPRELBN PHSAPREL PARCA PGREV PGOVDO PGON PCON PODC PRELOV PHSAK PSHA PGOVGM PRELP POSCE PGOVPTER PHUMRU PINRHU PARMR PGOVTI PPEL PMAT PAN PANAM PGOVBO PRELHRC

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 10UNVIEVIENNA70, IAEA/TC: PROSPECTS FOR REFORM OF THE TECHNICAL

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #10UNVIEVIENNA70.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
10UNVIEVIENNA70 2010-02-24 09:47 2011-08-30 01:44 CONFIDENTIAL UNVIE
VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHUNV #0070/01 0550947
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
R 240947Z FEB 10
FM USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0636
INFO RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA 0040
RUEANFA/NRC WASHDC
RHEGGTN/DEPT OF ENERGY GERMANTOWN MD
C O N F I D E N T I A L UNVIE VIENNA 000070 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR IO/GS AND ISN/MNSA 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 02/24/2019 
TAGS: AORC KNNP IAEA ENRG TRGY EAID
SUBJECT: IAEA/TC: PROSPECTS FOR REFORM OF THE TECHNICAL 
COOPERATION PROGRAM 
 
REF: 09 STATE 112473 
 
Classified By: Classified By: Charge Geoffrey Pyatt reasons 1.4 (b) and 
 
1.  (C)  This is an action message for ISN.  Please see 
para. 11. 
 
2.  (C)  SUMMARY: As the UNVIE continues to 
monitor Technical Cooperation projects, attend 
regional TC planning meetings, and engage in 
special briefings on issues such as results-based 
management (RBM), further management shortcomings 
in the Department of Technical Cooperation 
continue to come to light. In an effort to engage 
the IAEA's new leadership and promote reform, 
Mission demarched IAEA officials based on reftel 
outlining GAO recommendations for better management 
of the TC Programme. In subsequent conversations 
with the IAEA's External Relations  and Policy 
Coordination Office (EXPO), Missionoffs were 
thanked for spurring Director General Amano and 
other senior officials to think about ways to 
improve the TC Programme. EXPO assured Missionoffs 
that a response to the GAO recommendations would 
be forthcoming, possibly during DAS Kang's visit 
(March 1-4). In a subsequent conversation 
with Canadian counterparts, with whom Mission shared 
our nonpaper derived from reftel, Canada voiced its 
support for TC Reform and offered to work with the 
U.S. to achieve desired results. A complicating 
factor for Canada is that due to domestic fiscal 
considerations and a lack of coherent management in 
the TC Department, the Canadian Government may 
withhold its contribution to the Technical 
Cooperation Fund in 2010 and beyond.  Alarmed 
by the uproar such a move would provoke among G-77 
countries, Canadian diplomats suggested that U.S. 
officials consider raising with Ottawa the 
importance of paying TCF contributions in full. 
END SUMMARY 
 
--------------- 
CAN DO ATTITUDE 
--------------- 
 
3.  (C) During discussion with EXPO officials in 
February, Missionoffs found EXPO to be 
appreciative of reftel demarche based on 
the GAO review of the management shortcomings 
in the IAEA TC Department.  EXPO officials 
noted the excellent timing of the demarche 
given the transition to a new DG and 
subsequent decisions about bringing on new DDGs. 
Although DDG Cetto tends to project a "steady 
as she goes" approach that defers to members 
state preferences, EXPO expected many of the 
reftel points could be easily implemented, 
such as releasing project information in a 
more timely manner before the November TACC 
and Board. Additionally, EXPO agreed that 
bigger TC projects encompassing several member 
states is a better use of resources than large 
numbers of overlapping national projects 
that overlap. EXPO assured Missionoffs that 
it would coordinate a unified Agency response and 
present it to the USG quickly, perhaps during DAS 
Kang's visit (March 1-4). EXPO also stressed that 
the TC Department would implement any changes as 
communicated to the U.S. 
 
----------------- 
CAN'T DO ATTITUDE 
----------------- 
 
4.  (C) When reftel demarche reached DDG 
for TC Ana Maria Cetto and her senior 
staff, it was received coolly. Missionoff 
spoke with EXPO officials who confirmed 
that DDG Cetto was alone in her opposition 
when told by EXPO that the Agency should 
implement USG suggestions in compliance 
with GAO recommendations as much as possible. 
Other senior staff in the TC Department 
welcomed reftel suggestions and agreed 
with EXPO's assessment that many of the 
U.S. proposals are reasonable easily 
implemented. (Comment: So long as DDG Cetto 
remains in place we can expect her to 
 
try to slow roll reforms she does not 
agree with. End Comment) 
 
-------------- 
DDG Cetto's Future 
-------------- 
 
5.  (C)  According to Canadian counterparts Cetto 
continues to cater to G-77 interests rather than 
being balanced and apolitical, in the hope that 
she will garner enough G-77 support to retain 
her position as DDG.  Her contract expires 
in 2010 and Mission fully expects DG Amano to 
appointment a new DDG instead of retaining Cetto. 
The Mexican Mission has indicated to us that 
they expect Cetto to go but would like to retain 
a senior IAEA position for another Mexican 
national. Cetto's senior staff, Donatella 
Magliani and Oscar Acuna, both program 
coordinators, are also contemplating their 
future. Magliani, who was promoted by former 
DG ElBaradei prior to his departure, has been 
blamed by many within the Agency for 
the debacle at the November 2009 Board over a 
TC project to provide training on results-based 
management (RBM).  Magliani has indicated she 
will leave her position in late 2011/early 
2012. Acuna has indicated he will stay on 
and seek a contract renewal. TC Director for 
Europe, Peter Salema, continues to maintain he 
is not seeking the DDG position, but Kenya 
and other Africa Group members continue to 
lobby quietly on his behalf. 
 
-------------------------- 
TC Project Cycle 2012-2013 
-------------------------- 
 
6.  (C) In the run-up to the 2012-2013 project cycle, the 
TC Department has been updating its rules and procedures 
for project submittals by recipient states. According to 
Oscar Acuna, TC Program Coordinator, the new guidelines 
will be issued during the week of March 1. 
The guidelines do not need member states' approval 
and therefore will not be taken up during the Board 
of Governors.  While many things will stay the same, 
significant changes in the number of projects a 
recipient state can request and in evaluation are 
foreseen. (Note: Mission will report on new 
project guidelines when they become available and begin 
consultations on the new project cycle in August to 
ensure USG has enough time to conduct reviews of all 
project and regional strategy proposals. End Note.) 
 
------------------------------ 
Results Based Management (RBM) 
------------------------------ 
 
7. (C) Prior to and during the November 2009 Board, 
a Secretariat-proposed project on RBM drew 
criticism from many G-77 states that maintained 
the project was a way for Western states to 
control the spread of peaceful uses of nuclear 
technology. The Chair's conclusions for the 
November 2009 TACC called for a working group 
on RBM a suggestion promoted by the G-77 and 
then-Board Chair. The WG as proposed by the 
Secretariat was to consist of three WEOG and 
three G-77 member states, with the 
Secretariat as the Chair. While WEOG 
forwarded three names (Canada, Belgium, and 
Denmark), the G-77 did not and continues to 
refuse to do so.  DDG Cetto and Magliani met 
with G-77 representatives, at their request, on 
February 9 to speak once again about the 
utility of RBM.  According to Magliani the 
meeting was dominated by Iran, Egypt and 
Pakistan, who called on Cetto to create 
a formal WG on Technical Cooperation, 
not on RBM.  Magliani said the idea "shocked 
Cetto" and that it would not gain traction with 
the TC Department or EXPO. In a February 15 
conversation with Missionoff, Canada voiced 
its concern over this notion, suggesting that 
any formal WG on Technical Cooperation 
would only allow the G-77 to control the 
project submission process even further while 
eroding all oversight and evaluation of TC projects. 
 
 
8. (C) Canada continues to be a proponent of 
RBM and raised the issue during WEOG 
consultations with the Board Chair. The new 
Chairman, Malaysian Ambassador Shahrul Ikram 
Yaakob, acknowledged that nothing has moved on 
this issue in three months and pledged to 
find a way forward. Canada on behalf of WEOG 
noted that some sort of closure was needed 
on RBM. In subsequent conversations, Canada said 
it would reiterate this view at the March Board of 
Governors in a statement under "Any Other Business". 
Ambassador Davies, in the U.S. bilat with the 
Board Chair on February 17, also made a point 
of the transparently political exploitation of 
the RBM project by some G-77 states. 
 
 
----------------- 
Canadian Problems 
----------------- 
 
9. (C) In addition to Canadian concerns about 
TC project management, Canadian counterparts 
previewed possible problems concerning their 
payment of TC Fund contributions in 2010 and 
future years.  Because Canada's TCF 
contribution comes from its development 
agency, the Canadian Mission in Vienna must 
justify the IAEA's role as a development 
agency. In recent years this has become more 
difficult, because TC projects are not 
in-line with recipient states' declared 
development goals and some TC projects 
are in no way tied to development (i.e. 
HEU removal). With domestic fiscal 
constraints generally and confidence 
in the TC Programme shrinking specifically, 
Canadian counterparts in Vienna cites the 
fact that Canada did not pay its 2009 TCF 
contribution until the very last day of the 
year  as evidence of Ottawa's fading enthusiasm. 
(In contrast, Canada regularly pays its assessed 
contributions to the IAEA on the first day of 
the year, or, in the sace of its 2010 
contribution, weeks before it was due.) 
Our Canadian counterparts expect Canada 
would not be in a position to pay its TCF 
contribution in 2010 and perhaps beyond. 
They anticipate their failure to meet Canada's 
"voluntary scale of assessment" would have 
negative implications for Canada's participation 
in the Agency and hand the G-77/NAM a talking 
point on the broader theme that the West 
disrespects the Agency's balance between 
peaceful uses and "policing". Both Canadian 
counterparts requested that the USG consult 
Ottawa about the political fallout such a 
decision would cause. 
 
------- 
COMMENT 
------- 
 
10.  (C) TC is broken, but not beyond repair. Taking 
advantage of the Administration's renewed 
multilateral approach, the U.S. can assist in 
creating a more transparent environment in which 
Member States can ensure recipient states get what 
they need while minimizing proliferation risk. To 
leave behind the acrimony that characterizes the 
North/South divide about TC, any efforts to 
promote better planning, management, and 
transparency should be presented to the extent 
possible in terms of improving the efficiency 
and effectiveness of TC and of project delivery for 
recipient states. To mitigate potential 
G-77/NAM resistance, such efforts should be 
presented to the Secretariat by a group of like-minded 
states that reaches across regional groups. This 
necessarily means that all WEOG members must pay 
their full TCF contributions in a timely manner 
to avoid drawing G-77 criticism as being 
unsupportive of one the Agency's pillars. 
 
11. (C)  Mission suggests Department seek bilateral 
consultations with counterparts in Ottawa to 
ascertain Canada's position on its TCF payment for 2010. 
 
DAVIES