VZCZCXYZ0001
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHNY #0100/01 0531308
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 221306Z FEB 10
FM AMEMBASSY OSLO
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0044
INFO RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO
RUEHSF/AMEMBASSY SOFIA 0001
RUEHUJA/AMEMBASSY ABUJA

UNCLAS OSLO 000100 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
FOR G/TIP (LAURA PENA) 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: PGOV KTIP ELAB KCRM KFRD KWMN PHUM PREF SMIG KMCA NI
NO 
SUBJECT: NORWAY 2010 TIP REPORT 
 
REF: 10 STATE 2094; 09 OSLO 112 
 
¶1. (SBU)  SUMMARY:  Embassy Oslo's points of contact for TIP issues 
are Scott Sommers, Political Officer ( 47) 21 30 88 69, fax ( 47) 
22 55 43 13 and Tord Bergesen, Political Specialist, LES ( 47) 21 
30 85 02.  Poloff spent approximately 35 hours researching and 
preparing this report. End Summary. 
 
 
 
¶2.  The Trafficking In Persons report for Norway follows below 
sequenced by the checklist paragraph numbers: 
 
 
 
¶25. (SBU) THE COUNTRY'S TIP SITUATION: 
 
 
 
-- A. What is (are) the source(s) of available information on human 
trafficking? What plans are in place (if any) to undertake further 
documentation of human trafficking? How reliable are these sources? 
 
 
 
 
Norway has a single coordinating unit for victims of trafficking 
(hereafter denoted by the acronym KOM) which oversees coordination 
among an inter-ministerial commission and local government 
coordinating units.  As such, KOM has an excellent overview of the 
trafficking situation in Norway, at least as far as the government 
is concerned.  The statistics in this report largely were derived 
from KOM representatives.  NGOs that help victims of trafficking, 
the Norwegian equivalent of the FBI ("Kripos"), and the MFA's 
trafficking department also have aided in the production of this 
report. All the above named sources are quite reliable. 
 
 
 
-- B. Is the country a country of origin, transit, and/or 
destination for men, women, or children subjected to conditions of 
commercial sexual exploitation, forced or bonded labor, or other 
slave-like conditions? Are citizens or residents of the country 
subjected to such trafficking conditions within the country? If so, 
does this internal trafficking occur in territory outside of the 
government's control (e.g. in a civil war situation)? From where 
are people recruited or from where do they migrate prior to being 
subjected to these exploitative conditions? To what other countries 
are people trafficked and for what purposes? Provide, where 
possible, numbers or estimates for each group of trafficking 
victims. Have there been any changes in the TIP situation since the 
last TIP Report (e.g. changes in destinations)? 
 
 
 
Norway is mainly a country of destination for trafficking, but may 
be to a minimal extent also a country of transit and origin.  (The 
latter is suspected by the KOM unit to occur when asylum applicants 
who are turned down are recruited into trafficking when they are 
desperate to find an income).  Victims from 45 countries were 
identified in 2009, with Nigerians being the largest group and most 
others were from eastern Europe and other countries in Africa, with 
a few from Brazil.  The government identified a reported  292 
possible trafficking victims to Norway in 2009, an increase of 36 
over last year.   These include both possible victims of 
prostitution and labor trafficking, of which 69 were under 18 years 
of age (however, there were also 42 "accompanying children" who 
were living with their trafficked mothers in prostitution).  The 
majority of victims are engaged in forced prostitution.  The 
statistics are based on information gathered from the government 
and NGOs.  Victims are generally trafficked into Norway through 
other countries in Europe.  During the last year, the KOM project 
has documented that Belgium, Spain, England, France, Greece, Italy, 
the Netherlands, Sweden, the Czech Republic, Poland, Germany, and 
Russia were transit countries.  Outside Europe, India, Libya, 
Morocco, Thailand, and Turkey were transit countries.  Victims' 
movement is often controlled by large-scale criminal operations. 
The traffickers are usually criminals from the victim's home 
countries or transit countries. 
 
 
 
Since the government made the purchase of sex, but not prostitution 
per se (i.e. the sale of sex)  illegal on January 1, 2009, 334 
persons have been charged with the purchase or attempted purchase 
 
of sexual services and 21 have been charged with the purchase or 
attempted purchase of sexual services from a minor.  The number of 
sexual trafficking investigations has dropped last year, coinciding 
with a drop in the number of prostitutes seeking help from the most 
significant NGO that aids prostitutes.  At the same time, more 
women than ever have sought help from the ROSA project, the key NGO 
that aids trafficked women.  Thus, the effect of the law on 
trafficking is not yet clear, and the numbers might reflect higher 
awareness of aid available to victims of trafficking (VOTs), 
combined with lower overall TIP numbers. 
 
 
 
-- C. To what kind of conditions are the trafficking victims 
subjected? 
 
 
 
The conditions victims are trafficked into vary by source country. 
Nigerian victims typically live in communal apartments (4-6 people 
in a one-bedroom apartment), and until the change in the law, were 
forced into street prostitution, with the threat that unless they 
paid back their transit costs (often "50,000 Euros") their families 
in Nigeria would be threatened.  Victims from Eastern Europe are 
often given individual apartments but are closely watched and 
threatened with violence.  Some victims from African countries are 
legally married to their traffickers, and "work from home." 
 
 
 
-- D. Vulnerability to TIP:  Are certain groups of persons more at 
risk of human trafficking (e.g. women and children, boys versus 
girls, certain ethnic groups, refugees, IDPs, etc.)? If so, please 
specify the type of exploitation for which these groups are most at 
risk (e.g., girls are more at risk of domestic servitude than 
boys). 
 
 
 
The vast majority of trafficked persons who are identified by the 
government and NGOs are adult women for the commercial sex trade. 
Often victims are from minority groups in their source countries. 
KOM representatives suspect that labor trafficking victims are more 
likely to escape detection and identification than sex trafficking 
victims. 
 
 
 
-- E. Traffickers and Their Methods: Who are the 
traffickers/exploiters? Are they independent business people? Small 
or family-based crime groups? Large international organized crime 
syndicates? What methods are used to gain direct access to victims? 
For example, are the traffickers recruiting victims through 
lucrative job offers? Are victims sold by their families, or 
approached by friends of friends? Are victims "self-presenting" 
(approaching the exploiter without the involvement of a recruiter 
or transporter)? If recruitment or transportation is involved, what 
methods are used to recruit or transport victims (e.g., are false 
documents being used)? Are employment, travel, and tourism agencies 
or marriage brokers involved with or fronting for traffickers or 
crime groups to traffic individuals? 
 
 
 
There are multiple types of trafficking schemes, and each is 
largely associated with a different country of origin of the 
trafficked person: 
 
 
 
The largest single national group of trafficked people are 
Nigerian, and Nigerian traffickers compromise a wide ranging 
network with many people making money off of victims. 
Victims--vulnerable girls or women in Nigerian cities--are 
typically approached by a "nice" man with the promise of a 
legitimate job braiding hair (or similar) in Europe.  They are sent 
by bus to an intermediate point, such as Morocco, where they begin 
to be abused by their traffickers while waiting for transport to 
Europe, but many still maintain their belief that better days are 
ahead.  Usually, false papers are used to get them across the 
border into Italy or Spain, at which point illusions dissipate and 
they are forced into prostitution by their traffickers.  When a new 
batch of victims comes from Nigeria, they are forwarded from the 
intermediate country to Norway.  Fear is maintained by (sometimes 
acted-upon) threats to their families in Nigeria, and superstitious 
beliefs that the traffickers hold magical powers over them.  They 
 
are also promised escape from prostitution if they pay back an 
enormous sum (around 50,000 Euro). 
 
 
 
Trafficked victims from other African countries (e.g. Ghana, 
Eritrea, Cameroon, Kenya, Congo) are trafficked by individuals. 
Traffickers with residency in Norway go to their home countries and 
marry attractive women, then bring them back legally to Norway, and 
initially ask them to prostitute themselves just to help out with 
finances for a short time.  The traffickers always intended this to 
become their way of life. 
 
 
 
Traffickers from Eastern Europe are typically members of small 
family mafias.  A male trafficker is sent to his home country with 
the assignment to make an attractive girl fall in love with him. 
He spends money on her, but also may demonstrate a violent, 
powerful, or aggressive streak--but at least at first in an 
"attractive" way.  He eventually asks her to go to Norway with him, 
and once there, he gives her very strict instructions about her 
behavior.  He checks up on her constantly, and begins to become 
unpredictably violent.  Victims are held in a state between terror 
and love, vaguely aware that they are being exploited, but afraid 
of and "admiring" the control their trafficker has over them. 
 
 
 
¶26. (SBU) SETTING THE SCENE FOR THE GOVERNMENT'S ANTI-TIP EFFORTS: 
 
 
 
-- A. Does the government acknowledge that human trafficking is a 
problem in the country? If not, why not? 
 
 
 
The government acknowledges that trafficking is a serious problem, 
and has a special office (KOM) devoted entirely to overseeing 
intragovernmenal cooperation.  The government had an action plan, 
drafted in 2006, that was designed to run through 2009, when a new 
one would be drafted.  The drafting is still in progress, and the 
old action plan has been extended.  KOM is currently undergoing an 
independent evaluation of its effectiveness, and has a mandate 
through September 2010, by which time a new action plan should be 
in place. 
 
 
 
-- B. Which government agencies are involved in efforts to combat 
sex and labor trafficking - including forced labor - and, which 
agency, if any, has the lead in these efforts? 
 
 
 
Many government agencies are involved in combating TIP, including 
the Ministries for Labor and Social Inclusion, Justice and the 
Police, Foreign Affairs, Health, Children and Equality, and the 
Ministry of Defense.  The coordination of efforts under the Action 
Plan unveiled in 2007 is the responsibility of the Ministry of 
Justice and the Police KOM ("Coordinator for Human Trafficking") 
unit. 
 
 
 
-- C. What are the limitations on the government's ability to 
address these problems in practice? For example, is funding for 
police or other institutions inadequate? Is overall corruption a 
problem? Does the government lack the resources to aid victims? 
 
 
 
Funding for the police and other institutions is generally 
adequate, as would be expected of a relatively wealthy country such 
as Norway (consistently rated at or near the top in the UNDP 
development index).  In 2010, however, there was no "ear-marked" 
funding from the Ministry of Justice regarding TIP for the police. 
The Ministry has told the police authority that it must prioritize 
activity against TIP, and find funding from its general budget 
(which has been increased).  KOM itself has received "ear-marked" 
funding for January-September 2010 (the length of its current 
mandate before the new action plan is expected to be completed). 
In Oslo, the country's largest city, 14 police officers are 
assigned to the STOP anti-trafficking initiative, and in Bergen, 
the second largest city, three investigators are assigned to the 
 
EXIT anti-trafficking initiative.  These initiatives must, like 
other initiatives, fight for resources internally within their 
police districts. 
 
 
 
Corruption is not a problem.  The aid to the victims is partly paid 
by the government and partly by the local authorities where the 
victim lives.  Benefits are generous; the same comprehensive 
welfare benefits given to all Norwegians are available to victims 
of trafficking. 
 
 
 
-- D. To what extent does the government systematically monitor its 
anti-trafficking efforts (on all fronts -- prosecution, victim 
protection, and prevention) and periodically make available, 
publicly or privately and directly or through 
regional/international organizations, its assessments of these 
anti-trafficking efforts? 
 
 
 
Norway monitors its efforts abroad and domestically to prevent 
trafficking.  The Coordination Unit for Victims of Human 
Trafficking (KOM project) collects information from all the 
different institutions and organizations working against 
trafficking. The results are available to the public through 
statistical reports and open presentations of annual findings. 
Norway also provides its information to the EU and to the 
Nordic-Baltic Ministerial Conference. 
 
 
 
-- E. What measures has the government taken to establish the 
identity of local populations, including birth registration, 
citizenship, and nationality? 
 
 
 
Norway is a highly efficient bureaucratic state, and all births are 
registered.  Indigenous populations are fully integrated as 
Norwegian citizens. 
 
 
 
--F. To what extent is the government capable of gathering the data 
required for an in-depth assessment of law enforcement efforts? 
Where are the gaps? Are there any ways to work around these gaps? 
 
 
 
The government is capable of gathering data on identified victims, 
formal investigations, decisions made by police lawyers/district 
attorneys, and of convictions.   The police directorate administers 
a national competence group on TIP, with members from many police 
districts.  The group shares information about ongoing cases, 
experience with the use of different investigative measures, and so 
on. 
 
 
 
One significant data-gathering "gap" that the KOM unit experiences 
is that it is difficult to get reliable data to do in-depth 
assessment of why a particular case is dropped and another case is 
prosecuted.  To find this out, KOM must ask the investigator and 
prosecutor in every case.  Some NGOs suspect that the police drop 
cases due to lack of resources for investigation.  KOM has 
recommended that there be an in-depth analysis of all cases being 
dropped, to find out the real reasons. 
 
 
 
Another data-gathering "gap" is that the KOM unit has no way of 
knowing when police officers effectively "downgrade" a case that 
really should be a TIP case to some other kind of crime, such as 
pimping. 
 
 
 
¶27. (SBU) INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF TRAFFICKERS: 
 
 
 
For questions A-D, posts should highlight in particular whether or 
not the country has enacted any new legislation since the last TIP 
 
report. 
 
 
 
-- A. Existing Laws against TIP: Does the country have a law or 
laws specifically prohibiting trafficking in persons -- both sexual 
exploitation and labor? If so, please specifically cite the name of 
the law(s) and its date of enactment and provide the exact language 
[actual copies preferable] of the TIP provisions. Please provide a 
full inventory of trafficking laws, including non-criminal statutes 
that allow for civil penalties against alleged trafficking crimes 
(e.g., civil forfeiture laws and laws against illegal debt). Does 
the law(s) cover both internal and transnational forms of 
trafficking? If not, under what other laws can traffickers be 
prosecuted? For example, are there laws against slavery or the 
exploitation of prostitution by means of force, fraud, or coercion? 
Are these other laws being used in trafficking cases? 
 
 
 
There have been no changes in the law since the last report.  A 
significant change occurred on January 1, 2009, when the purchase, 
but not sale, of sex was banned. 
 
 
 
There is a paragraph specifically on trafficking in Criminal Code 
Section 224, as amended in 2006, in the chapter addressing crimes 
against personal freedom.  This is the section of law most 
frequently used to prosecute traffickers.  People who have been 
involved in trafficking will often have broken several other laws, 
such as: sexual abuse of minors under 14 years old, Section 195 
(2003); overseeing the prostitution trade in Section 202 (2003); 
law against coercion, Section 222 (2003); law against imprisonment, 
Section 223 (1999); law against slavery, Section 225 (2003); law 
against threats, Section 227 (2003); law against assault, Section 
228 (1988); law against sexual abuse, Section 192 (2003) and the 
Foreigner Act.  In addition, Section 60A, the 'organized crime 
paragraph' is commonly used with Section 224 on trafficking; it can 
double the length of punishment and allows more extensive police 
investigative methods. 
 
 
 
-- B. Punishment of Sex Trafficking Offenses: What are the 
prescribed and imposed penalties for the trafficking of persons for 
commercial sexual exploitation, including for the forced 
prostitution of adults and the prostitution of children? 
 
 
 
5-10 years of prison are the maximum ranges of penalty for regular 
and aggravated trafficking. 
 
 
 
-- C. Punishment of Labor Trafficking Offenses: What are the 
prescribed and imposed penalties for labor trafficking offenses, 
including all forms of forced labor? If your country is a source 
country for labor migrants, do the government's laws provide for 
criminal punishment -- i.e. jail time -- for labor recruiters who 
engage in recruitment of workers using knowingly fraudulent or 
deceptive offers with the purpose of subjecting workers to 
compelled service in the destination country? If your country is a 
destination for labor migrants (legal/regular or 
illegal/irregular), are there laws punishing employers or labor 
agents who confiscate workers' passports or travel documents for 
the purpose of labor trafficking, switch contracts without the 
worker's consent as a means to keep the worker in a state of 
compelled service, or withhold payment of salaries as means of 
keeping the worker in a state of compelled service? 
 
 
 
Forced labor has been illegal since 1959, and for trafficking there 
is a 10 year maximum sentence for aggravated circumstances. 
Section 224 for trafficking applies equally to sexual and labor 
trafficking.  Norway is not a significant destination for labor 
trafficking relative to other countries, but KOM unit personnel 
suspect that a smaller percentage of victims of labor trafficking 
are identified than victims of sexual trafficking.  There were 
seven investigations of forced labor in 2009; none resulted in 
prosecution in 2009, although at least one investigation is still 
ongoing.. 
 
-- D. What are the prescribed penalties for rape or forcible sexual 
assault? (NOTE: This is necessary to evaluate a foreign 
government's compliance with TVPA Minimum Standard 2, which reads: 
"For the knowing commission of any act of sex trafficking... the 
government of the country should prescribe punishment commensurate 
with that for grave crimes, such as forcible sexual assault 
(rape)." END NOTE) 
 
 
 
The penalties for forcible sexual assault or rape range from 14 
days to 10 years in prison.  In trafficking cases, frequently 
several laws will have been broken, all of which will be considered 
during sentencing. 
 
 
 
-- E. Law Enforcement Statistics: Did the government take legal 
action against human trafficking offenders during the reporting 
period? If so, provide numbers of investigations, prosecutions, 
convictions, and sentences imposed, including details on plea 
bargains and fines, if relevant and available. Please note the 
number of convicted trafficking offenders who received suspended 
sentences and the number who received only a fine as punishment. 
Please indicate which laws were used to investigate, prosecute, 
convict, and sentence traffickers. Also, if possible, please 
disaggregate numbers of cases by type of TIP (labor vs. commercial 
sexual exploitation) and victims (children under 18 years of age 
vs. adults). What were the actual punishments imposed on convicted 
trafficking offenders? Are they serving the time sentenced? If not, 
why not? 
 
 
 
During 2009, there were 38 investigations into trafficking cases 
(31 for sexual exploitation and 7 for labor exploitation).  There 
were 5 prosecutions against traffickers under section 224, all for 
sexual exploitation.  These 5 prosecutions involved 7 defendants. 
Of the five prosecutions, four led to convictions-six persons 
convicted total.  None of the convicted persons received a 
suspended sentence or fine as punishment--all received jail time. 
One of the convictions concerned a trafficked victim under the age 
of 18.  Sentences were as follows: one woman from Nigeria sentenced 
to 3 years and 2 months prison for exploiting a woman from Nigeria 
in prostitution; one man from Nigeria sentenced to 3 years prison 
for exploiting two women from Brazil in prostitution.  One man from 
Nigeria sentenced to 1 year 6 months prison for exploiting a woman 
from Nigeria in prostitution; three men from Albania sentenced to 3 
years and 3 months prison for exploiting a girl from Albania (16 
years old) in prostitution.  (Given the overall comparative 
leniency of the Norwegian justice system, these are significant 
sentences.  A man convicted of attempted murder, who shot at a 
synagogue and was implicated in a planned bombing of the US and 
Israeli embassies, received a sentence of 8 years in 2008.) 
 
 
 
-- F. Does the government provide any specialized training for law 
enforcement and immigration officials on identifying and treating 
victims of trafficking? Or training on investigating and 
prosecuting human trafficking crimes? Specify whether NGOs, 
international organizations, and/or the USG provide specialized 
training for host government officials. 
 
 
 
This is an area in which, in Post's opinion, the government of 
Norway excels.  In September of 2009, the KOM project held a 
well-attended three day seminar for key actors on TIP issues to 
educate them about identifying victims.  The seminar featured 
speakers from around the world, whom the head of the KOM project 
met on an International Visitor's program she attended in the U.S. 
in February 2009.  There were 200 participants from three 
categories of officials at the national level.  The main topics 
were trends and statistics on VOTs in Norway, experience in 
training of officers for identifying VOTs, and presentation of 
successful tools for identifying, assisting, and registering VOTs. 
There were 50 participants from each of the following four groups: 
police/prosecution, child welfare, immigration authorities, and 
NGOs.  U.S. Embassy officers were invited and observed parts of the 
seminar, and found it impressive.  The participants were from 
government and non-governmental organizations from all over Norway 
(Norway is a country of under five million people spread over a 
land area the size of California). 
 
In 2009, KOM gave about 40 additional speeches about TIP in 
different fora.  The audiences included police, prosecution 
authorities, child welfare workers, immigration authorities, NGO's 
and other social service agencies.  KOM hosts a national TIP 
hotline, and provides information and guidance to all actors 
working against TIP. 
 
 
 
In May 2008, the KOM project published a guide to identification of 
possible victims of trafficking, which is used to educate all 
government employees who might come in contact with victims of 
trafficking (e.g. immigration officials, social workers, 
asylum/refugee center employees) and explains how to identify 
victims, who to contact when trafficking is suspected, and what 
help for the victim is available.  Many NGOs operating in Norway 
receive substantial government funding in their work; this includes 
NGOs working with trafficking victims. Cooperation between NGOs and 
the KOM project is excellent, and data from the NGOs was used in 
developing the identification guide.  Nether the USG nor 
international organizations provided training to Norwegian 
officials except the aforementioned International Visitor program. 
 
 
 
--G. Does the government cooperate with other governments in the 
investigation and prosecution of trafficking cases? If possible, 
provide the number of cooperative international investigations on 
trafficking during the reporting period. 
 
 
 
The Norwegian government works with other European governments at 
the national and local police level to combat trafficking and 
pursue investigations and prosecution of traffickers residing 
outside Norway.  The Norwegian government has worked over the last 
year with the governments of the following countries in specific 
trafficking cases:  Bulgaria, Italy, Spain, Sri Lanka, Brazil, 
Romania, Thailand, Argentina, Cambodia, Albania, the United 
Kingdom, and all of the Nordic and Baltic countries. 
 
 Some of the different institutions with which the Norwegian 
government cooperates are the Council of Europe, the UN, the EU, 
NATO, the OSCE, EUROPOL, INTERPOL, FRONTEX, the Barents 
Cooperation, the Council of Baltic Sea States, the Nordic Baltic 
Task Force Against Trafficking in Human Beings, and the Nordic 
Council of Ministers. 
 
 
 
-- H. Does the government extradite persons who are charged with 
trafficking in other countries? If so, please provide the number of 
traffickers extradited during the reporting period, and the number 
of trafficking extraditions pending. In particular, please report 
on any pending or concluded extraditions of trafficking offenders 
to the United States. 
 
 
 
Cases of this nature have yet to occur in Norway.  However, Norway 
does have extradition agreements with many countries, and 
theoretically the government would be willing to extradite if the 
legal system and rights of the accused in the requesting country 
were deemed sufficiently reliable.  Norway cannot legally extradite 
Norwegian citizens. 
 
 
 
-- I. Is there evidence of government involvement in or tolerance 
of trafficking, on a local or institutional level? If so, please 
explain in detail. 
 
 
 
There is no evidence of governmental involvement in or tolerance of 
trafficking, however, a police officer was convicted of trafficking 
as detailed in paragraph J below. 
 
 
 
-- J. If government officials are involved in human trafficking, 
what steps has the government taken to end such complicity? Please 
indicate the number of government officials investigated and 
prosecuted for involvement in trafficking or trafficking-related 
 
criminal activities during the reporting period. Have any been 
convicted? What sentence(s) was imposed? Please specify if 
officials received suspended sentences, or were given a fine, 
fired, or reassigned to another position within the government as 
punishment. Please indicate the number of convicted officials that 
received suspended sentences or received only a fine as punishment. 
 
 
 
There is no evidence of any government involvement in human 
trafficking, but in January 2010 a police officer from Bergen was 
convicted and sentenced to 10 years of prison (the maximum 
sentence) for severe abuse of minors from Norway, Brazil, Romania 
and Afghanistan.  The officer was part of a pedophilia and child 
pornography ring.  He was prosecuted under Criminal Code Section 
224, the main trafficking section of the law.  The exploited 
victims were "traded" among the ring members. 
 
 
 
-- K. For countries that contribute troops to international 
peacekeeping efforts, please indicate whether the government 
vigorously investigated, prosecuted, convicted and sentenced 
nationals of the country deployed abroad as part of a peacekeeping 
or other similar mission who engaged in or facilitated severe forms 
of trafficking or who exploited victims of such trafficking. 
 
 
 
Not applicable for Norway.  Troops deployed on peacekeeping 
missions are trained on trafficking concerns.  There have not been 
any reported incidents requiring investigation in recent history. 
 
 
 
-- L. If the country has an identified problem of child sex 
tourists coming to the country, what are the countries of origin 
for sex tourists? How many foreign pedophiles did the government 
prosecute or deport/extradite to their country of origin? If your 
host country's nationals are perpetrators of child sex tourism, do 
the country's child sexual abuse laws have extraterritorial 
coverage (similar to the U.S. PROTECT Act) to allow the prosecution 
of suspected sex tourists for crimes committed abroad? If so, how 
many of the country's nationals were prosecuted and/or convicted 
during the reporting period under the extraterritorial provision(s) 
for traveling to other countries to engage in child sex tourism? 
 
 
 
There have been no indications that Norway is a destination for 
child sex tourists.  However, Norway's child sex crime laws, as 
well as its newly enacted prostitution law, have extraterritorial 
applicability.  As detailed above in section J, a police officer 
from Bergen was convicted and sentenced in January 2010 to ten 
years in prison for TIP and severe abuse of minors.  In 2007, one 
Norwegian was convicted for trafficking for the sexual abuse of 
five young boys/children in Thailand during 2004/2005.  He was 
sentenced to 7 years in prison of "preventative detention" 
("forvaring") which allows for longer imprisonment if, on a 
continuing basis, he is evaluated and found to be a threat. 
 
 
 
¶28. (SBU) PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE TO VICTIMS: 
 
 
 
-- A. What kind of protection is the government able under existing 
law to provide for victims and witnesses? Does it provide these 
protections in practice? 
 
 
 
Victims and witnesses have not generally experienced threats or 
harassment from traffickers once they have sought help from the 
government, although (sometimes rational, sometimes irrational) 
fear of retribution against family and friends in the source 
country prevents women from seeking government help.  The 
government provides safe housing in shelters or other types of 
housing, if needed.  This is provided primarily through the ROSA 
project--a government funded program specifically to help victims 
of  exploitation.  Victims are sent by ROSA to a network of dozens 
of women's' shelters around the country, where the fact that they 
have been trafficked is not even disclosed to other women in the 
shelter (usually other battered women).  It is in practice nearly 
impossible for the trafficker to find out where his victim has 
 
gone, after she has accepted shelter from ROSA.  Through ROSA and 
the Norwegian welfare state, there are also aid programs for the 
victims to rebuild their lives, such as medical care, training, 
working possibilities, and legal aid.  The full panoply of aid 
provided by the Norwegian welfare state is available to trafficking 
victims who choose to legally stay in Norway. 
 
 
 
-- B. Does the country have victim care facilities (shelters or 
drop-in centers) which are accessible to trafficking victims? Do 
foreign victims have the same access to care as domestic 
trafficking victims? Where are child victims placed (e.g., in 
shelters, foster care, or juvenile justice detention centers)? Does 
the country have specialized care for adults in addition to 
children? Does the country have specialized care for male victims 
as well as female? Does the country have specialized facilities 
dedicated to helping victims of trafficking? Are these facilities 
operated by the government or by NGOs? What is the funding source 
of these facilities? Please estimate the amount the government 
spent (in U.S. dollar equivalent) on these specialized facilities 
dedicated to helping trafficking victims during the reporting 
period. 
 
 
 
The government-funded ROSA project is one of the main institutions 
for assisting victims of trafficking.  In the last year, the ROSA 
project received 2.1 million kroner in funding (approx $350,000). 
ROSA received 124 distinct "initial contacts" with trafficking 
victims in 2008, a moderate increase from 2007 when there were 113 
"initial contacts."  Of the 124, 51 ultimately accepted shelter 
from ROSA (last year the number was 44).  This aid consists of 
support, housing and information.  Victims are provided with access 
to a lawyer, access to police interviewers should they want to 
speak with them and press charges, money for food, fitness 
facilities, Norwegian language classes, and other aid.  Foreign and 
domestic victims of trafficking have the same access to these 
services.  Due to the increasing awareness of potential victims, 
other institutions around the country are also providing victims 
safe housing and other social services.  Children are helped 
directly by the child welfare services.  In addition, other 
government-supported "NGOs", such as ProSenteret, an organization 
that helps prostitutes, also help victims of trafficking.  Emboffs 
have visited both ProSenteret and the women's shelters used by 
ROSA, and are impressed with the physical amenities provided to 
victims and trafficking and prostitutes.  Because of the 
all-encompassing nature of the Norwegian welfare state, it is 
nearly impossible to arrive at a total figure that the Norwegian 
government spends on trafficking victims: the $350,000 listed above 
for funding for the ROSA project, for example, primarily covers the 
administration costs of the program--services actually received by 
trafficking victims (including the actual free housing, free legal 
advice, and so forth) come through the welfare state, and are often 
paid directly by local governments.  The shelter system, for 
example, is an already-existing social program for any women who 
need a shelter, and is not maintained or administered by ROSA. 
 
 
 
-- C. Does the government provide trafficking victims with access 
to legal, medical and psychological services? If so, please specify 
the kind of assistance provided. Does the government provide 
funding or other forms of support to foreign or domestic NGOs 
and/or international organizations for providing these services to 
trafficking victims? Please explain and provide any funding amounts 
in U.S. dollar equivalent. If assistance provided was in-kind, 
please specify exact assistance. Please specify if funding for 
assistance comes from a federal budget or from regional or local 
governments. 
 
 
 
As stated above, legal, medical, and psychological services are 
provided through the ROSA project, as well as other NGOs such as 
ProSenteret, an NGO that helps prostitutes whether trafficked or 
not.  (Note that the concept of "NGO" in Norway is somewhat 
self-contradictory: what this means in practice is an organization 
that is not directly controlled by the government, but receives a 
large amount of its support from the government, with the 
understanding that the "NGO" can operationalize the government's 
concern about particular issues within its competency.)  The 
national health services, asylum services, and other welfare 
services all help victims of trafficking.  Much of the housing, 
medical and practical expenses are paid by the agencies, 
municipalities and institutions that provide the various services. 
 
Those funds come for those agencies' own budgets. 
 
 
 
The government's main contributions to combat foreign trafficking 
go through aid projects to NGOs, the UN, and other International 
Organizations in the source countries for trafficking. 
Internationally, the Norwegian government spent approximately 
50,000,000 kroner ($8.3 million) each year for the last two years 
on international anti-trafficking efforts and bilateral cooperation 
on trafficking.  The largest single recipient of Norwegian 
trafficking aid was the IOM, followed by NGO's, and other 
organizations like UNICEF and UNDOC.  All funding is made by the 
national government. 
 
 
 
-- D. Does the government assist foreign trafficking victims, for 
example, by providing temporary to permanent residency status, or 
other relief from deportation? If so, please explain. 
 
 
 
All non-Norwegian trafficking victims are provided a 6 month 
"reflection period" of legal residence in Norway, during which they 
can legally work, legally reside, and access all the social welfare 
benefits of the Norwegian state.  In order to access this 
"reflection period," the victim need not make a legal complaint 
about her/his trafficker; it only needs to be shown that there is 
"some" evidence that trafficking has occurred.  The 6 month 
"reflection period" cannot be renewed.  In order to obtain a 
longer-term residence permit which can be renewed, the victim must 
make a complaint to the police against the trafficker, and then the 
police will report this complaint to the immigration authorities. 
 
 
 
-- E. Does the government provide longer-term shelter or housing 
benefits to victims or other resources to aid the victims in 
rebuilding their lives? 
 
 
 
The government provides safe housing in shelters or other types of 
housing, if needed.  This is provided through, among others, the 
ROSA project (a government funded program).  There are also aid 
programs for the victims to rebuild their lives, such as medical 
care, training, working possibilities, and legal aid.  The 
Norwegian welfare state is one of the most comprehensive in the 
world. 
 
 
 
-- F. Does the government have a referral process to transfer 
victims detained, arrested or placed in protective custody by law 
enforcement authorities to institutions that provide short- or 
long-term care (either government or NGO-run)? 
 
 
 
Yes. 
 
 
 
-- G. What is the total number of trafficking victims identified 
during the reporting period? (If available, please specify the type 
of exploitation of these victims - e.g. "The government identified 
X number of trafficking victims during the reporting period, Y or 
which were victims of trafficking for sexual exploitation and Z of 
which were victims of nonconsensual labor exploitation.) Of these, 
how many victims were referred to care facilities for assistance by 
law enforcement authorities during the reporting period? By social 
services officials? What is the number of victims assisted by 
government-funded assistance programs and those not funded by the 
government during the reporting period? 
 
 
 
There were a total of 292 persons identified as potential victims 
of trafficking in 2009.  Of these, referrals to the KOM unit were 
as follows: 6 from the child welfare services, 134 from the 
Immigration Directorate, 41 from asylum reception centers for 
unaccompanied minors over the age of 15, 52 from the ROSA project, 
19 from the IOM, 38 from the police (of which 22 from the STOP 
project and 10 from the EXIT project), 1 case from KRIPOS (national 
criminal investigation service), 29 from ProSenteret, 30 from 
 
Nadheim (church city mission in Oslo), 32 from Oslo social 
services, 17 from the ADORA project (an employment project funded 
by the Norwegian state), 6 from Bergen municipality, 23 from Oslo 
municipality, and 3 from the church city mission in Stavanger. 
In all, there were 551 referrals to care facilities in trafficking 
cases--this is significantly greater than the total number of 
victims identified, because the same individuals were often 
referred by multiple different agencies or NGOs. 
 
 
 
-- H. Do the government's law enforcement, immigration, and social 
services personnel have a formal system of proactively identifying 
victims of trafficking among high-risk persons with whom they come 
in contact (e.g., foreign persons arrested for prostitution or 
immigration violations)? For countries with legalized prostitution, 
does the government have a mechanism for screening for trafficking 
victims among persons involved in the legal/regulated commercial 
sex trade? 
 
 
 
Yes.  The Identification Guide to Possible Victims of Trafficking, 
published by the KOM project in May 2008, incorporates a formal 
system of proactively identifying victims of trafficking among 
high-risk persons.  It is distributed to all government employees 
who, in the course of their work, have the potential to come in 
contact with trafficked persons. 
 
 
 
-- I. Are the rights of victims respected? Are trafficking victims 
detained or jailed? If so, for how long? Are victims fined? Are 
victims prosecuted for violations of other laws, such as those 
governing immigration or prostitution? 
 
 
 
The rights of the victims are respected.  They are neither 
detained, nor jailed, nor fined.  They are not prosecuted for 
violations of any legislation.  They are given a reflection period 
to build a case against the traffickers.  They are given a safe 
place to stay, information and legal aid.  In November 2008, the 
law was changed to give an amnesty from immigration laws (i.e. 
deportation) for any trafficking victim who gives evidence in court 
against her/his trafficker. 
 
 
 
-- J. Does the government encourage victims to assist in the 
investigation and prosecution of trafficking? How many victims 
assisted in the investigation and prosecution of traffickers during 
the reporting period? May victims file civil suits or seek legal 
action against traffickers? Does anyone impede victim access to 
such legal redress? If a victim is a material witness in a court 
case against a former employer, is the victim permitted to obtain 
other employment or to leave the country pending trial proceedings? 
Are there means by which a victim may obtain restitution? 
 
 
 
Victims are encouraged to file civil suits or legal action against 
their traffickers.  The victim can have other employment, and is 
also free to leave the country even though they plan to serve as a 
witness, unless they apply for asylum or a reflection period, in 
which case they must stay in Norway to preserve their immigration 
status.  A part of the government action plan is to have the 
victims find work or start training during the time they stay in 
Norway.  This fits into the program that the government has both in 
Norway and in the source country for those who return. The minimum 
amount for restitution is $20,000 (note: in last year's report we 
said $40,000.  This appears to have been an error.), while in 
special cases compensation may exceed $200,000. The compensation is 
paid by the government regardless of whether the trafficker has the 
assets to pay it, although in cases where the traffickers do have 
assets, the government collects restitution money from them in the 
form of a penalty. 
 
 
 
-- K. Does the government provide any specialized training for 
government officials in identifying trafficking victims and in the 
provision of assistance to trafficked victims, including the 
special needs of trafficked children? Does the government provide 
training on protections and assistance to its embassies and 
consulates in foreign countries that are destination or transit 
 
countries? What is the number of trafficking victims assisted by 
the host country's embassies or consulates abroad during the 
reporting period? Please explain the type of assistance provided 
(travel documents, referrals to assistance, payment for 
transportation home). 
 
 
 
Yes, the KOM project provides necessary training for the different 
groups that are involved in identifying victims. Individuals 
trained in identifying trafficking victims from the Immigration 
Department are present in some, but not all Norwegian embassies 
abroad.  Identifying possible victims of trafficking is part of the 
purpose of the visa interview process.  KOM works with the 
immigration directorate to help identify possible victims of 
trafficking at the time of their visa application to Norway. 
Numbers are not available on how many victims are being helped by 
the host country's embassies.  Norwegian embassies can assist 
victims who have returned to their home countries to improve their 
situation.  Norway assists in a special program of the IOM which 
helps victims of trafficking in Norway return to their home 
country, where they receive support from local NGOs or other 
International Organizations.  The government of Norway works 
through its embassies on bilateral cooperation on trafficking.  For 
example, a continuing project with Bulgaria will pay for equipment 
that will allow Bulgarian victims who were trafficked to Norway 
testify in Norwegian courts via a DVC link.  Ten Bulgarian and ten 
Norwegian experts (police and NGOs) will do an exchange to each 
other's countries in April 2010.  During the reporting period, 
Norwegian TIP experts visited Bulgaria and gave seminars for police 
districts all over the country. 
 
 
 
-- L. Does the government provide assistance, such as medical aid, 
shelter, or financial help, to its nationals who are repatriated as 
victims of trafficking? 
 
 
 
There are no identified Norwegian victims who have been 
repatriated. 
 
 
 
-- M. Which international organizations or NGOs, if any, work with 
trafficking victims? What type of services do they provide? What 
sort of cooperation do they receive from local authorities? 
 
 
 
The Norwegian government cooperates with a variety of international 
organizations such as the International Organization for Migration 
(IOM) and UNICEF, and local organizations such as Care, Red Cross 
and Save the Children.  However, in Norway, the primary service 
provider is the Norwegian government, through the ROSA project and 
the welfare state. 
 
 
 
Outside Norway, the Norwegian government has spent approximately 
50,000,000 kroner ($8.3 million) per year over the last two years 
on international anti-trafficking efforts and bilateral 
cooperation.  The largest single recipient of Norwegian trafficking 
aid was the IOM, followed by NGO's, and other organizations, 
including like UNICEF and UNODC. 
 
 
 
¶29. (SBU) PREVENTION: 
 
 
 
-- A. Did the government conduct anti-trafficking information or 
education campaigns during the reporting period? If so, briefly 
describe the campaign(s), including their objectives and 
effectiveness. Please provide the number of people reached by such 
awareness efforts, if available. Do these campaigns target 
potential trafficking victims and/or the demand for trafficking 
(e.g. "clients" of prostitutes or beneficiaries of forced labor)? 
(Note: This can be an especially noteworthy effort where 
prostitution is legal. End Note.) 
 
 
 
The purchase of sex is no longer legal in Norway, so some of the 
 
government's prior initiatives are now defunct, such as an internet 
campaign called STOP menneskehandel (stop human trafficking). This 
campaign focused on making purchasers of sex (legal until 2009) 
aware of the relationship between trafficking and prostitution. 
 
 
 
-- B. Does the government monitor immigration and emigration 
patterns for evidence of trafficking? 
 
 
 
While Norway is a member of the Schengen area and does not closely 
monitor land borders, trafficking patterns are monitored in 
cooperation with Frontex, Europol, and Interpol. 
 
 
 
-- C. Is there a mechanism for coordination and communication 
between various agencies, internal, international, and multilateral 
on trafficking-related matters, such as a multi-agency working 
group or a task force? 
 
 
 
As noted above, the government does have a steering/coordinating 
committee within the Norwegian government, chaired by the Ministry 
of Justice and the Police.  The earlier mentioned KOM project is 
established to coordinate the combating trafficking work and to 
gather the information from all the different institutions and 
groups.  International efforts are coordinated and arranged by the 
Ministry of Foreign Affairs Section for Global Initiatives and 
Gender Equality.  The government has not had an actual corruption 
case at the national level for years, but investigations for such 
matters would fall to Okokrim, the financial crimes investigative 
unit in the Ministry of Finance. 
 
 
 
-- D. Does the government have a national plan of action to address 
trafficking in persons? If the plan was developed during the 
reporting period, which agencies were involved in developing it? 
Were NGOs consulted in the process? What steps has the government 
taken to implement the action plan? 
 
 
 
In December 2006, the Norwegian government released its newest 
National Plan Against Trafficking, which laid out the strategy for 
the government to fight trafficking at the national and 
international levels through 2009.  All interested agencies were 
consulted and participated in the building of the National Plan. 
A new action plan began to be drafted in November 2009 and is still 
in progress, likely to be unveiled in the summer of 2010.  The 
applicability of the old action plan has been extended until the 
new one takes effect. 
 
 
 
-- E: Required of all Posts: What measures has the government taken 
during the reporting period to reduce the demand for commercial sex 
acts? (please see ref B, para. 9(3) for examples) 
 
 
 
After the government criminalized the purchase of sex on January 1, 
2009, the police consistently and publicly arrested attempted 
purchasers of sexual services consistently over the year.   During 
the year 334 persons were charged with the purchase or attempted 
purchase of sexual services and 21 were charged with the purchase 
or attempted purchase of sexual services from a minor. 
 
 
 
-- F. Required of all Posts: What measures has the government taken 
during the reporting period to reduce the participation in 
international child sex tourism by nationals of the country? 
 
 
 
The government has taken steps to reduce participation in sex 
tourism by investigating and convicting sex tourists.  For example, 
in 2007 a Norwegian national was convicted for having sex with 
children in Thailand, and received a sentence of 7 years 
"protective custody" (a prison sentence that can be lengthened 
based on the criminal's perceived further risk to society).  Norway 
 
 
is in the lead in preventing sexual exploitation of children on the 
internet, having in past years traced a child pornography ring to a 
US national.  In January 2010 a police officer from Bergen was 
convicted and sentenced to 10 years of prison (the maximum 
sentence) for severe abuse of minors from Norway, Brazil, Romania 
and Afghanistan.  The officer was part of a pedophilia and child 
pornography ring, and traveled to Afghanistan and other countries 
for sex.  He was prosecuted under Criminal Code Section 224, the 
main trafficking section of the law.  The exploited victims were 
"traded" among the ring members. 
 
 
 
-- G. Required of posts in countries that have contributed over 100 
troops to international peacekeeping efforts (Argentina, Australia, 
Austria, Bangladesh, Belgium, Benin, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, 
Cameroon, Canada, Chile, China, Cote d'Ivoire, Croatia, Denmark, 
Egypt, El Salvador, Ethiopia, Fiji, Finland, France, Gambia, 
Germany, Ghana, Guatemala, India, Indonesia, Ireland, Italy, 
Jordan, Kenya, Korea (ROK), Malawi, Malaysia, Mongolia, Morocco, 
Nepal, Niger, Nigeria, Norway, Pakistan, Peru, Philippines, Poland, 
Portugal, Russia, Rwanda, Senegal, Slovakia, South Africa, Spain, 
Sri Lanka, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia, Turkey, Uganda, Ukraine, United 
Kingdom, Uruguay, Yemen, Zambia, and Zimbabwe): What measures has 
the government adopted to ensure that its nationals who are 
deployed abroad as part of a peacekeeping or other similar mission 
do not engage in or facilitate severe forms of trafficking or 
exploit victims of such trafficking? If posts do not provide an 
answer to this question, the Department may consider including a 
statement in the country assessment to the effect that "An 
assessment regarding Country X's efforts to ensure that its troops 
deployed abroad for international peacekeeping missions do not 
engage in or facilitate trafficking or exploit trafficking victims 
was unavailable for this reporting period." 
 
 
 
All deploying Norwegian troops are briefed on trafficking prior to 
their overseas assignments.  This is a part of their military 
education.  There have been no reported cases of Norwegian troops 
being in any way involved in facilitating or exploiting victims of 
trafficking. 
 
 
 
¶30. (SBU) PARTNERSHIPS 
 
 
 
Secretary Clinton has identified a fourth "P", Partnerships, 
recognizing that governments' partnerships with other government 
and elements of civil society are key to effective anti-TIP 
strategies. Although the 2010 Report will include references and/or 
descriptions of these partnerships, they will not be considered in 
the determining the tier rankings, except in cases where a 
partnership contributes to the government's efforts to implement 
the TVPA's minimum standards. 
 
 
 
-- A. Does the government engage with other governments, civil 
society, and/or multilateral organizations to focus attention and 
devote resources to addressing human trafficking? If so, please 
provide details. 
 
 
 
See answer to paragraph B below. 
 
 
 
-- B. What sort of international assistance does the government 
provide to other countries to address TIP? 
 
 
 
The Norwegian government works both multilaterally (predominantly) 
and bilaterally on TIP.  Most of the $8.3 million spent on foreign 
aid that impacts human trafficking projects abroad is channeled 
through the IOM, followed by NGO's, and other organizations like 
UNICEF and UNODC.  The Norwegian government engages with many other 
governments on TIP issues, mostly on individual cases, but in 
specific instances-as with Bulgaria as detailed in paragraph 28 K 
above-on overall TIP prevention training and strategies. 
 
As another example, in cooperation with Italy and the Netherlands, 
Norway supports the IOM's "Counter Trafficking Initiative" (project 
No. NGA-2041). The project period is 2008-2010 and the total 
funding is 4.2 million kroner ($700,000). The objective is to 
provide for direct assistance to and protection of victims of human 
trafficking in Nigeria, and to contribute to free access to 
follow-up services. The Norwegian support will be used to 
strengthen the authorities' efforts, mainly those of the National 
Agency for the Prohibition of Traffic in Persons (NAPTIP), to 
combat trafficking, support for female victims of human trafficking 
and support for NGOs. The initiative will mainly contribute to 
ensure the safe return and rehabilitation of victims, reduce the 
recruitment from Nigeria, strengthen the cooperation between 
authorities and NGOs, provide better knowledge about Human 
Trafficking and strengthen research on the subject. 
WHITE