VZCZCXYZ0017
RR RUEHWEB

DE RUEHME #0216/01 0222205
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
R 222204Z JAN 10
FM AMEMBASSY MEXICO
TO RUEHC/DEPT OF AGRICULTURE WASHINGTON DC
INFO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC 0157
RUEHME/AMEMBASSY MEXICO
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA

UNCLAS MEXICO 000216 
 
SENSITIVE 
SIPDIS 
USDA FOR FFAS MILLER, FAS FOR OA/BREWER, STOLL 
OCRA/ZANIN, OSTA/BEAN 
PASS APHIS AND FSIS 
PASS USTR FOR JOHN MELLE AND LESLIE O'CONNOR 
OTTAWA FOR ROBIN TILSWORTH 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: EAGR ETRD MX TBIO EFIS
SUBJECT: ECONOMIA ON NEXT CCA, MEAT INSPECTION, CSF AND END 
 
(SBU) SUMMARY:  This message includes action requests (para 7). 
Mexican Secretariat of Economy (Economia) envisions holding the 
next meeting of the Consultative Committee on Agriculture in 
mid-April in Mexico and wishes to get started on an agenda.  Topics 
high on Mexico's list will include Mexico's desire for a 
declaration of disease-free areas for classical swine fever (CSF) 
and exotic Newcastle disease (END).  There is keen interest in the 
stalled meat inspection framework document negotiated by Mexican 
and U.S. meat inspection authorities.  USTR Kirk can expect 
trucking, tuna and country-of-origin labeling (COOL) to be on his 
agenda during his upcoming visit to Mexico.  Following several 
ministerial visits from Canada in the last two weeks, Economia is 
increasingly of the view that coming to common ground on bovine 
spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) will require a trilateral approach. 
END SUMMARY. 
 
 
 
CCA 
 
 
 
(SBU)  In an meeting with AgMinCouns January 22, Economia Director 
General for Conduct and Evaluation of Negotiations Juan Carlos 
Baker advised that Under Secretary Beatriz Leycegui will be 
available the second and third weeks of April for a Consultative 
Committee on Agriculture, and that Economia is engaging the 
Secretariat of Agriculture (SAGARPA) to firm up a date in that 
range.  With that in mind, Baker said Mexico is looking at what 
should be on the CCA agenda, mindful of the desire of both sides 
following the last CCA to make the agenda shorter.  Baker said the 
Mexican side would appreciate hearing back from the U.S. side a 
list of the most important priority topics along with the U.S. 
side's sense of what technical issues can be left out as they are 
being resolved at the technical level.  Mexico will be particularly 
interested in topics where movement is needed, and would like a 
list of pending issues from the U.S. side. 
 
 
 
(SBU) Baker said that at the next CCA Mexico will raise 
disease-free status for certain areas of Mexico with respect to 
classical swine fever (CSF) and exotic Newcastle disease (END), as 
that is a high priority for Mexico both for improved access to the 
U.S. market and for improvement of Mexico's ability to market pork 
and poultry to third countries. 
 
 
 
(SBU) Baker said that Mexico had hosted multiple Canadian ministers 
in the past two weeks, with Minister of Agriculture Gerry Ritz 
having visited Mexico last week.  The tone of these meetings, Baker 
said, drove home the point that Mexico needs to devote more 
attention to resolving disagreements with Canada, and by extension 
the United States, over beef access as it relates to BSE.  Baker 
said he is convinced that a trilateral approach will be necessary 
but added he is unsure to what degree the Mexican agencies involved 
are ready for that.  Baker noted that the major obstacle to 
improved access for beef is not SENASICA, the Ministry of 
Agriculture's veterinary and phytosanitary service, but rather is 
COFEPRIS, the Ministry of Health's consumer safety service. 
 
 
 
USTR KIRK'S UPCOMING VISIT 
 
 
 
(SBU) Baker said Mexico will want to discuss trucking, tuna and 
country-of-origin labeling with USTR Kirk during the upcoming visit 
to Mexico, "even though we know the reply on COOL will be that we 
need to let the WTO process run its course."  He said shrimp may 
also be raised in the context of Mexico conceding that it needs to 
enforce the regulations it said it would, but if so, only in 
passing.  With regard to shrimp, Baker mentioned as an aside that 
the issue has come to the attention of the Mexican presidential 
administration, which is ordering relevant agencies to "get moving" 
on enforcement of the regulations, and is setting deadlines of days 
rather than weeks or months for action in order to avoid a shutdown 
of trade in shrimp. 
 
MEAT INSPECTION 
 
 
 
(SBU) Mexico is keenly interested in completing work on the 
framework document setting terms of reference for meat inspection 
negotiated between the Mexican meat inspection authority, SENASICA, 
and USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Service.  Baker noted that 
this document could well serve as a model for future such documents 
that will facilitate trade and enhance competitiveness. 
 
 
 
ACTIONS REQUESTED 
 
 
 
(SBU) Washington addressees are requested to provide soonest a 
response to the trial balloon on holding a CCA in the second or 
third week of April, and a winnowed list of priority agenda items. 
 
 
 
COMMENTS 
 
 
 
(SBU) Pushing the CCA back from the originally proposed 
January-February timeframe to April was of course occasioned by the 
turnover of three under secretaries of agriculture in SAGARPA and 
the departure of SAGARPA's eminence gris for international affairs, 
Victor Villalobos, to a new job.  This may well be a blessing in 
disguise as it will give both sides a chance to make progress on at 
least a few more of the issues on our collective plates.  In 
particular we believe that with some more good-faith negotiating 
the two sides should be able to resolve the outstanding issues 
related to the FSIS-SENASICA meat inspection document. 
 
 
 
(SBU) With regard to the CSF and END issue, our sense is that the 
technical levels of SENASICA have been playing both sides against 
the middle (Economia and the political level of SAGARPA on one 
side, and APHIS and the rest of USDA on the other) by creatively 
interpreting the APHIS-SENASICA communications on this touchy 
subject.  We have heard from SENASICA's upper echelons, Economia, 
and the political level of SAGARPA a shared suspicion that APHIS' 
non-declaration of certain areas of Mexico free of CSF and END is 
due to protectionist sentiments in USDA out of sympathy for U.S. 
pork and poultry producers.  This is a suspicion we ought not to 
allow to take root, for if it does, a Mexican backlash against 
perceived protectionism would severely damage U.S. pork and poultry 
export interests (already under threat in the event of a carousel 
approach to punitive tariffs due to the trucking issue).  With that 
said, we believe that the issue must be resolved at the technical 
level, though some political as well as technical pressure on 
SENASICA may be required to ensure that SENASICA answers completely 
APHIS' questions (which answers APHIS needs to perform its due 
diligence).   We should also consider offering assistance to the 
technical level of SENASICA on how to obtain the information needed 
to answer APHIS' questions. 
FEELEY